Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiographics ; 43(12): e230060, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943699

RESUMO

Facial aesthetic procedures have become increasingly popular and complex, making knowledge of facial anatomy crucial for achieving desired outcomes without complications. Some of the most common procedures include blepharoplasty, bichectomy, face-lifts, facial implants, thread lifting, and fillers. Blepharoplasty and bichectomy are surgical procedures that respectively aim to restore youthful contours to the periorbita and create a slimmer lower face by removing Bichat fat from the maxillofacial region. Facial implants are used for aesthetic augmentation of the skeletal structure and restoration of facial contour by using biomaterials or autogenous bone grafts. Face-lift surgeries involve incisions and removal of excess skin, and thread lifts involve less invasive procedures performed by inserting threads beneath the skin, with the aim to lift the skin and thus reduce wrinkles and sagging. Fillers improve wrinkles and loss of facial volume, with biologic types made from animal, human, or bacterial sources (such as hyaluronic acid), while synthetic fillers include substances such as paraffin, silicone, calcium hydroxyapatite, polymethylmethacrylate microspheres, polyacrylamide hydrogel, hydroxyethyl-ethyl methacrylate, and poly-l-lactic acid. Synthetic fillers can be classified as rapidly resorbable (<12 months), slowly resorbable (<24 months), or permanent. Imaging modalities such as US, CT, and MRI can help identify and analyze each type of facial aesthetic procedure or filler, as well as their possible complications such as foreign-body granuloma, noninflammatory nodule, late intermittent persistent edema, filler migration, infection, or complications after removal of the buccal fat pad. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center The online slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article.


Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Animais , Humanos , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Silicones , Polimetil Metacrilato
2.
Radiographics ; 42(4): 1177-1195, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35657765

RESUMO

The greater wings of the sphenoid bone (GWS) comprise the components of the sphenoid bone that make up most of the posterior orbital wall and form the anterior and medial parts of the floor of the middle cranial fossa. Many important skull base foramina, which transmit vital neurovascular structures, are present in these paired wings on either side of the central body of the sphenoid bone. A wide variety of diseases can affect the GWS, ranging from benign osseus lesions to malignant primary and secondary bone abnormalities. The complex three-dimensional curved (winged) shape of the GWS and the wide array of pathologic entities that affect this bone can make it challenging for the radiologist to report the imaging findings accurately, especially in relation to the important skull base foramina. The authors describe a systematic approach to understanding the three-dimensional anatomy of the GWS and review important diseases, with the aid of imaging examples. Useful imaging "pearls" that can help in making specific diagnoses are provided throughout the article. ©RSNA, 2022.


Assuntos
Base do Crânio , Osso Esfenoide , Humanos , Base do Crânio/anatomia & histologia , Osso Esfenoide/anatomia & histologia , Osso Esfenoide/diagnóstico por imagem
3.
Radiographics ; 42(2): 522-540, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35119966

RESUMO

The external ear (EE) is an osseous-cartilaginous structure that extends from the auricle to the tympanic membrane. It is divided into two parts: the auricle (or pinna) and the external auditory canal (EAC). Given the ease of access to the EE, imaging studies are not always needed to make a diagnosis. However, when lesions block visual access to areas deep to the EE abnormality, complications are suspected, or there is lack of response to treatment, imaging becomes essential. A basic understanding of the embryologic development and knowledge of the anatomy of the auricle and EAC are useful for accurate diagnosis of EE lesions. Congenital, traumatic, inflammatory, neoplastic, and vascular conditions can affect the EE. An overview of the anatomy and embryologic development of the EE is presented, with discussion and illustrations of common and uncommon conditions that affect EE structures and a focus on the CT and MRI features that are of interest to radiologists. CT is usually the first diagnostic modality used to evaluate the EAC and is the superior method for demonstrating bone changes. MRI provides excellent tissue characterization and enables one to better define lesion extension and perineural tumor spread. In addition, a flowchart to facilitate the differential diagnosis of EE abnormalities is provided. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.


Assuntos
Meato Acústico Externo , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Meato Acústico Externo/anormalidades , Meato Acústico Externo/diagnóstico por imagem , Meato Acústico Externo/patologia , Humanos
4.
Radiographics ; 42(3): 806-821, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35302867

RESUMO

Whether used as a single modality or as part of a combined approach, radiation therapy (RT) plays an essential role in the treatment of several head and neck malignancies. Despite the improvement in radiation delivery techniques, normal structures in the vicinity of the target area remain susceptible to a wide range of adverse effects. Given their high incidence, some of these effects are referred to as expected postradiation changes (eg, mucositis, sialadenitis, and edema), while others are considered true complications, meaning they should not be expected and can even represent life-threatening conditions (eg, radionecrosis, fistulas, and radiation-induced neoplasms). Also, according to their timing of onset, these deleterious effects can be divided into four groups: acute (during RT), subacute (within weeks to months), delayed onset (within months to years), and very delayed onset (after several years).The authors provide a comprehensive review of the most important radiation-induced changes related to distinct head and neck sites, focusing on their typical cross-sectional imaging features and correlating them with the time elapsed after treatment. Radiologists should not only be familiar with these imaging findings but also actively seek essential clinical data at the time of interpretation (including knowledge of the RT dose and time, target site, and manifesting symptoms) to better recognize imaging findings, avoid pitfalls and help guide appropriate management. © RSNA, 2022.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Lesões por Radiação , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Humanos , Pescoço , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA