Phase 1 study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of CA102N as monotherapy and in combination with trifluridine-tipiracil in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

CA102N is a covalently bound conjugate of modified nimesulide (Nim) and NaHA, the sodium salt of hyaluronic acid (HA). HA is a natural ligand of cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), which is over-expressed in colorectal cancer (CRC). CA102N is designed to deliver nimesulide directly to the tumor via the interaction of HA and CD44. A Phase 1, 2-part (dose escalation, dose expansion), non-randomized, open-label, first-in-human study of CA102N, as monotherapy and in combination with trifluridine-tipiracil, was conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The CA102N doses evaluated were 0.36 mg/kg, 0.54 mg/kg, and 0.72 mg/kg Nim equivalent. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 as well as serious adverse events (SAEs) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) throughout the study; secondary endpoints were pharmacodynamics parameters, objective tumor response, and urinary pharmacodynamics markers of target inhibition. Between April 2019 and October 2021, 37 patients were enrolled in 3 US centers. No DLTs were observed in Part 1, and 0.72 mg/kg Nim equivalent was the dose selected for Part 2. In total, 52 TEAEs in 18 patients were CA102N-related; 4 (in 3 patients) were ≥ Grade 3. Exploratory analysis in the dose expansion cohort revealed a median progression-free survival of 3.7 (1.0, 6.77) months. Based on this study, CA102N as monotherapy or in combination with trifluridine-tipiracil, was safe and well-tolerated at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 0.72 mg/kg Nim equivalent in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in CRC warrants further clinical development. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03616574. Registration date: August 6, 2018).

Pharmacogenetic study in gastric cancer patients treated with adjuvant fluorouracil/leucovorin or epirubicin/cisplatin/fluorouracil before and after chemoradiation on CALGB 80101 (Alliance).

There is a lack of pharmacogenetic predictors of outcome in gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess previously identified candidate genes associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, or epirubicin toxicity or response in a cohort of resected gastric cancer patients treated on CALGB (Alliance) 80101. Gastric or gastroesophageal cancer patients randomized to adjuvant 5-FU/leucovorin or epirubicin/cisplatin/5-FU before and after 5-FU chemoradiation were genotyped for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GSTP1 (rs1695), ERCC1 (rs11615 and rs3212986), XRCC1 (rs25487), UGT2B7 (rs7439366) and the 28 base-pair tandem repeats in TYMS (rs34743033). Logistic regression and log rank tests were used to assess the association between each SNP and incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and leukopenia, overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Toxicity endpoint analyses were adjusted for the treatment arm, while OS and PFS were also adjusted for performance status, sex, age, lymph node involvement, and primary tumor site and size. Of 281 subjects with successful genotyping results and available clinical (toxicity and efficacy) data, 166 self-reported non-Hispanic White patients were included in the final analysis. There was a lack of evidence of an association among any SNPs tested with grade 3/4 neutropenia and leukopenia or OS and PFS. Age, lymph node involvement, and primary tumor size were significantly associated with OS and PFS. This study failed to confirm results of previous gastric cancer pharmacogenetic studies.

Phase I Study of Concomitant Pemetrexed and Cisplatin Plus External Beam Radiation Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinomas.

PURPOSE: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bi-weekly Pemetrexed (PEM) when combined with weekly cisplatin (CDDP) and standard dose external beam radiation (EBRT) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) carcinomas. METHODS: We conducted an open label, single institution, phase I dose escalation study designed to evaluate up to 15-35 patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal and GEJ carcinomas. RESULTS: 10 patients were treated with bi-weekly PEM, weekly CDDP, and EBRT. The MTD of bi-weekly PEM was determined to be 500 mg/m(2).

Methods for improving colorectal cancer annotation efficiency for artificial intelligence-observer training.

BACKGROUND: Missing occult cancer lesions accounts for the most diagnostic errors in retrospective radiology reviews as early cancer can be small or subtle, making the lesions difficult to detect. Second-observer is the most effective technique for reducing these events and can be economically implemented with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI). AIM: To achieve appropriate AI model training, a large annotated dataset is necessary to train the AI models. Our goal in this research is to compare two methods for decreasing the annotation time to establish ground truth: Skip-slice annotation and AI-initiated annotation. METHODS: We developed a 2D U-Net as an AI second observer for detecting colorectal cancer (CRC) and an ensemble of 5 differently initiated 2D U-Net for ensemble technique. Each model was trained with 51 cases of annotated CRC computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, tested with 7 cases, and validated with 20 cases from The Cancer Imaging Archive cases. The sensitivity, false positives per case, and estimated Dice coefficient were obtained for each method of training. We compared the two methods of annotations and the time reduction associated with the technique. The time differences were tested using Friedman's two-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Sparse annotation significantly reduces the time for annotation particularly skipping 2 slices at a time (P < 0.001). Reduction of up to 2/3 of the annotation does not reduce AI model sensitivity or false positives per case. Although initializing human annotation with AI reduces the annotation time, the reduction is minimal, even when using an ensemble AI to decrease false positives. CONCLUSION: Our data support the sparse annotation technique as an efficient technique for reducing the time needed to establish the ground truth.

International multicenter study comparing COVID-19 in patients with cancer to patients without cancer: Impact of risk factors and treatment modalities on survivorship.

Background: In this international multicenter study, we aimed to determine the independent risk factors associated with increased 30 day mortality and the impact of cancer and novel treatment modalities in a large group of patients with and without cancer with COVID-19 from multiple countries. Methods: We retrospectively collected de-identified data on a cohort of patients with and without cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and November 2020 from 16 international centers. Results: We analyzed 3966 COVID-19 confirmed patients, 1115 with cancer and 2851 without cancer patients. Patients with cancer were more likely to be pancytopenic and have a smoking history, pulmonary disorders, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and corticosteroid use in the preceding 2 wk (p≤0.01). In addition, they were more likely to present with higher inflammatory biomarkers (D-dimer, ferritin, and procalcitonin) but were less likely to present with clinical symptoms (p≤0.01). By country-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses, cancer was not found to be an independent risk factor for 30 day mortality (p=0.18), whereas lymphopenia was independently associated with increased mortality in all patients and in patients with cancer. Older age (≥65y) was the strongest predictor of 30 day mortality in all patients (OR = 4.47, p<0.0001). Remdesivir was the only therapeutic agent independently associated with decreased 30 day mortality (OR = 0.64, p=0.036). Among patients on low-flow oxygen at admission, patients who received remdesivir had a lower 30 day mortality rate than those who did not (5.9 vs 17.6%; p=0.03). Conclusions: Increased 30 day all-cause mortality from COVID-19 was not independently associated with cancer but was independently associated with lymphopenia often observed in hematolgic malignancy. Remdesivir, particularly in patients with cancer receiving low-flow oxygen, can reduce 30 day all-cause mortality. Funding: National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health.

Mogamulizumab in Combination with Nivolumab in a Phase I/II Study of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamic profile of mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody targeting effector regulatory T cells (Treg) in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, dose-finding (phase I), and dose expansion (phase II) study (NCT02705105) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. There were no dose-limiting toxicities in phase I with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg every week for cycle 1 followed by 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks intravenously, and cohort expansion occurred at this dose level. RESULTS: All 114 patients treated with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg in phases I (n = 4) and II (n = 110) were assessed for safety and efficacy. Mogamulizumab plus nivolumab showed acceptable safety and tolerability. Objective response rate was 10.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-17.7; 3 complete and 9 partial responses]. Disease control rate was 36.8%. Median duration of response was 14.4 months. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.3-3.1) months, and median overall survival was 9.5 (95% CI, 5.9-13.5) months. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of mogamulizumab with nivolumab for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors did not result in enhanced efficacy. Tolerability of mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg was acceptable.

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab for Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Phase II CheckMate 142 Study.

PURPOSE: Nivolumab received US Food and Drug Administration approval as a single agent or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan based on CheckMate 142. Presented are results of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab in the first-line therapy cohort from the phase II CheckMate 142 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with no prior treatment in the metastatic setting for MSI-H/dMMR CRC were treated with nivolumab every 2 weeks plus low-dose ipilimumab every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (investigator assessment; RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: Median age of treated patients was 66 years (N = 45). Median follow-up was 29.0 months. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 69% (95% CI, 53 to 82) and 84% (95% CI, 70.5 to 93.5), respectively, with 13% complete response rate. Median duration of response was not reached; 74% of responders had ongoing responses at data cutoff. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not reached with minimum follow-up of 24.2 months (24-month rates, 74% and 79%, respectively). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of baseline demographic and tumor characteristics, including BRAF or KRAS mutation status. In a post hoc analysis, of 14 patients who discontinued treatment and did not receive subsequent therapy, 10 remained progression-free. Patient-reported outcomes were stable over the treatment period. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22% of patients; 13% discontinued because of any-grade treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as a first-line treatment for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Based on these promising data, randomized studies are warranted.

