Resection of the primary tumor improves the prognosis of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases: mutual validation based on SEER database and institutional data.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GI-NENs) often result in liver metastases, and the role of Primary Tumor Resection (PTR) in managing GI-NENs with liver metastases (GI-NENLM) is still debated. This study aimed to investigate the potential benefits of PTR in treating GI-NENLM by analyzing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (FAH). METHODS: The SEER Registry 17 database and the FAH clinical pathology database were used to collect clinicopathology data for GI-NENLM diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 and between 2011 and 2022, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the clinicopathological characteristics of patients from both cohorts. Inverse probability weighting (IPTW) was used to weigh the PTR and non-PTR groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After matching, 155 patients from the SEER database were matched to the FAH cohort. PTR was significantly associated with better prognosis in PSM-matched/unmatched SEER cohorts (P < 0.01) and in the FAH cohort even after eliminating selection bias using IPTW (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis suggests that the cohort consisting of patients aged 55 years or older, individuals with colorectal primary tumors, those at the T1 disease stage, and those without extrahepatic metastasis may potentially benefit from PTR. Interaction analysis showed no significant interaction between PTR and other clinical and pathological factors except for age. CONCLUSION: The employment of PTR in patients with GI-NENLM is significantly correlated with individual survival benefits. We support performing PTR on carefully evaluated patients.

Evaluating Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Constructing a Novel Prognostic Nomogram Based on NETPET Score and Metabolic Parameters from PET/CT Imaging.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study is to compare the prognostic performance of NETPET scores, based on gallium-68 DOTANOC (68Ga-DOTANOC) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT), and PET-CT metabolic parameters in metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NET), while constructing and validating a nomogram derived from dual-scan PET-CT. METHODS: In this retrospective study, G1-G3 GI-NET patients who underwent 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDG PET scans were enrolled and divided into training and internal validation cohorts. Three grading systems were constructed based on NETPET scores and standardized uptake value maximum (SUVmax). LASSO regression selected variables for a multivariable Cox model, and nomograms predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were created. The prognostic performance of these systems was assessed using time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, concordance index (C-index), and other methods. Nomogram evaluation involved calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the aforementioned methods in both cohorts. RESULTS: In this study, 223 patients (130 males; mean age ± SD: 52.6 ± 12 years) were divided into training (148) and internal validation (75) cohorts. Dual scans were classified based on NETPET scores (D1-D3). Single 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDG PET-CT scans were stratified into S1-S3 and F1-F3 based on SUVmax. The NETPET score-based grading system demonstrated the best OS and PFS prediction (C-index, 0.763 vs. 0.727 vs. 0.566). Nomograms for OS and PFS exhibited superior prognostic performance in both cohorts (all AUCs > 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: New classification based on NETPET score predicts patient OS/PFS best. PET-CT-based nomograms show accurate OS/PFS forecasts.