Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Different types of grafts can be used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is little published data regarding skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications for different autograft types used in all-epiphyseal, transphyseal and partial epiphyseal/hybrid ACLR in skeletally immature children and adolescents. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for literature regarding ACLR using hamstrings, quadriceps or bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts in skeletally immature patients. Studies were included if they examined at least one of the following outcomes: graft failure, return to sport(s), growth disturbance, arthrofibrosis or patient reported outcomes and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Case reports, conference abstracts and studies examining allografts and extra-articular or over-the-top ACL reconstruction techniques were excluded. Graft failure rates were pooled for each graft type using the quality effects model of MetaXL. A qualitative synthesis of secondary outcomes was performed. RESULTS: The database search identified 242 studies. In total 31 studies were included in this review, comprising of 1358 patients. Most patients (81%) were treated using hamstring autograft. The most common used surgical technique was transphyseal. The weighted, pooled failure rate for each graft type was 12% for hamstring tendon autografts, 8% for quadriceps tendon autografts and 6% for BPTB autografts. Confidence intervals were overlapping. The variability in time to graft failure was high. The qualitative analysis of the secondary outcomes showed similar results with good clinical outcomes and low complication rates across all graft types. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review it is not possible to determine a superior graft type for ACLR in skeletally immature. Of the included studies, the most common graft type used was the hamstring tendon. Overall, graft failure rates are low, and most studies show good clinical outcomes with high return to sports rates.

PROMs in paediatric knee ligament injury: use the Pedi-IKDC and avoid using adult PROMs.

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to present an evidence-based overview of psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for children with knee ligament injury. METHODS: A systematic search of literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were diagnostic studies evaluating psychometric properties (validity, reliability, responsiveness) and comprehensibility of PROMs as well as studies including children (age < 18 years) with knee ligament injury. The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. Eight studies evaluated psychometric properties of PROMs, and two studies analysed comprehensibility of PROMs. The Pedi-IKDC has been evaluated in four studies and has acceptable psychometric properties. The KOOS-Child is evaluated in one study and has acceptable psychometric properties. The use of adult PROMs in children causes problems in comprehensibility. CONCLUSION: The Pedi-IKDC is an adequate PROM for children with knee ligament injuries. It is valid, reliable and responsive. The KOOS-Child might be an alternative PROM for the Pedi-IKDC, but has only been evaluated in one study. The clinical relevance of the present systematic review is that adult versions of PROMs are not recommended in children and adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Bilateral periprosthetic joint infection with Ureaplasma urealyticum in an immunocompromised patient.

This case study discusses how we diagnosed and treated a patient with a late haematogenous bilateral periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasties caused by Ureaplasma urealyticum. This has never been reported before. We will discuss how we used a PET-CT, synovial fluid cell count, and synovial fluid analysis by 16S rRNA gene sequencing to diagnose this PJI. We will also discuss how we treated this patient to obtain full recovery.

Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: Systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) seems to be an effective treatment for plantar fasciitis (PF) and is assumed to be safe. No systematic reviews have been published that specifically studied the complications and side effects of ESWT in treating PF. Aim of this systematic review is therefore to evaluate the complications and side effects of ESWT in order to determine whether ESWT is a safe treatment for PF. METHODS: For this systematic review the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase were used to search for relevant literature between 1 January 2005 and 1 January 2017. PRISMA guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were included for this review, representing 2493 patients (2697 heels) who received between 6424 and 6497 ESWT treatment sessions, with an energy flux density between 0.01 mJ/mm2 and 0.64 mJ/mm2 and a frequency of 1000-3800 SWs. Average follow-up was 14.7 months (range: 24 h - 6 years). Two complications occurred: precordial pain and a superficial skin infection after regional anaesthesia. Accordingly, 225 patients reported pain during treatment and 247 reported transient red skin after treatment. Transient pain after treatment, dysesthesia, swelling, ecchymosis and/or petechiae, severe headache, bruising and a throbbing sensation were also reported. CONCLUSION: ESWT is likely a safe treatment for PF. No complications are expected at one-year follow-up. However, according to the current literature long-term complications are unknown. Better descriptions of treatment protocols, patient characteristics and registration of complications and side effects, especially pain during treatment, are recommended.

[A man with colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma: which therapy is required?]. / Een man met colorectaal zegelringcelcarcinoom: welke behandeling is vereist?

BACKGROUND: Primary colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is rare and often affects younger patients. It demonstrates a different biological behaviour and has a less favourable prognosis than the more conventional colorectal adenocarcinoma. CASE DESCRIPTION: Patient A, a 65-year-old man, presented with a change in bowel habit. Colonoscopy showed a stenosis with signs of a nonspecific inflammation. However, laparoscopy revealed a primary colorectal SRCC with diffuse peritoneal metastases. Standard chemotherapy was unsuccessful. Patient A died 13 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Based on clinical and molecular differences, SRCC can be recognized as a separate subtype of colorectal cancer. The case description illustrates that this group of patients may benefit from a different management strategy than the usual therapy. A greater understanding of the characteristics of this specific malignancy is needed.