All patients with 'idiopathic' hypopituitarism should be screened for hemochromatosis.

Hypopituitarism usually occurs as the result of a pituitary tumour or as a consequence of its treatment. If, however, pituitary imaging is negative then an alternative diagnosis should be sought. Patients are often diagnosed as having idiopathic hypopituitarism when imaging is normal. Our objective is to highlight the importance of screening for hemochromatosis in patients with presumed 'idiopathic' hypopituitarism. Our patients presented initially with biochemical hypopituitarism and, after initial investigation and normal imaging, were labelled as having idiopathic disease. They subsequently developed iron overload in cardiac and hepatic tissue respectively requiring regular venesection to deplete body stores. Genetic analysis revealed homozygosity for the C282Y mutation in our first patient thus explaining his more severe iron overload whereas our second case was a heterozygote for the same mutation, with iron overload confirmed on liver biopsy. We recommend that iron studies are performed in all patients who present with hypopituitarism and normal pituitary imaging. This may lead to reversal of the hypopituitarism and avoid development of any systemic consequences of hemochromatosis.

Corticotropin tests for hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal insufficiency: a metaanalysis.

CONTEXT: The diagnostic value of tests for detecting hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal insufficiency (HPAI) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare standard-dose and low-dose corticotropin tests for diagnosing HPAI. DATA SOURCES: We searched the PubMed database from 1966-2006 for studies reporting diagnostic value of standard-dose or low-dose corticotropin tests, with patient-level data obtained from original investigators. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies had more than 10 patients. All subjects were evaluated because of suspicion for chronic HPAI, and patient-level data were available. We excluded studies with no accepted reference standard for HPAI (insulin hypoglycemia or metyrapone test) if test subjects were in the intensive care unit or if only normal healthy subjects were used as controls. DATA EXTRACTION: We constructed receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves using patient-level data from each study and then merged results to create summary ROC curves, adjusting for study size and cortisol assay method. Diagnostic value of tests was measured by calculating area under the ROC curve (AUC) and likelihood ratios. DATA SYNTHESIS: Patient-level data from 13 of 23 studies (57%; 679 subjects) were included in the metaanalysis. The AUC were as follows: low-dose corticotropin test, 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.94), and standard-dose corticotropin test, 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.74-0.84). Among patients with paired data (seven studies, 254 subjects), diagnostic value of low-dose corticotropin test was superior to standard-dose test (AUC 0.94 and 0.85, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose corticotropin test was superior to standard-dose test for diagnosing chronic HPAI, although it has technical limitations.

Twenty-four-hour growth hormone profiling in the assessment of acromegaly.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines recommend insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), random growth hormone (GH) and nadir GH on an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for assessment of acromegaly. At this Regional Centre, the 24-hour GH profile has also been used. DESIGN PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated 57 GH profiles from 34 patients from 2008 to 2012. Samples were drawn every 2 hour and matched with 0800 GH, nadir GH after OGTT and IGF-1. RESULTS: Correlations between the mean 13-point profiles and mean 5-point profile, OGTT nadir and 0800 GH were as follows: r = .99, .99 and .90, respectively (P < .01 for all). The correlation between the mean 13-point profiles and IGF-1 was r = .32 P = .02.Of 5 patients with very high 0800 GH preoperatively (≥20 µg/L), mean 13-point GH reduced by 88%-99% postoperatively. IGF-1 did not normalize in these patients, and all required extra treatment. Preoperatively, all patients had concordant 0800 GH and IGF-1. Postoperatively, 6 patients had 0800 GH <1 µg/L and high IGF-1; only 2 of these had a 13-point mean >1 µg/L, but 5 required further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone profiling is not necessary for assessing the majority of patients with acromegaly if there is confidence in the local IGF-1 assay. When undertaken, a 5-point profile is adequate. In patients with very high 0800 GH, 24-hour profiling was useful in demonstrating partial therapeutic success but did not alter management. Further work is needed to explore the possible role of GH profiling in stratifying patients with discordant IGF-1 and GH results.

Low- and standard-dose corticotropin and insulin hypoglycemia testing in the assessment of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function after pituitary surgery.

The optimal means of assessing the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis after pituitary surgery remains controversial. We compared low-dose (1 micro g iv) and standard-dose (250 micro g im) corticotropin tests performed 1 and 4-6 wk after pituitary surgery with an insulin hypoglycemia test performed at 4-6 wk. Forty-one patients (21 male and 20 female; median age, 52 yr; range, 23-73 yr) who had undergone pituitary surgery were studied (Cushing's disease excluded). Twenty-two of the 41 patients had normal cortisol responses to all tests both at 1 and 4-6 wk after surgery. Eight patients had subnormal cortisol responses to all tests. Of the 11 patients with discrepant results, seven had subnormal responses only after the low-dose corticotropin test; the remaining four patients had borderline responses to one or more tests. At 4-6 wk after surgery, subjects with a 30-min serum cortisol after standard-dose corticotropin of less than 350 nmol/liter (12.7 micro g/dl) consistently had a subnormal response to hypoglycemia, and those with a serum cortisol greater than 650 nmol/liter (23.6 micro g/dl) had a normal response to hypoglycemia. Definitive testing of the HPA axis using the standard-dose corticotropin test can be carried out provided it is performed at least 4 wk after pituitary surgery. A 30-min cortisol level greater than 650 nmol/liter (23.6 micro g/dl) indicates adequacy of the HPA axis, and a level of less than 350 nmol/liter (12.7 micro g/dl) indicates ACTH deficiency. No further testing is then required. An intermediate level of 350-650 nmol/liter (12.7-23.6 micro g/dl) warrants further assessment using the insulin hypoglycemia test.

