Sacroiliac radiographic progression over 10 years in axSpA: data from the DESIR inception cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sacroiliac radiographic progression over a 10-year follow-up and determine the baseline factors associated with such progression in patients with recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, <3 years). METHODS: This analysis was performed in the DESIR cohort (NCT01648907). The radiographic status of the patients (radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) vs non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA)) was based on the modified New York (mNY) criteria. Information on mNY criteria on the pelvic radiographs was obtained in four reading waves over a 10-year period. Images were blinded and centrally read by 3 trained readers. The % of mNY net progressors (ie, number of 'progressors' minus number of 'regressors' divided by the total number of patients) was assessed in completers (ie, pelvic radiographs at baseline and 10 years). The yearly likelihood of mNY+ was estimated using an integrated analysis (ie, including all patients with at least one available mNY score ('intention-to-follow' population) using a generalised estimating equations model and time-varying tumour necrosis factor (TNF) use as a confounder. Baseline predictors of mNY+ during 10 years were evaluated. RESULTS: Completers included 294 patients, while intention-to-follow included 659 participants. In the completers, the net % progression (from nr-axSpA to r-axSpA) was 5.8%. In the intention-to-follow population, the probability of being mNY+ was estimated to increase 0.87% (95% CI 0.56 to 1.19) per year (ie, 8.7% after 10 years) while when introducing TNF inhibitors (TNFi) as a time-varying covariate, the probability was 0.45% (95% CI 0.09 to 0.81) (ie, 4.5% after 10 years). Baseline bone marrow oedema (BME) on MRI of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) was associated with being mNY+ over time OR 6.2 (95% CI 5.3 to 7.2) and OR 3.1 (95% CI 2.4 to 3.9) in HLA-B27+ and HLA-B27-, respectively). Male sex, symptom duration >1.5 years, Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score ≥2.1 and smoking (only in HLA-B27 positives) were also associated with being mNY+ over 10 years. BME was not found to be a mediator of the HLA-B27 effect on mNY+ at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The yearly likelihood of switching from nr-axSpA to r-axSpA in patients after 10 years of follow-up was low, and even lower when considering TNFi use.

Efficacy Of Baricitinib in Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Up to 6.5 Years Of Treatment: Results Of A Long-Term Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of once-daily baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate response (IR) to MTX, csDMARDs, or bDMARDs. METHODS: Data from three completed phase III studies, RA-BEAM (MTX-IR), RA-BUILD (csDMARD-IR), and RA-BEACON (bDMARD-IR), and one completed long-term extension study (RA-BEYOND) were analyzed up to 6.5 years (340 weeks [RA-BEAM] and 336 weeks [RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON]). Low disease activity (LDA) (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] ≤11), clinical remission (SDAI ≤3.3), and physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI] ≤0.5) were the main outcomes assessed. Completer and non-responder imputation (NRI) analyses were conducted on each population. RESULTS: At week 340 or 336, LDA was achieved in 37%/83% of MTX-IR, 35%/83% of csDMARD-IR, and 23%/73% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. Remission was achieved in 20%/40% of MTX-IR, 13%/32% of csDMARD-IR, and 9%/30% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. HAQ-DI ≤0.5 was reached in 31%/51% of MTX-IR, 25%/46% of csDMARD-IR, and 24%/38% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg demonstrated efficacy up to 6.5 years with maintained LDA/remission results across SDAI, CDAI and DAS28-hsCRP consistent with previously reported data, and was well tolerated.

Factors Associated With Treatment Pathways in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Multistate Analysis of the 10-Year Follow-Up of the DESIR Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Current recommendations for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) emphasize the need of an individualized strategy in therapeutic decision-making. The study objectives were to describe therapeutic strategies observed in axSpA, and to assess the factors associated with treatment intensification over time. METHODS: We included patients with axSpA from the French prospective cohort DESIR (Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes), with a scheduled 10-year follow-up. A multistate model with 4 ordered treatment states (no treatment, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [csDMARDs], and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi]) was defined, with 6 possible transitions. Restricted mean sojourn times in each state were estimated. Then, predictors of those transitions were assessed by multivariable Cox models. RESULTS: A total of 686/708 (96.9%) patients who had > 1 visit were analyzed. At cohort entry, 199 (29%) were untreated, 427 (62.2%) were receiving NSAIDs, 60 (8.7%) csDMARDs, and none were receiving TNFi. Over the follow-up period, patients mostly (46.4% of the time) received NSAIDs, followed by TNFi (24.4% of the time). The presence of sacroiliitis on radiographs, inflammatory bowel disease, and articular index were jointly associated with the transition to NSAIDs. Longer duration in the previous state often decreased the hazard of the transition to csDMARDs or TNFi. Worse disease activity outcomes increased the hazard of most transitions. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this was the first study using a multistate model to easily represent different treatment states, detailing the transitions across them and their associated factors. Different time profiles for the management of patients with axSpA were identified, including in those abstaining from treatment up to a significant proportion of patients treated with csDMARDs.

