High-risk lesions in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy: upgrade rates and features associated with malignancy.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the upgrade rates of high-risk lesions (HRLs) in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy and evaluated imaging and clinical features associated with upgrade to malignancy. METHODS: This IRB-approved, retrospective study included MRI-guided breast biopsy exams yielding HRLs from August 1, 2011, to August 31, 2020. HRLs included atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), radial scar, and papilloma. Only lesions that underwent excision or at least 2 years of MRI imaging follow-up were included. For each HRL, patient history, imaging features, and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-two lesions in 65 patients were included in the study, with 8/72 (11.1%) of the lesions upgraded to malignancy. Upgrade rates were 16.7% (2/12) for ADH, 100% (1/1) for pleomorphic LCIS, 40% (2/5) for other LCIS, 0% (0/19) for ALH, 0% (0/18) for papilloma, and 0% (0/7) for radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion. Additionally, two cases of marked ADH bordering on DCIS and one case of marked ALH bordering on LCIS, were upgraded. Lesions were more likely to be upgraded if they presented as T2 hypointense (versus isotense, OR 6.46, 95% CI 1.27-32.92) or as linear or segmental non-mass enhancement (NME, versus focal or regional, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our data support the recommendation that ADH and LCIS on MRI-guided biopsy warrant surgical excision due to high upgrade rates. HRLs that present as T2 hypointense, or as linear or segmental NME, should be viewed with suspicion as these were associated with higher upgrade rates to malignancy.

Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (DBT VAB) allows biopsy of findings seen better or exclusively on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), including architectural distortion. Although architectural distortion with an associated sonographic mass correlate has a high risk of malignancy, limited data describe the radiologic-pathologic correlation of tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate. OBJECTIVE. This study evaluates the malignancy rate of architectural distortions without a sonographic correlate that undergo DBT VAB and provides radiologic-pathologic correlation for benign, high-risk, and malignant entities that are associated with architectural distortion. METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed imaging, as well as pathology slides and/or reports, for DBT VABs performed for architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate at a single institution between June 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. According to the correlative histopathology, cases were categorized as benign, high risk, or malignant, and specific histopathologic diagnoses were summarized. RESULTS. During the study period, 142 patients (mean age, 59 years) underwent DBT VAB for 151 unique architectural distortions without a sonographic correlate. DBT VAB revealed a malignant diagnosis in 27 (18%), a high-risk lesion in 50 (33%), and a benign diagnosis in 74 (49%). Two cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were upgraded to malignancy, resulting in a final malignancy rate of 19% (n = 29/151). Most malignant lesions were invasive carcinomas (83%, n = 24/29); most invasive carcinomas were of lobular subtype (54%, n = 13/24). Most high-risk lesions were radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions (62%, n = 31/50). Most benign results represented fibrocystic change (66%, n = 49/74). A subset (11%, n = 8/74) of benign results were considered discordant and subsequently excised, with none representing malignancy. CONCLUSION. The final malignancy rate of 19% in architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate justifies a recommendation for biopsy using DBT VAB. CLINICAL IMPACT. Our results highlight the utility of DBT VAB in the era of DBT. The detailed radiologic-pathologic correlations will assist radiologists in assessing concordance when performing DBT VAB for architectural distortions and provide a reference for future patient management.

Breast MRI biopsy cancellation due to lesion nonvisualization.

It is a clinical dilemma when a finding reported as suspicious on a breast MRI is not visualized at the time of a scheduled MRI-guided breast biopsy. We retrospectively reviewed all canceled MRI-guided biopsies at our institution between 6/1/2009 and 9/20/2019 and found a cancellation rate of 6.9% (72/1051). In one case, a mastectomy was performed after the canceled biopsy revealing a focus of DCIS in the same quadrant as the original finding (malignancy rate 2.1%). Our results support the current practice of 6-month follow-up MRI recommendation after a canceled MRI-guided biopsy for lesion nonvisualization.

Coronary Artery Calcium Score: the "Mammogram" of the Heart?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the classic analogy of "coronary artery calcium (CAC) as a mammogram of the heart", by evaluating the conceptual strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a potential cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening strategy using CAC in apparently healthy adults. RECENT FINDINGS: CAC is typically used for further CVD risk assessment. CAC is also currently being used as a screening test in specific subgroups of individuals, particularly in some Asian countries. Although this has yielded valuable insights on the determinants and pathophysiology of CVD, whether this approach results in improved clinical outcomes compared to other assessment and management approaches is currently unclear. Although CAC and mammograms share a number of characteristics, there are also important conceptual differences. The evidence supporting CAC, which is a robust CVD risk assessment tool, for CVD screening purposes is currently very limited, and further research is needed.

Can breast MRI predict pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: For patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer, it is standard of care to perform pre- and post-NAC imaging to evaluate response to therapy prior to surgery. In this study we assess outcome metrics of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following NAC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent a breast MRI before and after NAC between 2016 and 2021 at a single, multisite academic institution. All breast MRI studies were characterized as either radiologic complete response (rCR) or non-rCR. Corresponding surgical pathology reports were reviewed and categorized as pathologic complete response (pCR) or non-pCR. We defined a positive test as having residual enhancement on MRI (non-rCR) and a positive outcome as having residual disease on final surgical pathology (non-pCR). RESULTS: There were 225 patients included in the study (mean age 52 ± 12 years). Breast cancer receptor distribution was HR+/HER2- (n = 71, 32%), HR+/HER2+ (n = 51, 23%), HR-/HER2- (n = 72, 32%), and HR-/HER2+ (n = 31, 14%). In total, 78 (35%) had rCR and 77 (34%) had pCR; 43 (19%) had both rCR and pCR. The overall accuracy rate was 69% (156/225), sensitivity 76% (113/148), specificity 56% (43/77), positive predictive value 77% (113/147), and negative predictive value 55% (43/78). The PPV was significantly associated with receptor status (p = 0.004). No patient or imaging characteristics were associated with sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Breast MRI only moderately predicts pathologic response for invasive breast cancer treated with NAC (overall accuracy 69%). PPV is significantly associated with receptor status.

