RESUMO
PURPOSE: Ureteroenteric strictures (UESs) are a common and morbid complication of radical cystectomy and urinary diversions. UES occurs in 4% to 25% of all patients undergoing urinary diversion, and anastomotic ischemia is implicated in stricture formation. SPY fluorescence angiography is a technology that can be employed during open surgery that allows for evaluation of ureteral perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective single-institution study of intraoperative use of SPY for ureteral assessment with a primary outcome of UES incidence compared with a cohort of historic controls prior to the use of SPY during urinary diversion at our institution. Chart abstraction was conducted to determine the presence of confirmed stricture in these patients, defined as endoscopic diagnosis or definitive imaging findings. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 test for UES incidence. Demographics characteristics were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients underwent urinary diversion during the study period. UES occurred in 31 of 277 patients (11.1%) in the control group compared with 1 of 55 patients (1.8%) enrolled in the SPY arm (P = .03). The per-ureter UES rate was 6.7% (33/582) in the control group compared with 0.9% (1/107) in the SPY group. Median follow-up in the SPY group was 17.5 months and 58.6 months in the control group. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5 in the SPY group and 4 in the control group. There were no other significant demographic differences between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: SPY fluorescent angiography can be used during open urinary diversion to ensure perfusion to ureteroenteric anastomosis. Our single-institution study demonstrates a decreased incidence of UES when ureteral perfusion assessment is performed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO.: NCT05022199.
RESUMO
Background: Tele-cystoscopy involves trained advanced practice providers performing cystoscopy with real-time interpretation by an urologist. The goal of this externally validated care model is to expand the availability of cystoscopy to underserved rural areas. Herein we report on population demographics and describe the socioeconomic benefits of tele-cystoscopy for bladder cancer surveillance. Methods: Using an IRB-approved protocol, patients were consented for dual, sequential cystoscopy wherein they experienced a standard-of-care cystoscopy along with tele-cystoscopy. Patients completed a questionnaire that contained both subjective and objective health and socioeconomic-related questions as well as a satisfaction survey. Patients were also probed about factors associated with transportation to their cystoscopy appointments including gasoline costs, travel time, and time off work. Using the Distressed Community Index, patients were ascribed an economic resource category ranging from prosperous to distressed. Results: In total, 48 patients with a mean age of 55 completed surveys after completing dual cystoscopies. Thirteen patients (27%) were uninsured and 10 patients (20%) had Medicaid as primary insurance. The tele-cystoscopy clinic saved patients an average of 235 miles and 434 min of travel time. In total, 82% of patients resided in a distressed community indicating fewer economic resources. Satisfaction results showed a mean score of 31.38 (out of 32). Conclusions: Patients were satisfied with tele-cystoscopy, noting increased access to health care and fewer disruptions impacting bladder cancer surveillance. Tele-cystoscopy may be a viable option to expand access and improve adherence to guidelines for bladder cancer surveillance, particularly benefiting patients in rural areas and those of lower socioeconomic status.