Erosions on T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Radiography of Sacroiliac Joints in Recent-Onset Axial Spondyloarthritis: 2-Year Data (EMBARK Trial and DESIR Cohort).

OBJECTIVE: (1) To compare the capacity to detect sacroiliac joint (SIJ) erosions and baseline-to-week 104 change in erosions between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographs in recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); and (2) to compare treatment-discriminatory capacities of MRI and radiographic scores for erosion detection in patients receiving etanercept in the Effect of Etanercept on Symptoms and Objective Inflammation in Nonradiographic axSpA (EMBARK) trial vs controls in the DESIR (Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes) cohort. METHODS: Anonymized SIJ MRI and radiographs were assessed at patient and joint surface levels. Three readers evaluated MRI; 3 different readers evaluated radiographs. Final scores for comparison of radiographs and MRI for detection of erosions were assigned based on agreement of ≥ 2 of 3 readers' assessments. RESULTS: At baseline, discordance in erosion detection between imaging methods was more frequent for MRI erosions in the absence of radiographic erosions (48/224 [21.4%] patients) than for radiographic erosions in the absence of MRI erosions (14/224 [6.3%] patients; P < 0.001). After 104 weeks, a decrease in erosions was observed on MRI but not radiographs in 49/221 (22.2%) patients, and on radiographs but not MRI in 6/221 (2.7%) patients (P < 0.001). In the treatment-discriminant capacity analysis, the largest standardized differences between etanercept and control cohorts at week 104 were changes in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI erosion discrete score, changes in erosion average score, and meeting the modified New York criteria on radiographs, with unadjusted/adjusted Hedges G effect sizes of 0.40/0.50, 0.40/0.56, and 0.40/0.43, respectively. CONCLUSION: In recent-onset axSpA, SIJ erosions and erosion change were observed more frequently on MRI than radiography. The significance of interval improvement of MRI erosions warrants further research. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01258738, NCT01648907].

Disease activity and widespread pain are main contributors to patient-reported global health in axial spondyloarthritis: an analysis of 6064 patients.

Global health (GH) and health-related quality of life are patient priorities in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Our objective was to assess the relative importance of disease-related factors including disease activity, and patient-related factors including comorbidities, to explain GH in axSpA. Post hoc cross-sectional analyses of 4 sets (COMOSPA, PERSPA, COMEDSPA, and DESIR) of patients fulfilling ASAS criteria for axSpA. GH was assessed through the ASAS Health Index (ASAS-HI) or the EuroQoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D). Disease-related factors included disease activity (ASDAS, psoriasis, arthritis, enthesitis, and CRP), disease duration, diagnostic delay, bamboo spine, and treatment. Non-disease-related factors included sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities and chronic widespread pain. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions and partial variances (R2) were applied to identify independent determinants of GH. In 6064 patients (range 284-2756 across datasets), mean age ranged 38.9-45.8 years, 51-68% were male. GH was generally moderate: median ASAS-HI ranged 5.0-7.0. GH was explained by ASDAS (range of odds ratios, OR, 2.60-4.48) and chronic widespread pain (range of OR 2.19-8.39); other determinants included comorbidities and sociodemographic characteristics. Only 47-57% of the total variance in GH could be explained by the models; disease activity (partial variance, 16-26%) and chronic widespread pain (partial variance 12-15%) were the key contributing variables. A wide range of disease and non-disease-related variables usually collected in studies could only explain 47-57% of the variability in GH. Among these, disease activity and chronic widespread pain were most relevant and of similar magnitude of importance. These findings will be helpful for shared decision-making.

