Real-World Use of Molnupiravir in the Treatment of Outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection-A Patient Profile Based on the Experience of a Tertiary Infectious Disease Center.

During the current pandemic, the gap between fundamental research and clinical practice has been narrowing at a faster pace than ever before. While clinical trials play the main role of confirming the safety and efficacy of new drugs, a drug's introduction into clinical practice creates the need for further research in order to best position the use of the novel drug in terms of when, to whom, and how it would be best administered to achieve the best possible outcome under feasible clinical circumstances. We briefly present the results of a retrospective analysis of the characteristics of outpatients treated with molnupiravir in a tertiary care infectious disease hospital in Bucharest, Romania, between February and March 2022, when Romania was experiencing its fifth wave of COVID-19. A total of 46 outpatients received molnupiravir treatment and had complete clinical data available; of them, 56.5% (n = 20) were males and the median age was 48.5 years (IQR: 37.8, 67.0 years). A total of 54.2% (n = 26) of patients had at least one chronic condition. Of the 45 patients who underwent lung CT imaging evaluation, 13 (28.9%) showed changes suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia. COVID-19 vaccination status was strongly protective for pneumonia (p = 0.002). All patients were symptomatic, and molnupiravir was initiated at a mean time from onset of symptoms of 3.5 (±1.5) days. At phone follow-up 5 days after the initial evaluation and initiation of molnupiravir treatment, all patients, except for one, confirmed a favorable course under treatment, with no worsening of COVID-19 severity and improvement in symptoms; none of them progressed to respiratory failure or required hospitalization. In conclusion, treatment was well tolerated and associated a favorable outcome of COVID-19 in routine practice in a clinical population that was slightly older and had a smaller burden of comorbidities and a higher rate of COVID-19 vaccination compared to that from the pivotal trial.

Treatment initiation or switch to BIC/FTC/TAF - real-world safety and efficacy data from two HIV centers in Romania.

INTRODUCTION: Development of highly active antiretroviral therapy marked an important step forward in the management of people living with HIV and fixed dose combinations are now available to be used as modern antiretroviral regimens. The single-tablet regimen bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) was recently approved in Europe and included in international guidelines and recommendations. It became available in Romania in early 2021. We present the real-world results from a retrospective analysis of patients initiating BIC/FTC/TAF in two HIV centers in Romania. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients treated with BIC/FTC/TAF (first-line or switch) in two HIV centers in Romania, one in Bucharest and one in Iași. We collected data on baseline patient characteristics, reasons for initiation of BIC/FTC/TAF and preliminary clinical and laboratory efficacy, safety and tolerability data. All assessments had been performed according to local practice. Statistical analyses were mostly descriptive and association analysis was performed to assess changes in laboratory parameters from baseline to data cut-off (October 2021). RESULTS: In total, 122 patients were initiated on BIC/FTC/TAF in routine clinical practice from February to October 2021 in the two HIV centers, either as first-line or switch. The majority of patients were male (71%). The median age at baseline was 35.0 years (IQR 32.0-50.8 years). Overall, 91 patients (75%) were treatment-experienced and the most frequent reason for switch was treatment simplification (79%). The mean ± standard deviation follow-up duration on treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF was 101.6 ± 64.2 days until the cut-off date for this analysis. We found no significant changes in lipid values, blood glucose or liver enzymes, coupled with a significant decrease in viral load (p=0.001). A low number of adverse events occurred during the treatment period (n=4): two cases of fatigue and two gastrointestinal reactions. No patient discontinued BIC/FTC/TAF and the overall tolerability was good. CONCLUSIONS: The insights of the first report on BIC/FTC/TAF use in routine clinical practice in Romania provide an overview of effectiveness and safety to local clinicians treating this patient population.