Clinical Use of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice to Assess Patient Reported Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: EPIC-CP (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice) is a short questionnaire that comprehensively measures patient reported health related quality of life at the point of care. We evaluated the feasibility of using EPIC-CP in the routine clinical care of patients with prostate cancer without research infrastructure. We compared longitudinal patient and practitioner reported prostate cancer outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed health related quality of life outcomes in 482 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2010 to 2014. EPIC-CP was administered and interpreted in routine clinical practice without research personnel. We compared practitioner documented rates of incontinence pad use and functional erections to patient reported rates using EPIC-CP. RESULTS: A total of 708 EPIC-CP questionnaires were completed. Mean urinary incontinence domain scores were significantly higher (worse) than baseline (mean ± SD 0.6 ± 0.2) 3 and 6 months after treatment (mean 3.1 ± 2.3 and 2.2 ± 2.1, respectively, each p <0.05) but they returned to baseline at 12 months (mean 1.6 ± 1.7, p >0.05). Mean sexual domain scores were significantly worse than baseline (mean 2.4 ± 2.8) at all posttreatment time points (each p <0.05). Practitioners significantly overestimated incontinence pad-free rates at 3 months (48% vs 39%) and functional erection rates at 3 months (18% vs 12%), 6 months (38% vs 23%) and 12 months (45% vs 23%, each p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EPIC-CP is feasible to use in the routine clinical care of patients with prostate cancer without requiring a research infrastructure. Using EPIC-CP in clinical practice may help practitioners objectively assess and appropriately manage posttreatment side effects in patients with prostate cancer.

Aspirin and clopidogrel during robotic partial nephrectomy, is it safe?

INTRODUCTION: Continuation of antiplatelet medications through major urologic surgery may increase the risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications. However, withdrawal of antiplatelet therapy may place some patients at high risk of serious cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications. We assess the feasibility of performing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients maintained on aspirin or dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Perioperative data was collected prospectively on 230 subjects undergoing RPN enrolled in an IRB approved quality of life study. We analyzed subjects who were maintained on either aspirin alone or both aspirin and clopidogrel throughout the operative and perioperative period. RESULTS: Of the 230 patients, six were identified who continued antiplatelet medication throughout the perioperative period. Four patients were maintained on 81 mg of aspirin and two patients continued aspirin and clopidogrel. Average RENAL score was 7 with mean tumor size of 4.1 cm. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Average estimated blood loss was 242 mL. Ninety day complication rate was 33%. One patient had postoperative bleeding on day 14 after restarting coumadin in addition to their aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: We present a case series demonstrating that in carefully selected patients, RPN on aspirin and clopidogrel is feasible and safe. This is the first report of patients who underwent RPN while on both aspirin and clopidogrel.

Optimizing prostate cancer detection during biopsy by standardizing the amount of tissue examined per core.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect on cancer detection by varying the number of cores taken for prostate biopsy according to the size of the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively registered prostate biopsy database identified 3040 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy at a Veterans Administration Hospital between 1994 and 2008. Of 2224 biopsies, 681 (31%) were found to have cancer and 1540 (69%) had negative biopsies. Prostate volume to biopsy core ratios (volume/number of cores) were derived and a comparative analysis was performed to determine the impact on cancer detection rates. RESULTS: The median prostate volume was significantly smaller for those patients diagnosed with prostate cancer than for those with negative biopsies (33 vs 43 cc, P= 0.01). The median number of cores was the same for both groups of patients (median 12, P= 0.66). The median transrectal ultrasonography TRUS size/core ratio was 3.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.5] for patients with identified cancer as compared with 4.7 (IQR = 3.9) for those with negative biopsies (P= 0.000). On multivariable logistic regression analysis TRUS size/core ratio had a significant impact on cancer detection with a relative risk ratio of 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5, P= 0.001) even when controlled for age, race, prostate volume, digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen level. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer detection can be enhanced by individualizing the number of cores performed to a real-time prostate volume sampling. The present study emphasizes that optimal cancer detection rates were observed when a ratio of 3.5 cc per tissue core was achieved. Proper prospectively designed studies must be performed to further validate these findings.

How to Quantify Recovery After Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: An Assessment of Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive approaches to adrenal surgery were adopted in an attempt to reduce surgical morbidity. Despite the widespread use, few studies objectively evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). We assessed patients' health status and recovery after LA with the use of validated questionnaires. METHODS: Patients seen in urology clinic for evaluation of adrenal surgery were enlisted in our prospective, patient-reported, HRQOL study assessing postoperative recovery. HRQOL was measured using Convalescence And Recovery Evaluation (CARE) and Short Form-12 questionnaires administered before surgery and at 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks and annually after surgery. All operations were performed using a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach by a single fellowship-trained surgeon. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients who met study inclusion criteria from July 2009 to November 2014 were included in our evaluation. Mean patient age was 53 years. Tumor size ranged from 2.0 to 5.5 cm and consisted of benign lesions, adrenal metastasis, and 1 adrenocortical carcinoma. Mean operative time was 98 minutes and median estimated blood loss was 50 mL. Median length of hospital stay was 1 day. Quality of life reflected by the CARE survey was impacted at 2 weeks postoperative and returned to baseline after 4 weeks. Pain and activity domains of CARE showed a significant decrease from baseline status. Physical component summary of Short Form-12 questionnaire supported the finding of negative impact of surgery on activity level within first 4 weeks of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite minimally invasive approach, patients undergoing LA may require about 4 weeks to return to baseline activity, gastrointestinal, and pain status.

Copy number alterations in pancreatic cancer identify recurrent PAK4 amplification.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal of all cancers. The median survival is six months and less than 5% of those diagnosed survive five years. Recurrent genetic deletions and amplifications in 72 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, the largest sample set analyzed to date for pancreatic cancer, were defined using comparative genomic hybridization The recurrent genetic alterations identified target a number of previously well-characterized genes, as well as regions that contain possible new oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. We have focused on chromosome 19q13, a region frequently found amplified in pancreatic cancer and demonstrate how boundaries of common regions of mutation can be mapped and how a gene, in this case PAK4 amplified on chromosome19q13, can be functionally validated. We show that although the PAK4 gene is not activated by mutation in cell lines with gene amplification, an oncogenic form of the KRAS2 gene is present in these cells and oncogenic KRAS2 can activate PAK4. In fact in the three samples we identified with PAK4 gene amplification, the KRAS2 gene was activated and genomically amplified. The kinase activity of the PAK4 protein is significantly higher in cells with genomic amplification as compared to cells without amplification. Our study demonstrates the utility of analyzing copy number data in a large set of neoplasms to identify genes involved in cancer. We have generated a useful dataset which will be particularly useful for the pancreatic cancer community as efforts are undertaken to sequence the pancreatic cancer genome.