A Rare Intrathecal Pump Complication Caused by Prolonged Seroma Leading to a Potential Pump Pocket Fill: A Near Miss.

Intrathecal drug delivery systems have been used with increasing frequency in patients with chronic intractable pain. Common complications of intrathecal drug delivery systems include surgical bleeding, spinal cord injury, fractured or migrated catheter, meningitis, pump failure, granuloma formation, cerebral spinal fluid leak, and hygroma formation. We present a rare near-miss case that could have led to the inadvertent filling of an intrathecal pump pocket with a high concentration of narcotic and local anesthetic. This situation arose due to the discovery of a prolonged intrathecal pump pocket seroma during a routine maintenance and refill procedure.

The Postoperative Pain Assessment Skills pilot trial.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Pain-related misbeliefs among health care professionals (HCPs) are common and contribute to ineffective postoperative pain assessment. While standardized patients (SPs) have been effectively used to improve HCPs' assessment skills, not all centres have SP programs. The present equivalence randomized controlled pilot trial examined the efficacy of an alternative simulation method - deteriorating patient-based simulation (DPS) - versus SPs for improving HCPs' pain knowledge and assessment skills. METHODS: Seventy-two HCPs were randomly assigned to a 3 h SP or DPS simulation intervention. Measures were recorded at baseline, immediate postintervention and two months postintervention. The primary outcome was HCPs' pain assessment performance as measured by the postoperative Pain Assessment Skills Tool (PAST). Secondary outcomes included HCPs knowledge of pain-related misbeliefs, and perceived satisfaction and quality of the simulation. These outcomes were measured by the Pain Beliefs Scale (PBS), the Satisfaction with Simulated Learning Scale (SSLS) and the Simulation Design Scale (SDS), respectively. Student's t tests were used to test for overall group differences in postintervention PAST, SSLS and SDS scores. One-way analysis of covariance tested for overall group differences in PBS scores. RESULTS: DPS and SP groups did not differ on post-test PAST, SSLS or SDS scores. Knowledge of pain-related misbeliefs was also similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that DPS is an effective simulation alternative for HCPs' education on postoperative pain assessment, with improvements in performance and knowledge comparable with SP-based simulation. An equivalence trial to examine the effectiveness of deteriorating patient-based simulation versus standardized patients is warranted.

Steroid dysregulation and stomatodynia (burning mouth syndrome).

Stomatodynia ( burning mouth syndrome) is characterized by a spontaneous, continuous burning pain felt in the oral mucosa typically of anxiodepressive menopausal women. Because there is no obvious organic cause, it is considered a nonspecific pain. This Focus Article proposes a hypothesis based on the following pathophysiological cascade: chronic anxiety or post traumatic stress leads to a dysregulation of the adrenal production of steroids. One consequence is a decreased or modified production of some major precursors for the neuroactive steroid synthesis occurring in the skin, mucosa, and nervous system. At menopause, the drastic fall of the other main precursor supply , the gonadal steroids, leads to a brisk alteration of the production of neuroactive steroids. This results in neurodegenerative alterations of small nerves fibers of the oral mucosa and /or some brain areas involved in oral somatic sensations. These neuropathic changes become irreversible and precipitate the burning pain, dysgeusia, and xerostomia associated with stomatodynia, which all involve thin nerve fibers.

Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phase 4: initial treatment.

Outcome 4-6 years after initial treatment was assessed for Phase 4 (2000-2001) of the Toronto Study. Of 582 teeth treated, 430 were lost to follow-up (99 discontinuers, 331 dropouts), 15 were extracted, and 137 (32% recall minus 15 extracted teeth) were examined for outcome: healed (no apical periodontitis, signs, symptoms) or diseased. When pooled with Phases 1-3, 439 of 510 teeth (86%) were healed. Logistic regression identified 2 significant (P < or = .05) preoperative outcome predictors: radiolucency (odds ratio [OR], 2.86; confidence interval [CI], 1.56-5.24; healed: absent, 93%; present, 82%) and number of roots (OR, 2.53; CI, 1.25-5.13; healed: single, 93%; multiple, 84%). In teeth with radiolucency, intraoperative complications (OR, 2.27; CI, 1.05-4.89; healed: absent, 84%; present, 69%) and root-filling technique (OR, 1.89; CI, 1.01-3.53; healed: lateral, 77%; vertical, 87%) were additional outcome predictors. A better outcome was suggested for teeth without radiolucency, with single roots, and without mid-treatment complications. The predictive value of root-filling technique in teeth with radiolucency requires validation from randomized controlled trials.

Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment.

Outcome 4-6 years after retreatment was assessed for Phases 3 and 4 of the Toronto Study. Of 477 teeth retreated, 333 were lost to follow-up, 18 were extracted, and 126 (41% recall, excluding 124 discontinuers) were examined for outcome of healed (periapical index score, < or = 2; no signs or symptoms) or diseased. When pooled with Phases 1 and 2, 187 of 229 teeth (82%) were healed. Logistic regression identified significant (P < or = .05) preoperative outcome predictors: root filling quality (odds ratio [OR], 4.18; confidence interval [CI], 1.72-10.12; healed: inadequate, 88%; adequate, 66%), perforation (OR, 4.01; CI, 1.28-12.62; healed: absent, 87%; present, 56%), and radiolucency (OR, 3.33; CI, 1.19-9.36; healed: absent, 93%; present, 80%). In teeth with radiolucency, outcome predictors were number of treatment sessions (OR, 12.08; CI, 1.84-infinity; healed: one, 100%; > or = 2, 77%) and previous root filling quality (OR, 7.68; CI, 2.36-26.89; healed: inadequate, 86%; adequate, 50%). Outcome was better in teeth with inadequate previous root filling, without perforation and radiolucency. Suggested significance of number of treatment sessions in teeth with radiolucency requires validation from randomized controlled trials.

Mapping of pain curricula across health professions programs at the University of Toronto.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing societal need for health professional competency in pain care. The University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain-Interfaculty Pain Curriculum (UTCSP-IPC) has been offered since 2002. Content and process have been updated annually. In addition, participating health professions programs have advanced their pain teaching. A curricular scan was needed to creatively and constructively advance the UTCSP-IPC. AIM: The aim of this study was to map curricular pain content in participating health professions programs onto the UTCSP-IPC content as a first step to further curriculum design. METHODS: UTCSP-IPC committee members and faculty representatives from six health profession programs completed a 27-item online survey in this collaborative action study. Descriptive statistics were completed in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: The UTCSP-IPC provided an average of 43.3% (range 32%-62%) of total pain content teaching hours to participating health professions students and a range of 8% to 100% of total opioid-related teaching hours. Curricular overlaps and gaps in pain content were identified and will be used to update and inform the iterative design of the UTCSP-IPC. Ninety-three percent of participating health professions faculty indicated that the interprofessional focus on pain care in the UTCSP-IPC was important. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the value of the UTCSP and areas of curricular refinement to ensure continued relevance in relationship to pain content within the six participating health professions programs. Mapping a coordinated approach between uniprofessional and interprofessional teaching will both meet the demands of professional competence and create greater applicability to future practice settings.

Contexte : Il est de plus en plus nécessaire que les professionnels de la santé aient les compétences nécessaires pour la prise en charge de la douleur au sein de la société. Le Programme interfacultaire sur la douleur du Centre pour l'étude de la douleur de l'Université de Toronto (UTCSP-IPC) est offert depuis 2002. Son contenu et son processus ont été mis à jour chaque année. Les programmes des professions du domaine de la santé participantes ont eux aussi perfectionné leur enseignement sur la douleur. Une radiographie du programme était donc nécessaire afin d'améliorer l'UTCSP-IPC de manière créative et constructive.Objectif : Recenser le contenu sur la douleur dans les programmes des professions du domaine de la santé participantes afin de l'inclure dans l'UTCSP-IPC en tant que première étape pour améliorer la conception du programme.Méthodes : Des membres du comité de l'UTCSP-IPC et des représentants des facultés de six programmes de professions du domaine de la santé ont répondu à un sondage en ligne comprenant 27 énoncés dans le cadre de cette étude collaborative. Des statistiques descriptives ont ensuite été compilées dans Microsoft Excel™.Résultats : Au total, l'UTCSP-IPC a donné en moyenne 43,4 % (entre 32 et 62 %) d'heures d'enseignement sur la douleur aux étudiants des professions du domaine de la santé participantes, et de huit à 100 % d'heures d'enseignement liées aux opioïdes. Les lacunes et les chevauchements dans le contenu portant sur la douleur ont été répertoriés. Cette information sera utilisée pour la mise à jour et la conception itérative de l'UTCSP-IPC. Quatre-vingt-treize pour cent des facultés des professions du domaine de la santé participantes ont souligné l'importance de continuer à mettre l'accent sur l'aspect interprofessionnel de la prise en charge de la douleur dans l'UTCSP-IPC.Conclusion : Cette étude a mis en évidence l'importance de l'UTCSP ainsi que les aspects du programme qui doivent être peaufinés pour maintenir sa pertinence en ce qui concerne le contenu sur la douleur au sein des six programmes des professions du domaine de la santé participantes. L'élaboration d'une approche coordonnée entre l'enseignement uniprofessionnel et l'enseignement interprofessionnel permettra à la fois de répondre aux exigences en matière de compétences professionelles et d'améliorer l'applicabilité dans les futurs milieux de pratique.

Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phase III: initial treatment.

The 4- to 6-year outcome of initial endodontic treatment was assessed for phase III (1998-1999) of the Toronto Study. Of the 532 teeth treated, 248 were from discontinuers (excluded), 142 from dropouts, 10 extracted, and 132 (50% recall) examined for outcome: healed (no apical periodontitis [AP], signs, symptoms) or diseased. Phase III was analyzed alone and combined with phases I, II (n = 373 teeth). Logistic regression performed on the combined phases I-III sample identified significant (p < or = 0.05) outcome predictors: preoperative AP (OR = 3.5; CI 1.7-7.2; healed: absent, 93%; present, 80%), number of roots (OR = 2.2; CI 1.0-4.7; healed: 1 - 92%; > or =2 - 83%), and intraoperative complications (OR = 2.2; CI 1.1-4.5; healed: absent, 88%; present, 76%). Treatment technique (OR = 2.8; CI 1.3-6.1; healed: Schilder, 89%; alternative, 73%) was suggested as an outcome predictor in teeth with AP, requiring confirmation from randomized controlled trials.

Successful treatment of Raynaud's syndrome in a lupus patient with continuous bilateral popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a case report.

Raynaud's syndrome has been treated medically and invasively, sometimes with regional anesthesia leading up to sympathectomy. We demonstrate that regional anesthesia was in this case a useful technique that can allow some patients to find temporary but significant relief from symptoms of Raynaud's syndrome exacerbation. We present a 43-year-old woman with Raynaud's syndrome secondary to lupus who was treated with bilateral popliteal nerve block catheters for ischemic pain and necrosis of her feet; this led to almost immediate resolution of her pain and return of color and function of her feet. While medical management should continue to be a front-line treatment for Raynaud's syndrome, regional anesthesia can be useful in providing rapid dissipation of symptoms and may thus serve as a viable option for short-term management of this syndrome.

Impacts of Contracted Endodontic Cavities on Instrumentation Efficacy and Biomechanical Responses in Maxillary Molars.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, we reported that in mandibular molars contracted endodontic cavities (CECs) improved fracture strength compared with traditional endodontic cavities (TECs) but compromised instrumentation efficacy in distal canals. This study assessed the impacts of CECs on instrumentation efficacy and axial strain responses in maxillary molars. METHODS: Eighteen extracted intact maxillary molars were imaged with micro-computed tomographic imaging (12-µm voxel), assigned to CEC or TEC groups (n = 9/group), and accessed accordingly. Canals were instrumented (V-Taper2H; SSWhite Dental, Lakewood, NJ) with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation, reimaged, and the proportion of the modified canal wall determined. Cavities were restored with bonded composite resin (TPH-Spectra-LV; Dentsply International, York, PA). Another 28 similar molars (n = 14/group) with linear strain gauges (Showa Measuring Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) attached to mesiobuccal and palatal roots were subjected to load cycles (50-150 N) in the Instron Universal Testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA), and the axial microstrain was recorded before access and after restoration. These 28 molars and additional 11 intact molars (control) were cyclically fatigued (1 million cycles, 5-50 N, 15 Hz) and subsequently loaded to failure. Data were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The overall mean proportion of the modified canal wall did not differ significantly between CECs (49.7% ± 12.0%) and TECs (44.7% ± 9.0%). Relative changes in axial microstrain responses to load varied in both groups. The mean load at failure for CECs (1703 ± 558 N) did not differ significantly from TECs (1384 ± 377 N) and was significantly lower (P < .005) for both groups compared with intact molars (2457 ± 941 N). CONCLUSIONS: In maxillary molars tested in vitro, CECs did not impact instrumentation efficacy and biomechanical responses compared with TECs.

