RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance with French guidelines for the prevention of central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections in two university hospitals. METHODS: An observational audit was conducted in 7 wards using a digital tool. RESULTS: The prerequisite of hand hygiene (HH) were respected by 90% of health-care worker; 86% performed HH prior to equipment preparation and 59% repeated it prior to infusion. Wearing gloves when necessary and rinsing were respected in 46.7% and 75.6% of the observations. CONCLUSION: Findings showed an acceptable level of adherence to recommended practices for CVC management. However, barriers of unrespect evidence-based recommendations need to be investigated in depth.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , França , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Higiene das Mãos/normas , Higiene das Mãos/métodos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Between 2013 and 2014 a Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) outbreak occurred in a teaching hospital in France. The outbreak was significant possibly due to the lack of implementation of recommended control measures. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of the lack of adherence to control measures for prevention of VRE acquisition in contact patients taking into account individual risk factors. Contact patients (first two months of the outbreak) with VRE acquisition were compared to patients without VRE acquisition (univariate and logistic regression), in terms of institutional characteristics (unit of hospitalization and isolation measures) and risk factors. Between December 2013 and February 2014, 282 contact patients were included in the study. The prevalence of VRE acquisition was 6.4% (18/282). Significant risk factors for VRE acquisition according to logistic regression analysis were; lack of isolation, hospitalization in the same hospital unit as a VRE carrier patient and lack of isolation (RR=856.8, p=0.001), hospitalization in a specific unit (RR=927.4, p=0.002), McCabe score equal to 2 (RR=5233.6, p=0.008), age (RR=1.2 by year, p=0.011), hemodialysis (RR=36.1, p=0.011), central venous catheter (RR=25.4, p=0.021) and surgery (RR=0.012, p=0.007). Antibiotic use was a significant risk factor for VRE acquisition using univariate analysis (p<10-3). The findings confirm that the factors focused on by the study (lack of isolation and dedicated unit) had a significant effect on VRE acquisition as patient associated factors. It highlights the importance of observance of the guidelines.