Clinical and imaging outcomes of different phenotypes of axial spondyloarthritis: 5-year analysis of the DESIR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term outcomes of three phenotypes of axial SpA (axSpA). METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of axSpA from the DESIR cohort were grouped into three phenotypes at baseline: 'Pure axSpA' ('Axial'), 'axSpA with peripheral signs' ('IBP+Peripheral') and 'axSpA at risk' ('At risk') by latent class analysis. Clinical and imaging data were collected up to 5 years. Clinical outcomes, measured in each visit, included disability (BASFI) and quality of life (QoL; SF36). Imaging outcomes included inflammatory and structural lesions on MRI and radiographs of spine and SIJ. The association between phenotype membership at baseline and each outcome was tested in multivariable GEE models. RESULTS: In total, 576 patients with axSpA were included. 'At risk' patients had worse disability and QoL than 'Axial' patients over time. For instance, 'At risk' patients had on average 0.4 more points in BASFI over time than 'Axial' patients [ß (95 % CI): 0.4 (0.2; 0.7)]. This difference was mostly noted in female patients who were HLA-B27 positive. In addition, the difference between the 'At risk' and 'Axial' phenotypes was higher in patients receiving bDMARDs than in those not (ß=0.6 vs 0.5), since BASFI improved more in 'Axial' (∆BASFI: -1.3) than in 'At risk' (∆BASFI: -0.9) treated patients. There were no differences in disability and QoL between 'Axial' and 'IBP+Peripheral' patients. Imaging outcomes were worse in the 'Axial' phenotype than in the others over time. CONCLUSION: Patients with 'axSpA at risk' show worse self-reported outcomes over time and are less likely to benefit from anti-inflammatory treatment than those with a classical axSpA phenotype.

When Usual Care Is Not So Usual: Protocol Violations and Generalizability in a Treat-to-Target Strategy Trial in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of protocol violations in the treat-to-target group in the Tight Control in Spondyloarthritis (TICOSPA) trial and to compare the proportion of patients optimally treated according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)/EULAR 2016 recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) between the treat-to-target versus usual care (UC) arms. METHODS: This study was a cluster-randomized, controlled 48-week trial including patients with axSpA who fulfilled the ASAS criteria, had an Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score >2.1, and were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug naive. Eighteen axSpA expert centers were randomly allocated to one treatment arm: (a) treat-to-target prespecified management strategy (four-week visits), and (b) UC treatment decisions at the rheumatologist's discretion (12-week visits). Protocol violations in the treat-to-target arm and the fulfillment of the 2016 ASAS/EULAR recommendations in both arms were evaluated at every visit. ASAS Health Index (ASAS-HI) and disease activity outcomes at 48 weeks were compared between treat-to-target violators versus nonviolators. Patients treated according to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations were compared between both arms. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients initiated the trial (80 patients with treat to target; 80 patients with UC). In the treat-to-target arm, 51.2% patients violated the protocol at least once (62.2% of violations resulting in maintenance/reduction of treatment against protocol). After 48 weeks, treat-to-target violators versus nonviolators showed similar ratios of ASAS-HI improvement. The proportion of patients managed according to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations after the first 12 weeks were 63.9% versus 61.8% for the treat-to-target and UC arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Protocol violations in the treat-to-target arm in the TICOSPA trial were frequent, although they did not have an impact on the rate of the primary outcome. The groups with UC was optimally treated, partly explaining the nonachievement of the primary objective in the TICOSPA trial.

Sensitivity to change of structural outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis after 10 years of follow up. Data from the DESIR cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity to change in structural imaging outcomes over 10 years of follow-up in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Patients with axSpA from the Devenir des Spondyloarthropathies Indifferénciées Récentes cohort were included. Radiographs and MRIs of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) and spine were obtained at baseline and at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years. The yearly rate of change of each structural outcome was analysed using generalised estimating equation models, including all patients with ≥1 score from ≥1 reader from ≥1 reading wave, using the time (years) as an explanatory variable and adjusting for reader and wave. All outcomes were standardised, and the relative standardised rate of change was calculated (ie, the standardised rate of an outcome divided by the rate of a reference outcome). RESULTS: A total of 659 patients (46% males and mean age 33.6 years) were included. The most sensitive outcome to change in the SIJ (both MRI and radiographs) was the presence of ≥3 fatty lesions at a specific timepoint, with a relative standardised rate of change per year of 5.28 using the modified New York criteria as reference.Similarly, the most sensitive to change (in both MRI and radiographs) outcome in the spine was the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS; relative standardised yearly change 1.76) using ≥1 syndesmophyte as reference. CONCLUSION: MRI structural outcomes in the SIJ (ie, fatty lesions) are more sensitive to change than radiographic outcomes. Conversely, the mSASSS remains the most sensitive method, even when compared with MRI of the spine.