Skeletal metastases in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal metastases (SM) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an infrequent occurrence that has been previously reported in literature to occur in less than 2.5% of the cases. Complications such as pathological fractures can result in intractable pain, immobilization and a significant deterioration in quality of life. The purpose of this study is to improve the understanding of the increasing incidence of SM and the importance of surveillance and adequate management of SM in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a clinical database at a single tertiary care institution for cancer patients; this included 207 patients with advanced PDAC diagnosed between December 2004 and March 2017 receiving palliative chemotherapy. SM were identified by computerized tomography (CT)/fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Information regarding demographics, clinical course and date of last follow-up/death were collected. After a median follow-up of 11 months, an analysis was conducted, including a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: The study included 207 patients; 19 out of 207 patients (9.2%) developed SM; the primary tumor was located in the pancreatic body/tail in 12 out of 19 patients (63.2%). The thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were the most common sites of SM. Other common synchronous sites of metastases included the liver and lung. A majority of the lesions were osteolytic (63.2%). The median time of diagnosis from the initial diagnosis was 2 months (range, 0-60 months). Bone pain was observed as the initial symptom in 7 out of 19 patients (36.8%), 2 out of 19 patients (10.5%) had a pathological fracture and 1 out of 19 patients (5.3%) developed a para-spinal mass causing inferior vena cava compression. The median survival period for patients with SM was 11 months (range, 0-62 months) and for those without SM was 12 months (range, 0-147 months) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-2.30, P=0.51]. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a challenge with regards to management of the increasing number of patients with SM. Thoracic and lumbar vertebrae are the most common sites and pathological fractures in these sites can be catastrophic. Careful evaluation of skeletal signs and symptoms, early detection and intervention are essential to prevent morbidity and mortality from complications in patients with PDAC and SM.

COVID-19 vaccine guidance for patients with cancer participating in oncology clinical trials.

Emerging efficacy data have led to the emergency use authorization or approval of COVID-19 vaccines in several countries worldwide. Most trials of COVID-19 vaccines excluded patients with active malignancies, and thus data on the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the vaccines in patients with cancer are currently limited. Given the risk posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, decisions regarding the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in patients participating in trials of investigational anticancer therapies need to be addressed promptly. Patients should not have to choose between enrolling on oncology clinical trials and receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Clinical trial sponsors, investigators and treating physicians need operational guidance on COVID-19 vaccination for patients with cancer who are currently enrolled or might seek to enrol in clinical trials. Considering the high morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with cancer, the benefits of vaccination are likely to far outweigh the risks of vaccine-related adverse events. Herein, we provide operational COVID-19 vaccine guidance for patients participating in oncology clinical trials. In our perspective, continued quality oncological care requires that patients with cancer, including those involved in trials, be prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination, which should not affect trial eligibility.

AROME-ESO Oncology Consensus Conference: access to cancer care innovations in countries with limited resources. Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the Mediterranean Area (AROME-Paris) and European School of Oncology (ESO - Milan).

PURPOSE: Cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Its incidence is still increasing, particularly in developing countries. Recent progresses further strengthen the differences between low/middle and high-income countries. This situation calls for joint action to reduce inequities in cancer outcomes among the patients. The Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the Mediterranean Area (AROME) and the European School of Oncology (ESO), have initiated joint conferences devoted to access to innovations in oncology in the Mediterranean area. The heterogeneity of the economic, political and cultural situations of the different participating countries, offers the opportunity to develop consensus conference. METHODS: Cancer prevention and treatment strategies were discussed according to existing international guidelines. The Scientific committee prepared 111 questions with an objective to prioritize the access to treatments and innovations in low/middle-income Mediterranean countries. The results from the votes of 65 oncology experts, coming from 16 countries and 33 institutions have been analysed and access priorities classified accordingly. RESULTS: Ninety six percent of the proposed general recommendations concerning national health care strategies, oncology education, and treatment organization were considered to be high priorities. Regarding access to systemic treatments, 41% of the drugs without validated predictive markers and 53% of those with validated predictive markers were considered to be 1st level priority. Only 4 biological tests were considered to be 1st level priority to access to innovation. CONCLUSIONS: AROME-ESO consensus offers to cancer specialists from developing countries a basis for discussion with health authorities and payers on the prioritization of access to innovations in cancer care.

