Percutaneous microwave ablation versus sclerotherapy for large hepatic hemangioma: a multi-center cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) and percutaneous sclerotherapy (PS) for the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma (LHH). METHODS: This retrospective study included 96 patients who underwent MWA (n = 54) and PS (n = 42) as first-line treatment for LHH in three tertiary hospitals from January 2016 to December 2021. Primary outcomes were technique efficacy rate (volume reduction rate [VRR] > 50% at 12 months), symptom relief rate at 12 months and local tumor progression (LTP). Secondary outcomes included procedure time, major complications, treatment sessions, cost and one-, two-, three-year VRR. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 36 months, the MWA group showed a higher technique efficacy rate (100% vs. 90.4%, p = .018) and symptom relief rate (100% vs. 80%, p = .123) than the PS group. The MWA group had fewer treatment sessions, higher one-, two- and three-year VRR, lower LTP rate (all p < .05), longer procedure time and higher treatment costs than the PS group (both p < .001). MWA shared a comparable major complications rate (1.8% vs. 2.4%, p = .432) with PS. After multivariate analysis, the lesion's heterogeneity and maximum diameter >8.1 cm were independent risk factors for LTP (all p < .05). In the PS group, lesions with a cumulative dose of bleomycin > 0.115 mg/cm3 had a lower risk of LTP (p = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Both MWA and PS treatments for large hepatic hemangioma are safe and effective, with MWA being superior in terms of efficacy.

Importance of the enhanced cooling system for more spherical ablation zones: Numerical simulation, ex vivo and in vivo validation.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a small-gauge microwave ablation antenna (MWA) with an enhanced cooling system (ECS) for generating more spherical ablation zones. METHODS: A comparison was made between two types of microwave ablation antennas, one with ECS and the other with a conventional cooling system (CCS). The finite element method was used to simulate in vivo ablation. Two types of antennas were used to create MWA zones for 5, 8, 10 min at 50, 60, and 80 W in ex vivo bovine livers (n = 6) and 5 min at 60 W in vivo porcine livers (n = 16). The overtreatment ratio, ablation aspect ratio, carbonization area, and other characteristcs of antennas were measured and compared using numerical simulation and gross pathologic examination. RESULTS: In numerical simulation, the ECS antenna demonstrated a lower overtreatment ratio than the CCS antenna (1.38 vs 1.43 at 50 W 5 min, 1.19 vs 1.35 at 50 W 8 min, 1.13 vs 1.32 at 50 W 10 min, 1.28 vs 1.38 at 60 W 5 min, 1.14 vs 1.32 at 60 W 8 min, 1.10 vs 1.30 at 60 W 10 min). The experiments revealed that the ECS antenna generated ablation zones with a more significant aspect ratio (0.92 ± 0.03 vs 0.72 ± 0.01 at 50 W 5 min, 0.95 ± 0.02 vs 0.70 ± 0.01 at 50 W 8 min, 0.96 ± 0.01 vs 0.71 ± 0.04 at 50 W 10 min, 0.96 ± 0.01 vs 0.73 ± 0.02 at 60 W 5 min, 0.94 ± 0.03 vs 0.71 ± 0.03 at 60 W 8 min, 0.96 ± 0.02 vs 0.69 ± 0.04 at 60 W 10 min) and a smaller carbonization area (0.00 ± 0.00 cm2 vs 0.54 ± 0.06 cm2 at 50 W 5 min, 0.13 ± 0.03 cm2 vs 0.61 ± 0.09 cm2 at 50 W 8 min, 0.23 ± 0.05 cm2 vs 0.73 ± 0.05 m2 at 50 W 10 min, 0.00 ± 0.00 cm2 vs 1.59 ± 0.41 cm2 at 60 W 5 min, 0.23 ± 0.22 cm2 vs 2.11 ± 0.63 cm2 at 60 W 8 min, 0.57 ± 0.09 cm2 vs 2.55 ± 0.51 cm2 at 60 W 10 min). Intraoperative ultrasound images revealed a hypoechoic area instead of a hyperechoic area near the antenna. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the dissected tissue revealed a correlation between the edge of the ablation zone and that of the hypoechoic area. CONCLUSIONS: The ECS antenna can produce more spherical ablation zones with less charring and a clearer intraoperative ultrasound image of the ablation area than the CCS antenna.