Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet ; 403(10421): 29, 2024 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184335
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(31): e39182, 2024 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093736

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has caused continuous effects on the global public, especially for susceptible and vulnerable populations like pregnant women. COVID-19-related studies and publications have shown blowout development, making it challenging to identify development trends and hot areas by using traditional review methods for such massive data. Aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis to explore the status and hotspots of COVID-19 in obstetrics. An online search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database from January 01, 2020 to November 31, 2022, using the following search expression: (((TS= ("COVID 19" OR "coronavirus 2019" OR "coronavirus disease 2019" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "2019-nCoV" OR "2019 novel coronavirus" OR "SARS coronavirus 2" OR "Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2" OR "SARS-COV2")) AND TS= ("obstetric*" OR "pregnancy*" OR "pregnant" OR "parturition*" OR "puerperium"))). VOSviewer version 1.6.18, CiteSpace version 6.1.R6, R version 4.2.0, and Rstudio were used for the bibliometric and visualization analyses. 4144 articles were included in further analysis, including authors, titles, number of citations, countries, and author affiliations. The United States has contributed the most significant publications with the leading position. "Sahin, Dilek" has the largest output, and "Khalil, Asma" was the most influential author with the highest citations. Keywords of "Cov," "Experience," and "Neonate" with the highest frequency, and "Systematic Review" might be the new research hotspots and frontiers. The top 3 concerned genes included ACE2, CRP, and IL6. The new research hotspot is gradually shifting from the COVID-19 mechanism and its related clinical research to reviewing treatment options for pregnant women. This research uniquely delves into specific genes related to COVID-19's effects on obstetrics, a focus that has not been previously explored in other reviews. Our research enables clinicians and researchers to summarize the overall point of view of the existing literature and obtain more accurate conclusions.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Obstetrícia , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/genética , Bibliometria , Obstetrícia/tendências , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/genética , Proteína C-Reativa/genética , Interleucina-6/genética
3.
J Hypertens ; 42(1): 143-152, 2024 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737865

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a special liver disease during pregnancy, characterized by abnormal bile acid metabolism. However, there is no consensus on how to group women with ICP based on the time of diagnosis worldwide. This study aimed to adopt a new grouping model of women with ICP, and the time from diagnosis to delivery was defined as the monitoring period. METHODS: This retrospective real-world data study was conducted across multiple centers and included 3172 women with ICP. The study first evaluated the significant difference in medication and nonmedication during different monitoring times. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model was then used to screen nine risk factors based on the predictors. The model's discrimination, clinical usefulness, and calibration were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve, and calibration analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of preeclampsia risk in ICP patients without drug intervention increased with the extension of the monitoring period. However, the risk of preeclampsia decreased in ICP patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. A predictive nomogram and risk score model was developed based on nine risk factors. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.765 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.724-0.807] and 0.812 (95% CI: 0.736-0.889) for the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that a longer ICP monitoring period could lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes in the absence of drug intervention, especially preeclampsia. A predictive nomogram and risk score model was developed to better manage ICP patients, maintain pregnancy to term delivery, and minimize the risk of severe adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.


Assuntos
Pré-Eclâmpsia , Complicações na Gravidez , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nomogramas , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA