Thromboembolic complications after COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.

AIM: Increased venous thrombosis and arterial embolism rates are observed in the general population during or after COVID-19. Data regarding the kidney transplant population are scarce. In this study, we aim to investigate the thrombotic complications and risk factors associated with thrombotic complications in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and June 2022. The endpoint was the occurrence of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-nine patients were followed for a median of 10.8 months after COVID-19. Forty patients (8.5%) died. Thromboembolic complications developed in 51 (11.9%) of the surviving patients. Twenty-four patients with thromboembolic events were receiving prophylactic anticoagulation before the event. The patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 were 292, 129, and 48, respectively. Patients with moderate COVID-19 had a significantly higher percentage of thromboembolic complications than patients with mild COVID-19. Older age, prior heart disease, and moderate COVID-19 were significantly associated with thromboembolic events. The incidence of thromboembolic events after COVID-19 is 10.9 per 100 patient-year. CONCLUSION: Thromboembolic complications were observed at increased rates in kidney transplant recipients after COVID-19. Therefore, prospective and cohort studies for post-COVID-19 complications regarding the treatment modalities are urgently needed.

The 3-Step Model of informed consent for living kidney donation: a proposal on behalf of the DESCaRTES Working Group of the European Renal Association.

Living donation challenges the ethical principle of non-maleficence in that it exposes healthy persons to risks for the benefit of someone else. This makes safety, informed consent (IC) and education a priority. Living kidney donation has multiple benefits for the potential donor, but there are also several known short- and long-term risks. Although complete standardization of IC is likely to be unattainable, studies have emphasized the need for a standardized IC process to enable equitable educational and decision-making prospects for the prevention of inequities across transplant centers. Based on the Three-Talk Model of shared decision-making by Elwyn et al., we propose a model, named 3-Step (S) Model, where each step coincides with the three ideal timings of the process leading the living donor to the decision to pursue living donation: prior to the need for kidney replacement therapy (team talk); at the local nephrology unit or transplant center, with transplant clinicians and surgeons prior to evaluations start (option talk); and throughout evaluation, after having learned about the different aspects of donation, especially if there are second thoughts or doubts (decision talk). Based on the 3-S Model, to deliver conceptual and practical guidance to nephrologists and transplant clinicians, we provide recommendations for standardization of the timing, content, modalities for communicating risks and assessment of understanding prior to donation. The 3-S Model successfully allows an integration between standardization and individualization of IC, enabling a person-centered approach to potential donors. Studies will assess the effectiveness of the 3-S Model in kidney transplant clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of interleukin-1 blockers in kidney transplant recipients with familial Mediterranean fever: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Data on use of interleukin (IL)-1 blockers in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) are very limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra and canakinumab in the transplantation setting. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included KTRs who suffered from AA amyloidosis caused by FMF and treated with anakinra or canakinumab (study group, n = 36). Using propensity score matching, we selected 36 patients without FMF or amyloidosis from our database of 696 KTRs as the control group. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival. Biopsy-confirmed graft rejection, changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), proteinuria and number of monthly attacks were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: All KTRs with FMF began IL-1 blocker therapy with anakinra and nine (25%) were switched to canakinumab. Overall death was more frequent in the study group (19.4% vs 0%) (P = .005); however, overall graft loss was comparable between study (27.8%) and control groups (36.1%) (P = .448). Five- and 10-year graft survival rates were significantly higher in the study group (94.4% and 83.3%, respectively) than in the control group (77.8% and 63.9%, respectively) (P = .014 and P < .001, respectively). Rejections were numerically lower in study group (8.3% vs 25%), but it did not reach to statistical significance (P = .058). When compared with the pre-treatment period, with IL-1 blockers, the number of attacks per month (P < .001), and eGFR (P = .004), hsCRP (P < .001) and ESR (P = .026) levels were lower throughout the follow-up, whereas proteinuria levels were not. CONCLUSIONS: Anakinra and canakinumab are effective in KTRs suffering from FMF; however, the mortality rate may be of concern.

Outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: a propensity-score-matched analysis with case-control design.

