Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for breast cancer: A Phase 1 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy is combined with focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (FUS-MB) treatment. The acoustic exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) within the target volume causes bubble cavitation, which induces perturbation of tumour vasculature and activates endothelial cell apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Subsequent irradiation of a microbubble-sensitised tumour causes rapid increased tumour death. The study here presents the mature safety and efficacy outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB) treatment, a radioenhancement therapy for breast cancer. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase 1 clinical trial included patients with stages I-IV breast cancer with in situ tumours for whom breast or chest wall radiotherapy was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04431674). Patients were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or microbubble administration. Patients underwent 2 to 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments throughout radiotherapy. An MR-coupled focussed ultrasound device operating at 800 kHz and 570 kPa peak negative pressure was used to sonicate intravenously administrated microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were tumour response at 3 months and local control (LC). A total of 21 female patients presenting with 23 primary breast tumours were enrolled and allocated to intervention between August/2020 and November/2022. Three patients subsequently withdrew consent and, therefore, 18 patients with 20 tumours were included in the safety and LC analyses. Two patients died due to progressive metastatic disease before 3 months following treatment completion and were excluded from the tumour response analysis. The prescribed radiation doses were 20 Gy/5 fractions (40%, n = 8/20), 30 to 35 Gy/5 fractions (35%, n = 7/20), 30 to 40 Gy/10 fractions (15%, n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (10%, n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3 to 29). Radiation dermatitis was the most common acute toxicity (Grade 1 in 16/20, Grade 2 in 1/20, and Grade 3 in 2/20). One patient developed grade 1 allergic reaction possibly related to microbubbles administration. At 3 months, 18 tumours were evaluated for response: 9 exhibited complete response (50%, n = 9/18), 6 partial response (33%, n = 6/18), 2 stable disease (11%, n = 2/18), and 1 progressive disease (6%, n = 1/18). Further follow-up of responses indicated that the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LC rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84%, 100%]), 88% (95% CI [75%, 100%]), and 76% (95% CI [54%, 100%]), respectively. The study's limitations include variable tumour sizes and dose fractionation regimens and the anticipated small sample size typical for a Phase 1 clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: MRgFUS-MB is an innovative radioenhancement therapy associated with a safe profile, potentially promising responses, and durable LC. These results warrant validation in Phase 2 clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04431674.

Spectral-based Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging Processing Techniques: Comparisons of RF Versus IQ Approaches.

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an imaging technique which includes spectral-based parameterization. Typical spectral-based parameters include the backscatter coefficient (BSC) and attenuation coefficient slope (ACS). Traditionally, spectral-based QUS relies on the radio frequency (RF) signal to calculate the spectral-based parameters. Many clinical and research scanners only provide the in-phase and quadrature (IQ) signal. To acquire the RF data, the common approach is to convert IQ signal back into RF signal via mixing with a carrier frequency. In this study, we hypothesize that the performance, that is, accuracy and precision, of spectral-based parameters calculated directly from IQ data is as good as or better than using converted RF data. To test this hypothesis, estimation of the BSC and ACS using RF and IQ data from software, physical phantoms and in vivo rabbit data were analyzed and compared. The results indicated that there were only small differences in estimates of the BSC between when using the original RF, the IQ derived from the original RF and the RF reconverted from the IQ, that is, root mean square errors (RMSEs) were less than 0.04. Furthermore, the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) was calculated for ACS maps with a value greater than 0.96 for maps created using the original RF, IQ data and reconverted RF. On the other hand, the processing time using the IQ data compared to RF data were substantially less, that is, reduced by more than a factor of two. Therefore, this study confirms two things: (1) there is no need to convert IQ data back to RF data for conducting spectral-based QUS analysis, because the conversion from IQ back into RF data can introduce artifacts. (2) For the implementation of real-time QUS, there is an advantage to convert the original RF data into IQ data to conduct spectral-based QUS analysis because IQ data-based QUS can improve processing speed.