Circumscribed Masses on Breast MRI: Can MRI Features Guide Management?

OBJECTIVE: Management of circumscribed breast masses seen on MRI is largely extrapolated from mammography and US data with limited MRI-specific data available. This study aimed to assess clinical and MRI imaging features of malignant circumscribed breast masses. METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, breast MRIs performed between April 1, 2008, and August 30, 2020, containing circumscribed masses, excluding multiple bilateral circumscribed masses, were reviewed. Clinical and imaging features of all eligible masses were recorded, and associations with malignant outcomes were assessed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: For the 165 masses that met study criteria in 158 women, the mean age was 48 years (SD 12.0 years). Nine of 165 masses were malignant (5.5%). Round masses were significantly more likely to be malignant (7/37, 18.9%) compared to oval masses (2/128, 1.7%) (P < 0.001). Among masses with available dynamic contrast kinetics data, the malignancy rate was 0/84 (0%) for persistent kinetics, 2/23 (8.7%) for plateau kinetics, and 4/24 (16.7%) for washout kinetics (P = 0.002). The malignancy rate for oval masses without washout kinetics was 0% (0/92). T2 hyperintense masses had a malignancy rate of 7/104 (6.7%), and homogeneously enhancing masses had a malignancy rate of 5/91 (5.5%). CONCLUSION: These data support the use of mass shape and dynamic contrast enhancement kinetics to guide management of circumscribed breast masses seen by MRI, with oval masses without washout kinetics and any circumscribed mass with persistent kinetics showing no malignancies in this study.

Outcomes of Canceled Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Due to Nonvisualization.

Objective: Architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate is an indication for digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (DBT-VAB). However, when the finding is not visualized on the day of biopsy, the procedure is canceled. This study reports the outcomes of canceled DBT-VAB of architectural distortion due to nonvisualization. Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, chart review was performed to identify DBT-VABs of architectural distortion at our institution between June 1, 2017, and November 1, 2020, that were canceled because of nonvisualization at the time of biopsy. Cases without follow-up imaging were excluded. Statistical analysis, including the frequency of cases yielding malignancy by the end of the study period, was performed. Results: In total, 7.2% (39/544) of architectural distortions recommended for biopsy during the study period were canceled because of nonvisualization, 30 of which had follow-up imaging and were included in the study. Mean patient age was 56 years (standard deviation [SD], 9.6 years) and mean follow-up time was 26.7 months (SD, 11.2 months; range, 8.4-50.9 months). During the follow-up period, 16.7% (5/30) underwent repeat biopsy attempt, with one malignant result (1/30, 3.3%; SD, 18%; 95% confidence interval: 0.6%-16.7%). In total, 86.7% (26/30) of cases were declared benign during the follow-up period and 10% (3/30) remained stable with a BI-RADS 3 assessment category. Conclusion: During available follow-up, there was a low likelihood that distortions not visualized at the time of DBT-VAB represented malignancy (3.3%, 1/30). While this low malignancy rate is reassuring, imaging follow-up is warranted.

Characteristics and Outcomes of BI-RADS 3 Lesions on Breast MRI.

BACKGROUND: There are few data regarding the use and outcomes of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 assessment on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to describe the imaging findings prompting a BI-RADS 3 assessment and to report their outcomes, including the timing of follow-up examinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study evaluating 199 breast lesions in 186 patients who were assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment on breast MRI over a 5-year period. Clinical and imaging features were recorded. For outcomes analysis, lesions were considered benign if they showed 2 years of MRI stability, if they were declared benign during follow-up, or if the patient underwent biopsy with benign pathology results. Clinical and imaging features of BI-RADS 3 lesions associated with malignancy were assessed by the Fisher exact test, with P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 199 breast MRI lesions assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 80 (40%) of 199 were non-mass enhancement, 61 (31%) were a single focus, and 58 (29%) were masses. A total of 131 lesions (66%) were eligible for outcome analysis after excluding those lost to follow-up; 4 (3%) were diagnosed as malignant within the 2-year follow-up. Masses assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment were more likely to be malignant during follow-up than non-mass enhancement or single focus (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Despite limited data on the use of BI-RADS 3 at breast MRI, there is a low malignancy rate of 3% at our institution. Additional studies are needed to further define the appropriate use of BI-RADS 3 on breast MRI.

Breast Arterial Calcium: A Game Changer in Women's Cardiovascular Health?

In 2018, cardiovascular disease (CVD) was the leading cause of death among women, and current CVD prevention paradigms may not be sufficient in this group. In that context, it has recently been proposed that detection of calcification in breast arteries may help improve CVD risk screening and assessment in apparently healthy women. This review provides an overview of breast arterial anatomy; and the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and measurement of breast artery calcium (BAC); and discusses the features of the BAC-CVD link. The potential clinical applications that BAC may offer for CVD prevention in the context of current clinical practice guidelines and recommendations are also discussed. Finally, current gaps in evidence gaps are outlined, and future directions in the field are explored with a focus on the implementation of BAC mammography as a CVD risk-screening tool in routine clinical practice.

Breast Cancer Screening.

Breast cancer screening has become a controversial topic. Understanding the points of contention requires an appreciation of the conceptual framework underpinning cancer screening in general, knowledge of the strengths and limitations of available screening modalities, and familiarity with published clinical trial data. This review is data intense with the intention of presenting enough information to permit the reader to enter into the discussion with an ample knowledge base. The focus throughout is striking a balance between the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.