A Phase 1 dose-escalation trial of glufosfamide in combination with gemcitabine in solid tumors including pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics and to establish the maximum tolerated dose of glufosfamide when administered in combination with gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors. METHODS: This Phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluated the combination of glufosfamide + gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with glufosfamide doses from 1,500 to 4,500 mg/m(2) i.v. over 4 h on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Detailed PK sampling was performed on days 1 and 8 of the first two cycles. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicity: Grade 3 fatigue at 2,500 mg/m(2) and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia at 4,500 mg/m(2). Five patients completed six cycles and one patient remained on study for ten cycles. Two patients discontinued for adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in seven patients and five patients, respectively. The CrCL fell below 60 mL/min in two patients. There was one unconfirmed partial response and 10 of 19 (52.6%) patients had stable disease or better at 8 weeks and three patients had continuing stable disease at 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetic analyses suggest no interaction between glufosfamide and gemcitabine. CONCLUSION: Phase I data indicate that full dose glufosfamide (4,500 mg/m(2)) can be given safely in combination with gemcitabine. A Phase II study in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is ongoing.

A Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of PX-12, a novel inhibitor of thioredoxin-1, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Thioredoxin-1 (Trx-1) is a cellular redox protein that promotes tumor growth, inhibits apoptosis, and up-regulates hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor. Objectives of this study were to determine safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of PX-12, a small-molecule inhibitor of Trx-1. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-eight patients with advanced solid tumors received PX-12 at doses of 9 to 300 mg/m(2), as a 1- or 3-h i.v. infusion on days 1 to 5, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: At the 300 mg/m(2) dose level, one patient experienced a reversible episode of pneumonitis during the first cycle, and a second patient developed pneumonitis after the second cycle. Doses up to 226 mg/m(2) were well tolerated, and grade 3/4 events were uncommon (<3% of patients). The limiting factor on this dosing schedule was pungent odor caused by expired drug metabolite, 2-butanethiol. The best response was stable disease in seven patients (126-332 days). Whereas PX-12 was not detectable following the infusion, the C(max) of its inactive metabolite, 2-mercaptoimidazole, increased linearly with dose. PX-12 treatment lowered plasma Trx-1 concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: PX-12, the first Trx-1 inhibitor to enter clinical trials, was tolerated up to a dose of 226 mg/m(2) by a 3-h infusion. Based on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data, a trial of prolonged infusion schedule of PX-12 has been initiated.

Response to a third-line mitomycin C (MMC)-based chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma carrying germline BRCA2 mutation.

CONTEXT: Gemcitabine remains the mainstay of palliative chemotherapy for those patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Objective radiological responses to gemcitabine are rare and reported median survival is only about six months. New therapeutic concepts and strategies are needed in order to improve those dismal statistics. CASE REPORT: We report here a case of a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer responding to a third-line therapy with combination of mitomycin C and capecitabine. Interestingly, the patient had a strong family history of breast cancer and tested positive to germline BRCA2 mutation. CONCLUSION: We feel that this is of interest because of preclinical reports of increased sensitivity of pancreatic cells carrying BRCA2 mutations to DNA-intercalating agents such as mitomycin C. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to support this novel concept.

Chemotherapy re-challenge response rate in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are few treatment options in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after progression on standard chemotherapy. Third and fourth line therapies typically consist of regorafenib or trifluridine-tipiracil, however, clinical benefit of these medications is limited, as progression free survival is approximately 1.9 months for regorafenib (Grothey et al. 2013) and 2.0 months for trifluridine-tipiracil (Mayer et al. 2015). Another choice in this setting may include the re-initiation of previously used chemotherapy, therefore in this study we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy re-challenge. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study assessing patients with mCRC who were 18-89 years of age and treated with re-challenge chemotherapy. Re-challenge chemotherapy was defined as re-initiation of oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based regimens at least nine months from the end of initial exposure. A minimum of four chemotherapy cycles was required to qualify as initial exposure. The key endpoints of this study were clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the proportion of patients with partial response or stable disease, and time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: A total of 67 chemotherapy re-challenges were accounted for in 51 patients. The overall CBR was 70.7%. Partial responses occurred in 50.7% cases. The TTP was 6.0 months. For the 51 cases of first re-challenge, the CBR was 75.5% and TTP was 6.5 months. Fourteen patients had a second re-challenge, and in these patients, the CBR was 61.5% and TTP was 4.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based re-challenge should be considered as a third or fourth line treatment option in select patients with mCRC. CBR and especially TTP compare favorably to approved third line therapies such as regorafenib or trifluridine-tipiracil.

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura due to Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody that enhances the efficacy of the immune system by targeting a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), which is a protein receptor that downregulates the immune system. Nivolumab is also a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets another protein receptor that prevents activated T cells from attacking the cancer; this receptor is called programmed cell death 1 (PD-1). The FDA approved ipilimumab combined with nivolumab as a frontline therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma and as a second-line therapy for patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colon cancer. Immune-related adverse events such as autoimmune colitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, nephritis, hypophysitis, and thyroiditis may occur during or weeks to months after therapy. We report a case of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma following one cycle of ipilimumab and nivolumab. Only one case report of ipilimumab-induced TTP exists in the medical literature. With the wide use of immunotherapy to treat cancers, physicians need to be aware of this rare immune-related adverse event.

Mechanisms of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors and clinical update of US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapy in advanced melanoma.

Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor an activating BRAF mutation. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibitors such as dabrafenib and trametinib, vemurafenib and cobimetinib, and encorafenib and binimetinib are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved to treat patients with BRAF V600-mutated advanced melanoma. Both genetic and epigenetic alterations play a major role in resistance to BRAF inhibitors by reactivation of the MAPK and/or the PI3K-Akt pathways. The role of BRAF inhibitors in modulating the immunomicroenvironment and perhaps enhancing the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors is gaining interest. This article provides a comprehensive review of mechanisms of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma and summarizes landmark trials that led to the FDA approval of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma.

A Phase II Study of Celecoxib With Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression is associated with increased tumor invasiveness and proliferation in CRC, and COX-2 inhibition has demonstrated chemopreventive activity. This study investigated the addition of celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, to the irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) regimen for patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients enrolled in this single-arm phase II study received celecoxib at 400 mg orally twice daily in combination with weekly irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)), and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The protocol was amended midway to additionally exclude patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 and require all patients with specific cardiovascular risk factors to take daily aspirin (81 mg). RESULTS: The objective RR was 31.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19%-47%). Median progression-free survival was 8.7 months (95% CI, 5.8-10.6), and the median overall survival was 19.7 months (95% CI, 15.4-22.8). All cardiac events were observed before protocol modification. The median overall survival before and after protocol modification was 11.4 versus 24.2 months, respectively (P<0.0001); tumor RR and progression-free survival were not statistically different before or after protocol modification. The trial was halted after an interim analysis demonstrated that the primary endpoint would not be met. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib plus IFL chemotherapy for patients with metastatic CRC is tolerable, but does not appear to increase the efficacy of IFL.

Erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors: phase IB trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase IB trial was to evaluate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity of erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included those with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma or other malignancies potentially responsive to gemcitabine. In the escalating phase of the trial, patients were enrolled in sequential cohorts using 100 or 150 mg oral daily dosing of erlotinib. Gemcitabine dose was 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly x 7 (first cycle), then weekly x 3, every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed at least one course on study. In Cohort IA, at the 100 mg/day dose of erlotinib, three patients have developed grade 3 transaminase elevations. After stricter inclusion criteria were adopted (Cohort IB), no additional events of grade 3 transaminase elevations were observed and the dose of erlotinib was escalated to 150 mg/day (Cohorts IB and IIB) without reaching dose-limiting toxicities. The most common toxicities included diarrhea, skin rash, fatigue and neutropenia. The pharmacokinetic analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between erlotinib and gemcitabine. Objective responses were seen in two patients: cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer (n = 15) had a median progression-free survival of 289 days, the estimated overall survival of 389 days (12.5 months), and a 1-year survival rate of 51%. CONCLUSION: The 150 mg/day dose of erlotinib can be safely administered in combination with standard dose gemcitabine in selected patients with pancreatic cancer and other advanced solid tumors. Promising antitumor activity has been observed in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Durable and Complete Response to Herceptin Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer.

Gastroesophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The 2 most common histologies are squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, which has seen an increase in incidence correlating with an increase in obesity in developed countries. Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma has a preponderance to metastasize early, making it a highly lethal cancer with a low 5-year survival rate of ∼15-25%. Therefore, for the majority of patients, treatment focuses on palliation and prolongation of survival. Combination chemotherapy regimens, mostly platinum-based, have only modestly prolonged survival in patients with stage IV disease. Recently, it was discovered that the activation of the HER2 receptor plays an important role in a minority of adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and stomach. This introduced the treatment option of trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody directed at the HER2 receptor, which has demonstrated improvement in overall and progression-free survival as noted in the ToGA trial. Currently, the role of Herceptin therapy beyond first-line therapy and outside of combination regimens is not well established. In this case report we review 2 cases of patients with gastroesophageal cancer, with HER2 overexpression, who achieved a robust response to trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy and were able to maintain a durable response with maintenance trastuzumab monotherapy.