Palliative care in small-scale living facilities: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Innovative small-scale facilities for dementia focus on providing quality of life and maintaining the functional abilities of residents while offering residents a home for life. To fulfill the home-for-life principle, palliative care approaches are necessary to maintain quality of life in these facilities. Few studies have reported on how palliative care is provided to residents in small-scale facilities. The aim of our review is to determine the extent to which palliative care approaches are reported in small-scale facilities. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature using recommended methods from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Four databases, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, were searched for studies published from 1995 to 2023. One reviewer completed the title, abstract and full-text screening and data extraction; two additional team members piloted the screening and extraction process and met with the main reviewer to make decisions about article inclusion and ensure consistency and accuracy in the review process. The extracted data was open-coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. The data was then synthesized into themes using palliative care domains for dementia. RESULTS: Of the 800 articles obtained in the search, only ten met the inclusion criteria: six from Japan, two from the Netherlands, and one each from Austria and the United States. In most small-scale facilities, palliative care is important, with facilities prioritizing family involvement and person-centred care, minimizing resident discomfort and enhancing residents' remaining abilities until the end of life. The included studies did not discuss palliative care policies or professional staff training in depth. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of the literature on palliative care in small-scale facilities for individuals with dementia. Most facilities focus on residents' wishes at the end of life to enhance comfort and provide a home-like environment. However, more research is needed to further understand the quality of palliative care approaches in these homes.

Workforce resilience supporting staff in managing stress: A coherent breathing intervention for the long-term care workforce.

BACKGROUND: Staff in long-term care (LTC) homes have long-standing stressors, such as short staffing and high workloads. These stressors increased during the COVID-19 pandemic; better resources are needed to help staff manage stress and well-being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a simple stress management strategy (coherent breathing). METHODS: We conducted a pre-post intervention study to evaluate a self-managed coherent breathing intervention from February to September 2022. The intervention included basic (breathing only) and comprehensive (breathing plus a biofeedback device) groups. Six hundred eighty-six participants were initially recruited (359 and 327 in the comprehensive and basic groups respectively) from 31 LTC homes in Alberta, Canada. Two hundred fifty-four participants completed pre-and post-intervention questionnaires (142 [55.9%] in comprehensive and 112 [44.1%] in basic). Participants were asked to use coherent breathing based on a schedule increasing from 2 to 10 min daily, 5-7 times a week over 8 weeks. Participants completed self-administered online questionnaires pre- and post-intervention to assess outcomes-stress, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, resilience, insomnia, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout. We used a mixed-effects regression model to test the main effect of time (pre- and post-intervention) and group while testing the interaction between time and group and controlling for covariates. RESULTS: We found statistically significant changes from pre- to post-intervention in stress (b = -2.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -3.1, -1.9), anxiety (b = -0.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -0.7, -0.3), depression (b = -0.4, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -0.6, -0.2), insomnia (b = -1.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -2.1, -0.9), and resilience (b = 0.2, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.1, 0.2). We observed no statistically significant differences between the two intervention groups on any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that coherent breathing is a promising strategy for improving stress-related outcomes and resilience. This intervention warrants further, more rigorous testing.