Transfer learning of pre-treatment quantitative ultrasound multi-parametric images for the prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a severe type of cancer with a poor prognosis, despite advancements in therapy. As the disease is often inoperable, current guidelines suggest upfront aggressive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Complete pathological response to chemotherapy is linked to improved survival, but conventional clinical assessments like physical exams, mammography, and imaging are limited in detecting early response. Early detection of tissue response can improve complete pathological response and patient survival while reducing exposure to ineffective and potentially harmful treatments. A rapid, cost-effective modality without the need for exogenous contrast agents would be valuable for evaluating neoadjuvant therapy response. Conventional ultrasound provides information about tissue echogenicity, but image comparisons are difficult due to instrument-dependent settings and imaging parameters. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) overcomes this by using normalized power spectra to calculate quantitative metrics. This study used a novel transfer learning-based approach to predict LABC response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using QUS imaging at pre-treatment. Using data from 174 patients, QUS parametric images of breast tumors with margins were generated. The ground truth response to therapy for each patient was based on standard clinical and pathological criteria. The Residual Network (ResNet) deep learning architecture was used to extract features from the parametric QUS maps. This was followed by SelectKBest and Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE) techniques for feature selection and data balancing, respectively. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm was employed to classify patients into two distinct categories: nonresponders (NR) and responders (RR). Evaluation results on an unseen test set demonstrate that the transfer learning-based approach using spectral slope parametric maps had the best performance in the identification of nonresponders with precision, recall, F1-score, and balanced accuracy of 100, 71, 83, and 86%, respectively. The transfer learning-based approach has many advantages over conventional deep learning methods since it reduces the need for large image datasets for training and shortens the training time. The results of this study demonstrate the potential of transfer learning in predicting LABC response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before the start of treatment using quantitative ultrasound imaging. Prediction of NAC response before treatment can aid clinicians in customizing ineffectual treatment regimens for individual patients.

In vivo validation of an in situ calibration bead as a reference for backscatter coefficient calculation.

Objectives: The study aims to assess the capability of Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) based on the backscatter coefficient (BSC) for classifying disease states, such as breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and quantifying fatty liver disease. We evaluate the effectiveness of an in situ titanium (Ti) bead as a reference target in calibrating the system and mitigating attenuation and transmission loss effects on BSC estimation. Methods: Traditional BSC estimation methods require external references for calibration, which do not account for ultrasound attenuation or transmission losses through tissues. To address this issue, we use an in situ titanium (Ti) bead as a reference target, because it can be used to calibrate the system and mitigate the attenuation and transmission loss effects on estimation of the BSC. The capabilities of the in situ calibration approach were assessed by quantifying consistency of BSC estimates from rabbit mammary tumors (N=21). Specifically, mammary tumors were grown in rabbits and when a tumor reached 1 cm or greater in size, a 2-mm Ti bead was implanted into the tumor as a radiological marker and a calibration source for ultrasound. Three days later, the tumors were scanned with a L-14/5 38 array transducer connected to a SonixOne scanner with and without a slab of pork belly placed on top of the tumors. The pork belly acted as an additional source of attenuation and transmission loss. QUS parameters, specifically effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC), were calculated using calibration spectra from both an external reference phantom and the Ti bead. Results: For ESD estimation, the 95% confidence interval between measurements with and without the pork belly layer was (6.0,27.4) using the in situ bead and (114, 135.1) with the external reference phantom. For EAC estimation, the 95% confidence interval were (-8.1, 0.5) for the bead and (-41.5, -32.2) for the phantom. These results indicate that the in situ bead method shows reduced bias in QUS estimates due to intervening tissue losses. Conclusions: The use of an in situ Ti bead as a radiological marker not only serves its traditional role but also effectively acts as a calibration target for QUS methods. This approach accounts for attenuation and transmission losses in tissue, resulting in more accurate QUS estimates and offering a promising method for enhanced disease state classification in clinical settings.

In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.

OBJECTIVE: The study described here was aimed at assessing the capability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) based on the backscatter coefficient (BSC) for classifying disease states, such as breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and quantification of fatty liver disease. We evaluated the effectiveness of an in situ titanium (Ti) bead as a reference target in calibrating the system and mitigating attenuation and transmission loss effects on BSC estimation. METHODS: Traditional BSC estimation methods require external references for calibration, which do not account for ultrasound attenuation or transmission losses through tissues. To address this issue, we used an in situ Ti bead as a reference target, because it can be used to calibrate the system and mitigate the attenuation and transmission loss effects on estimation of the BSC. The capabilities of the in situ calibration approach were assessed by quantifying consistency of BSC estimates from rabbit mammary tumors (N = 21). Specifically, mammary tumors were grown in rabbits and when a tumor reached ≥1 cm in size, a 2 mm Ti bead was implanted in the tumor as a radiological marker and a calibration source for ultrasound. Three days later, the tumors were scanned with an L-14/5 38 array transducer connected to a SonixOne scanner with and without a slab of pork belly placed on top of the tumors. The pork belly acted as an additional source of attenuation and transmission loss. QUS parameters, specifically effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC), were calculated using calibration spectra from both an external reference phantom and the Ti bead. RESULTS: For ESD estimation, the 95% confidence interval between measurements with and without the pork belly layer was 6.0, 27.4 using the in situ bead and 114, 135.1 with the external reference phantom. For EAC estimation, the 95% confidence intervals were -8.1, 0.5 for the bead and -41.5, -32.2 for the phantom. These results indicate that the in situ bead method has reduced bias in QUS estimates because of intervening tissue losses. CONCLUSION: The use of an in situ Ti bead as a radiological marker not only serves its traditional role but also effectively acts as a calibration target for QUS methods. This approach accounts for attenuation and transmission losses in tissue, resulting in more accurate QUS estimates and offering a promising method for enhanced disease state classification in clinical settings.

