Antiresorptive treatments for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CIO) is the most common type of secondary osteoporosis, leading to fractures, and increased morbidity and mortality. SOURCE OF DATA: Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Prolonged glucocorticoids administration leads to secondary osteoporosis. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The optimal management for CIO is controversial. GROWING POINTS: The present study compared bone mineral density, fractures and adverse events in patients undergoing treatment with risedronate, alendronate, zoledronate, denosumab or etidronate for CIO. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: For selected patients with CIO, alendronate performed better overall. These results must be interpreted within the limitations of the present study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Chondral defects of the knee are common and their treatment is challenging. SOURCE OF DATA: PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus databases. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Both autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and membrane-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) have been used to manage chondral defects of the knee. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: It is debated whether AMIC and mACI provide equivalent outcomes for the management of chondral defects in the knee at midterm follow-up. Despite the large number of clinical studies, the optimal treatment is still controversial. GROWING POINTS: To investigate whether AMIC provide superior outcomes than mACI at midterm follow-up. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: AMIC may provide better outcomes than mACI for chondral defects of the knee. Further studies are required to verify these results in a clinical setting.

NSAIDs for Prophylaxis for Heterotopic Ossification After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been recommended to prevent of heterotopic ossification (HO) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), but debates are still ongoing. The present Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared all available pathways of NSAID treatment as prophylaxis for HO after THA. The present Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted according to The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions guidelines. All randomized clinical trials comparing two or more interventions to prevent HO after THA were considered for analysis. HO was classified according to Brooker. The quality of the methodological assessment was performed through the risk of bias summary tool of the Review Manager Software 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). The network meta-analysis was performed through a STATA routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis, with log odd ratio (LOR) effect measure. Data from 26 studies (6396 THAs; 58% females) were collected. The mean follow-up was 10.50 ± 5.7 months. ANOVA showed good comparability among mean age and gender (P > 0.5). Celecoxib demonstrated the highest rate of Brooker class 0 (LOR 6.96), followed by diclofenac (LOR 6.94). Naproxen demonstrated the lowest rate of Brooker I HO (LOR 2.82), followed by celecoxib (LOR 3.52). Celecoxib demonstrated lowest rate of Brooker class II HO (LOR 1.66), class III (LOR), and class IV (LOR 0.25). The equation for global linearity detected no statistically significant inconsistency (P > 0.5) in all the comparisons. The present Bayesian network meta-analysis encourages the use of celecoxib as a prophylaxis for HO. These conclusions must be interpreted in light of the limitations of the present study. Future investigations are required to establish more definitely the role of celecoxib.Level of Evidence: I, Bayesian network analysis of RCTs.

Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The role of the lateral retinaculum in patellofemoral instability is still debated. Lateral retinacular release (LRR), has been extensively performed in combination with different surgical procedures, including reconstruction of medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Despite controversial indications, the results from these studies seem promising. The present study conducts a systematic review about current biomechanical and clinical evidence concerning the role of LRR in combination with MPFL reconstruction. We performed a comprehensive literature research, comparing the outcomes of MPFL reconstruction with and without LRR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed in August 2020. All articles describing the outcome of isolated MPFL reconstruction alone or in combination with a LRR in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting data on patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up were included. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included. RESULTS: A total of 63 articles were eligible for this systematic review, including 2131 knees. The mean follow-up was 40.87 ± 24.1 months. All scores of interests improved in favour of the combined group: Kujala + 3.8% (P = 0.01), Lysholm + 4.2% (P = 0.004), Tegner + 0.8 points (P = 0.04), IKDC + 9.8% (P = 0.02). The ROM was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.4). Similarity was found in terms of positivity to the apprehension test (P = 0.05), rate of complications (P = 0.1), re-dislocations (P = 0.8), and revision surgeries (P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that adding a lateral release impacts positively on the outcome of MPFL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Systematic review.

Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the presence of various different surgical procedures, the preferable technique for repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures is unknown and, therefore, object of discussions. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes and complication-rates between the minimally invasive and the standard open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. In September 2019 the main databases were accessed. All clinical trials of evidence level I to III comparing minimally invasive vs. open surgery of Achilles tendon rupture were included in the present study. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included. Missing data under the outcomes of interest warranted the exclusion from the present work. For the statistical analysis we referred to the Review Manager Software Version 5.3. (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen). Continuous data were analysed through the inverse variance method. For the effect estimate the mean difference was used. Dichotomous data were analysed through the Mante-Haenszel method via odd ratio effect measure. The confidence interval was set at 95% in all the comparisons. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were included for meta-analysis. The funnel plot revealed poor data dispersion, attesting to this study a low risk of publication bias. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Data from 2223 (1055 open, 1168 minimally invasive) surgical procedures were extracted. The mean follow-up was of 24.29 ± 22.4 months. The open group reported a lower value of post-operative palpable knot at last follow-up and a lower rate of sural nerve palsy. In the minimally-invasive group a shorter surgery duration and a lower rate of post-operative wound necrosis and reduced risk of wound scarring and adhesions has been evidenced. The minimally-invasive cohort detected the lowest values of superficial and deep infections. In both groups no significant difference was shown in re-rupture rate. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the minimally-invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction, the open procedure evidenced a lower rate of sural nerve palsy and postoperative palpable knot, whereas in the minimally-invasive reconstruction group quicker surgery duration, a lower rate of post-operative wound necrosis, superficial and deep infections and less scar tissue adhesions could be observed. No relevant discrepancies were detected among the two techniques in terms of post-operative re-rupture.

Comparison between intra-articular infiltrations of placebo, steroids, hyaluronic and PRP for knee osteoarthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Regarding the efficacy of intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids, current evidence is controversial. The superiority of one technique over another is questioned and debates are ongoing. The purpose of the present study was to compare and investigate the efficacy of these intra-articular infiltrations in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted comparing patient outcomes at 3, 6 and 12-months of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. All the RCTs comparing the outcomes of two or more intra-articular infiltrations of interest for knee OA were considered for inclusion. The outcomes of interest were the WOMAC and VAS scores. The network meta-analyses were performed using the STATA routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models. RESULTS: Data from 30 RCTs (3463 patients) were collected. At 3-months follow-up, PRP showed the best WOMAC scores, followed by the Placebo, CCS and HA. At 6-months follow-up, PRP showed the best WOMAC scores, followed by HA, CCS and Placebo. At 12-months follow-up, PRP showed the best WOMAC scores, followed by the Placebo, HA and CCS. At 3-months follow-up, the PRP showed the best VAS scores, followed by CCS, HA and Placebo. At 6-months follow-up, PRP showed the best VAS scores, followed by CCS, Placebo and HA. At 12-months follow-up, the PRP showed the best VAS scores, followed by CCS, Placebo and HA. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injections of PRP demonstrated the best overall outcome compared to steroids, hyaluronic acid and placebo for patients with knee osteoarthrosis at 3, 6 and 12-months follow-up. Among CCS, hyaluronic acid and placebo, no discrepancies were detected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Reliability of the MOCART score: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The present systematic review analysed the available literature to assess reliability of the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score in the evaluation of knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. METHODS: All the studies using the MOCART score for knee and/or talus chondral defects were accessed in March 2021. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess associations between the MOCART score at last follow-up and data of patients at baseline, clinical scores and complications. A multiple linear model regression analysis was used. RESULTS: The MOCART score evidenced no association with patient age (P = 0.6), sex (P = 0.1), body mass index (P = 0.06), defect size (P = 0.9), prior length of symptoms (P = 0.9) or visual analogue scale (P = 0.07). For chondral defects of the knee, no statistically significant association was found between the MOCART score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (P = 0.9) and with the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scales (P = 0.2), Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.2), visual analogue scale P = 0.07), rate of failure (P = 0.2) and revision (P = 0.9). For chondral defect of the talus, no statistically significant associations were found between the MOCART score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (P = 0.3), Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.4), visual analogue scale (P = 0.1), rate of failure (P = 0.1) and revision (P = 0.7). CONCLUSION: The MOCART score demonstrated no association with patient characteristics and with the surgical outcome in patients who underwent surgical management for knee and talus chondral defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Bone metastases: a comprehensive review of the literature.

The last report of the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that approximately four million people experience bone pain due to malignant diseases. Among them, metastatic bone pain is one of the most important sources of complaint. The estimated median survival in the presence of bone metastases ranks from 10 to 12 weeks. Bone represents a potential target of distant metastases for the majority of malignant tumours. However, the exact incidence of bone metastases is unknown. Bone metastases have an important socio-economic impact, and due to the enhancement of the overall survivorship, their incidence is increasing. Malignant neoplasms such as lung, thyroid, renal cancer, multiple myeloma, and melanoma often metastasize to the bone. Bone metastases commonly localize to the spinal column, pelvis, shoulder, and distal femur. The proper treatment for painful skeletal metastases is still unknown. Hence, the purpose of this review of the literature was to update current evidence concerning the aetiogenesis, biological behaviour, and treatment algorithms for painful skeletal metastases.

Short stems for total hip replacement among middle-aged patients.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of short stem implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in middle-aged patients. For this purpose, a meta-analysis of the current literature was conducted. The focus was on clinical outcomes,radiological parameters, and further complications of both components. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. All randomized and non-randomized clinical trials comparing short stem versus standard stem prostheses for THA were considered for inclusion. Only studies reporting data concerning uncemented stems for primary total hip arthroplasty were included. Only studies reporting data concerning patients with a mean age of 45 to 69 were included. RESULTS: A total of 2197 procedures in 2116 patients were analysed. The mean follow-up was 30.2 months. The short stem group showed a statistically significant higher WOMAC score and a reduced total estimated blood loss compared with the standard stem group. The short stem group showed a reduced rate of femoral fractures, dislocations, and revision, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: According to the main findings of this meta-analysis and current evidence, we encourage the use of the uncemented short stems during primary total hip arthroplasty in middle-aged patients.

Patellar fixation graft via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques during isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: There is still a lack of evidence concerning the patellar fixation of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) graft in selected patient with recurrent instability. The purpose of the present study was to investigate and compare clinical outcomes and further complications of isolated MPFL reconstruction via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques for recurrent patellofemoral instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In September 2019, the main databases were accessed. All the clinical trials performing isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were included in the present study. Only articles fixing the MPFL graft through suture anchors and/ or patellar tunnel techniques were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Data from 46 papers (1712 patients) were recorded. The mean follow-up was 40 ± 18 months. No differences were found in Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analogic scale, range of motion and re-dislocation rate. The suture anchors fixation group detected reduced rate of apprehension test (OR: 0.6; p = 0.03), revision surgeries (OR: 0.4; p = 0.02) and anterior knee pain (OR: 0.05; p < 0.0001) and reduced not-classified complications (OR: 0.18; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Both the suture anchors and the bone-tunnels are a feasible option for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Patellar fixation via suture anchors evidenced a reduced rate of anterior knee pain, revision surgeries, apprehension test and an overall reduced complication compared to the bone-tunnel technique.

Implant positioning among the surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Although there is anatomical individuality among patients, some standardized requirements for component orientation for total hip arthroplasty (THA) exist. To date, no study has compared implant positioning using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Hence, the purpose of this study was to perform a NMA comparing implant positioning among the various approaches for THA. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. All randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (nRCT) clinical trials comparing two or more different approaches for THA were considered for inclusion. For the statistical analysis, the STATA Software/ MP, Version 14.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) was used. The NMA was performed through a Stata routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled in the present study, a total of 4060 patients, with a mean of 17.84 ± 16.41 months follow-up. The patient baseline data were very homogeneous across the groups concerning age (P = 0.91), sex (P = 0.52), and BMI (P = 0.83). Concerning the cup anteversion, the anterolateral approach reported the value closest to the reference value. The test for overall inconsistency, however, was not statistically significant (P = 0.30). Concerning cup inclination, the lateral approach reported the value closest to the reference value. The test for overall inconsistency was statistically significant (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty detected the best femoral stem alignment and cup anteversion. Data concerning cup inclination detected no sufficient transitivity to draw consistent conclusions.

Gap balancing versus measured resection for primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study.

INTRODUCTION: To achieve the most desirable post-operative results, operation techniques and procedures for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are highly standardized. However, debates persist whether patients having undergone a gap balancing technique (GB) perform better than those having undergone measured resection (MR) technique. Therefore, a meta-analysis study was conducted to investigate advantages of GB compared to the MR. The focus of the present study was on clinical and functional scores, radiological measurements and further complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. In November 2019, literature search was performed. All clinical studies comparing measured resection technique versus gap balancing technique for primary total knee arthroplasty were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality assessment and statistical analyses were performed through the Review Manager Software version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). RESULTS: Data from 25 clinical trials (2971 procedures) were collected. Patient baseline demonstrated a good comparability. No difference among the two cohorts was found in terms of SF-12 Mental and Physical, ROM, KSS, KSS Function, OKS, WOMAC. No difference was found in the alignment of mechanical axis and femoral rotation. During the knee motion, no difference was found between the medial and lateral gaps among the two techniques. The GB showed a significant elevated joint line (P < 0.0001), along with a longer duration of the operating time (P = 0.001). No differences were found in terms of revision surgery, aseptic loosening or prosthetic infections. CONCLUSION: GB and MR achieve similar outcomes for TKA. In the GB group, a proximalisation of the joint line and extended operating time was detected. Regarding the additional outcomes of interest, the present analysis showed comparability between both groups, MR and GB.

Improved outcomes after mesenchymal stem cells injections for knee osteoarthritis: results at 12-months follow-up: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: According to the World Health organization (WHO), more than 10% in people older than 60 years suffer from osteoarthritis (OA). Over the last years, there has been an increased interest around regenerative medicine, especially regarding stem cell treatments and related applications. We hypothesize that stem cell therapies can represent a feasible option for idiopathic knee OA, delaying or even avoiding the joint replacement. To emphasize the potential of percutaneous injections of mesenchymal stem cells for knee OA, a comprehensive systematic review of the literature was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two independent authors (FM, GC) performed the literature search. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). The main databases were accessed: Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Scopus, AMED. For this systematic review, all articles treating percutaneous injections of mesenchymal stem cells for knee OA were considered. Because of the rapid advancements promoted by the scientific progress on stem cell expansion and processing, only articles published within the last five years were included. Solely articles reporting the outcomes of interest across 6- and 12-month follow-up were recruited for eligibility. We included only studies reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest. We referred for the quality assessment to the Coleman Methodology Score (CMS). The statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager Software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen). RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were enrolled in the present study, comprising 1069 treated knees. The mean age of the samples was 57.39 ± 7.37 years. 72% of the included studies harvested the stem cells from the iliac crest (bone marrow-derived MSCs), the remaining 28% from the adipose tissue (adipose-derived MSCs). The mean visual analogic scale improved from 18.37 to 30.98 and 36.91 at 6- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. The mean WOMAC score improved from 25.66 to 25.23 and 15.60 at 6- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. The mean walking distance improved from 71.90 to 152.22 and 316.72 at 6- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. The mean Lequesne scale improved from 33.76 to 12.90 at 12-month follow-up. The KOOS score improved from 41.07 to 8.47% and 18.94 at 6- and 12-month follow-up. All the KOOS subscales improved significantly from the baseline. A total of 136 (12.7%) local complications were detected. CONCLUSION: According to the current evidences and the main findings of this systematic review, we reported that MSC infiltrations for knee OA can represent a feasible option, leading to an overall remarkable improvement of all clinical and functional considered outcomes, regardless of the cell source. Patients treated at earlier-degeneration stages reported statistically significant greater outcomes. The pain and function scores were improved considerably, thus, leading to a significant improvement of patient participation in recreational activities and quality of life.

Hemiarthroplasty versus total arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) are complicated by high mortality rates and continue to represent an important cause of disability, having a negative impact on patient mobility and physical independence. The purpose of this study was to update and analyse current outcomes and evidence concerning hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) versus total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Thus, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In October 2019, the following databases were accessed: Embase, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Scopus. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing total hip arthroplasty versus hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were included in the present study. For the statistical analysis and the methodological quality assessment, the Review Manager Software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen) and STATA/MP Software 14.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) were used. RESULTS: Data from 2325 (1171 HHA vs 1154 THA) patients were collected. The mean follow-up was 58.12 months. The HHA group reported lower values of the mean Harris hip score (EE 3.22; p = 0.2), surgical duration (EE 21.75; p < 0.0001), length of the hospitalization stay (EE 0.8; p = 0.4). The HHA group evidenced lower dislocations rate (OR 1.78; p = 0.01, Fig. 4), but higher rate of acetabular erosion (OR 0.08; p = 0.0006). At a mean of 58.12 ± 52.8 months follow-up, revisions rate scored reduced in the THA group (OR 0.76; p = 0.2). Subgroup analysis of RCTs < 5 years follow-up revealed reduced revision in favour of the HHA group (OR 2.19; p = 0.03), while subgroup analysis of RCTs > 5 years follow-up revealed reduced revision in favour of the THA group (OR 0.25; p = 0.0003). The Kaplan-Meier curve detected similarity of patients survivorship between the two groups (HR 1.06; p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: For the elderly population, both HHA and THA are valid solutions to treat displaced femoral neck fractures, with comparable survivorship. HHA detected reduced dislocations, while for THA a lower risk of acetabular erosion and further revision surgeries were reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Arthroscopic surgery versus physiotherapy for femoroacetabular impingement: a meta-analysis study.

INTRODUCTION: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is thought to play an important role in the development of hip osteoarthritis. However, there is no consensus about the optimal treatment options, since non-operative therapy such as physiotherapy and surgical treatment such as arthroscopic hip surgery can both improve symptoms. Therefore, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes between two different treatment regimes; physiotherapy versus arthroscopic treatment for FAI. METHODS: The present meta-analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. In November 2019, the main online databases were accessed. All the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing surgical arthroscopic treatment versus physiotherapy for FAI were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included. For the all analysis, we used Review Manager Software. Data from 644 patients were analysed. RESULTS: Data from 644 patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 14.67 ± 8.3 months. The unpaired t test detected an optimal baseline comparability in terms of side, gender, years, duration of symptoms and BMI (p = 0.08-0.9). The VAS subscale of the score EQ-5D and the mean iHOT33 reported favourable values in the arthroscopic group (p = 0.03 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Similar findings were evidenced in the iHOT33 subgroup 6-months (p = 0.70) and 12-months (p = 0.0002). The HOS score, the ADL (p < 0.0001) and the sport (p = 0.0003) subscales reported both greater values in the arthroscopic group. No statistical significance was found concerning the risk to incur in further total hip arthroplasty (p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: Based on only three high-quality RCTs, arthroscopic hip surgery is an effective therapeutic treatment for FAI revealing superior results than a non-surgical approach with physiotherapy.

Surgical versus conservative treatment for first patellofemoral dislocations: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: The first approach for acute patellar dislocation is still a debated topic. The purpose of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis evaluating the outcomes of the surgical approach compared to the conservative treatments for primary acute patellar dislocation. We hypothesize that a prompt surgical treatment may lead to better outcomes in terms of re-dislocations and quality of life. METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. All the prospective clinical trials comparing surgical and conservative treatment for first acute patellofemoral dislocation were included in this study. For the methodological quality assessment, the PEDro appraisal score was adopted. For the risk of publication bias, the funnel plot was performed. The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager Software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). RESULTS: The funnel plot detected a low risk of publication bias. According to the PEDro score, the methodological quality assessment was good. Data from 654 patients were collected, undergoing a mean of 53.8 ± 48.4 month follow-up. A total of 311 patients (17.66 ± 4.1 years old) were analyzed in the surgery group and 291 patients (19.25 ± 4.5 years old) in the conservative ones. The mean Kujala score resulted in greater favor of the surgery group (MD: 9.99%; P = 0.006). The analysis of the comparison of re-dislocations resulted in favor of the surgery group (OR: 0.41; P < 0.0001). The analysis of the comparison of persistent joint instability resulted in favor of the surgery group (OR: 0.41; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Data from the present study encourage a prompt surgical approach for the first patellofemoral dislocation.

Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus.

INTRODUCTION: After the first patellar dislocation, most patients report damage of the medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and surgical reconstruction is required. The purpose of this study is to systematically review current evidence and to clarify the role of the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons as graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in October 2019. All clinical trials using the semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendon grafts for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum of 12-month follow-up were considered. The PEDro score was used for the methodological quality assessment. RESULTS: Data from 1491 procedures were collected. The mean follow-up was 36.12 months. There was comparability among the patient baseline. All the scores of interests (Kujala, Tegner, Lysholm) and range of motion scored better in the semitendinosus group. Moreover, in favour of the semitendinosus group, a statistically significant reduction of the revision surgeries and re-dislocations were evidenced. Apprehension test and persistent instability sensation found any statistical correlations. CONCLUSION: Isolated MPFL reconstruction through semitendinosus tendon graft performed better than the gracilis in selected patients suffering from recurrent patellofemoral instability.

Bipolar versus monopolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femur neck fractures: a meta-analysis study.

INTRODUCTION: Hemiarthroplasty is commonly performed to treat femoral neck fractures. Still, there is a lack of consensus concerning the best component for hemiarthroplasty: unipolar and bipolar implants. Last meta-analysis on this topic is outdated, and an update of current evidences is required. The purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the unipolar versus bipolar implants for hemiarthroplasty, focusing on the clinical scores, perioperative data, further complications and mortality rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In September 2019, the main databases were accessed: all the clinical trials comparing unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were considered for inclusion. For the methodological quality assessment, we referred to the PEDro score. For the statistical analysis, we referred to the Review Manager 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). For implant survivorship, we referred to the STATA/MP software version 14.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas). RESULTS: A total of 27 articles were considered for inclusion, consisting of 16 randomized and 11 non-randomized clinical trials. A total of 4511 patients were enrolled, undergoing a mean 21.26 months follow-up. A statistically significant reduction in the acetabular erosion was observed in the bipolar group (OR 3.16, P < 0.0001). Although statistically insignificant, the bipolar group reported a reduction in the mean Harris hip score, reduced surgical duration and hospitalization, reduced dislocation and revisions rate. Concerning the mortality, a reduction across all the follow-ups in favor of the bipolar group was detected, but without statistically significance. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis evidenced a reduction in the acetabular erosion after bipolar hemiarthroplasty compared to the unipolar implants. Any statistically significant difference concerning the other endpoints of interest was detected. Current evidence concerning this topic are controversial, and further randomized clinical trials are required.

Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to clarify the role of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for primary ACL reconstruction. Thus, a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing patients undergoing a primary ACL reconstruction with QT versus patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. In January 2020, the main databases were accessed. Articles comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft versus HT autograft and/or PT autograft for primary ACL reconstruction were included in the present study. The statistical analysis was performed with STATA Software/MP, through a Bayesian hierarchical random-effect model analysis. RESULTS: Data from a total of 2603 knees were analysed. The overall mean follow-up was 35.0 months. Among the different grafts were evidenced comparable values of IKDC, Tegner and Lysholm score. The QT autograft detected comparable rate of Lachman test > 3 mm, Pivot shift test > 3 m and instrumental laxity > 3 mm. The QT autograft showed a lower rate of autograft failure above all. The QT autograft detected the reduced rate of AKP than the PT. CONCLUSION: Quadriceps tendon autograft may represent a feasible option for primary ACL reconstruction. These results must be interpret within the limitations of the present network meta-anlaysis.

Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Alternatives to the classical medial parapatellar (MPP) approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the mini-medial parapatellar (MMPP), mini-subvastus (MSV), mini-midvastus (MMV) and quadriceps-sparing (QS) approaches. The best approach has been not fully clarified. The purpose of the present study was to conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing these approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare interventions. The databases search was performed in October 2019. All clinical trials comparing two or more approaches for primary TKA were considered for inclusion. The baseline comparability was evaluated through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The statistical analysis was performed through the STATA software/MP. A Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis was adopted in all the comparisons. RESULTS: Data from 52 articles (4533 patients) were collected. The mean follow-up was 20.38 months. With regard to diagnosis, gender, age and BMI, adequate baseline comparability was detected. The MSV approach ranked better concerning clinical scores (the lowest visual analogic scale, the higher KSS and KSFS) and functional outcomes (the shortest straight leg raise, the greatest degree of flexion and range of motion). Concerning perioperative data, the MSV evidenced the shortest hospital stay, while the MPP the shortest surgical duration and lowest estimated blood loss. CONCLUSION: According to the main findings of the present study, the mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty demonstrated superior overall compared to the other approaches. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider this approach in the light of the evidence and limitations of this Bayesian network meta-analysis.