BACKGROUND: We compared long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation (KTx) in patients with and without congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). METHODS: KTx recipients (KTRs) with CAKUT in 1980-2016 were identified; their hard copy and electronic medical records were reviewed and compared to a propensity-score-matched control group (non-CAKUT) from the same period. The primary outcomes were graft loss or death with a functioning graft; secondary outcomes included posttransplant urinary tract infections (UTIs) and biopsy-proven rejection (BPR). RESULTS: : We identified 169 KTRs with CAKUT and 169 matched controls. Median follow-up was 132 (IQR: 75.0-170.0) months. UTIs were more common in CAKUT patients compared to non-CAKUT group (20.7% vs 10.7%; p = 0.01). Rates of BPR were similar between the two groups. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, 10-year graft survival rates were significantly higher in the CAKUT group than in the non-CAKUT group (87.6% vs 69.2%; p < 0.001), while patient survival rates were similar. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, CAKUT (HR: 0.469; 95% CI: 0.320-0.687; p < 0.001) and PRA positivity before transplantation (HR: 3.756; 95% CI: 1.507-9.364; p = 0.005) predicted graft loss. DISCUSSION: Graft survival in KTRs with CAKUT appears superior to KTRs without CAKUT. Transplant centers should develop multidisciplinary educational and social working groups to support and encourage CAKUT patients with kidney failure to seek for transplants.

Genotype-Phenotype correlations of SCARB2 associated clinical presentation: a case report and in-depth literature review.

BACKGROUND: Biallelic pathogenic variants in the SCARB2 gene have been associated with action myoclonus-renal failure (AMRF) syndrome. Even though SCARB2 associated phenotype has been reported to include typical neurological characteristics, depending on the localization and the feature of the pathogenic variants, clinical course and the presentations have been shown to differ. CASE PRESENTATION: Whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis revealed a homozygous truncating variant (p.N45MfsX88) in SCARB2 gene in the index case, and subsequent sanger sequencing analysis validated the variant in all affected family members from a Turkish family with the clinical characteristics associated with AMRF and related disorders. Intrafamilial clinical heterogeneity with common features including dysarthria, tremor and proteinuria, and distinct features such as peripheral neuropathy (PNP), myoclonus and seizures between the affected cases, was observed in the family. In-depth literature review enabled the detailed investigation of the reported variants associated with AMRF and suggested that while the type of the variant did not have a major impact on the course of the clinical characteristics, only the C terminal localization of the pathogenic variant significantly affected the clinical presentation, particularly the age at onset (AO) of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we showed that biallelic SCARB2 pathogenic variants might cause a spectrum of common and distinct features associated with AMRF. Of those features while the common features include myoclonus (100%), ataxia (96%), tonic clonic seizures (82%), dysarthria (68%), tremor (65%), and renal impairment (62%), the uncommon features involve PNP (17%), hearing loss (6.8%), and cognitive impairment (13.7%). AO has been found to be significantly higher in the carriers of the p.G462DfsX34 pathogenic variant. SCARB2 pathogenic variants have not been only implicated in AMRF but also in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Gaucher disease (GD), suggesting the importance of genetic and functional studies in the clinical and the diagnostic settings. Given the proven role of SCARB2 gene in the pathogenesis of AMRF, PD and GD with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, investigation of the possible modifiers, such as progranulin and HSP7, has a great importance.