Impact of the time of initiation and line of biologic therapy on the retention rate of secukinumab in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): data from the French multicentre retrospective FORSYA study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 1-year retention rate of secukinumab in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and its predisposing factors with regard to its time of initiation (eg, right after or remotely from its launch). METHODS: Study design: Retrospective multicentre French study of patients with axSpA. Study periods: Two cohorts were evaluated regarding the time of initiation of secukinumab: cohort 1 (C1)-between 16 August 2016 and 31 August 2018-and cohort 2 (C2)-between 1 September 2018 and 13 November 2020. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The 1-year retention rate of secukinumab was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the retention curves of the two cohorts. Preselected factors (eg, disease characterristics, line and time of secukinumab initiation) of secukinumab retention at 1 year were analysed by univariate and multivariate Cox model regression. RESULTS: In total, 906 patients in C1 and 758 in C2 from 50 centres were included in the analysis. The 1-year retention rate was better in C2 (64% (61%-68%)) vs C1 (59% (55%-62%)) (HR=1.19 (1.02-1.39); p=0.0297). In the multivariate analysis, the line of biologic therapy was the single predictive factor of the 1-year retention rate of secukinumab picked up in both cohorts, with a better retention rate when prescribed as first-line biologic therapy. CONCLUSION: The better secukinumab retention rate remotely from its launch is explained by its use at an earlier stage of the disease, suggesting a change in the behaviour of prescribing physicians. Our results emphasise the relevance of iterative evaluations of routine care treatments.

Diagnosis challenges in inception cohorts in axial spondyloarthritis: the case of the French national DESIR cohort.

BACKGROUND: Inception cohorts aim to describe chronic diseases from diagnosis and over years of follow-up. Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) diagnosis might be challenging during the first years of the disease. Thus, identifying the features that will be associated with a confirmed diagnosis over time is key. OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and the predisposing factors for a change of an initial diagnosis in an inception axSpA cohort. METHODS: DESIR is an ongoing national multicentre inception axSpA cohort with currently 12.5 years of follow-up. At the entry visit and confirmed at each visit, the diagnosis of axSpA was based on the opinion of the treating rheumatologist. Follow-up was interrupted in case of a change in this initial diagnosis. Multiple imputation was used to estimate the probability of a change in the initial diagnosis of axSpA for each patient lost to follow-up. Factors predisposing to an unchanged diagnosis of axSpA were then assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model on the imputed data sets. RESULTS: Of the 708 patients included, over 10 years of follow-up, 45 (6.4%) were excluded due to a diagnosis change and 300 (42.4%) patients were lost to follow-up. Based on the imputation of these 300 patients, a change in their initial axSpA diagnosis was estimated in 42 (14.0%). Factors predisposing to an unchanged initial axSpA diagnosis during follow-up were (ORs (95% CIs)): radiographic sacroiliitis: 17.0 (4.1 to 71.0); psoriasis: 5.3 (2.0 to 14.3); CRP≥6 mg/L: 2.7 (1.3 to 5.3); good NSAID response: 2.5 (1.5 to 4.2); HLA B27+: 2.0 (1.3 to 3.3); anterior chest wall pain: 2.0 (1.2 to 3.3) and female sex: 1.9 (1.2 to 3.0). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a change in diagnosis in recent onset axSpA exists, but is not frequent, and is less likely to occur in the presence of objective features at baseline.

Sex differential impact of comorbidities in spondyloarthritis: data from COMOSPA study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the prevalence of comorbidities in female and male patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and to assess whether comorbidities had a different impact on disease outcomes in male and female patients. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the COMOrbidities in SPondyloArthritis study. Differences in comorbidities regarding sex were assessed using logistic regression models. Comorbidities were evaluated for their impact on disease outcomes (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, European health-related quality of life questionnaire) with linear models, which included sex and comorbidity as explanatory variables and their interaction. Age and treatment with biological synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were included as confounders. RESULTS: We included 3982 patients with SpA (65% male, mean age 43.6 years). Male and female patients with SpA exhibited similar comorbidity profiles, except for a low prevalence of fibromyalgia in males and a higher prevalence of certain cardiovascular risk factors in males (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, renal impairment and ischaemic heart disease). Comorbidities, especially fibromyalgia, correlated with higher disease activity, decreased physical function and reduced health-related quality of life in both sexes. Some comorbidities exhibited sex-specific associations with disease outcomes. Peptic ulcers and high waist circumference had a greater impact on disease activity in females (with a higher impact in BASDAI than in ASDAS). In contrast, osteoporosis had a more pronounced effect on physical function in male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities exert distinct influences on disease activity, physical function and health-related quality of life in male and female patients with SpA. Understanding these sex-specific effects is crucial for improving SpA management, emphasising the importance of assessing disease activity using ASDAS when comorbidities are present to mitigate sex-related disparities in disease assessment.

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: psychometric properties and clinically meaningful thresholds for interpretation.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is an important symptom for most patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument that has been used in axSpA clinical trials to measure fatigue severity and impact on daily activities. However, the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue are not fully evaluated across the entire spectrum of axSpA including non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). This study determined: (1) the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue in nr-axSpA, r-axSpA, and the broad axSpA population and (2) FACIT-Fatigue scores representing meaningful within-patient change (MWPC), meaningful between-group differences, and cross-sectional severity bands. METHODS: Data from two Phase 3 trials in adults with nr-axSpA (BE MOBILE 1; N = 254) and r-axSpA (BE MOBILE 2; N = 332) were analyzed pooled and separately to assess the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Fatigue. MWPC and meaningful between-group difference estimates were derived using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Cross-sectional fatigue severity bands were estimated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The FACIT-Fatigue presented good internal consistency, adequate convergent and known-groups validity, and was sensitive to change over time across the full axSpA spectrum. A 5-11-point increase in FACIT-Fatigue score was estimated to represent a MWPC, with an 8-point increase selected as the responder definition. A 2.14-5.34-point difference in FACIT-Fatigue score change over a 16-week period was estimated to represent a small-to-medium meaningful between-group difference. FACIT-Fatigue score severity bands were defined as: none or minimal (>40), mild (>30 to ≤40), moderate (>21 to ≤30), and severe (≤21). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of the FACIT-Fatigue as a fit-for-purpose measure to assess fatigue-related treatment benefit in axSpA clinical trials. The proposed score estimates and thresholds can guide FACIT-Fatigue score interpretation across the full axSpA spectrum. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03928704. Registered 26 April 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03928704 . CLINICALTRIALS: Gov, NCT03928743. Registered 26 April 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03928743 .

Ten-year clinical outcome of recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis: Results from the DESIR inception Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the 10-year clinical outcome of patients with recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS STUDY DESIGN: The DESIR cohort is an inception cohort of axSpA patients. METHODS DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT: The diagnosis and management of patients were based on the decision of the treating rheumatologist. METHODS STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Both complete cases and imputed data analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 708 enrolled patients, 45 were excluded due to a change in the baseline diagnosis, 3 patients died, and 300 were lost to follow-up over the 10years. In the completer population, one patient required bilateral total hip replacement, and 56 patients received a pension due to invalidity. The prevalence of main extra-musculoskeletal features increased from baseline to year 10: psoriasis from 18% to 30%, acute anterior uveitis from 10% to 18%, and inflammatory bowel disease from 5% to 10%. The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension, with an increase from 5% to 15% from baseline to year 10. In the imputed data analysis the estimated proportions of patients with an acceptable status at year 10 were 70% [95% CI: 63; 77] for acceptable PASS, 43% [95% CI: 37; 49] for BASDAI<3, and 48% [95% CI: 41; 56] for ASDAS<2.1. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that despite a quite favorable 10-year outcome exists for severe outcomes, a large proportion of patients present with an important disease burden reflected by patient-reported outcomes. This information can be valuable for providing patients with information at the time of diagnosis.

Comparing clinical profiles in spondyloarthritis with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis: insights from the ASAS-PerSpA study.

Objectives: Assuming SpA manifestations may vary among patients with different inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subtypes, we explored the clinical characteristics associated with the presence of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: We included 3152 patients of ASAS-PerSpA study diagnosed with either axial SpA or peripheral SpA, according to their treating rheumatologist. Of these, 146 (4.6%) had confirmed IBD by endoscopy and were categorized into CD or UC groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the two subgroups. Results: From 146 patients included in the current analysis, 87 (59.6%) had CD [75 (86.2%) axial SpA and 12 (13.8%) peripheral SpA], and 39 (26.7%) had UC [34 (87.2%) axial SpA and 5 (12.8%) peripheral SpA]. CD and UC groups had similar age with average of 44.9 (13.5) vs 44.0 (13.0) years, respectively, and a slight male predominance in CD (63.2%) compared with UC (51.3%). Diagnostic delay for SpA was 7.0 (6.9) years for CD and 8.8 (8.1) years for UC. Chronic back pain was the most reported symptom present in 95.4% of CD patients and 89.7% of UC patients. Both groups had similar musculoskeletal phenotyping, with higher frequency of psoriasis (15.4%) and uveitis 28.2% in UC; and higher tendency to be HLA-B27 positive in CD (51.9% in CD vs.s 39.4% in UC). Conclusion: In our analysis patients with SpA and concurrent CD or UC had mainly similar musculoskeletal phenotypes. However, they differ slightly in extra-musculoskeletal manifestations and HLA-B27 prevalence.

Standardized reporting for systematic global evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis: An evidence-based and consensus-driven initiative.

INTRODUCTION: National and international scientific societies advocate for a regular, systematic, and standardized global evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. However, there are no recommendations specifying the content of this global evaluation. This initiative aimed to propose a standardized reporting framework, using evidence-based and consensus approaches, to collect data on all domains of axSpA. METHODS: A literature review and consensus process involved a steering committee and an expert panel of 37 rheumatologists and health professionals. The first steering committee took place in March 2022 and identified the main domains for inclusion in the standardized report. A hierarchical literature review was conducted to identify items within these domains and tools for assessment. The items and tools for assessment were discussed and consensus was reached through a vote session during an expert meeting that took place in March 2023. RESULTS: The steering committee identified four main domains to include in the standardized reporting framework: disease assessment, comorbidities, lifestyle, and quality of life. Items and tools for assessment were adopted after the expert meeting. Additionally, recommendations regarding digital tools (websites, apps, social media) were provided. CONCLUSION: This initiative led to a consensus, based on evidence and expertise, on a reporting framework for use during periodic systematic global evaluations of axSpa in daily practice.

Adding ultrasound to treat-to-target shows no benefit in achieving clinical remission nor in slowing radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether using ultrasound (US) in addition to clinical information versus only clinical information in a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy leads to more clinical remission and to less radiographic progression in RA. METHODS: Patients with RA from the 2-year prospective BIODAM cohort were included. Clinical and US data (US7-score) were collected every 3 months and hands and feet radiographs every 6 months. At each visit, it was decided whether patients were treated according to the clinical definition of T2T with DAS44 remission as benchmark (T2T-DAS44). T2T-DAS44 was correctly applied if: (i) DAS44 remission had been achieved or (ii) if not, treatment was intensified. A T2T strategy also considering US data (T2T-DAS44-US) was correctly applied if: (i) both DAS44 and US remission (synovitis-score < 2, Doppler-score = 0) were present; or (ii) if not, treatment was intensified. The effect of T2T-DAS44-US on attaining clinical remission and on change in Sharp-van der Heijde score compared to T2T-DAS44 was analysed. RESULTS: A total of 1016 visits of 128 patients were included. T2T-DAS44 was correctly followed in 24% of visits and T2T-DAS44-US in 41%. DAS44 < 1.6 was achieved in 39% of visits. Compared to T2T-DAS44, using the T2T-DAS44-US strategy resulted in a 41% lower likelihood of DAS44 remission [OR (95% CI): 0.59 (0.40;0.87)] and had no effect on radiographic progression [ß(95% CI): 0.11 (- 0.16;0.39)] assessed at various intervals up to 12 months later. CONCLUSION: Our results do not suggest a benefit of using the US7-score in addition to clinical information as a T2T benchmark compared to clinical information alone. Key Points • Ultrasound has a valuable role in diagnostic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis, but it is unclear whether adding ultrasound to the clinical assessment in a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy leads to more patients achieving remission and reduction in radiographic progression. • Our data from a real-world study demonstrated that adding information from ultrasound to the clinical assessment in a T2T strategy led to a lower rather than a higher likelihood of obtaining clinical remission as compared to using only clinical assessment. • Our data demonstrated that adding ultrasound data to a T2T strategy based only on clinical assessment did not offer additional protection against radiographic progression in patients with RA. • Adding US to a T2T strategy based on clinical assessment led to far more treatment intensifications (with consequences for costs and exposure to adverse events) without yielding a meaningful clinical benefit.

