Conventional versus Liquid-based Cytology: "Man versus Machine".

Background: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) can improve adequacy, monolayer quality with a clean background compared to conventional smears (CS). Aims and Objectives: The objective was to compare the quality and diagnostic yield of CS and LBC in routine cytological investigations. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 306 samples (255 gynecological, 39 nongynecological, and 12 fine needle aspiration cytology [FNAC]) during a 2-year period (2019-2020). From each patient, two samples were collected in the same manner in the same sitting and processed by CS and LBC (ThinPrep® 2000, Hologic Inc.). Both CS and LBC were compared for adequacy, quality, representativeness, inflammation, hemorrhage, necrosis, preservation, reactive changes, organisms, atypia/dysplasia/malignancy, and preparation/screening time. Statistical analysis was performed. Results: No statistically significant difference was noted for adequacy, representativeness, reactive changes, preservation, and atypia/dysplasia/malignancy. CS was better in cellularity and diagnosis of inflammation and organisms, whereas LBC had a clean background and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0005). Conclusions: CS was equivalent to LBC in adequacy, representativeness, reactive changes, and atypia/dysplasia/malignancy. Adequacy comparable to LBC can be achieved in CS by careful sample collection, processing, and screening by trained cytotechnologists. CS was better in detecting organisms and inflammation than LBC. The advantages of LBC were monolayer smear, clean background, and lesser screening time, but the demerit was higher cost and longer processing time. Therefore, LBC is best suited to those laboratories having high sample inadequacy rates, lack of competent cytotechnologists, and no financial constraints. Either man or machine, appropriate and adequate sample collection by trained personnel forms the cornerstone for ensuring adequacy in both CS and LBC.

Is Diagnosis of Low-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma Possible in Urine Cytology?

BACKGROUND: Urine cytology is a useful modality, primarily for the diagnosis and follow-up surveillance of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). Its utility in diagnosing low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC) remains controversial because of low reported sensitivity compared to cystoscopy. AIM: To study the cytomorphology of LGUC in voided urine samples and analyze its utility in diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of one year, including 48 voided urine samples in cases which were confirmed as LGUC on subsequent histology. Urine cytology smears of these cases, originally stained with Papanicolaou stain were reviewed, critically analyzed and the specific cytomorphologic and cystoscopic findings were documented. RESULTS: On review 18 samples were re-categorized as LGUC which included 10 samples initially diagnosed as Negative for HGUC, 2 as Atypical Urothelial Cells - Not Otherwise Specified (AUC-NOS) and 6 as Suspicious for Carcinoma. In addition, another 3 samples with initial diagnosis of LGUC remained as LGUC on review. Thus, a total of 21 LGUC samples were identified after the review. 26 (54%) samples with a diagnosis of negative for HGUC remained negative even after review, as the tumor cells were not identified either due to sampling error or unrecognizable morphology. One (2%) samples of AUC-NOS remained the same on review due to very scant atypical cells. In 21 LGUC samples, cytology showed a dual population of benign differentiated urothelial cells and small urothelial cells with subtle nuclear atypia such as irregular and thickened nuclear membrane with increased nuclear cytoplasmic ratio. In 12 false negative LGUC samples, the diagnostic cells were camouflaged by their subtle nuclear atypia coupled with an overwhelming background of differentiated benign urothelial cells as both appeared almost similar in morphology. Papillary fragments were identified only in 2 samples. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of LGUC on cytology is challenging and depends on the presence of diagnostic cells, pick up of diagnostic cells on screening and accurate interpretation. Special attention to papillary fragments and aforementioned nuclear atypia should be paid as tumor cells may resemble normal urothelial cells and can be easily missed.

Has urine cytology a role to play in the era of fluorescence in situ hybridization?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of urine cytology as a diagnostic tool and in follow-up of patients with urinary bladder cancer. STUDY DESIGN: From 951 cases, 1,831 urine specimens were collected in a 5-year period (2000-2004). Six hundred fifty-two cases were suspected to have primary bladder cancer and formed the basis of the study. The final diagnosis was based on histology. When histology was not available, clinical or radiologic findings formed the basis for the final diagnosis. RESULTS: We had 173 false negative and 6 false positive cases in our series, giving an overall sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 96%. The main reason for false negativity was screening error, noticed in low grade urothelial carcinoma. False positivity was due to inflammatory atypia and polyomaviral cytopathic changes. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity in our study compared well with those in the world literature. Urine cytology can be successfully used as a primary diagnostic tool and also as a follow-up modality as the cystoscopically occult malignancy can be detected easily.

"Agar Cell-Suspension": A Novel Technique for Processing Clear Specimens.

CONTEXT: Clear cytology specimens are processed by cytocentrifugation which is preferred over membrane filters (MF). Although both techniques are expensive, cytocentrifugation is less tedious and may cause cellular distortion. AIM: To standardize "Agar cell-suspension" (ACS) an innovative, simple, cost-effective technique to process clear specimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: About 93 clear specimens (65 urine, 15 effusion, 12 CSF, and 1 bronchial lavage) were processed by both cytocentrifugation and ACS. The sample was centrifuged in two tubes; one was used for ACS and other for cytocentrifugation. ACS smears were prepared by mixing one drop of 0.5% agar solution with the last drop of the centrifugate. Smears were fixed in methanol and stained by Papanicolaou staining method. ACS smears were compared with cytocentrifuged smears (CS) and evaluated for cellularity, cytomorphology preservation, staining quality, time, and cost. RESULTS: As compared to CS smears, ACS smears showed better cellularity in 16.1%, comparable in 53.7%, and less in 30.1%. All ACS smears (100%) showed well-preserved cytomorphology as compared to 96.7% CS. Staining quality was optimal in 96.7% ACS smears against 91.3% CS. Both techniques took equal time. The additional cost of ACS was only 0.03 INR compared to 12.50 INR for CS. CONCLUSIONS: ACS is an innovative, simple, easy, and cost-effective technique for processing clear specimens. It gives equally good results comparable to cytocentrifugation in terms of cellularity and staining quality. ACS does not cause cell distortion or air-drying as seen in some CS. Thus, ACS is a superior alternative to cytocentrifugation.