Patients' Values Related to Treatment Options for Teeth with Apical Periodontitis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to explore patients' values when selecting treatment for a tooth with apical periodontitis (AP), namely retention via root canal treatment (RCT) and extraction without replacement or replacement with implant-supported crowns or fixed or removable partial prostheses. METHODS: Through 2 surveys of patients (800 university patients and 200 community patients, response rate = 43%) and dentists (498 Ontario endodontists, periodontists, prosthodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, response rate = 40% and 1983 Ontario general dentists, response rate = 15%), the importance of values that might be considered important to patients when selecting treatment options for a tooth with AP were recorded. Chi-square and Kendall's tau tests were used to respectively compare the importance rating frequency by each surveyed group and its correlation to their demographic variables (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Patients considered communication and trust (94%), tooth retention (90%), esthetic outcome (84% regardless of location), cost (83%), longevity (83%), and preoperative pain (81%) as the most important decision values. Dentists overrated the importance of patients' previous experience with the treatment options (94% vs. 72%), dental insurance (90% vs. 70%), and intraoperative pain (79% vs. 60%) while underestimating the importance of maintenance cost (60% vs. 79%). CONCLUSIONS: Dentists should respect patients' views about esthetic outcome, longevity, and cost associated with treatment options for a tooth with AP. In particular, this survey highlights the value of communication and trust between patient and dentist and preservation of the natural tooth through RCT over implant-supported crown replacement when planning treatment for a tooth with AP.

Mechanisms associated with unusual orofacial pain.

This article presents an overview of possible mechanisms associated with pain perception, with a specific focus on understanding unusual manifestations of orofacial pain associated with nerve insult. It includes recent evidence concerning neurobiological changes that occur in the periphery at tissue and nerve sites, or within the central nervous system, and that may involve chemical and inflammatory responses, sensitization, or alterations of cellular function. Moreover, the contribution of the autonomic nervous system, changes in emotional reactivity and vigilance, the roles of high brain centers such as the basal ganglia (nigro-striatal) system, and the influence of aging and gender, are briefly described.

Is myofascial pain of the temporal muscles relieved by oral sumatriptan? A cross-over pilot study.

There is evidence that serotonin may be implicated in the pathophysiology of myofascial pain (MFP). Because of this, we used oral sumatriptan (Imitrex, Glaxo), a peripherally acting agonist of 5-HT1D receptors, in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled double crossover pilot study of 7 patients with episodic MFP of the temporalis muscles. The results showed that there was a significant reduction in pain intensity and increase in pain relief over time with both the active medication and the placebo, but no significant difference between treatments. All but 1 patient reported that they are not interested in retaking the same medication. These data suggest that oral sumatriptan may not be the drug of choice in the control of episodic MFP.

Memories of chronic pain and perceptions of relief.

Clinicians and researchers often ask patients to remember their past pain. They also use patient's reports of relief from pain as evidence of treatment efficacy, assuming that relief represents the difference between pretreatment pain and present pain. We have estimated the accuracy of remembering pain and described the relationship between remembered pain, changes in pain levels and reports of relief during treatment. During a 10-week randomized controlled clinical trial on the effectiveness of oral appliances for the management of chronic myalgia of the jaw muscles, subjects recalled their pretreatment pain and rated their present pain and perceived relief. Multiple regression analysis and repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis. Memory of the pretreatment pain was inaccurate and the errors in recall got significantly worse with the passage of time (P < 0.001). Accuracy of recall for pretreatment pain depended on the level of pain before treatment (P < 0.001): subjects with low pretreatment pain exaggerated its intensity afterwards, while it was underestimated by those with the highest pretreatment pain. Memory of pretreatment pain was also dependent on the level of pain at the moment of recall (P < 0.001). Ratings of relief increased over time (P < 0.001), and were dependent on both present and remembered pain (Ps < 0.001). However, true changes in pain were not significantly related to relief scores (P = 0.41). Finally, almost all patients reported relief, even those whose pain had increased. These results suggest that reports of perceived relief do not necessarily reflect true changes in pain.

The efficacy of oral splints in the treatment of myofascial pain of the jaw muscles: a controlled clinical trial.

Oral splints are widely used in the treatment of myofascial pain of masticatory muscles, even though their mechanism of action is unknown. The present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of splints using a parallel, randomized, controlled and blind design. Following a sample size estimation, 63 subjects were recruited and assigned to 3 groups: (1) passive control: full occlusal splint worn only 30 min at each appointment; (2) active control: palatal splint worn 24 h/day; and (3) treatment: full occlusal splint worn 24 h/day. On each of 7 visits over 10 weeks, subjects rated on 100 mm visual analogue scales their pain intensity and unpleasantness at rest and after experimental mastication. The effect of pain on the quality of life was also rated on category scales. All pain ratings decreased significantly with time, and quality of life improved for all 3 groups. However, there were no significant differences between groups in any of the variables. These data suggest that the gradual reduction in the intensity and unpleasantness of myofascial pain, as well as the improvement of quality of life during the trial, was non-specific and not related to the type of treatment.

An integrated undergraduate pain curriculum, based on IASP curricula, for six health science faculties.

Pain education, especially for undergraduates, has been identified as important to changing problematic pain practices, yet, no published data were found describing an integrated, interprofessional pain curriculum for undergraduate students. Therefore, this project aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate an integrated pain curriculum, based on the International Association for the Study of Pain curricula [http://www.iasp-pain.org/curropen.html], for 540 students from six Health Science Faculties/Departments. Over an 18-month period, the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain's Interfaculty Pain Education Committee developed a 20-h undergraduate pain curriculum to be delivered during a 1-week period. Students from Dentistry, Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy participated as part of their 2nd or 3rd year program. Teaching strategies included large and small groups, Standardized Patients, and 63 facilitators. Evaluation methods included: (a) pre- and post-tests of the Pain Knowledge and Beliefs Questionnaire (PKBQ) and (b) Daily Content and Process Questionnaire (DCPQ) to obtain feedback about process, content, and format across the curriculum's 5 days. A significant improvement in pain knowledge and beliefs was demonstrated (t = 181.28, P < 0.001), although non-responders were problematic at the post-test. DCPQ overall ratings of 'exceeding or meeting expectations' ranged from 74 to 92%. Ratings were highest for the patient-related content and panel, and the small-group discussions with Standardized Patients. Overall evaluations were positive, and statistically significant changes were demonstrated in students' pain knowledge and beliefs. This unique and valuable learning opportunity will be repeated with some modifications next year.

Treatment outcome in endodontics-The Toronto Study. Phases I and II: apical surgery.

This study prospectively assessed the 4 to 8 yr outcome of apical surgery performed by graduate students in phases I and II of the Toronto Study. The study cohort included 155 teeth in 138 patients. Outcome was assessed by a blinded and calibrated examiner. Clinical and radiographic measures were used for a dichotomous outcome: healed (no signs and symptoms, Periapical Index score /= 3). The recall rate was 85% and the overall healed rate 74%. Healed rate was significantly higher for teeth with small (

Clinical decision making for a tooth with apical periodontitis: the patients' preferred level of participation.

INTRODUCTION: To effectively engage patients in clinical decisions regarding the management of teeth with apical periodontitis (AP), there is a need to explore patients' perspectives on the decision-making process. This study surveyed patients for their preferred level of participation in making treatment decisions for a tooth with AP. METHODS: Data were collected through a mail-out survey of 800 University of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry patients, complemented by a convenience sample of 200 patients from 10 community practices. The Control Preferences Scale was used to evaluate the patients' preferences for active, collaborative, or passive participation in treatment decisions for a tooth with AP. Using bivariate and logistic regression analyses, the Gelberg-Andersen Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations was applied to the Control Preferences Scale questions to understand the influential factors (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Among 434 of 1,000 respondents, 44%, 40%, and 16% preferred an active, collaborative, and passive participation, respectively. Logistic regression showed a significant association (P ≤ .025) between participants' higher education and preference for active participation compared with a collaborative role. Also, immigrant status was significantly associated with preference for passive participation (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients valued an active or collaborative participation in deciding treatment for a tooth with AP. This pattern implied a preference for a patient-centered practice mode that emphasizes patient autonomy in decision making.

Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars.