Impact of disease outcomes on the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Health Index (ASAS HI): a Bayesian network analysis of the DESIR cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to build a structural model visualising and quantifying the interrelationships of different disease outcomes with the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Health Index (ASAS HI) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Cross-sectional data collected at month 72 of the Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifferénciées Récentes cohort was analysed. Combining prior knowledge and observed data, probabilistic Bayesian network modelling was used to study how the interplay of different disease outcomes affects the ASAS HI, which measures disease-specific overall functioning and health. Disease outcomes comprised, among others, the Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI). RESULTS: Data of 384 patients were analysed. The obtained structure suggests that ASAS HI is determined by both patient-reported physical function (BASFI) and disease activity (ASDAS). The parameters of the structural model show that an increase of ASDAS or BASFI by 1 unit corresponds to an increase of ASAS HI by 0.70 or 1.25 units, respectively. Moreover, the model suggests that disease activity has an indirect impact on ASAS HI via BASFI. No relationship between spinal mobility or structural damage and ASAS HI was found. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first structural model developed to better understand the construct and the interplay between clinically relevant outcomes related to ASAS HI in axSpA patients. It shows that disease activity and physical function have a strong impact on ASAS HI, confirming it to be a valid construct of overall functioning and health in axSpA patients.

Referring early arthritis patients within 6 weeks versus 12 weeks after symptom onset: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The first recommendation of the European League Against Rheumatism for the management of early arthritis states that patients should be referred to, and seen by, a rheumatologist within 6 weeks after symptom onset. However, implementation of this recommendation is a challenge, and evidence supporting this timeframe compared with longer timeframes is absent. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether visiting a rheumatologist within 6 weeks of symptom onset relates to improved long-term outcomes compared with visiting a rheumatologist between 7 and 12 weeks after symptom onset. METHODS: In this observation cohort study, consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) and the French Etude et Suivi des Polyarthrites Indifferenciées Recentes (ESPOIR) were included. In this analysis, we included patients who were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and classified according to 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria, and with symptom onset and remission data available. Patients were categorised into groups based on time between symptom onset and first encounter with a rheumatologist: within 6 weeks, between 7 weeks and 12 weeks, and after 12 weeks. The main outcomes were sustained disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-free remission and radiographic progression. Multivariable Cox regression, linear mixed models, and meta-analyses were used. FINDINGS: 1025 patients with rheumatoid arthritis included in the EAC between Jan 1, 1996, and Dec 31, 2017, and 514 patients with rheumatoid arthritis included in ESPOIR between Nov 1, 2002, and April 30, 2005, were included in this analysis. Median follow-up was 7·1 years (IQR 3·9-12·2) in the EAC and 10·0 years (9·0-10·0) in ESPOIR. After 7 years of follow-up in the EAC, 30 (24%) of 127 patients with a time to encounter of 6 weeks or less, 45 (20%) of 223 patients with a time of 7-12 weeks, and 100 (15%) of 675 patients with a time of more than 12 weeks achieved sustained DMARD-free remission. After 10 years of follow-up in ESPOIR, three (27%) of 11 patients with a time to encounter of 6 weeks or less, 11 (11%) of 100 patients with a time of 7-12 weeks, and 41 (10%) of 403 patients with a time of more than 12 weeks had sustained DMARD-free remission. In the EAC multivariable analysis, patients who encountered a rheumatologist within 6 weeks obtained sustained DMARD-free remission more often than those seen between 7 and 12 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 1·59 [95% CI 1·02-2·49], p=0·042), and after 12 weeks (1·54 [1·04-2·29], p=0·032). In the ESPOIR multivariable analysis, similar but non-significant effects were observed (HR 2·81 [95% CI 0·75-10·53], p=0·12, for within 6 weeks vs 7-12 weeks and 3·05 [0·89-10·49], p=0·077, for within 6 weeks vs more than 12 weeks). The meta-analysis of both cohorts showed that the time to encounter of 6 weeks or less was associated with a higher chance of achieving sustained DMARD-free remission than a time of 7-12 weeks (HR 1·69 [95% CI 1·10-2·57], p=0·016) and a time of more than 12 weeks (1·67 [1·08-2·58], p=0·020). The multivariable analysis showed that patients who encountered a rheumatologist within 6 weeks had similar radiographic progression to those seen between 7 and 12 weeks in both cohorts (ß=1·00 [95% CI 0·95-1·05], p=0·96, in the EAC and 0·93 [0·80-1·07], p=0·30, in ESPOIR) and to those seen after 12 weeks (ß=0·96 [95% CI 0·92-1·00], p=0·064, in the EAC and 0·89 [0·77-1·02], p=0·10, in ESPOIR). In the meta-analysis, a time to encounter of 6 weeks or less was not associated with less radiographic progression than a time of 7-12 weeks (ß=0·99 [95% CI 0·95-1·04], p=0·75) but was associated with less radiographic progression than a time of more than 12 weeks (0·95 [0·91-0·99], p=0·028). INTERPRETATION: Visiting a rheumatologist within 6 weeks of symptom onset had benefits for achieving sustained DMARD-free remission, but not for radiographic progression. FUNDING: European Research Council, Dutch Arthritis Society, Merck Sharp & Dohme, INSERM, The French Society of Rheumatology, Pfizer, AbbVie, Lilly, and Sanofi.