Efficacy of intravenous combined immunosuppression with plasmapheresis in adult patients with refractory primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) treatment is based on immunosuppressive therapies. Since refractory disease is common, alternative methods are emerging. One of these methods is plasmapheresis with intravenous cyclosporine and corticosteroids, and it could be an option in post-transplant recurrent FSGS. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of this combined treatment in adult patients with refractory primary FSGS. METHODS: Seven refractory primary FSGS patients were included. Demographics, estimated glomerular filtration rates, serum albumin levels, urine protein/creatinine ratios, and previous treatments were evaluated. Also, complications and remission rates were assessed. RESULTS: Median patient age was 23 years. Median duration of diagnosis was 2 years. Median number of plasmapheresis sessions was 14. Five of seven patients (71.4%, one complete, four partial remissions) were responders after the protocol. Changes in serum albumin levels and proteinuria after protocol were statistically significant (P = 0.018 and P = 0.018, respectively). eGFR levels did not change statistically (P = 0.753). Median follow-up duration after the treatment was 17 months. However, two patients experienced disease relapse (28.5%). End-stage kidney disease was developed in two patients. Sustained remission rate was 42.8% during follow-up (One complete and two partial remissions). Also, 42.8% of patients experienced catheter infections. Catheter-associated thrombosis that required surgery was observed in a patient. CONCLUSIONS: Plasmapheresis combined with intravenous cyclosporine and corticosteroids could be an option in refractory primary FSGS. High response rates after this protocol were encouraging. However, the relapsing disease was observed after the cessation of apheresis. Also, complications of the protocol could limit the applicability.

COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Experience from the First Two Waves of Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of complications from COVID-19. However, data on the risk of allograft damage or death in kidney transplant recipients recovering from COVID-19 is limited. In addition, the first and second waves of the pandemic occurred at different times all over the world. In Turkey, the Health Minister confirmed the first case in March 2020; after that, the first wave occurred between March and August 2020; afterward, the second wave began in September 2020. This study aims to demonstrate the clinical presentations of kidney transplant recipients in the first two waves of the pandemic in Turkey and explore the impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes after the initial episode. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 from seven centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. Initially, four hundred and eighty-eight kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021 were enrolled. The endpoints were the occurrence of all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury, cytokine storm, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In addition, longer-term outcomes such as mortality, need for dialysis, and allograft function of the surviving patients was analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-five patients were followed up for a median of 132 days after COVID-19. Forty-seven patients (9.9%) died after a median length of hospitalization of 15 days. Although the mortality rate (10.1% vs. 9.8%) and intensive care unit admission (14.5% vs. 14.5%) were similar in the first two waves, hospitalization (68.8% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (44.2% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.009), acute respiratory distress syndrome (18.8% vs. 16%; p = 0.456), and cytokine storm rate (15.9% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.072) were higher in first wave compared to the second wave. These 47 patients died within the first month of COVID-19. Six (1.4%) of the surviving patients lost allografts during treatment. There was no difference in the median serum creatinine clearance of the surviving patients at baseline (52 mL/min [IQR, 47-66]), first- (56 mL/min [IQR, 51-68]), third- (51 mL/min [IQR,48-67]) and sixth-months (52 mL/min [IQR, 48-81]). Development of cytokine storm and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were independent predictors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality remains a problem in COVID-19. All the deaths occur in the first month of COVID-19. Also, acute kidney injury is common in hospitalized patients, and some of the patients suffer from graft loss after the initial episode.

LIMS1 risk genotype and T cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to examine the association of LIM zinc finger domain containing 1 (LIMS1) genotype with allograft rejection in an independent kidney transplant cohort. METHODS: We genotyped 841 kidney transplant recipients for the LIMS1 rs893403 variant by Sanger sequencing followed by polymerase chain reaction confirmation of the deletion. Recipients who were homozygous for the LIMS1 rs893403 genotype GG were compared with the AA/AG genotypes. The primary outcome was T cell-mediated or antibody-mediated rejection (TCMR or ABMR, respectively) and secondary outcome was allograft loss. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.4 years, the rate of TCMR was higher in recipients with the GG genotype (n = 200) compared with the AA/AG genotypes (n = 641) [25 (12.5%) versus 35 (5.5%); P = 0.001] while ABMR did not differ by genotype [18 (9.0%) versus 62 (9.7%)]. Recipients with the GG genotype had 2.4 times higher risk of TCMR than those who did not have this genotype [adjusted hazard ratio2.43 (95% confidence interval 1.44-4.12); P = 0.001]. A total of 189 (22.5%) recipients lost their allografts during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year (94.3% versus 94.4%; P = 0.99) and 10-year graft survival rates (86.9% versus 83.4%; P = 0.31) did not differ significantly in the GG versus AA/AG groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that recipient LIMS1 risk genotype is associated with an increased risk of TCMR after kidney transplantation, confirming the role of the LIMS1 locus in allograft rejection. These findings may have clinical implications for the prediction and clinical management of kidney transplant rejection by pretransplant genetic testing of recipients and donors for LIMS1 risk genotype.

