Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 82: 206-211, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902469

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The empiric antibiotic regimen started after deep cultures and explantation of the graft mostly do not cover antifungals. We retrospectively studied the outcome of candida compared to non-candida VGI and assessed whether these results could justify the addition of antifungals to the empiric antibiotics in the early postoperative period. METHODS: All patients treated for infected aorto(ilio)femoral graft with excision and reconstruction at the vascular department of University Hospitals Leuven between January 2010 and 2017 (n = 56) were studied retrospectively. Patients were allocated to the candida group (n = 10) or non-candida group (n = 46) according to the presence of Candida in deep culture isolates. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the candida group compared to the non-candida group. All-cause 30-day mortality was 40% and 13% for both groups respectively (P = 0.066). At 5 years this was 90% and 46% respectively (P = 0.014). In the candida group 6 patients (60%) had to be revised in the operating room due to bleeding, compared to 5 patients (11%) in the non-candida group (P = 0.002).  Two patients (20%) and 5 patients (11%) had to be readmitted to the ICU, respectively. CONCLUSION: Survival of candida related VGI is significantly worse, especially in the first 5 postoperative months. This could justify the addition of an antifungal to the early empiric postoperative antibiotic cocktail, especially in patients with an aorto-enteric fistula. A cost-benefit analysis could be useful to evaluate the yield.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Doenças Vasculares , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Candida , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia
2.
Phlebology ; : 2683555241256543, 2024 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782448

RESUMO

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) for the treatment of vascular leg ulcers. Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was done for studies where L-PRF was used to treat vascular leg ulcers. Results: Among six included articles, a total of 76 venous leg ulcers were treated with L-PRF. None of the studies included ulcers of arterial or lymphatic origin. Fifty-seven (75.0%) of the venous ulcers completely healed at end of follow-up. Mean time to complete healing was 6.7 weeks (SD = 5.0). All non-healed ulcers showed an important reduction in wound area. No adverse effects related to L-PRF therapy were reported. Conclusions: The results suggest that L-PRF could be a safe, simple to use and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of venous leg ulcers, however, caution is advised as the results are based on small sample sizes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA