Recurrent Wnt Pathway and ARID1A Alterations in Sinonasal Olfactory Carcinoma.

Sinonasal tumors with neuroepithelial differentiation, defined by neuroectodermal elements reminiscent of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and epithelial features such as keratin expression or gland formation, are a diagnostically challenging group that has never been formally included in sinonasal tumor classifications. Recently, we documented that most of these neuroepithelial neoplasms have distinctive histologic and immunohistochemical findings and proposed the term "olfactory carcinoma" to describe these tumors. However, the molecular characteristics of olfactory carcinoma have not yet been evaluated. In this study, we performed targeted molecular profiling of 23 sinonasal olfactory carcinomas to further clarify their pathogenesis and classification. All tumors included in this study were composed of high-grade neuroectodermal cells that were positive for pankeratin and at least 1 specific neuroendocrine marker. A significant subset of cases also displayed rosettes and neurofibrillary matrix, intermixed glands with variable cilia, peripheral p63/p40 expression, and S100 protein-positive sustentacular cells. Recurrent oncogenic molecular alterations were identified in 20 tumors, including Wnt pathway alterations affecting CTNNB1 (n = 8) and PPP2R1A (n = 2), ARID1A inactivation (n = 5), RUNX1 mutations (n = 3), and IDH2 hotspot mutations (n = 2). Overall, these findings do demonstrate the presence of recurrent molecular alterations in olfactory carcinoma, although this group of tumors does not appear to be defined by any single mutation. Minimal overlap with alterations previously reported in ONB also adds to histologic and immunohistochemical separation between ONB and olfactory carcinoma. Conversely, these molecular findings enhance the overlap between olfactory carcinoma and sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinomas. A small subset of neuroepithelial tumors might better fit into the superseding molecular category of IDH2-mutant sinonasal carcinoma. At this point, sinonasal neuroendocrine and neuroepithelial tumors may best be regarded as a histologic and molecular spectrum that includes core groups of ONB, olfactory carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and IDH2-mutant sinonasal carcinoma.

Xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumors/keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumors involving the head and neck: report of seven cases and review of the literature.

Xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumor (XGET) and HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumor (KPGCT) are recently described morphologically overlapping rare neoplastic entities characterized by HMGA2::NCOR2 fusions, low-grade biological behavior, and a strong predilection for young females. To date, 47 cases have been reported with only four occurring in head and neck anatomic locations. In this study, we describe the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings of seven XGET/KPGCTs occurring in the head and neck region. The patients were six females and one male, aged 3.5-59 years old (median, 25 years). The tumors involved the ear, vocal cord, skull, neck soft tissue, and sinonasal cavity. Tumor sizes ranged from 1.5 to 6.7 cm. Histologically, the tumors were characterized by xanthogranulomatous histiocytes, osteoclast-like giant cells, and keratin-positive epithelioid cells. The XGET/KPGCTs involving the ear was remarkable for more cytologic atypia than previously described. Four cases had the HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion identified by NGS and three had HMGA2 gene locus alterations by FISH. Follow-up information was available for 3 of 7 patients (range 6-46 months). The patient with a vocal cord XGET/KPGCTs developed a local recurrence treated with excision. This study illustrates that XGET/KPGCTs involves the head and neck region as well, where it may be unexpected and hence under-recognized, and expands the anatomic locations of involvement to include unreported sites (ear, vocal cord, and sinonasal tract).

A Comprehensive Clinicopathologic and Molecular Reappraisal of GLI1-altered Mesenchymal Tumors with Pooled Outcome Analysis Showing Poor Survival in GLI1- amplified Versus GLI1-rearranged Tumors.

GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumor is a recently described distinct pathologic entity with an established risk of malignancy, being defined molecularly by either GLI1 gene fusions or amplifications. The clinicopathologic overlap of tumors driven by the 2 seemingly distinct mechanisms of GLI1 activation is still emerging. Herein, we report the largest series of molecularly confirmed GLI1-altered mesenchymal neoplasms to date, including 23 GLI1-amplified and 15 GLI1-rearranged new cases, and perform a comparative clinicopathologic, genomic, and survival investigation. GLI1-rearranged tumors occurred in younger patients (42 vs. 52 y) and were larger compared with GLI1-amplified tumors (5.6 cm vs. 1.5 cm, respectively). Histologic features were overall similar between the 2 groups, showing a multinodular pattern and a nested architecture of epithelioid, and less commonly spindle cells, surrounded by a rich capillary network. A distinct whorling pattern was noted among 3 GLI1-amplified tumors. Scattered pleomorphic giant cells were rarely seen in both groups. The immunoprofile showed consistent expression of CD56, with variable S100, CD10 and SMA expression. Genomically, both groups had overall low mutation burdens, with rare TP53 mutations seen only in GLI1-amplified tumors. GLI1-amplified mesenchymal tumors exhibit mostly a single amplicon at the 12q13-15 locus, compared with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, which showed a 2-peak amplification centered around CDK4 (12q14.1) and MDM2 (12q15). GLI1-amplified tumors had a significantly higher GLI1 mRNA expression compared with GLI1-rearranged tumors. Survival pooled analysis of current and published cases (n=83) showed a worse overall survival in GLI1-amplified patients, with 16% succumbing to disease compared with 1.7% in the GLI1-rearranged group. Despite comparable progression rates, GLI1-amplified tumors had a shorter median progression-free survival compared with GLI1-rearranged tumors (25 mo vs. 77 mo). Univariate analysis showed that traditional histologic predictors of malignancy (mitotic count ≥4/10 high-power fields, presence of necrosis, and tumor size ≥5 cm) are associated with worse prognosis among GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors.

Myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue and bone in children and young adults: A clinicopathologic study of 40 cases occurring in patients ≤ 21 Years of age.

Myoepithelial tumors of the soft tissue and bone occurring in patients 21 years of age and younger are rare, and their clinicopathologic features remain incompletely understood. We studied a well-characterized series of 40 such tumors. Cases were retrieved from our archives for the period 2009-2022 and re-reviewed. Available immunohistochemical and molecular genetic data was collected. Clinical information including available follow-up was obtained. The tumors occurred in 18 males and 22 females, ranging from 3 months to 21 years of age (median 11.5 years), and involved a wide variety of soft tissue (n = 36) and bone (n = 4) locations. Histologically benign myoepithelial tumors tended to occur in adolescents (median age 14.5 years; range 5-21 years), whereas myoepithelial carcinomas occurred in younger patients (median age 8.5 years; range 3 months-20 years). Microscopically, the tumors showed a complex admixture of epithelioid, plasmacytoid and spindled cells in a variably hyalinized, myxoid, chondroid or chondromyxoid background. Small subsets of histologically malignant tumors had rhabdoid or "round cell" features. Immunohistochemistry showed 35/40 (88%) cases to be positive with at least one keratin antibody. The 5 keratin-negative tumors were uniformly positive for S100 protein and/or SOX10 and expressed EMA (4 cases) and/or p63 (3 cases). EMA, SMA and GFAP were positive in 21/25 (84%), 13/21 (62%), and 8/21 (38%) tumors, respectively. SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 expression was retained in 29/31 (94%) and 22/22 (100%) of cases, respectively. FISH for EWSR1 gene rearrangement was positive in 6/18 (33%) tested cases. Two EWSR1-negative tumors were also FUS-negative. NGS identified EWSR1::POU5F1, FUS::KLF17, and BRD4::CITED1 gene fusions in 3 tested cases. Clinical follow-up (22 patients; median 23 months; range 1-119 months) showed 3 patients with local recurrences and 5 with distant metastases (lymph nodes, lung, and brain). Three patients died of disease, 3 were alive with recurrent or unresectable disease, and 16 were disease-free. Adverse clinical outcomes were seen only in patients with malignant tumors. We conclude that myoepithelial neoplasms of soft tissue and bone are over-repesented in patients ≤21 years of age, more often histologically malignant, and potentially lethal. Histologic evaluation appears to reliably predict the behavior of these rare tumors.