A functional common polymorphism in the vitamin D-responsive element of the GH1 promoter contributes to isolated growth hormone deficiency.

CONTEXT: Causal mutations have been detected only in a minority of isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) patients. Idiopathic IGHD might be the result of the interaction between several low-penetrance genetic factors and the environment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the contribution to IGHD of genetic variations in the GH1 gene regulatory regions. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A case-control association study was performed including 118 sporadic IGHD patients with a nonsevere phenotype (height -4/-1 sd score and partial GH deficiency) and two control groups, normal stature (n=200) and short-stature individuals with normal GH secretion (n=113). Seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the GH1 promoter, one in the IVS4 region, and two in the locus control region were analyzed. RESULTS: The -57T allele within the vitamin D-responsive element showed a positive significant association when comparing patients with normal (P=0.006) or short stature (P=0.0011) controls. The genotype -57TT showed an odds ratio of 2.93 (1.44-5.99) and 2.99 (1.42-6.31), respectively. The functional relevance of the -57 variation was demonstrated by the luciferase assay in the presence of vitamin D. The vitamin D-induced inhibition of luciferase activity was significantly (P=0.012) stronger for the promoter haplotype carrying the associated variation -57T [haplotype #1 (hp#1)] with respect to hp#2, bearing -57G. Replacement of the T with a G at -57 on hp#1 abolished the repression, demonstrating that the T at position -57 is necessary to determine the greater vitamin D-induced inhibitory effect of hp#1. EMSA experiments showed a different band-shift pattern of the T and G sequences. CONCLUSION: The common -57G-->T polymorphism contributes to IGHD susceptibility, indicating that it may have a multifactorial etiology.

A novel mutation in the human aromatase gene: insights on the relationship among serum estradiol, longitudinal growth and bone mineral density in an adult man under estrogen replacement treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Here we report on a new case of human aromatase deficiency in a man of 26 years of age and present the results of five year follow-up during trandermal estradiol (tE2) substitution, focusing on bone growth and mineralization. The lack of patient's compliance to tE2 treatment, resulting in low but detectable serum estradiol levels, provides helpful information about the physiological estradiol needed in serum to guarantee a complete bone maturation and mineralization. DESIGN: Clinical case report study. METHODS: Genetic, biochemical and hormonal evaluations and the study of bone health were performed before and during estrogen treatment. RESULTS: Eunuchoid body proportions, unfused epiphyses, tall stature, osteopenia, increase fasting insulin, mild astenozoospermia and a history of right cryptorchidism were present. Baseline serum FSH was slightly above the normal range and estradiol was undetectable. Genetic analysis revealed a pattern of compound heterozygosity due to 23 bp deletion in exon IV and a point mutation in the first nucleotide of intron IX of the CYP19A1 gene, respectively. The closure of epiphyseal cartilage, the normalization of bone BMD and bone turnover markers, and the improvement of insulin levels were reached during tE2 only when serum estradiol raised above 73 pmol/L. Sperm parameters and overweight did not improve with substitutive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This new case of aromatase deficiency underlines the role of estrogen on skeletal maturation, BMD, metabolic abnormalities and gonadal axis. It provides evidence on the need not only of a continuous estrogen replacement, but also of ensuring adequate estradiol levels in serum in order to ensure a complete bone maturation and mineralization and to prevent the worsening of body skeletal proportions. The comprehension of this physiological aspect has relevant clinical significance especially for the development of new therapeutic strategies useful to treat growth disorders by targeting serum estradiol in men.

