Sex differences in Parkinson's disease-related non motor symptoms: a focus on sleep problems.

Parkinson's disease (PD) symptomatology differs between females and males, yet the contribution of sex on sleep problems needs further analysis. Here, we aimed to investigate sex-specific patterns in the relationship between sleep problems, assessed using the Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS-2), non motor symptoms (NMS), measured by the NMS scale (NMSS), and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), evaluated by the Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ-39), in a large cohort of PD patients. One-hundred-fifty-four PD patients were included in the study. Female PD patients (n = 62) exhibited a higher prevalence of sleep problems than males (n = 92), with nocturnal motor-related sleep issues being the most frequent. Sleep disturbances differently correlated with a range of NMS between the two sexes. In females, sleep problems mostly correlated with pain; on the other hand, sleep disturbances were linked to a frailer phenotype characterized by global dysautonomia, perception disturbances, and impaired cognitive function in males. Whether female PD patients experienced a lower HR-QoL than males, sleep disturbances were associated with a worse HR-QoL in both sexes. In conclusion, sleep problems in PD differently burden the two sexes, suggesting possible different etiopathogenesis, diagnostic investigations, and possibly tailored approaches.

Sleep problems affect quality of life in Parkinson's disease along disease progression.

OBJECTIVES: Non-motor symptoms (NMS) frequently impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). Sleep problems represent one of the main NMS complained by PD patients. In this observation study, sleep problems measured by Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale - 2nd version (PDSS-2), and HRQoL measured by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ39) were quantified in patients with PD ranging from mild to moderate-advanced disease stages, and correlated to motor impairment and anti-PD therapy. METHODS: We included idiopathic PD patients who underwent PDSS-2 and PDQ39. Moreover, we assessed patients' motor symptoms by rating the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - III section (motor examination), patients' PD status following H&Y stage, and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty-four patients with PD were included and distributed for H&Y stage. PDSS-2 and PDQ39 total and sub-items scores significantly increased with the H&Y stage. PDSS-2 total score significantly correlated with PDQ39 total score (γ = 0.63, P < 0.01). Finally, distributing PD patients according to the PDSS-2 cut-off for detecting sleep disturbances, we found in poor sleepers (n = 58) higher PDQ39 scores than good sleepers (n = 89). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep problems are very common in patients with PD and severely impact on HRQoL. Sleep impairment and low HRQoL occur from the early stages of the disease and deteriorate along disease progression. Further studies investigating sleep and quality of life should be planned for targeting sleep improvement to increase HRQoL and possibly reduce motor impairment.

Prevalence and impact of COVID-19 in Parkinson's disease: evidence from a multi-center survey in Tuscany region.

BACKGROUND: If Parkinson's Disease (PD) may represent a risk factor for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is debated and there are few data on the direct and indirect effects of this pandemic in PD patients. OBJECTIVE: In the current study we evaluated the prevalence, mortality and case-fatality of COVID-19 in a PD cohort, also exploring possible risk factors. We also aimed to investigate the effect of lockdown on motor/non-motor symptoms in PD patients as well as their acceptability/accessibility to telemedicine. METHOD: A case-controlled survey about COVID-19 and other clinical features in PD patients living in Tuscany was conducted. In non-COVID-19 PD patients motor/non-motor symptoms subjective worsening during the lockdown as well as feasibility of telemedicine were explored. RESULTS: Out of 740 PD patients interviewed, 7 (0.9%) were affected by COVID-19, with 0.13% mortality and 14% case-fatality. COVID-19 PD patients presented a higher presence of hypertension (p < 0.001) and diabetes (p = 0.049) compared to non-COVID-19. In non-COVID-19 PD population (n = 733) about 70% did not experience a subjective worsening of motor symptoms or mood, anxiety or insomnia. In our population 75.2% of patients was favorable to use technology to perform scheduled visits, however facilities for telemedicine were available only for 51.2% of cases. CONCLUSION: A higher prevalence of COVID-19 respect to prevalence in Tuscany and Italy was found in the PD population. Hypertension and diabetes, as for general population, were identified as risk factors for COVID-19 in PD. PD patients did not experience a subjective worsening of symptoms during lockdown period and they were also favorable to telemedicine, albeit we reported a reduced availability to perform it.