INTRODUCTION: Conservative endodontic cavity (CEC) may improve fracture resistance of teeth but compromise the instrumentation of canals. This study assessed the impacts of CEC on both variables in 3 tooth types. METHODS: Extracted human intact maxillary incisors, mandibular premolars, and molars (n = 20/type) were imaged with micro-computed tomographic imaging (20-µm resolution) and assigned to CEC or traditional endodontic cavity (TEC) groups (n = 10/group/type). Minimal CECs were plotted on scanned images. Canals were prepared with WaveOne instruments (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) using 1.25% sodium hypochlorite and post-treatment micro-computed tomographic images obtained. The proportion of the untouched canal wall (UCW) and the dentin volume removed (DVR) for each tooth type was analyzed with the independent-samples t test. The 60 instrumented and 30 intact teeth (negative control, n = 10/type) were loaded to fracture in the Instron Universal Testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA) (1 mm/min), and the data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test. RESULTS: The mean proportion of UCW was significantly higher (P < .04) only in the distal canals of molars with CEC (57.2% ± 21.7%) compared with TEC (36.7% ± 17.2%). The mean DVR was significantly smaller (P < .003) for CEC than for TEC in incisors (16.09 ± 4.66 vs 23.24 ± 3.38 mm(3)), premolars (8.24 ± 1.64 vs 14.59 ± 4.85 mm(3)), and molars (33.37 ± 67.71 mm(3)). The mean load at fracture for CEC was significantly higher (P < .05) than for TEC in premolars (586.8 ± 116.9 vs 328.4 ± 56.7 N) and molars (1586.9 ± 196.8 vs 641.7 ± 62.0 N). In both tooth types, CEC did not differ significantly from the negative controls. CONCLUSIONS: Although CEC was associated with the risk of compromised canal instrumentation only in the molar distal canals, it conserved coronal dentin in the 3 tooth types and conveyed a benefit of increased fracture resistance in mandibular molars and premolars.

Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NeP), redefined as pain caused by a lesion or a disease of the somatosensory system, is a disabling condition that affects approximately two million Canadians. OBJECTIVE: To review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews related to the pharmacological management of NeP to develop a revised evidence-based consensus statement on its management. METHODS: RCTs, systematic reviews and existing guidelines on the pharmacological management of NeP were evaluated at a consensus meeting in May 2012 and updated until September 2013. Medications were recommended in the consensus statement if their analgesic efficacy was supported by at least one methodologically sound RCT (class I or class II) showing significant benefit relative to placebo or another relevant control group. Recommendations for treatment were based on the degree of evidence of analgesic efficacy, safety and ease of use. RESULTS: Analgesic agents recommended for first-line treatments are gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Tramadol and controlled-release opioid analgesics are recommended as second-line treatments for moderate to severe pain. Cannabinoids are now recommended as third-line treatments. Recommended fourth-line treatments include methadone, anticonvulsants with lesser evidence of efficacy (eg, lamotrigine, lacosamide), tapentadol and botulinum toxin. There is support for some analgesic combinations in selected NeP conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide an updated, stepwise approach to the pharmacological management of NeP. Treatment should be individualized for each patient based on efficacy, side-effect profile and drug accessibility, including cost. Additional studies are required to examine head-to-head comparisons among analgesics, combinations of analgesics, long-term outcomes and treatment of pediatric, geriatric and central NeP.

A survey of patients' preferences for the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.

INTRODUCTION: This research aimed to investigate the preference of patients in Toronto, Canada for management of a tooth affected by painful apical periodontitis when considering its retention via root canal treatment (RCT) and its extraction followed by no replacement, replacement with an implant-supported crown, fixed, or removable partial prostheses. METHODS: Data were collected through a mail-out survey of the University of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry patients, which was complemented by a convenience sample of patients in 10 community practices in Toronto (n = 1000, response rate = 43%). Participants were asked to select their general preference for anterior and posterior teeth with apical periodontitis between saving the tooth or extraction and their specific preference for tooth retention via RCT or extraction. By using bivariate and logistic regression analyses, we applied the Gelberg-Andersen Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations to the preference questions to understand the influential factors (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Participants' specific preference for tooth retention via RCT was slightly but significantly lower than their general preference (anterior tooth, 93.7% versus 97.2%; posterior tooth, 83.8% versus 89.6%; P < .005). Higher annual income, previous RCT, functional dentition, good/excellent self-rated oral health, and regular dental visits were associated with higher preferences for tooth retention in response to different questions. CONCLUSIONS: The high preference for retaining a tooth in general was moderated by the specific consideration of RCT to retain the tooth. When RCT and extraction are viable options, patients should be advised about the treatment options in an impartial manner and encouraged to communicate their preferences.