Effect of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, doxazosin, on endothelial function and insulin action.

Essential hypertension is associated with impairment of both endothelial function and insulin action, and this has provided rationale for the use of antihypertensive agents that are at least neutral, if not beneficial, in these areas. This study examines the effect of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, doxazosin, on endothelial function and insulin action. Sixteen patients with essential hypertension were recruited with 13 (3 men/10 women; median age, 55 years; range, 38 to 65 years) completing the study. A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study design was used. After a 6-week placebo run-in, there were two 12-week treatment periods of either placebo or doxazosin, separated by a 6-week wash out period. Subjects were studied at the end of each treatment period with endothelial function assessed by forearm plethysmography and insulin action by the hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Blood pressure was significantly lowered by doxazosin (doxazosin 144 +/-3/86 +/- 2 mm Hg; placebo 159 +/- 3/96 +/- 1 mm Hg, P <.005 for both systolic and diastolic pressure; mean +/- SEM). Baseline forearm blood flow (FBF) was unchanged (doxazosin 4.9 +/- 0.9; placebo 4.0 +/- 0.7 mL x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1), P >.05), however, FBF responses (area under dose response curve, percentage change in infused:control arm ratio) to acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) were improved by doxazosin (doxazosin 58.6 +/- 11.7 standard units [SU]; placebo 22.1 +/- 7.0 SU, P =.03) with responses to sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation) unchanged (doxazosin 40.3 +/- 5.5 SU; placebo 46.3 +/- 8.1 SU, P >.05). Exogenous glucose infusion rates to maintain euglycemia during hyperinsulinemia were not significantly different (doxazosin 30.4 +/- 0.9; placebo 32.3 +/- 1.0 micromol x kg(-1) min(-1), P >.05). Suppression of postabsorptive endogenous glucose production by insulin was also unchanged by treatment (doxazosin 65.6% +/- 7.5% suppression; placebo 68.3% +/- 11.2% suppression, P >.05). Doxazosin has a neutral effect on both peripheral and hepatic insulin action, but improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation. These results indicate that doxazosin can be used safely in patients with insulin resistance, while its positive effect on endothelial function may lessen the subsequent incidence of atherosclerosis.

Comparison of 5% versus 15% sucrose intakes as part of a eucaloric diet in overweight and obese subjects: effects on insulin sensitivity, glucose metabolism, vascular compliance, body composition and lipid profile. A randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: The effect of dietary sucrose on insulin resistance and the pathogenesis of diabetes and vascular disease is unclear. We assessed the effect of 5% versus 15% sucrose intakes as part of a weight maintaining, eucaloric diet in overweight/obese subjects. METHODS: Thirteen subjects took part in a randomised controlled crossover study (M:F 9:4, median age 46 years, range 37-56 years, BMI 31.7±0.9 kg/m(2)). Subjects completed two 6 week dietary periods separated by 4 week washout. Diets were designed to have identical macronutrient profile. Insulin action was assessed using a two-step hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp; glucose tolerance, vascular compliance, body composition and lipid profiles were also assessed. RESULTS: There was no change in weight or body composition between diets. There was no difference in peripheral glucose utilization or suppression of endogenous glucose production. Fasting glucose was significantly lower after the 5% diet. There was no demonstrated effect on lipid profiles, blood pressure or vascular compliance. CONCLUSION: A low-sucrose diet had no beneficial effect on insulin resistance as measured by the euglycaemic glucose clamp. However, reductions in fasting glucose, one hour insulin and insulin area under the curve with the low sucrose diet on glucose tolerance testing may indicate a beneficial effect and further work is required to determine if this is the case. Clinical Trial Registration number ISRCTN50808730.

Low-fat versus low-carbohydrate weight reduction diets: effects on weight loss, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk: a randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVE: Low-fat hypocaloric diets reduce insulin resistance and prevent type 2 diabetes in those at risk. Low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets are advocated as an alternative, but reciprocal increases in dietary fat may have detrimental effects on insulin resistance and offset the benefits of weight reduction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated a low-fat (20% fat, 60% carbohydrate) versus a low-carbohydrate (60% fat, 20% carbohydrate) weight reduction diet in 24 overweight/obese subjects ([mean +/- SD] BMI 33.6 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2), aged 39 +/- 10 years) in an 8-week randomized controlled trial. All food was weighed and distributed, and intake was calculated to produce a 500 kcal/day energy deficit. Insulin action was assessed by the euglycemic clamp and insulin secretion by meal tolerance test. Body composition, adipokine levels, and vascular compliance by pulse-wave analysis were also measured. RESULTS: Significant weight loss occurred in both groups (P < 0.01), with no difference between groups (P = 0.40). Peripheral glucose uptake increased, but there was no difference between groups (P = 0.28), and suppression of endogenous glucose production was also similar between groups. Meal tolerance-related insulin secretion decreased with weight loss with no difference between groups (P = 0.71). The change in overall systemic arterial stiffness was, however, significantly different between diets (P = 0.04); this reflected a significant decrease in augmentation index following the low-fat diet, compared with a nonsignificant increase within the low-carbohydrate group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates comparable effects on insulin resistance of low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets independent of macronutrient content. The difference in augmentation index may imply a negative effect of low-carbohydrate diets on vascular risk.