Significance of caveolin-1 immunohistochemical staining differences in biopsy samples from kidney recipients with BK virus viremia.

BK virus infections which usually remains asymptomatic in healthy adults may have different clinical manifestations in immunocompromised patient population. BK virus reactivation can cause BK virus nephropathy in 8% of kidney transplant patients and graft loss may be seen if not treated. Clathrin or Caveolar system is known to be required for the transport of many viruses from Polyomaviruses family including BK viruses. In this study, kidney transplant patients with BK virus viremia were divided into two groups according to the BK virus nephropathy found in kidney biopsy (Group I: Viremia+, Nephropathy+ / Group II: Viremia+, Nephropathy-). Kidney biopsies were examined with immunohistochemical staining to determine the distribution and density of the Caveolin-1 and Clathrin molecules. Immunohistochemical staining of the 31 pathologic specimens with anti-caveolin-1 immunoglobulin revealed statistically significant difference between group-I and group-II. The number of the specimens stained with anti-caveolin-1 was less in group I. On the other hand, we did not find any difference between the groups regarding the anti-clathrin immunochemical analysis. According to these findings, caveolin-1 expression differences in kidney transplant patients may be important in disease progression.

Antibody response to two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has high mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is vital for this population. Although the humoral response to messenger RNA vaccines was shown to be impaired in KTR, there is a lack of data regarding the antibody response to inactivated vaccines. We investigated the antibody response to two consequent doses of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac; Sinovac Biotech, China). METHODS: A total of 118 patients from two centers were included. The levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G antibodies against the nucleocapsid and spike antigens were determined with enzyme immunoassay (DIA.PRO; Milano, Italy) before the vaccine and one month after the second dose of the vaccine. Thirty-three patients were excluded due to antibody positivity in the serum samples obtained before vaccination. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients, 47 of whom were female, with a mean age of 46 ± 12, were included in the statistical analysis. The maintenance immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (88.2%), mycophenolate (63.6%), and low-dose steroids (95.3%) in the majority of the patients. After a median of 31 days following the second dose of the vaccine, only 16 (18.8%) patients developed an antibody response. The median (IQR) antibody level was 52.5 IU/ml (21.5-96). Age (48 vs. 38, p = .005) and serum creatinine levels (1.14 vs. 0.91, p = .04) were higher in non-responders and were also found to be independently associated with the antibody response (odds ratio (OR): 0.93, p = 0.012 and 0.15, p = 0.045, respectively) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found the antibody response to the inactivated vaccine to be considerably low (18.8%) in KTR. Increased age and impaired renal function were associated with worse antibody response. Based on the knowledge that mRNA vaccines yield better humoral responses, this special population might be considered for additional doses of mRNA vaccination.

COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter experience in Istanbul.

INTRODUCTION: Management of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients should include treatment of the infection, regulation of immunosuppression, and supportive therapy. However, there is no consensus on this issue yet. This study aimed to our experiences with kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 from five major transplant centers in Istanbul, Turkey, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified as having moderate or severe pneumonia for the analysis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were acute kidney injury, the average length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care, and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Forty patients were reviewed retrospectively over a follow-up period of 32 days after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Cough, fever, and dyspnea were the most frequent symptoms in all patients. The frequency of previous induction and rejection therapy was significantly higher in the group with severe pneumonia compared to the moderate pneumonia group. None of the patients using cyclosporine A developed severe pneumonia. Five patients died during follow-up in the intensive care unit. None of the patients developed graft loss during follow-up. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 has been seen to more commonly cause moderate or severe pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients. Immunosuppression should be carefully reduced in these patients. Induction therapy with lymphocyte-depleting agents should be carefully avoided in kidney transplant recipients during the pandemic period.