National recommendations based on scientific evidence and opinions of experts on the use of methotrexate in rheumatic disorders, especially in rheumatoid arthritis: results of the 3E Initiative from Brazil / Recomendações nacionais baseadas em evidências científicas e opiniões dos especialistas sobre o uso do metotrexato nas doenças reumáticas, especialmente na artrite reumatoide: resultados da iniciativa 3E do Brasil

Objetivos: A utilização do metotrexato (MTX) tem sido a base da terapia da artrite reumatoide (AR), porém ainda não temos uniformidade sobre as normas para seu uso clínico. O objetivo deste estudo foi criar recomendações baseadas em evidências científicas e opiniões de especialistas (experts) sobre o uso do MTX, as quais permitirão melhorar nossa prática clínica. Métodos: O 3E (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative in Rheumatology é um grupo multinacional de reumatologistas oriundos de 17 países, incluindo o Brasil. Após uma seleção de dez questões sobre o uso de MTX, feita pelo método Delphi, realizou-se uma revisão sistemática da literatura (RSL) (Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Abstracts EULAR 2005-2007 e ACR 2006-2007) por seis revisores bibliográficos internacionais escolhidos pelos mentores do estudo 3E. Duas diferentes questões nacionais do Brasil também foram incluídas e essa pesquisa foi realizada por um revisor bibliográfico nacional. Os resultados da RSL foram apresentados por sete membros do comitê científico brasileiro do 3E, em um encontro nacional de 48 reumatologistas, os quais discutiram as informações da RSL, votaram e elaboraram recomendações nacionais aqui apresentadas. Estas foram utilizadas posteriormente na criação de recomendações multinacionais. Resultados e conclusões: Formularam-se 21 recomendações acerca das dez questões internacionais e das duas questões nacionais, com um nível de concordância entre os participantes de 77% (63 a 100%). O MTX é indicado inicialmente por via oral, na dose mínima de 10 mg/sem e máxima de 25 mg/sem. A elevação de AST/ALT acima de 3 vezes o limite superior do valor normal, por pelo menos três vezes, justifica a suspensão temporária do MTX, podendo-se reinstituir com a normalização dos valores encontrados. MTX é seguro a longo prazo. O uso de álcool (> 100 g/sem) deve ser evitado...

OBJECTIVES: The use of methotrexate (MTX) has been the basis for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy, but there is no uniformity on the guidelines for its clinical use. The objective of this study was to develop recommendations based on scientific evidence and opinions of experts on the use of MTX, which will allow the improvement of our clinical practice. METHODS: 3E (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative in Rheumatology is a multinational group of rheumatologists from 17 countries, including Brazil. After a selection of 10 questions about the use of MTX, held by the Delphi method, a systematic literature review (SLR) was done (Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Abstracts EULAR 2005-2007 and ACR 2006-2007) by six international bibliographic reviewers chosen by the mentors of the 3E study. Two other different national questions from Brazil were also included, and the SLR was done by a national bibliographic reviewer. The results of SLR were presented by 7 members of our Brazilian 3E scientific committee at a meeting of 48 rheumatologists, which discussed RSL details, voted, and produced the national recommendations presented here. These recommendations were subsequently used in the creation of multinational recommendations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 21 recommendations concerning the 10 international and the 2 national questions were formulated, with an agreement level of 77% among the participants (63-100%). Oral MTX should be started at a minimum dose of 10 mg/wk and a maximum dose of 25 mg/wk. Elevation of AST/ALT above 3x the upper limit, for at least 3 times consecutively, justifies the temporary suspension of MTX, which can be restored after normalization of serum liver enzyme levels; MTX is safe for long term use. The use of alcohol (100 g/wk) should be avoided. Combinations of MTX with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs are recommended, although there is risk of greater toxicity. Folic acid should be associated with MTX in dose higher...