Quantitative US Delta Radiomics to Predict Radiation Response in Individuals with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Purpose To investigate the role of quantitative US (QUS) radiomics data obtained after the 1st week of radiation therapy (RT) in predicting treatment response in individuals with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Materials and Methods This prospective study included 55 participants (21 with complete response [median age, 65 years {IQR: 47-80 years}, 20 male, one female; and 34 with incomplete response [median age, 59 years {IQR: 39-79 years}, 33 male, one female) with bulky node-positive HNSCC treated with curative-intent RT from January 2015 to October 2019. All participants received 70 Gy of radiation in 33-35 fractions over 6-7 weeks. US radiofrequency data from metastatic lymph nodes were acquired prior to and after 1 week of RT. QUS analysis resulted in five spectral maps from which mean values were extracted. We applied a gray-level co-occurrence matrix technique for textural analysis, leading to 20 QUS texture and 80 texture-derivative parameters. The response 3 months after RT was used as the end point. Model building and evaluation utilized nested leave-one-out cross-validation. Results Five delta (Δ) parameters had statistically significant differences (P < .05). The support vector machines classifier achieved a sensitivity of 71% (15 of 21), a specificity of 76% (26 of 34), a balanced accuracy of 74%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 on the test set. For all the classifiers, the performance improved after the 1st week of treatment. Conclusion A QUS Δ-radiomics model using data obtained after the 1st week of RT from individuals with HNSCC predicted response 3 months after treatment completion with reasonable accuracy. Keywords: Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD), Ultrasound, Radiation Therapy/Oncology, Head/Neck, Radiomics, Quantitative US, Radiotherapy, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Machine Learning Clinicaltrials.gov registration no. NCT03908684 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Quantitative ultrasound radiomics guided adaptive neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: early results from a randomized feasibility study.

Background: In patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), quantitative ultrasound (QUS) radiomics can predict final responses early within 4 of 16-18 weeks of treatment. The current study was planned to study the feasibility of a QUS-radiomics model-guided adaptive chemotherapy. Methods: The phase 2 open-label randomized controlled trial included patients with LABC planned for NAC. Patients were randomly allocated in 1:1 ratio to a standard arm or experimental arm stratified by hormonal receptor status. All patients were planned for standard anthracycline and taxane-based NAC as decided by their medical oncologist. Patients underwent QUS imaging using a clinical ultrasound device before the initiation of NAC and after the 1st and 4th weeks of treatment. A support vector machine-based radiomics model developed from an earlier cohort of patients was used to predict treatment response at the 4th week of NAC. In the standard arm, patients continued to receive planned chemotherapy with the treating oncologists blinded to results. In the experimental arm, the QUS-based prediction was conveyed to the responsible oncologist, and any changes to the planned chemotherapy for predicted non-responders were made by the responsible oncologist. All patients underwent surgery following NAC, and the final response was evaluated based on histopathological examination. Results: Between June 2018 and July 2021, 60 patients were accrued in the study arm, with 28 patients in each arm available for final analysis. In patients without a change in chemotherapy regimen (53 of 56 patients total), the QUS-radiomics model at week 4 of NAC that was used demonstrated an accuracy of 97%, respectively, in predicting the final treatment response. Seven patients were predicted to be non-responders (observational arm (n=2), experimental arm (n=5)). Three of 5 non-responders in the experimental arm had chemotherapy regimens adapted with an early initiation of taxane therapy or chemotherapy intensification, or early surgery and ended up as responders on final evaluation. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the feasibility of QUS-radiomics adapted guided NAC for patients with breast cancer. The ability of a QUS-based model in the early prediction of treatment response was prospectively validated in the current study. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT04050228.

Apriori prediction of chemotherapy response in locally advanced breast cancer patients using CT imaging and deep learning: transformer versus transfer learning.