Variations of type IV collagen-encoding genes in patients with histological diagnosis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), an important cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), covers a spectrum of clinicopathological syndromes sharing a common glomerular lesion, based on an injury of podocytes caused by diverse insults to glomeruli. Although it is well expressed in many reports that the term FSGS is not useful and applicable to a single disease, particularly in genetic studies, FSGS continues to be used as a single clinical diagnosis. Distinguishing genetic forms of FSGS is important for the treatment and overall prognosis because secondary forms of FSGS, produced by rare pathogenic variations in podocyte genes, are not good candidates for immunosuppressive treatment. Over the past decade, several next generation sequencing (NGS) methods have been used to investigate the patients with steroid resistance nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) or FSGS. Pathogenic variants in COL4A3, COL4A4, or COL4A5 genes have been frequently identified in patients with histologic diagnosis of FSGS. The contribution of these mostly heterozygous genetic variations in FSGS pathogenesis and the clinical course of patients with these variations have not been well characterized. This review emphasizes the importance of appropriate approach in selection and diagnosis of cases and interpretation of the genetic data in these studies and suggests a detailed review of existing clinical variant databases using newly available population genetic data.

COSMC expression as a predictor of remission in IgA nephropathy.

PURPOSE: The impact of core 1,3-galactosyltransferase-specific molecular chaperon (COSMC) gene expression and methylation profile on clinical progression of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance and the relation of the COSMC gene expression and methylation pattern with the progression of IgAN. METHODS: Thirty-nine biopsy-confirmed IgAN patients, 11 healthy relatives and 20 healthy controls were recruited. The COSMC mRNA levels and methylation profile of COSMC gene promoter were measured using the quantitative real-time PCR. The galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) levels were measured using ELISA in serum and cell culture supernatant. The effect of IL-4 and AZA on COSMC expression and methylation and the correlation of COSMC gene expression and methylation levels with baseline kidney function tests, histology and long-term outcomes were examined. RESULTS: The mean COSMC mRNA level was significantly lower, and serum Gd-IgA1 level was higher in IgAN patients compared with the control groups (p < 0.001, and p = < 0.001, respectively). The COSMC mRNA levels were correlated with intensity of hematuria (r = - 0.41, p = 0.009), serum creatinine level (r = - 0.37, p = 0.002) and eGFR (r = 0.36, p = 0.002). The COSMC methylation levels were correlated with age (r = 0.25, p = 0.04) and baseline eGFR (r = - 0.326, p = 0.006). Twenty IgAN patients (51.3%) reached to complete (5, 12.8%) or partial remission (15, 38.5%) after a median of 34.5 months (IQR, 13.75-71). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, COSMC mRNA expression (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.871, 95% CI 1.287-2.722, p = 0.001) and Oxford T score (aHR 0.355, 95% CI 0.146-0.859, p = 0.022) predicted the remission. CONCLUSION: COSMC mRNA level is a novel biomarker candidate to predict the remission in IgAN patients.

Long-term Effects of Gastric Acid Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Objectives: Prophylactic acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors or H2 receptor antagonists is often administered after kidney transplantation. The Association of proton pump inhibitors or H2 receptor antagonists with acute rejection, hypomagnesemia, and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients is not well established. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 302 kidney transplant recipients at one center (57% male; mean age 35.5±11.2 years) with more than 6 months post-transplant follow-up. Recipients were grouped according to gastric acid prophylaxis: only proton pump inhibitors (n=179), only H2 receptor antagonists (n=42), proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists (n=55), and nonusers (n=26). The primary outcome was biopsy-proven acute rejection. Graft loss and hypomagnesemia were defined as secondary outcomes. Results: Nonusers were younger and mostly under steroid-free immunosuppression compared to other study groups (p=0.030 and p=0.009, respectively). The primary outcome was similar across study groups (p=0.266). Kaplan-Meier analyses also demonstrated similar 10-year graft survival rates: 95.5% for proton pump inhibitors, 97.6% for H2 receptor antagonists, 100% for proton pump inhibitors/H2 receptor antagonists, and 96.2% for nonusers (p=0.275). Conclusions: The use of proton pump inhibitors is not associated with acute rejection or graft loss but may cause mild hypomagnesemia in kidney transplant recipients.

