Diagnostic yield of multi-gene panel for muscular dystrophies and other hereditary myopathies.

Genetic testing is being considered the first-step in the investigation of hereditary myopathies. However, the performance of the different testing approaches is little known. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a next-generation sequencing panel comprising 39 genes as the first-tier test for genetic myopathies diagnosis and to characterize clinical and molecular findings of families from southern Brazil. Fifty-one consecutive index cases with clinical suspicion of genetic myopathies were recruited from October 2014 to March 2018 in a cross-sectional study. The overall diagnostic yield of the next-generation sequencing panel was 52.9%, increasing to 60.8% when including cases with candidate variants. Multi-gene panel solved the diagnosis of 12/25 (48%) probands with limb-girdle muscular dystrophies, of 7/14 (50%) with congenital muscular diseases, and of 7/10 (70%) with muscular dystrophy with prominent joint contractures. The most frequent diagnosis for limb-girdle muscular dystrophies were LGMD2A/LGMD-R1-calpain3-related and LGMD2B/LGMD-R2-dysferlin-related; for congenital muscular diseases, RYR1-related-disorders; and for muscular dystrophy with prominent joint contractures, Emery-Dreifuss-muscular-dystrophy-type-1 and COL6A1-related-disorders. In summary, the customized next-generation sequencing panel when applied in the initial investigation of genetic myopathies results in high diagnostic yield, likely reducing patient's diagnostic odyssey and providing important information for genetic counseling and participation in disease-specific clinical trials.

Accuracy of muscle fasciculations for the diagnosis of later-onset spinal muscle atrophy.

Diagnosis of later-onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic properties of the detection of muscle fasciculations for SMA diagnosis in adolescents and adults with proximal muscle weakness. A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was performed, in which 10 subjects with SMA (5 with type II and 5 with type III) and 9 subjects with genetic muscle diseases were evaluated by physical examination, muscle ultrasound (MUS) and electromyography (EMG). Inter-rater reliability of MUS was higher than physical examination and in a sensitivity analysis of MUS, all SMA subjects and a single patient with genetic muscle disease presented fasciculations in at least 2 different muscle groups, resulting in a sensitivity of 1 (95% CI: 0.69 to 1) and a specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.52 to 1) for SMA diagnosis. Forty-two percent of evaluated subjects did not agree to perform EMG, limiting this method results. Muscle ultrasound presented the best diagnostic accuracy and physical examination combined with MUS seemed to be a good strategy for screening adolescents and adults with proximal muscle weakness for SMA. These results might improve diagnostic guidelines for later-onset SMA, leading to earlier diagnosis, treatment and specific care.

Evoked potentials as biomarkers of hereditary spastic paraplegias: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias (HSP) are a group of genetic diseases that lead to slow deterioration of locomotion. Clinical scales seem to have low sensitivity in detecting disease progression, making the search for additional biomarkers a paramount task. This study aims to evaluate the role of evoked potentials (EPs) as disease biomarkers of HSPs. METHODS: A single center cross-sectional case-control study was performed, in which 18 individuals with genetic diagnosis of HSP and 21 healthy controls were evaluated. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) obtained with transcranial magnetic stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were performed in lower (LL) and upper limbs (UL). RESULTS: Central motor conduction time in lower limbs (CMCT-LL) was prolonged in HSP subjects, with marked reductions in MEP-LL amplitudes when compared to the control group (p<0.001 for both comparisons). CMCT-UL was 3.59ms (95% CI: 0.73 to 6.46; p = 0.015) prolonged and MEP-UL amplitudes were reduced (p = 0.008) in the HSP group. SSEP-LL latencies were prolonged in HSP subjects when compared to controls (p<0.001), with no statistically significant differences for upper limbs (p = 0.147). SSEP-UL and SSEP-LL latencies presented moderate to strong correlations with age at onset (Rho = 0.613, p = 0.012) and disease duration (Rho = 0.835, p<0.001), respectively. Similar results were obtained for the SPG4 subgroups of patients. CONCLUSION: Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials can adequately differentiate HSP individuals from controls. MEP were severely affected in HSP subjects and SSEP-LL latencies were prolonged, with longer latencies being related to more severe disease. Future longitudinal studies should address if SSEP is a sensitive disease progression biomarker for HSP.