Assessing the ability of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy age 4-7 years to swallow softgel capsules: Clinical trial experience with edasalonexent.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: There is limited information on acceptability of solid dosage forms by young patients with neuromuscular disorders such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Capsule size selection and ability to swallow the NF-κB inhibitor edasalonexent were assessed in males 4-7 years of age with DMD enrolled in clinical trials for a new therapeutic. METHODS: The Phase 3 PolarisDMD randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 131 patients from 8 countries. The Phase 2 MoveDMD trial enrolled 31 patients in the United States. As part of enrolment criteria, these trials assessed the ability to swallow softgel 100 mg (~10 mm) or 250 mg (~15 mm) capsules formulated with a phosphatidylcholine-containing coating. Supportive strategies included pill-swallowing techniques and aids. RESULTS: Most (97%; 175/181) patients screened were able to swallow capsules. In Phase 2 and 3, respectively, 77% (24/31) and 61% (80/131) of enrolled patients selected the larger capsule and among those selecting the smaller capsule, most transitioned to the larger capsule. There were no obvious geographical differences in ability to swallow capsules and size selection was not correlated with age. Compliance was high (92%-98%) through 52 weeks of dosing with no discontinuations due to capsule burden. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Swallowing of capsules was not a barrier for drug administration in young patients with DMD. Capsule formulations may be an acceptable alternative to liquid formulations for children as young as 4 years of age.

Variability and trends in corticosteroid use by male United States participants with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the Duchenne Registry.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for Duchenne muscular dystrophy remain limited, although consensus treatment guidelines recommend corticosteroid use. METHODS: This retrospective analysis assessed corticosteroid use in ambulatory and nonambulatory US males with Duchenne, age 35 and under, or Becker muscular dystrophy, who enrolled in The Duchenne Registry from 2007 to 2016 (formerly DuchenneConnect). RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of corticosteroid use initiation was 5.9 (2.5) years, and deflazacort use (54%) was slightly more common than prednisone/prednisolone (46%). Among all responses from those with Duchenne, 63% were currently on corticosteroids, 12% were no longer on corticosteroids, and 25% had never been on corticosteroids. Among those who were nonambulatory, 49% were currently on corticosteroids, 28% had discontinued corticosteroids, and 23% had never used corticosteroids. Primary reasons for never initiating therapy were that corticosteroids were not prescribed or recommended and concerns about side effects. Corticosteroid use was maximal at age 8 (84% on corticosteroids) and gradually declined from age 10 to 19. The primary reasons for corticosteroid discontinuation were problems with side effects (65%) or not enough benefit (28%). Average doses of corticosteroids were below recommended doses. In the 159 responses with Becker muscular dystrophy, 20% were currently using corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the self-selected nature of participation, it appears that a considerable proportion of US participants registered with The Duchenne Registry were either not on corticosteroids or not on recommended doses despite consensus recommendations. Side effects were a consideration in initiating and discontinuing treatment. These data reinforce the need for additional treatment options for those affected by Duchenne.

Apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibition with mipomersen in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy and safety as add-on therapy in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a common genetic disorder leading to premature coronary artery disease. Despite statins and additional lipid-lowering therapies, many HeFH patients fail to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. We evaluated mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, to further lower LDL-C in HeFH patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial randomized patients with HeFH and coronary artery disease on maximally tolerated statin and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L (≥100 mg/dL) to weekly subcutaneous mipomersen 200 mg or placebo (2:1) for 26 weeks. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline at week 28. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory tests, and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hepatic fat. Of 124 randomized patients (41 placebo, 83 mipomersen), 114 (41 placebo, 73 mipomersen) completed treatment. Mean (95% confidence interval) LDL-C decreased significantly with mipomersen (-28.0% [-34.0% to -22.1%] compared with 5.2% [-0.5% to 10.9%] increase with placebo; P<0.001). Mipomersen significantly reduced apolipoprotein B (-26.3%), total cholesterol (-19.4%), and lipoprotein(a) (-21.1%) compared with placebo (all P<0.001). No significant change occurred in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Adverse events included injection site reactions and influenza-like symptoms. Five mipomersen patients (6%) had 2 consecutive alanine aminotransferase values ≥3 times the upper limit of normal at least 7 days apart; none were associated with significant bilirubin increases. Hepatic fat content increased a median of 4.9% with mipomersen versus 0.4% with placebo (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mipomersen is an effective therapy to further reduce apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, including LDL and lipoprotein(a), in HeFH patients with coronary artery disease on statins and other lipid-lowering therapy. The significance of hepatic fat and transaminase increases remains uncertain at this time. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00706849.

Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in high-risk statin-intolerant patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AIMS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB) synthesis inhibitor, in patients who are statin intolerant and at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects, not receiving statin therapy because of statin intolerance, received a weekly subcutaneous dose of 200 mg mipomersen or placebo (2:1 randomization) for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was per cent change in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) from the baseline to Week 28. The other efficacy endpoints were per cent change in apoB and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)]. Safety was determined using the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory evaluations. After 26 weeks of mipomersen administration, LDL-c was reduced by 47 ± 18% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). apoB and Lp(a) were also significantly reduced by 46 and 27%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). Four mipomersen (19%) and two placebo subjects (17%) discontinued dosing prematurely due to AEs. Persistent liver transaminase increases ≥ 3× the upper limit of normal were observed in seven (33%) subjects assigned to mipomersen. In selected subjects, liver fat content was assessed, during and after treatment, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Liver fat content in these patients ranged from 0.8 to 47.3%. Liver needle biopsy was performed in two of these subjects, confirming hepatic steatosis with minimal inflammation or fibrosis. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that mipomersen is a potential therapeutic option in statin-intolerant patients at high risk for CVD. The long-term follow-up of liver safety is required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00707746.

A Mixed-Method Study Exploring Patient-Experienced and Caregiver-Reported Benefits and Side Effects of Corticosteroid Use in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are recommended to all people with Duchenne as standard of care; patient experience data is important to guide corticosteroid decision making and as a comparator for new treatment options. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses patient and caregiver-reported benefits and side effects from corticosteroids to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy, their importance, and satisfaction. METHODS: Using one-on-one interviews (n = 28) and an online survey (n = 236), parents and adults with Duchenne reported corticosteroid benefits and side effects rated as both experienced and important. RESULTS: Benefits to breathing, heart function, arm strength, slowing progression of weakness, and getting around were rated as particularly important, regardless of ambulatory status. Important side effects included increased fracture risk, unwanted weight gain, and diabetes/prediabetes. Parents rated behavior issues and adults rated delayed puberty as having high importance. Being ambulatory was independently associated with reporting more net benefit (p = 0.02). For side effects, parent scores were significantly higher than adult score (p = 0.02). Corticosteroid type was not significant. Participants were, overall, satisfied with corticosteroids (means ranging from 6.2 to 7.7 on a scale of 0-10), with no significant differences based on corticosteroid type. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, most participants were satisfied with the use of corticosteroids. While a range of side effects were rated as important and relatively common, individuals using corticosteroids and their caregivers indicate that benefits outweigh the side effects. Qualitative data indicate that high acceptability is influenced by lack of treatment alternatives. Patient experience data on use of corticosteroids in Duchenne may be relevant to drug development, regulatory assessment of new treatments, and to families making decisions about corticosteroid use.

Disease-modifying effects of edasalonexent, an NF-κB inhibitor, in young boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Results of the MoveDMD phase 2 and open label extension trial.

Chronic activation of NF-κB is a key driver of muscle degeneration and suppression of muscle regeneration in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Edasalonexent (CAT-1004) is an orally-administered novel small molecule that covalently links two bioactive compounds (salicylic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) that inhibit NF-κB. This placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept phase 2 study with open-label extension in boys ≥4-<8 years old with any dystrophin mutation examined the effect of edasalonexent (67 or 100 mg/kg/day) compared to placebo or off-treatment control. Endpoints were safety/tolerability, change from baseline in MRI T2 relaxation time of lower leg muscles and functional assessment, as well as pharmacodynamics and biomarkers. Treatment was well-tolerated and the majority of adverse events were mild, and most commonly of the gastrointestinal system (primarily diarrhea). There were no serious adverse events in the edasalonexent groups. Edasalonexent 100 mg/kg was associated with slowing of disease progression and preservation of muscle function compared to an off-treatment control period, with decrease in levels of NF-κB-regulated genes and improvements in biomarkers of muscle health and inflammation. These results support investigating edasalonexent in future trials and have informed the design of the edasalonexent phase 3 clinical trial in boys with Duchenne.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase 3 Study of Edasalonexent in Pediatric Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Results of the PolarisDMD Trial.

BACKGROUND: Edasalonexent (CAT-1004) is an orally-administered novel small molecule drug designed to inhibit NF-κB and potentially reduce inflammation and fibrosis to improve muscle function and thereby slow disease progression and muscle decline in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). OBJECTIVE: This international, randomized 2 : 1, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in patients ≥4 - < 8 years old with DMD due to any dystrophin mutation examined the effect of edasalonexent (100 mg/kg/day) compared to placebo over 52 weeks. METHODS: Endpoints were changes in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA; primary) and timed function tests (TFTs; secondary). Assessment of health-related function used the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection tool (PODCI). RESULTS: One hundred thirty one patients received edasalonexent (n = 88) and placebo (n = 43). At week 52, differences between edasalonexent and placebo for NSAA total score and TFTs were not statistically significant, although there were consistently less functional declines in the edasalonexent group. A pre-specified analysis by age demonstrated that younger patients (≤6.0 years) showed more robust and statistically significant differences between edasalonexent and placebo for some assessments. Treatment was well-tolerated and the majority of adverse events were mild, and most commonly involved the gastrointestinal system (primarily diarrhea). CONCLUSIONS: Edasalonexent was generally well-tolerated with a manageable safety profile at the dose of 100 mg/kg/day. Although edasalonexent did not achieve statistical significance for improvement in primary and secondary functional endpoints for assessment of DMD, subgroup analysis suggested that edasalonexent may slow disease progression if initiated before 6 years of age. (NCT03703882).

A 50-week extension study on the safety and efficacy of colesevelam in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Colesevelam is a bile acid sequestrant that differs structurally from traditional bile acid sequestrants, allowing it to bind bile acids with greater affinity. Studies have shown that colesevelam significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and, in some cases, significantly increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of colesevelam in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, open-label, titration-based extension study enrolled subjects who completed one of three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II studies with colesevelam. This study consisted of a 4-week washout/dietary stabilization period, a 50-week open-label treatment period, and a 2-week follow-up period. SETTING: Ten clinical centers within the US. SUBJECTS: Males and females 18 years of age or older who had completed a previous short-term (4- or 6-week) phase II clinical study with colesevelam. INTERVENTION: At week 0 (following a 4-week washout of all lipid-lowering medication), subjects initiated treatment with colesevelam at a dosage of 1.5 g/day. Colesevelam was uptitrated to a maximum dosage of 3.75 g/day as necessary to achieve a 15-30% reduction from baseline in LDL-C level. At week 12, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) or niacin (nicotinic acid) could be added if colesevelam 3.75 g/day was not sufficient to result in a 15-30% reduction from baseline in LDL-C level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary efficacy measure was the change in LDL-C level from baseline to week 50 across all treatment regimens. Secondary efficacy parameters included the change and percent change in total cholesterol, HDL-C, and triglyceride levels from baseline to week 50. There were three cohorts analyzed: (i) colesevelam monotherapy (included all subjects who received colesevelam monotherapy, regardless of dose); (ii) all treatment regimens (included all subjects who received colesevelam monotherapy or colesevelam plus low-dose statin or niacin therapy); and (iii) combination therapy (included only subjects who received colesevelam plus low-dose statin therapy). Two additional cohorts were also evaluated: (iv) maximum-dose colesevelam monotherapy (included only subjects who received colesevelam 3.75 g/day monotherapy); and (v) all maximum-dose colesevelam treatment regimens (included all subjects who received colesevelam 3.75 g/day, either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose statin or niacin therapy). RESULTS: In total, 272 subjects were screened, 260 enrolled, and 186 completed the study. In total, 255 subjects were included in the intent-to-treat population. The maximum dosage of colesevelam (3.75 g/day) was taken by 50% of subjects (n = 94/188) at week 50; only 38 subjects received low-dose statin or niacin by study end. At week 50, LDL-C levels were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced from baseline across all treatment regimens (by 29.6 mg/dL [from 185.8 to 156.2 mg/dL; 15.0%]). Colesevelam also significantly reduced total cholesterol levels and significantly increased HDL-C and triglyceride levels across all treatment regimens (p < 0.001 for all). Drug-related adverse events were reported by 36.2% of subjects across all treatment regimens (and by 47.4% of subjects who received colesevelam plus low-dose statin or niacin therapy). CONCLUSION: In this study, colesevelam was found to be safe and effective for the management of LDL-C levels in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia.

Phase 1 Study of Edasalonexent (CAT-1004), an Oral NF-κB Inhibitor, in Pediatric Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Edasalonexent is an orally administered small molecule designed to inhibit NF-κB, which is activated from infancy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and is central to causing muscle damage and preventing muscle regeneration. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and exploratory pharmacodynamics of three doses of edasalonexent in ambulatory males ≥4 to <8 years of age with genetically confirmed Duchenne muscular dystrophy. METHODS: This was a 1-week, open-label, multiple-dose study with 3 sequential ascending doses (33, 67 and 100 mg/kg/day) of edasalonexent administered under different dietary conditions to 17 males with a mean age of 5.5 years. RESULTS: All doses of edasalonexent were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events, no drug discontinuations and no dose reductions. The majority of adverse events were mild, and the most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (primarily diarrhea). Edasalonexent was rapidly absorbed with peak levels observed 2-6 hours after dosing and exposures appeared to increase nearly proportionally to dose for the 2 lower and all 3 doses under low-fat and high-fat meal conditions, respectively. Only minor plasma accumulation of edasalonexent was observed with 7 days of dosing. After treatment with edasalonexent for 7 days, levels of NF-κB-regulated genes and serum proteins were decreased. CONCLUSIONS: This first report of edasalonexent oral administration for one week in male pediatric patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy showed that treatment was well tolerated and inhibited NF-kB pathways.

A Novel NF-κB Inhibitor, Edasalonexent (CAT-1004), in Development as a Disease-Modifying Treatment for Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Phase 1 Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in Adult Subjects.

In Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), NF-κB is activated in skeletal muscle from infancy regardless of the underlying dystrophin mutation and drives inflammation and muscle degeneration while inhibiting muscle regeneration. Edasalonexent (CAT-1004) is a bifunctional orally administered small molecule that covalently links 2 compounds known to inhibit NF-κB, salicylic acid and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Edasalonexent is designed to inhibit activated NF-κB upon intracellular cleavage to these bioactive components. Preclinical data demonstrate disease-modifying activity in DMD animal models. Three placebo-controlled studies in adult subjects assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single or multiple edasalonexent doses up to 6000 mg. Seventy-nine adult subjects received edasalonexent, and 25 received placebo. Pharmacokinetic results were consistent with the intracellular cleavage of edasalonexent to its active components. Food increased plasma exposures of edasalonexent and salicyluric acid, an intracellularly formed metabolite of salicylic acid. The NF-κB pathway and proteosome gene expression profiles in peripheral mononuclear cells were significantly decreased (P = .02 and P = .002, respectively) after 2 weeks of edasalonexent treatment. NF-κB activity was inhibited following a single dose of edasalonexent but not by equimolar doses of salicylic acid and DHA. Edasalonexent was well tolerated, and the most common adverse events were mild diarrhea and headache. In first-in-human studies, edasalonexent was safe, well tolerated, and inhibited activated NF-κB pathways, suggesting potential therapeutic utility in DMD regardless of the causative dystrophin mutation, as well as other NF-κB-mediated diseases.

Preclinical and clinical development of deferitrin, a novel, orally available iron chelator.

Deferitrin, a novel, orally available iron chelator, is in the early stage of clinical development for the treatment of chronic iron overload due to transfusional therapy. Preclinical pharmacology studies demonstrate iron excretion largely by the fecal route. Initial clinical studies have shown deferitrin to be well absorbed. Further clinical studies are ongoing to determine the efficiency and safety of deferitrin.

Mipomersen preferentially reduces small low-density lipoprotein particle number in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Because of variability in lipoprotein cholesterol content, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol frequently underrepresents or overrepresents the number of LDL particles. Mipomersen is an antisense oligonucleotide that reduces hepatic production of apolipoprotein B-100, the sole apolipoprotein of LDL. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of mipomersen on lipoprotein particle numbers as well as subclass distribution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. METHODS: We compared the tertiary results for the direct measurement of LDL particle numbers by NMR among 4 placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of mipomersen that had similar study designs but different patient populations: homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), severe hypercholesterolemia, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with established coronary artery disease, or hypercholesterolemia with high risk for coronary heart disease (HC-CHD). RESULTS: HoFH patients had the highest median total LDL particles at baseline compared with HC-CHD patients, who had the lowest. At baseline, the HoFH population uniquely had a greater mean percentage of large LDL particles (placebo, 60.2%; mipomersen, 54.9%) compared with small LDL particles (placebo, 33.1%; mipomersen, 38.9%). In all 4 studies, mipomersen was associated with greater reductions from baseline in the concentrations of small LDL particles compared with those of large LDL particles, and both total LDL particles and small LDL particles were statistically significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Mipomersen consistently reduced all LDL particle numbers and preferentially reduced the concentration of small LDL particles in all 4 phase 3 studies.

Colesevelam HCl improves fasting plasma glucose and lipid levels in patients with prediabetes.

Although colesevelam hydrochloride (HCl) is indicated to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with hyperlipidemia and improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, its effects on glucose and lipids in patients with prediabetes have not been previously studied. To evaluate the effects of colesevelam HCl in patients with prediabetes, a post-hoc analysis was conducted on data from a 24-week lipid-lowering study. Using baseline laboratory safety data for fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 88 patients were identified as having prediabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced by 4.0 mg/dL with colesevelam HCl 3.8 g/day and by 6.1 mg/dL with colesevelam HCl 4.5 g/day compared with placebo. Additionally, LDL-C was reduced by 13.2% and 12.0% with colesevelam HCl 3.8 and 4.5 g/day, respectively, versus placebo. Colesevelam HCl 3.8 g/day also significantly reduced total cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo)B levels, whereas no significant difference in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apoA-I, or triglyceride levels was observed versus placebo. In patients with hyperlipidemia and prediabetes, colesevelam HCl improved glycemic control and the lipid profile.

Absorption of colesevelam hydrochloride in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether colesevelam hydrochloride is absorbed in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, radiolabeled study was performed with 16 healthy volunteers. Subjects were administered non-radiolabeled colesevelam hydrochloride 1.9 g twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by a single dose of [14C]-colesevelam 2.4 g (480 pCi). These subjects continued to receive non-radioactive colesevelam 1.9 g twice daily for 4 days after administration of the radiolabeled dose. Blood, urine, and feces were collected immediately prior to administration of [14C]-colesevelam and at specified intervals after administration. The whole-blood equivalent concentration of colesevelam was calculated using data collected throughout the 96 hours following radiolabeled drug administration. The proportion of [14C]-colesevelam excreted through urine or feces was calculated based on the amount of radioactivity recovered up to 216 hours after the radiolabeled dose. RESULTS: The mean cumulative total recovery of [14C]-colesevelam in urine and feces was 0.05% and 74%, respectively. Excluding 2 subjects for whom cumulative recovery was <25%, the mean cumulative fecal recovery was 82%. The mean maximum whole-blood equivalent concentration of colesevelam was 0.165+/-0.10 microg equiv/g 72 hours after administration of [14C]-colesevelam, which was estimated to be 0.04% of the administered dose. All blood samples contained <4 times the number of background counts (dpm). CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative recovery data in urine and feces are consistent with the conclusion that colesevelam is not absorbed and is excreted entirely through the gastrointestinal system.

Dietary sphingomyelin suppresses intestinal cholesterol absorption by decreasing thermodynamic activity of cholesterol monomers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In humans, cholesterol absorbed from the intestine contributes appreciably to serum cholesterol levels. We hypothesized that cholesterol thermodynamic activity (A(t)) would predict bioavailability of cholesterol monomers in intestinal content, and that natural dietary phospholipids exhibiting high affinity for cholesterol would reduce its absorption. METHODS: Cholesterol A(t) was determined by measuring partitioning of monomeric cholesterol from aqueous solutions of taurocholate, cholesterol, and either milk sphingomyelin (MSM), dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC), or egg yolk phosphatidylcholine (EYPC) into wafers of polymerized silicone. Cholesterol absorption from the same mixtures was tested with monolayers of Caco-2 cells. For in vivo absorption studies (employing male C57L/J mice), we used the fecal dual isotope method during dietary enrichment with MSM, DPPC, or EYPC at varying dose levels. RESULTS: Cholesterol A(t) values were reduced significantly in MSM- and DPPC-containing systems compared with EYPC and correlated positively with reduced uptake and esterification of cholesterol by Caco-2 cells. Mice fed chow absorbed 31.4% +/- 6.9% (mean +/- SEM) cholesterol, whereas enrichment with MSM or DPPC led to dose-dependent decreases in cholesterol absorption; even at 0.1% MSM, cholesterol absorption was reduced by 20.4% +/- 15.4% (P < 0.05, n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: Different phospholipids have distinct effects on micellar cholesterol A(t), which predicts cholesterol uptake by enterocytes in vitro as well as in vivo. Natural phospholipids with high affinity for cholesterol, as evidenced particularly by sphingomyelin, decrease A(t) and curtail intestinal cholesterol absorption.

Effect of colesevelam on lovastatin pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: To assess potential interactions of colesevelam hydrochloride and lovastatin in healthy volunteers when lovastatin alone was administered with dinner, both lovastatin and colesevelam were administered with dinner, and colesevelam was administered with dinner and lovastatin was administered 4 hours later with a snack. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, 3-period, crossover drug interaction study was performed with 22 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected at specified intervals before and after dosing, and plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid were measured using a liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopy method. RESULTS: Maximal concentration (Cmax), AUC from time 0 to the last time point measured (AUC0-t), and AUC0-infinity values for lovastatin were 102%, 94%, and 104%, and for lovastatin hydroxyacid were 102%, 91%, and 92%, respectively, of control values when colesevelam and lovastatin were coadministered with dinner. Administration of colesevelam with dinner and lovastatin 4 hours later with a snack resulted in a decreased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin (63% and 37%, respectively; p < 0.05) and an increased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin hydroxyacid (61% and 50%, respectively; p < 0.05), both compared with lovastatin alone administered with dinner. CONCLUSIONS: Colesevelam had no significant effect on lovastatin pharmacokinetics when coadministered with lovastatin at dinner. A split-dosing regimen resulted in alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters for lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid that are likely due to known differences in the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin when administered to patients with meals or in a fasting state.