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a key element of treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Predicting the response to NAC for patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) before treatment initiation could be beneficial to optimize therapy, ensuring the administration of effective treatments. The objective of the work here was to develop a predictive model to predict tumor response to NAC for LABC using deep learning networks and computed tomography (CT). Materials and methods: Several deep learning approaches were investigated including ViT transformer and VGG16, VGG19, ResNet-50, Res-Net-101, Res-Net-152, InceptionV3 and Xception transfer learning networks. These deep learning networks were applied on CT images to assess the response to NAC. Performance was evaluated based on balanced_accuracy, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity classification metrics. A ViT transformer was applied to utilize the attention mechanism in order to increase the weight of important part image which leads to better discrimination between classes. Results: Amongst the 117 LABC patients studied, 82 (70%) had clinical-pathological response and 35 (30%) had no response to NAC. The ViT transformer obtained the best performance range (accuracy = 71 ± 3% to accuracy = 77 ± 4%, specificity = 86 ± 6% to specificity = 76 ± 3%, sensitivity = 56 ± 4% to sensitivity = 52 ± 4%, and balanced_accuracy=69 ± 3% to balanced_accuracy=69 ± 3%) depending on the split ratio of train-data and test-data. Xception network obtained the second best results (accuracy = 72 ± 4% to accuracy = 65 ± 4, specificity = 81 ± 6% to specificity = 73 ± 3%, sensitivity = 55 ± 4% to sensitivity = 52 ± 5%, and balanced_accuracy = 66 ± 5% to balanced_accuracy = 60 ± 4%). The worst results were obtained using VGG-16 transfer learning network. Conclusion: Deep learning networks in conjunction with CT imaging are able to predict the tumor response to NAC for patients with LABC prior to start. A ViT transformer could obtain the best performance, which demonstrated the importance of attention mechanism.

Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for head and neck cancer: A phase 1 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Preclinical research demonstrated that the exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) to focussed ultrasound within the targeted tumour upregulates pro-apoptotic pathways and enhances radiation-induced tumour cell death. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (MRgFUS-MB) for head and neck cancers (HN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective phase 1 clinical trial included patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent HN cancer (except nasopharynx malignancies) for whom locoregional radiotherapy with radical- or palliative-intent as deemed appropriate. Patients with contraindications for microbubble administration or contrast-enhanced MR were excluded. MR-coupled focussed ultrasound sonicated intravenously administered microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. Patients receiving 5-10 and 33-35 radiation fractions were planned for 2 and 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments, respectively. Primary endpoint was toxicity per CTCAEv5.0. Secondary endpoint was tumour response at 3 months per RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled between Jun/2020 and Nov/2023, but 1 withdrew consent. Eleven patients were included in safety analysis. Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 0.3-38). Most patients had oropharyngeal cancer (55 %) and received 20-30 Gy/5-10 fractions (63 %). No systemic toxicity or MRgFUS-MB-related adverse events occurred. The most severe acute adverse events were radiation-related grade 3 toxicities in 6 patients (55 %; dermatitis in 3, mucositis in 1, dysphagia in 6). No radiation necrosis or grade 4/5 toxicities were reported. 8 patients were included in the 3-month tumour response assessment: 4 had partial response (50 %), 3 had complete response (37.5 %), and 1 had progressive disease (12.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: MRgFUS-MB treatment was safe and associated with high rates of tumour response at 3 months.

A priori prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative ultrasound, texture derivative and molecular subtype.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the performances of the tumor response prediction prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on quantitative ultrasound, tumour core-margin, texture derivative analyses, and molecular parameters in a large cohort of patients (n = 208) with locally advanced and earlier-stage breast cancer and combined them to best determine tumour responses with machine learning approach. Two multi-features response prediction algorithms using a k-nearest neighbour and support vector machine were developed with leave-one-out and hold-out cross-validation methods to evaluate the performance of the response prediction models. In a leave-one-out approach, the quantitative ultrasound-texture analysis based model attained good classification performance with 80% of accuracy and AUC of 0.83. Including molecular subtype in the model improved the performance to 83% of accuracy and 0.87 of AUC. Due to limited number of samples in the training process, a model developed with a hold-out approach exhibited a slightly higher bias error in classification performance. The most relevant features selected in predicting the response groups are core-to-margin, texture-derivative, and molecular subtype. These results imply that that baseline tumour-margin, texture derivative analysis methods combined with molecular subtype can potentially be used for the prediction of ultimate treatment response in patients prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.