Papanicolaou stain: Is it economical to switch to rapid, economical, acetic acid, papanicolaou stain?

OBJECTIVE: To standardize an inexpensive and rapid Papanicolaou staining technique with limited ethanol usage. STUDY DESIGN: Smears from 200 patients were collected (2 per patient) and fixed in methanol. Half were subjected to conventional Papanicolaou and half to stain ing with rapid, economical, acetic acid Papanicolaou (REAP) stain. In REAP, pre-OG6 and post-OG6 and post-EA36 ethanol baths were replaced by 1% acetic acid and Scott's tap water with tap water. Hematoxylin was preheated to 60 degrees C. Final dehydration was with methanol. REAP smears were compared with Papanicolaou smears for optimal cytoplasmic and nuclear staining, stain preservation, cost and turnaround time. RESULTS: With the REAP method, cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was optimal in 181 and 192 cases, respectively. The staining time was considerably reduced, to 3 minutes, and the cost per smear was reduced to one fourth. The staining quality remained good in all the smears for > 2 years. CONCLUSION: REAP is a rapid, cost-effective alternative to Papanicolaou stain. Though low stain penetration in large cell clusters is a limitation, final interpretation was not compromised.

Cytology of lleal conduit urine in bladder cancer patients: diagnostic utility and pitfalls.

OBJECTIVE: To study the cytomorphology of urine obtained from the ileal conduit and to determine its utility and identify the pitfalls. STUDY DESIGN: Urine specimens from 469 cases of suspected or proven bladder cancer received over a period of 5 years were analyzed in the cytology laboratory. In 35 cases, total bladder resection was followed by ileal conduit reconstruction. The follow-up cytologic analysis of these 35 ileal conduit cases formed the basis of this study. RESULTS: There was absence of urothelial cells in all but 2 cases. The smear predominantly showed small, scattered intestinal mucosal cells with pyknotic nuclei, extensive karyorrhexis and numerous bacteria. In 2 cases, cytology proved superior to endoscopy and radiology in detecting recurrent disease. We had 2 false negative cases, and the negativity was attributed to sampling errors. There was 1 false positive case in which 3-dimensional clusters of intestinal columnar cells were erroneously diagnosed as adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Urine obtained from ileal conduit specimens shows a smear picture that is different from that of specimens from the bladder. Thus, it is imperative to understand the difference between the cytomorphology of bladder urine and ileal conduit urine, to minimize the pitfalls and increase diagnostic utility.

Collection devices for cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cervicovaginal smears obtained by a cotton-tipped swab with those obtained by cervix brush and modified Ayre spatula. STUDY DESIGN: A combined cervicovaginal smear was collected from 100 women using 3 different collection devices: cotton-tipped swab, cervix brush, and modified Ayre spatula. In each patient a set of 3 smears was collected by the same cytotechnologist using all 3 devices in random order. Smears were evaluated using parameters mandatory for an optimal smear: evenly dispersed, well-preserved, adequate cells from the transformation zone. The cost and availability of the collection devices were also considered. RESULTS: The swab was the most effective device in obtaining thin, evenly spread, adequate, well-preserved smears as against the cervix brush and Ayre spatula. The pickup of abnormal cells was similar with the cotton-tipped swab and cervix brush, while the Ayre spatula failed to yield high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance and adenocarcinoma cells. The cotton-tipped swab proved to be the most cost effective. CONCLUSION: A properly prepared cotton-tipped swab is an inexpensive, readily available, nontraumatic collection device that yields smear of optimal quality.

Pulmonary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of diffuse large B-cell type with simultaneous humeral involvement in a young lady: an uncommon presentation with cytologic implications.

A bronchogenic carcinoma, almost invariably, presents as a lung mass. Primary pulmonary lymphomas are rare. We report an unusual case of a pulmonary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with simultaneous involvement of the right humerus in a 37 year old lady. Bronchial lavage smears showed atypical cells with irregular nuclear membranes raising a suspicion of a hematolymphoid tumor, over a small cell carcinoma that was the closest differential diagnosis. Biopsy from the lung mass and from the lesion in the humerus showed an identical malignant round cell tumor with prominent apoptosis. On immunohistochemistry (IHC), tumor cells were diffusely positive for leukocyte common antigen (LCA), CD20 and MIB1 (70%), while negative for cytokeratin (CK), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) synaptophysin, chromogranin, neuron specific enolase (NSE), CD3, and CD10. Diagnosis of a pulmonary NHL of diffuse large B-cell type with involvement of the humerus was formed. The case is presented to create an index of suspicion for the possibility of a NHL on respiratory samples, while dealing with small round cells with irregular nuclear membranes. IHC is necessary to confirm he diagnosis. A simultaneous association in the humerus in our case makes it unusual.