GH response to ghrelin in subjects with congenital GH deficiency: evidence that ghrelin action requires hypothalamic-pituitary connections.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of GH response to ghrelin in patients with GH deficiency (GHD) may help to elucidate the site and mechanism of action of ghrelin. We aimed to investigate the GH-releasing effect of ghrelin in children and young adults with childhood-onset GHD. DESIGN: All subjects underwent ghrelin testing and neuro-imaging examination. Magnetic resonance imaging evidenced the presence of a vascular pituitary stalk (VPS) or its complete absence (PSA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen prepubertal children and nine adult patients with childhood-onset GHD were selected for the study. The children were enrolled at a median age of 5.8 years. The adult subjects were included at a median age of 23.3 years. The diagnosis of GHD in the adult patients had been established at a median age of 8.5 years. Ghrelin was administered at a dose of 1 microg/kg body weight, i.v. at time zero, and blood for GH determination was obtained at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 min. RESULTS: Median GH response after ghrelin was similar between children and adults. Median peak GH response to ghrelin (7.45 microg/l, IQR: 3.9-11.3 microg/l) was significantly higher in patients with VPS (10.9 microg/l, IQR: 2.4-15.1 mcirog/l) than in those with PSA (IQR: 2.3-6.7 microg/l; P=0.001). It was significantly higher in subjects with isolated GHD (12.5 microg/l, IQR: 10.8-15.5 microg/l) than in those with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (5.15 microg/l, IQR: 2.4-9.0 microg/l; P=0.003). No correlation was found between the GH peak after ghrelin and body mass index. CONCLUSION: The GH response to ghrelin in patients with congenital hypopituitarism depends on the degree of the anatomical abnormalities and lends further support to the assumption that the main action of the peptide is exerted at the hypothalamic level and requires the integrity of hypothalamic-pituitary connections.

Traumatic brain injury and hypopituitarism in children and adolescents: is the problem under-estimated?

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death in children. Only recently, the importance of hypopituitarism as a consequence of TBI has been highlighted in adult patients. Data from systematic clinical studies in adults and patients in transition from adolescence to adulthood point to the presence of hypopituitarism in nearly a third of patients hospitalized for TBI. But, no systematic studies on posttraumatic hypopituitarism exist in children and adolescents. Case reports and small series of patients, however, suggest that children are affected to a comparable extent. Since normal pituitary function is required for normal growth and pubertal development in childhood, particular attention should be paid to this condition. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature on TBI and causes, clinical picture, and diagnosis of hypopituitarism in childhood and adolescence, underlying the relevance of the problem and its underestimation in clinical paediatric practice.

The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in adults is based on a reduced peak GH response to provocative tests, such as the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and the GH-releasing hormone-arginine (GHRH-ARG) test. However, the cut-off limits of peak GH response in lean subjects are not reliable in obese patients; this is noteworthy since adult GHD is often associated with obesity. Aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic cut-off limits of peak GH response to the GHRH-ARG test in overweight and obese as well as in lean population. DESIGN AND METHODS: The GH responses to the GHRH-ARG test were studied in 322 patients with organic hypothalamic-pituitary disease and in 318 control subjects. Patients were subdivided into two groups on the basis of the number of pituitary hormone deficits, except for GH deficiency: (a) patients with total pituitary hormone deficit (TPHD) and (b) patients without or with no more than two pituitary hormone deficits (PHD). Both patients and control subjects were divided into three subgroups according to body mass index (BMI): lean (BMI <25 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI > or = 25 and <30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)). TPHD patients were assumed to be GH deficient, whereas PHD patients may include subjects with either normal or impaired GH secretion. The statistical analysis was carried out by the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve analysis (Medcalc 7.2). The diagnostic cut-off points were calculated for lean, overweight and obese subjects to provide optimal separation of GH-deficient patients and control subjects according to two criteria: (1) a balance between high sensitivity and high specificity; (2) to provide the highest pair of sensitivity/specificity values for GH deficiency. RESULTS: In the lean population the best pair of values, with highest sensitivity as 98.7% and highest specificity as 83.7%, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 11.5 mug/l. In the overweight population the best pair of values, 96.7 and 75.5%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 8.0 mug/l. In the obese population the best pair of values, 93.5 and 78.3%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 4.2 mug/l. Applying the above mentioned cut-off points, among PHD patients we found that 80 subjects (72%) were GHD whereas 31 (28%) had normal GH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion the GHRH-ARG test is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in lean, overweight and obese patients, provided that specific BMI-related cut-off limits are assumed.

IGFs and IGFBPs in adult growth hormone deficiency.

In the current guidelines for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) it is stated that, within the appropriate clinical context, it has to be shown by provocative tests only. But the diagnostic value of measuring IGF-I levels has been recently revisited. It has been confirmed that normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD in adults. However, it has also been emphasized that very low IGF-I levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (and without malnutrition, liver disease or hypothyroidism) could be considered definite evidence for severe GHD. This assumption particularly applies to patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood. The value of measuring IGF-I levels for monitoring the efficacy and the adequacy of rhGH replacement remains definitely accepted.

GHRH and GH secretagogues: clinical perspectives and safety.

The diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone deficiency (GHD), as well as the possibility of counteracting somatopause and age-related changes in body composition, structural functions, and metabolism, prompted interest in potential clinical uses of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH secretagogues (GHS). GHD often reflects hypothalamic GHRH deficiency and it has been clearly demonstrated that the age-related decline in the function of the GH/IGF-I axis reflects a reduction in hypothalamic function as evidenced by the preservation of the releasable pool of pituitary GH in aged subjects. The effectiveness of recombinant human GH (rhGH) is well established, but it is also recognized that GH replacement does not mimic physiological GH secretion which theoretically would be restored by GHRH and/or GHS. At present, it has been clearly demonstrated that GHRH and/or GHS represent reliable tools for the diagnosis of GHD. On the other hand, neither GHRH nor GHS has been shown to provide effective alternatives to rhGH for the treatment of GHD. Although GHRH and/or GHS represent the most logical approaches for the restoration of the GH/IGF-I axis to a youthful level of activity and for counteracting the somatopause, this hypothesis has never been proven definitively. Conceptually, GHRH replacement would be the most physiological approach and its safety is guaranteed, provided an appropriate dose is used, in order to avoid hyperactivity of the GH/IGF-I axis. However, a long-acting preparation is needed. On the other hand, GHS, e.g., ghrelin analogues, could be considered as a function of their selectivity of action. However, ghrelin has a wide spectrum of endocrine and non-endocrine actions at both central and peripheral levels. Thus, non-selective GHS, although available in orally active forms, could elicit unforeseen side effects. Previous studies with GHRH and/or GHS in aging patients provided encouraging results. However, it still remains to be definitively demonstrated that aged subjects would benefit from chronic treatment with these molecules.

Primary growth hormone insensitivity (Laron syndrome) and acquired hypothyroidism: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Primary growth hormone resistance or growth hormone insensitivity syndrome, also known as Laron syndrome, is a hereditary disease caused by deletions or different types of mutations in the growth hormone receptor gene or by post-receptor defects. This disorder is characterized by a clinical appearance of severe growth hormone deficiency with high levels of circulating growth hormone in contrast to low serum insulin-like growth factor 1 values. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 15-year-old Caucasian girl who was diagnosed with Silver-Russell syndrome at the age of four and a half years. Recombinant growth hormone was administered for 18 months without an appropriate increase in growth velocity. At the age of seven years, her serum growth hormone levels were high, and an insulin-like growth factor 1 generation test did not increase insulin-like growth factor 1 levels (baseline insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, 52 µg/L; reference range, 75 µg/L to 365 µg/L; and peak, 76 µg/L and 50 µg/L after 12 and 84 hours, respectively, from baseline). The genetic analysis showed that the patient was homozygous for the R217X mutation in the growth hormone receptor gene, which is characteristic of Laron syndrome. On the basis of these results, the diagnosis of primary growth hormone insensitivity syndrome was made, and recombinant insulin-like growth factor 1 therapy was initiated. The patient's treatment was well tolerated, but unexplained central hypothyroidism occurred at the age of 12.9 years. At the age of 15 years, when the patient's sexual development was almost completed and her menstrual cycle occurred irregularly, her height was 129.8 cm, which is 4.71 standard deviations below the median for normal girls her age. CONCLUSION: The most important functional tests for the diagnosis of growth hormone insensitivity are the insulin-like growth factor 1 generation test and genetic analysis. Currently, the only effective treatment is daily administration of recombinant insulin-like growth factor 1 starting from early childhood. However, these patients show a dramatically impaired final height. In our case, unexplained central hypothyroidism occurred during treatment.

