The aging brain: Movement speed and spatial control.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: With aging, people commonly develop motor slowing (bradykinesia). Although this slowness with aging may be entirely related to degradation of the cerebral networks important in motor programing, it is possible that, at least in part, it may be a learned procedure for enhancing the accuracy and/or precision of movements. The goal of this study is to test these contradictory hypotheses. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy adults, 12 younger than age 26 and 12 older than age 65 were asked to make alternative marks with a pen between a card centered in front of them and a series of circles distributed across a page. Performance was timed, and participants were instructed to complete the task as quickly as possible while not sacrificing accuracy for speed. The circle sizes and hand used varied by trial. RESULTS: The older adults performed the task more slowly for all target circle diameters. As the circles decreased in size, the younger adults performed the task more rapidly than did the older participants, but the younger participants also had a greater decline in accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: During this aiming task, healthy older adults were less likely than younger adults to sacrifice accuracy for speed. Thus, at least in part, their slowing may be a learned adaptive strategy.

Building a Healthy Temple diabetes self-management education support program in Hispanic faith community settings: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Diabetes self-management is key to preventing diabetes complications disproportionately affecting Hispanics. Church appears a promising setting for delivering a diabetes self-management education support (DSMES) program. "Faith-placed" (FP) programing refers to health interventions implemented in the church setting; while "faith-based" (FB) signifies integrating spirituality with health interventions. The Building a Health Temple (BHT) DSMES program integrates spirituality with DSMES to improve diabetic outcomes. This cluster-randomized trial tests the effectiveness of BHT DSMES by adapting an existing DSMES program into faith-based context. A total of 360 participants will be recruited from 18 churches (~20 participants/church). Churches will be randomly assigned to either the FB or FP intervention arm. Intervention activities will be implemented over 14 consecutive weeks. Participants in the FB arm will participate in BHT DSMES including a Health Sermon, the Self-Management Resource Center (SMRC) Diabetes Self-Management Program (DSMP), and a 7-session Healthy Bible Study, delivered by two trained church lay health leaders. Participants in the FP arm will attend the same SMRC DSMP facilitated by outside health professional, followed by a 7-session community health and safety curriculum as a partial attention control intervention. The primary outcome will be a change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level. Secondary outcomes include: changes in body mass index, waist circumference, diabetes distress score, diabetes self-care behaviors, eating behavior, and physical activity level. Data will be collected at baseline, 6, 9, and 12 months during the study period. The proposed study will lead to innovative DSMES program delivery through faith settings for Hispanic persons with diabetes.

Background distraction during vertical solid and character line bisections.

Background-objectives: When vertical lines are positioned above or below the center of the page, line bisection deviates toward the center of the page, suggesting that the edges of the page distract the allocation of attention to the line. A letter-character line (LCL) bisection requires both global and focal attention, to identify the target letter closest to the line's center. If more focal and less global attention is allocated to a LCL, more global attentional resources may be available and inadvertently allocated to the page. Alternatively, if the allocation of focal attention to a LCL inhibits global attentional processing, there may be less distraction by the page. METHOD: Twenty-four healthy adults (12 older) bisected vertical solid and character lines centered, or positioned closer to the top or bottom of the page. RESULTS: There was no difference between bisection of solid and character lines centered on the page. Page-related deviations were greater with character lines than solid line bisections, and greater for lines positioned toward the top than the bottom of the page. With lines positioned toward the top, the older participants' attempted bisections were higher than those of the younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the allocation of focal attention increases global attentional distractibility and that global-background attentional distraction is greater when the vertical lines are placed in the upper part of the page. Older participants appeared to be less distracted when lines were placed toward the top of the page, but the reason for this age difference requires further research.

Asymmetrical distractibility of global and focal visuospatial attention during segmental and total compound line bisections.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Compound horizontal lines are composed of 2 segments of unequal length and width. Line bisection requires that the participants attend to the entire line (global attention). The longer segment often distracts participants, suggesting that attention directed to this segment (focal attention) disrupts the allocation of global attention. This study attempted to learn whether the allocation of focal attention to a line segment is distracted by global attention allocated to the entire line and whether there are right-left distraction asymmetries when allocating focal or global attention. METHOD: Twenty-four healthy adults (12 > 65 years old) attempted to bisect horizontal lines composed of 2 segments of unequal length, with the larger segment placed to the right or left. They were also asked to bisect the longer segment of these lines. RESULTS: When allocating focal attention to the larger segment, healthy participants were more distracted when the smaller segment was on the left than on the right. In contrast, when attempting to allocate global attention to the entire line, participants were more distracted when the larger segment was on the right side. There were no significant differences between older and younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: The asymmetrical global distraction during segment bisection might be related to the right hemisphere's dominance in mediating global attention and allocating attention leftward. In contrast, the asymmetrical focal distraction during full-line bisection might be related to the left hemisphere's dominance in mediating focal attention and allocating attention toward the right. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).