RESUMO
Under the auspices of a partnership grant to reduce cancer health disparities, Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) partnered with the Ponce School of Medicine to identify the perceived cultural communication needs of MCC healthcare providers regarding Hispanic patients with limited or no English skills. Oncologists (N = 72) at MCC were surveyed to identify the specific areas of cultural communication techniques for which they desired to receive additional training. The majority of participants (66%) endorsed an interest in obtaining training to communicate difficult issues (terminal illness, controversial diagnosis) in a manner respectful to Hispanic culture. A workshop was conducted with providers (N = 55) to improve cultural communication between Hispanic patients and families focusing on culture, terminal illness, and communication strategies. Findings from a pre-post test indicate an overall positive response to the workshop. Results from this study can help inform future efforts to enhance cultural competency among health providers.
Assuntos
Competência Cultural/educação , Educação Médica/organização & administração , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Competência Profissional , Competência Cultural/psicologia , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Studies of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) have shown the importance of follow-up for effectiveness, but this has not been tested in an oncology clinic. In this pilot study, we enrolled 15 early breast cancer patients, aged 70 and older. They received a multidisciplinary CGA every 3 months and structured follow-up from the SAOP nurse practitioner, dietitian, social worker, and pharmacist according to risk. Total follow-up was 6 months. Median age of evaluable patients was 79 years (range 72-87). Median number of comorbidities by Cumulative Index Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) was 5 (3-9) at baseline. Ten patients were at pharmacological risk, five at psychosocial risk, and eight at nutritional risk. Patients presented on average six problems initially, and three new problems during follow-up. The intervention directly influenced oncological treatment in four cases. It ensured continuity/coordination of care in seven cases. Success rate in addressing problems was 87%. Mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Breast (FACT-B) scores improved from 110.5 (S.D. 16.7) to 116.3 (S.D. 16.5) (t=0.025). Function and independence were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with early breast cancer have a high prevalence of comorbidity. A CGA with follow-up has potential for improving the treatment and prognosis of these patients and is feasible in an academic oncology setting.