A comparison of methods of plasmapheresis for the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the outcomes associated with plasma exchange (PE), double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), or immunoadsorption (IA) in the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection (AMR). METHODS: Sixty-nine kidney transplantation (KTx) recipients with late AMR were retrospectively categorized according to management with PE (n = 30), DFPP (n = 22) or IA (n = 17). Allograft loss was compared across treatment groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. RESULTS: Study groups were similar regarding age, sex, donor type, kidney function, donor specific antibodies, and post-KTx follow-up time. Five-year graft survival trended higher with IA (70.6%) compared to PE (36.7%) and DFPP (27.3%) (p = 0.06). In multivariate Cox regression, baseline eGFR (HR per ml/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI]; 0.96 [0.94-0.99]), rituximab use (HR [95% CI]; 0.42 [0.21-0.84]), interstitial inflammation (i) (HR [95% CI]; 2.05 [1.13-3.69]), and transplant glomerulopathy (cg) (HR [95% CI]; 1.46 [1.13-1.87]) were associated with graft loss. CONCLUSION: These results motivate the need for continued assessment of rituximab and plasmapheresis in larger studies.

Immunosuppression of HLA identical living-donor kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant (KT) recipients of HLA identical siblings (HLAid) have lower immunological risk, but there are no specific recommendations for immunosuppression. Our aim was to analyze evidence about results from HLAid living-donor recipients under different immunosuppression in the current era of immunological risk assessment. METHODS: Systematic review of studies describing associations between outcomes of HLAid living-donor KT recipients according to their immunological risk and applied immunosuppression. RESULTS: From 1351 studies, 16 (5636 KT recipients) were included in the analysis. All studies were retrospective, ten comparing immunosuppression strategies, and six immunological risk strata. Of those ten, six studies were published in 1990 or earlier and only three included tacrolimus. The evidence is poor, and the inclusion of calcineurin inhibitors does not demonstrate better results. Furthermore, only few studies describe different immunosuppression regimens according to the patient immunological risk and, in general, they do not include the assessment with new solid phase assays. CONCLUSIONS: There are no studies analyzing the association of outcomes of HLAid KT recipients with current immunological risk tools. In the absence of evidence, no decision or proposal of immunosuppression adapted to modern immunological risk assessment can be made currently by the Descartes Working Group.

Differences in clinical outcomes of COVID-19 among vaccinated and unvaccinated kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The remarkable efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines have been described in healthy individuals, but kidney transplant recipients have been excluded from these studies. Therefore, real-world evidence of these vaccines can guide clinicians in predicting complications in kidney transplant recipients and how many doses of vaccines are protective. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 vaccines on kidney transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This matched case-control study included vaccinated kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 from two centers between 1 May and 1 October 2021. All patients in the vaccinated group received a minimum of two doses of the vaccine and were diagnosed with COVID-19 at least one month after the last dose. Each vaccinated patient was matched with an unvaccinated kidney transplant recipient diagnosed with COVID. The endpoints were all-cause mortality, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, acute kidney injury, cytokine storm, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. RESULTS: The median age of vaccinated seventy-two participants was 45 years, and 41 of the participants were men in the vaccinated group. Four patients in the vaccinated group and nine patients in the control group died during follow-up (p = 0.247). Seventeen patients in the vaccinated group, thirty-four participants in the control group were hospitalized (p = 0.004); five vaccinated patients and ten unvaccinated patients were followed-up in the ICU during follow-up (p = 0.168). Thirteen of the vaccinated and twelve unvaccinated patients developed acute kidney injury (p = 0.16). The occurrence of cytokine storm (n = 4 vs. n = 11; p = 0.061) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 5 vs. n = 10; p = 0.168) was higher in the patient group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 remains a fatal disease despite advancing treatment modalities and preventive strategies. COVID-19 vaccines can't prevent death in all kidney transplant recipients, but they decrease hospitalization rate and duration in most patients.