Managing patients with hypopituitarism after traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight how traumatic brain injury as well as subarachnoid hemorrhage and primary brain tumors of the central nervous system can induce hypopituitarism - an underdiagnosed clinical problem. Then, further information of the problem is likely to stimulate appropriate screening programs for patients with brain injuries, at high risk of developing an unrecognized hypopituitarism. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent papers have alerted endocrinologists about brain injury-induced hypopituitarism. Both retrospective and prospective studies recommended that patients with more severe forms of head injury and, in particular, those with fractures of the base of the skull or early diabetes insipidus be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of endocrine dysfunction, and appropriate dynamic pituitary function tests performed. SUMMARY: We hope this review will stimulate further interest in the endocrine community about the pathophysiology and management (diagnosis and treatment) of different kinds and degrees of pituitary insufficiency due to traumatic brain injury. Further studies will be crucial to raise awareness and remind physicians of the prevalence of hypopituitarism in patients with traumatic brain injury, and elucidate any incremental benefits these patients may receive from hormone replacement.

Growth hormone levels in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adulthood.

Current guidelines for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) state that the diagnosis must be proven biochemically by provocative testing that is done within the appropriate clinical context. The need for reliance on provocative testing is based on evidence that the evaluation of spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion over 24 h and the measurement of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels do not distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Regarding IGF-I, it has been demonstrated that very low levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e., patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD, or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) may be considered definitive evidence for severe GHD obviating the need for provocative tests. However, normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD and therefore adults suspected for GHD and with normal IGF-I levels must undergo a provocative test of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the test of choice, with severe GHD being defined by a GH peak less than 3 microg/l, the cut-off that distinguishes normal from GHD adults. The ITT is contraindicated in the presence of ischemic heart disease, seizure disorders, and in the elderly. Other tests are as reliable as the ITT, provided they are used with appropriate cut-off limits. Glucagon stimulation, a classical test, and especially new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GHS (i.e., GHRP-6) have well-defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, are independent of age and gender, and are able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. The confounding effect of overweight or obesity on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests needs to be considered as the somatotropic response to all stimuli is negatively correlated with body mass index. Appropriate cut-offs for lean, overweight, and obese subjects must be used in order to avoid false-positive diagnoses of severe GHD in obese adults.

Cut-off limits of the GH response to GHRH plus arginine test and IGF-I levels for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in late adolescents and young adults.

OBJECTIVE: To define the appropriate diagnostic cut-off limits for the GH response to GHRH+arginine (ARG) test and IGF-I levels, using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, in late adolescents and young adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 152 patients with childhood-onset organic hypothalamic-pituitary disease (85 males, age (mean+/-s.e.m.): 19.2+/-0.2 years) and 201 normal adolescents as controls (96 males, age: 20.7+/-0.2 years). Patients were divided into three subgroups on the basis of the number of the other pituitary hormone deficits, excluding GH deficiency (GHD): subgroup A consisted of 35 panhypopituitary patients (17 males, age: 21.2+/-0.4 years), subgroup B consisted of 18 patients with only one or with no more than two pituitary hormone deficits (7 males, age: 20.2+/-0.9 years); and subgroup C consisted of 99 patients without any known hormonal pituitary deficits (60 males, age: 18.2+/-0.2 years). Both patients and controls were lean (body mass index, BMI<25 kg/m(2)). Patients in subgroup A were assumed to be GHD, whereas in patients belonging to subgroups B and C the presence of GHD had to be verified. RESULTS: For the GHRH+ARG test, the best pair of highest sensitivity (Se; 100%) and specificity (Sp; 97%) was found choosing a peak GH of 19.0 microg/l. For IGF-I levels, the best pair of highest Se (96.6%) and Sp (74.6%) was found using a cut-off point of 160 microg/l (SDS: -1.3). Assuming 19.0 microg/l to be the cut-off point established for GHRH+ARG test, 72.2% of patients in subgroup B and 39.4% in subgroup C were defined as GHD. In patients belonging to group B and C and with a peak GH response <19 microg/l to the test, IGF-I levels were lower than 160 microg/l (or less than 1.3 SDS) in 68.7 and 41.6% of patients respectively predicting severe GHD in 85.7% of panhypopituitary patients (subgroup A). CONCLUSIONS: In late adolescent and early adulthood patients, a GH cut-off limit using the GHRH+ARG test lower than 19.0 microg/l is able to discriminate patients with a suspicion of GHD and does not vary from infancy to early adulthood.

Traumatic brain injury-induced hypopituitarism in adolescence.

Childhood hypopituitarism may be present at birth or may be acquired. Young children and teenagers are particularly susceptible to TBI; in fact TBI is one of the first causes of death and disability in children older than one month of age since the most common cause of TBI is car crashes, including pedestrian-car and bicycle-car encounters, falls, child abuse, violence and sports injuries. Furthermore younger kids are more likely to have TBI due to falls while teenagers have more TBI than any other population from motor vehicle crashes. As reported for the adult patients hypopituitarism in adolescence should be suspected within an appropriate clinical context. In adolescents affected by TBI no experience about this condition has been reported but it is well known that treatment of hypopituitarism, in particular of GH deficiency, has multiple beneficial effects in addition to its promotion of linear growth and in particular in the transition phase. These include maintenance of normal body composition, structure function and metabolism through adult life. Therefore, the onset of TBI-induced GH deficiency in this particular phase of life should be strictly evaluated and corrected for the possible adult health consequences.

Insulin-like growth factor I levels and the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency.

The current guidelines state that, within the appropriate clinical context, the diagnosis of adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency must be made biochemically using provocative tests. Measurement of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) levels cannot always distinguish between healthy and GH-deficient individuals. In particular, IGFBP-3 as a marker of GH status is clearly less sensitive than IGF-I and there is general agreement that its measurement does not provide useful diagnostic information. However, the diagnostic value of measuring IGF-I levels has been revisited recently. It has been confirmed that normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GH deficiency (GHD) in adults, in whom the diagnosis has therefore to be based on the demonstration of severe impairment of the peak GH response to provocative tests. It has also been emphasized that very low IGF-I levels in patients with high suspicion of GHD could be considered to be definite evidence for severe GHD. This assumption particularly applies to patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitary deficiencies acquired in adulthood. In addition, the use of IGF-I levels to monitor the efficacy and adequacy of recombinant human GH replacement remains widely accepted.

Endocrine responses to ghrelin in adult patients with isolated childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid acylated peptide, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogues (GHS) receptor (GHS-R), which is specific for synthetic GHS. Similar to synthetic GHS, ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion but also displays significant stimulatory effects on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. It has been hypothesized that isolated GH deficiency (GHD) could reflect hypothalamic impairment that would theoretically involve defect in ghrelin activity. PATIENTS: In the present study, we verified the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg i.v.) on GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in adult patients with isolated severe GHD [five males and one female, age (mean +/- SEM) 24.7 +/- 2.6 years, BMI 25.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m2]. In all patients, the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1 IU regular insulin i.v.) and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) (1 microg/kg i.v.) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) was also studied. The hormonal responses in GHD were compared with those in age-matched normal subjects (NS, seven males, age 28.6 +/- 2.9 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2). RESULTS: IGF-I levels in GHD were markedly lower than in NS (69.8 +/- 11.3 vs. 167.9 +/- 19.2 microg/l, P < 0.003). Ghrelin administration induced significant increase in GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in all GHD. In GHD, the GH response to ghrelin was higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH + ARG, which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than that to ITT (9.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 microg/l). These GH (1 microg/l = 2 mU/l) responses in GHD were markedly lower (P < 0.0001) than those in NS (ghrelin vs. GHRH + ARG vs. ITT 92.1 +/- 16.7 vs. 65.3 +/- 8.9 vs. 17.7 +/- 3.5 microg/l). In GHD, the highest individual peak GH response to ghrelin was markedly lower than the lowest peak GH response in NS (28.5 vs. 42.9 microg/l). GHD and NS showed overlapping PRL (1 microg/l = 32 mU/l) (10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.9 +/- 2.2 microg/l), ACTH (22.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 18.7 +/- 4.6 pmol/l) and cortisol responses (598.1 +/- 52.4 vs. 486.9 +/- 38.9 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that ghrelin is one of the most powerful provocative stimuli of GH secretion, even in those patients with isolated severe GHD. In this condition, however, the somatotroph response is markedly reduced while the lactotroph and corticotroph responsiveness to ghrelin is fully preserved, indicating that this endocrine activity is fully independent of mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect. These results do not support the hypothesis that ghrelin deficiency is a major cause of isolated GH deficiency but suggest that ghrelin might represent a reliable provocative test to evaluate the maximal GH secretory capacity provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed.