EndoSuture aneurysm repair versus fenestrated aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare midterm results of EndoAnchors in EndoSuture aneurysm repair (ESAR) versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) in short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: All patients who underwent an ESAR procedure for a short neck AAA at our center between September 2017 and May 2020 were considered for analysis. To form the control group, preoperative computed tomography angiography of patients who underwent FEVAR for juxtarenal AAA between April 2012 and May 2020 were reviewed and patients who met short neck criteria selected. A propensity-matched score on neck length and neck diameter was calculated, resulting in 18 matched pairs. AAA shrinkage, type Ia endoleaks (EL), AAA-related reinterventions, and AAA-related deaths were compared. RESULTS: The median AAA diameter was 54 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 52-61 mm) versus 58 mm (IQR, 53-63 mm) with a median neck length of 8 mm (IQR, 6-12 mm) vs 10 mm (IQR, 6-13 mm) in ESAR and FEVAR patients, respectively. Technical success was 100% in both groups. Procedural success was 94% in the ESAR group versus 100% in the FEVAR group. The median procedure duration was 138 mm (IQR, 113-182 mm) vs 240 mm (IQR, 199-293 mm) ( P < .001) and the median length of stay was 2 days (IQR, 2-3 days) vs 7 days (IQR, 6-7 days) (P < .001) in ESAR and FEVAR patients, respectively. No major hospital complications were observed in ESAR patients compared with two in FEVAR patients (11%) with one transient acute kidney injury and one transient paraplegia. The median follow-up was 23 months (IQR, 19-33 months) vs 36 months (IQR, 22-57 months) with 67% versus 61% AAA shrinkage in the ESAR and FEVAR groups, respectively (P = .73). No type Ia EL, proximal neck-related reinterventions, or AAA-related deaths were observed in either group. No AAA-related reintervention was observed in the ESAR group versus three reinterventions in the FEVAR group (P = .23). CONCLUSIONS: ESAR seems to be a safe technique with no major postoperative complications or reinterventions observed during follow-up. It seems to offer similar midterm results as FEVAR in terms of type Ia EL, aneurysm shrinkage, and aneurysm-related mortality. ESAR seems to be a good off-the-shelf alternative to FEVAR in case of technical constraints.

A Wound Environment Control System to Avoid Major Amputation in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

We report the case of a 58-year-old patient with a diabetic foot lesion at high risk of major amputation successfully treated by a new innovative wound environment control system.

Acute aortoiliac occlusion in a patient with novel coronavirus disease-2019.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome novel coronavirus-2 pandemic is affecting almost every country in the world. Even if the major symptoms of coronavirus disease-2019 are respiratory, different symptoms at presentation are now recognized. Venous thromboembolism has been reported in infected patients and few but increasing cases of arterial thrombosis have been described. We report a case of acute aortoiliac and lower limb artery occlusions in a patient presenting with severe coronavirus disease-2019 infection. The mechanism of the occlusion seemed to be distal embolization from a floating thrombus in the aortic arch caused by a major inflammatory state and virus infection. The patient underwent aortoiliac and lower limb artery mechanical thrombectomy, but required unilateral major amputation.

Natural History of Asymptomatic Superior Mesenteric Arterial Stenosis Depends on Coeliac and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Status.

OBJECTIVE: The benefit of preventive treatment for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis remains uncertain. The latest European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines remain unclear given the lack of data in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate asymptomatic SMA stenosis prognosis according to the presence of associated coeliac artery (CA) and/or inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) stenosis. METHODS: This was a single academic centre retrospective study. The entire computed tomography (CT) database of a single tertiary hospital was reviewed from 2009 to 2016. Two groups were defined: patients with isolated > 70% SMA stenosis (group A) and patients with both SMA and CA and/or IMA > 70% stenosis (group B). Patient medical histories were reviewed to determine the occurrence of mesenteric disease (MD) defined as development of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) or chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI). RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were included. Median follow up was 39 months. There were 24 patients in group A and 53 patients in group B. In group B, eight (10.4%) patients developed MD with a median onset of 50 months. AMI occurred in five patients with a median of 33 months and CMI in three patients with a median of 88 months. Patients of group B developed more MD (0% vs. 15.1%; p = .052). The five year survival rate was 45% without significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with SMA stenosis associated with CA and/or IMA seem to have a higher risk of developing mesenteric ischaemia than patients with isolated SMA stenosis. Considering the low life expectancy of these patients, cardiovascular risk factor assessment and optimisation of medical treatment is essential. Preventive endovascular revascularisation could be discussed for patients with non-isolated > 70% SMA stenosis, taking into account life expectancy.

Analysis of Preoperative CT Scan Can Help Predict Technical Failure of Endovascular Treatment of TASC C-D Aortoiliac Chronic Total Occlusions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To evaluate if features of occlusion analyzable on preoperative computed tomography scan could predict risks of technical failure or iliac rupture of endovascular treatment of TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus C-D aortoiliac chronic total occlusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients treated by endovascular techniques for a TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus C-D aortoiliac chronic total occlusion between 2009 and 2016 were included (107 patients, 148 iliac arteries). We evaluated the location of the occlusion and the importance of the arterial calcifications. For this factor, patients were divided into 3 groups: the Black occlusion group with mild or no calcifications, the white occlusion group with moderate no protrusive calcifications, and the white protrusive occlusion group with heavy endoluminal calcifications. Technical failure occurred in 11 iliac arteries and peroperative iliac rupture in 6. The location in the external iliac artery is the most significate risk factor of technical failure in univariate (OR = 9.93; P = 0.0012) and multivariate analysis (OR = 15.26; P = 0.0006). The presence of heavy endoluminal calcifications is a further significate risk factor (OR = 13.88; P = 0.0365). Rupture rate was comparable between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative computed tomography scan can predict risk of technical failure but not of iliac rupture.

Anatomical Considerations of Infrageniculate Popliteal Artery Puncture: Alternative Pathway for Retrograde Access After Failed Re-entry.

BACKGROUND: A distal approach in endovascular procedures for revascularization of lowers limbs can be considered in case of no re-entry in subintimal recanalization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a medial approach to the infrageniculate popliteal artery (IPA) using existing computed tomography (CT) scan simulation and punctures performed on cadavers. METHODS AND RESULTS: CT angiographies of lower extremities were used to simulate IPA puncture and puncture trajectory. Tissues damaged during the trajectory between the puncture site and the access-related injuries were analyzed. Anatomical punctures on cadaverous model were also performed. Corpses were placed in supine position, the hip in slight flexion (40°) and abduction (external rotation of 60°). A 16 G needle was used for the IPA puncture. Twelve CT angiography simulations were made. Of these 12 simulations, 9 revealed an isolated lesion of the popliteal vein and 2 isolated lesions of the tibial nerve. A lesion of the tibial nerve and the popliteal vein on the same simulation was once observed. Damage to the medial gastrocnemius muscle could not be avoided in each case. Ten punctures were performed on cadavers with technical success. There were 6 popliteal vein lesions, 3 tibial nerve lesions, and 1 case without lesion. In all cases, damage to the medial gastrocnemius muscle was seen. CONCLUSIONS: This medial approach was feasible and is accompanied by trauma of elements of the popliteal pedicle. Preoperative CT angiography could anticipate best site of puncture and potential access-related injury.

The Common Femoral Artery Bifurcation Lesions: Clinical Outcome of Simple Versus Complex Stenting Techniques - An Analysis Based on the TECCO Trial.

BACKGROUND: Common femoral artery (CFA) stenting appears as a promising alternative treatment to the open surgery for de novo CFA stenosis. The stenting of lesions just located at the CFA is simple, whereas stenting of CFA bifurcation lesions is more complex, and outcomes are still matter of debate. The aim of this study was to describe and to compare clinical outcomes of techniques used to treat simple over complex lesions for the stenting of CFA lesions. MATERIALS/METHODS: From the French randomized controlled trial, TECCO, a total of 54 patients underwent stenting intervention and were enrolled in this study. Patients were excluded if they had CFA thrombosis, restenosis, and nonatheromatous lesions. Patients were classified by simple and complex lesions based on the type of lesion. The primary end point was the primary sustained clinical improvement. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in the simple lesion group, and 36 patients, in the complex lesion group. Baseline characteristics of patients were comparable between the 2 groups. The technical success was 100% in the simple lesion group and 91.7% in the complex lesion group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups, regarding the primary sustained clinical improvement. The primary patency rates at 24 months for simple and complex lesion groups were 86.3% and 79%, respectively (P = 0.66). Freedom from target lesion revascularization was of 93.3% and 82% in the simple and complex lesion group, respectively (P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The stenting technique for CFA bifurcation lesions is a safe and effective technique. More trials with a large number of patients are needed to define the optimal stenting technique.

Association between physical activity and sedentary behaviour on carotid atherosclerotic plaques: an epidemiological and histological study in 90 asymptomatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid atherosclerotic plaques are a source of emboli for stroke. 'Unstable' carotid atherosclerotic plaques may have intraplaque haemorrhages, neovessels, prevalent macrophages, excessive calcium deposits, a large lipid core and a thin fibrous cap. Regular physical activity (PA) may lower the risk of plaques becoming unstable. We evaluated the association of both PA and sedentary behaviour (SB) with carotid plaque histopathology. METHODS: 90 asymptomatic patients who were undergoing carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery narrowing identified on ultrasound reported their PA and SB by questionnaires. We calculated PA intensity in MET (metabolic equivalent of task)-min/week. For analysis, the population was divided into tertiles according to PA (T1PA: the less PA patients; T2PA: the intermediate PA patients; T3PA: the most physically active patients) (T1PA900 and <900 MET-min/week, respectively). All the other features that associate with plaque instability (eg, neovessels, macrophages, etc) did not differ by level of PA or SB. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study of asymptomatic patients who underwent endarterectomy (i) higher reported PA, (ii) intensity of PA and (iii) lower reported SB were associated with lower prevalence of intraplaque haemorrhage. This could be a mechanism whereby PA protects against cerebrovascular disease (stroke) and death.

Results of retrograde open mesenteric stenting for acute thrombotic mesenteric ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an emergent event with a high mortality rate; survivors have high rates of intestinal failure. Restoration of blood flow using endovascular or surgical revascularization is associated with better outcome in terms of survival rate and intestinal resection. Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS), which is a hybrid technique, combines two benefits: prompt blood flow restoration with an endovascular approach and inspection and resection of the small bowel. The aim of the study was to assess the results of ROMS in thrombotic AMI in a retrospective multicenter study. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled all consecutive patients who underwent ROMS revascularization for occlusive thrombotic AMI in three participating tertiary care centers between November 2012 and March 2017. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (14 men and 11 women; mean age, 64.9 ± 11.6 years) were included. In two patients, ROMS was not possible because of failure of re-entry in the aortic lumen (technical success, 92%). One patient required revascularization of two visceral arteries and underwent an aortohepatic bypass. Five patients (20%) underwent endarterectomy and patch angioplasty of the superior mesenteric artery before retrograde stenting. Thirteen patients (52%) required bowel or colon resection (11 patients required both resections) during the initial procedure with a mean length of small bowel resection of 52 ± 87 cm. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 25%, and the overall 1-year survival rate was 65%. The 1-year primary patency rate was 92%. In one patient, postoperative imaging at 1 month showed stent migration in the aortic bifurcation. CONCLUSIONS: ROMS for thrombotic AMI has a high technical success rate and a high midterm primary patency rate. It could be an alternative procedure to retrograde superior mesenteric artery bypass for patients when percutaneous endovascular revascularization is not indicated or has failed.

What Is the Secondary Patency of Thrombosed Bypasses of the Lower Limbs Cleared by Fibrinolysis In Situ?

BACKGROUND: In case of acute thrombosis, lower limb bypasses can, in certain cases, be cleared by local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF). The aim of this study is to evaluate the secondary patency of thrombosed bypasses after fibrinolysis. METHODS: This retrospective study includes all patients hospitalized for thrombosed bypasses of the lower limbs that were treated with in situ fibrinolysis using urokinase, between 2004 and 2013, in 2 French university hospital centers. Fibrinolysis was indicated in case of recent thrombosis (<3 weeks) provoking acute limb ischemia without sensory-motor deficit and in the absence of general contraindications. The secondary patency of the grafts was defined as the time after fibrinolysis without a new thrombotic event. RESULTS: There were 207 patients, hospitalized for recent thrombosis of 244 bypasses. The LIF was efficient in 74% of the cases (n = 180). Secondary patency of these bypasses was 54.2% and 32.4% overall, 68.3% and 50.3% for the suprainguinal bypasses, and 48.3% and 21.5% for the infrainguinal bypasses at 1 and 5 years, respectively. There is a significant difference (P = 0.002) regarding the permeability of the suprainguinal and infrainguinal bypasses. The survival rate was 75% (±6.4%) at 5 years and the limb salvage rate was 89% (±3.3%), 78.2% (±5.1%), and 75% (±5.8%) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The only independent factor influencing the secondary patency of infrainguinal bypasses that was significant in a multivariate analysis was the infragenicular localization of the distal anastomosis (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: LIF is an effective approach that often allows the identification of the underlying cause, permitting elective adjunctive treatment of the underlying cause. Although LIF is at least as effective as its therapeutic alternatives described in the literature, the secondary patency of the bypasses remains modest and encourages close monitoring, particularly in patients with an infragenicular bypass.

Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms Using Combination of Renal and Visceral Bypass and Fenestrated/Branched Stent Grafts.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report our experience of treatment of aortic aneurysms using combination of renal and visceral arteries bypasses and fenestrated/branched stent graft in various complex anatomical situations. METHODS: Between November 2005 and March 2017, 10 patients underwent a hybrid strategy combining bypasses for renal and/or visceral arteries and custom-made fenestrated/branched stent grafts. Two patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm (1 juxtarenal and 1 suprarenal), and 8 patients had thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (1 type I, 2 type II including one dissection, 2 type III, 1 type IV, and 2 type V). In total, 37 renal and visceral arteries were targeted, of which 23 were treated using fenestrated or branched stent graft and 14 were treated by bypass (11 to renal artery and 3 to celiac trunk). RESULTS: Technical success was 100%, and no patient died during a mean follow-up of 24.3 ± 21 months. Six patients had 7 postoperative complications after bypass surgery, and 3 patients had 3 complications after fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR/BEVAR) procedure. Seven reinterventions were performed in 3 patients. No occlusion of target vessels occurred. Renal function was stable during follow-up in all patients except one who developed end-stage renal failure requiring permanent dialysis. On the last follow-up computed tomography scan, aneurysm diameter decreased for 6 patients, was stable for 3 patients, and increased for one patient, in which persistent type II endoleak was observed. Aneurysm exclusion was complete in the remaining 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of FEVAR/BEVAR procedures with renal and/or visceral artery bypass in patients with complex aortic aneurysms is feasible with acceptable results. Morbidity associated with bypass surgery has to be carefully balanced with the risk of catheterization difficulties in the setting of adverse anatomical features of the visceral/renal arteries or the aorta.

Correction to: Comments on Chavent et al.: Renovascular hypertension: results in adulthood of renal autotransplantation performed in children.

In the name of the first author, the element "Della" was misinterpreted as a second given name. In fact, it is part of her surname.

Effects on Mortality and Cardiovascular Events of Adherence to Guideline-Recommended Therapy 4 Years after Lower Extremity Arterial Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: All patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LE-PAD) should benefit from recommended pharmacologic therapies including antiplatelet agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors (statins). In the present study, this triple therapy was defined as the best medical treatment. This study was designed to determine the current risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality and also to evaluate the effect of pharmacologic treatment on patient's survival, CV events, and additional vascular surgery in vascularized LE-PAD patients. This observational, cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data of 140 consecutive patients after hospitalization for LE-PAD revascularization in the vascular surgery department of our university hospital, between January 1 and June 30, 2013. METHODS: Data from guideline-recommended classes of medications (ACE, ARB, statins, and antiplatelet agents or anticoagulation) were collected at the time of discharge to hospitalization and at the end of the follow-up. Information about mortality, CV events, and additional vascular surgery was collected during follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of patients was 41 months. Mortality and CV events concerned 24% and 12% of the patients, respectively, and additional vascular surgery was performed in 33% of the patients. There was no difference in mortality and CV event rates according to pharmacologic treatment. Additional vascular surgery rate of LE-PAD patients with best medical treatment tended to be lower than without (incidence rate ratio = 0.5777; 95% confidence interval, 0.3101-1.06; P = 0.08). Best medical treatment was prescribed in 54% of patients at discharge of hospitalization. This proportion (54%) was statistically unchanged at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort, we failed to show that best medical treatment decreased mortality or CV event rates, but it tended to be associated with decreased additional vascular surgery rate. Further studies taking into consideration the control of CV risk factors could be interesting to demonstrate better outcome from LE-PAD patients with best medical treatment compared with LE-PAD patients without. There is an urgent need for a more effective implementation of currently recommended medication and a continued search after more effective pharmacologic treatment options in LE-PAD.

How Admission to a Vascular Surgery Department Improves Medical Treatment in Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: All patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LE-PAD) should benefit from recommended pharmacologic therapies including antiplatelet agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins). In the present study, this triple therapy was defined as the best medical treatment. This study was designed to determine the number of patients who received best medical treatment at admission and at discharge from a vascular surgery department. We also examined the number of patients who received adapted medical treatment and every pharmacologic class separately. Finally, we investigated whether there were differences in prescribing rates according to patient characteristics and cardiovascular history, clinical grade of LE-PAD, and the type of surgery practiced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart analysis of 140 consecutive patients admitted to the vascular surgery department of our university hospital, between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2013. To be included, patients required a vascular surgery for peripheral arterial disease with atherosclerosis. Data from guideline-recommended classes of medications (antiplatelet agents, ACE, ARBs, and statins) at the time of admission and discharge were collected and compared. RESULTS: Best medical treatment was prescribed in 44% patients before hospital admission and in 50% at discharge (P = 0.10). Before hospital admission, 84% of patients had antiplatelet therapy compared with 96% at discharge (P = 0.0004); 73% had a statin, compared with 83% at discharge (P = 0.001); 64% had an ACE inhibitor or ARB, compared with 63% at the time of discharge (P = 1).The proportion of patients receiving best medical treatment at admission and discharge increased in case of coronary artery disease (P = 0.004). There was no difference in prescriptions of best medical treatment and best or adapted treatments at admission and discharge according to the severity of LE-PAD or type of revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Admission to a vascular department significantly increased the rate of prescription of antiplatelet and statin therapy, but no significant improvement was achieved for the prescription of best medical treatment and best or adapted treatments.