RESUMO
Paralyzed muscles can be reanimated following spinal cord injury (SCI) using a brain-computer interface (BCI) to enhance motor function alone. Importantly, the sense of touch is a key component of motor function. Here, we demonstrate that a human participant with a clinically complete SCI can use a BCI to simultaneously reanimate both motor function and the sense of touch, leveraging residual touch signaling from his own hand. In the primary motor cortex (M1), residual subperceptual hand touch signals are simultaneously demultiplexed from ongoing efferent motor intention, enabling intracortically controlled closed-loop sensory feedback. Using the closed-loop demultiplexing BCI almost fully restored the ability to detect object touch and significantly improved several sensorimotor functions. Afferent grip-intensity levels are also decoded from M1, enabling grip reanimation regulated by touch signaling. These results demonstrate that subperceptual neural signals can be decoded from the cortex and transformed into conscious perception, significantly augmenting function.
Assuntos
Retroalimentação Sensorial/fisiologia , Percepção do Tato/fisiologia , Tato/fisiologia , Adulto , Interfaces Cérebro-Computador/psicologia , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Força da Mão/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Córtex Motor/fisiologia , Movimento/fisiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
For brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to be viable for long-term daily usage, they must be able to quickly identify and adapt to signal disruptions. Furthermore, the detection and mitigation steps need to occur automatically and without the need for user intervention while also being computationally tractable for the low-power hardware that will be used in a deployed BCI system. Here, we focus on disruptions that are likely to occur during chronic use that cause some recording channels to fail but leave the remaining channels unaffected. In these cases, the algorithm that translates recorded neural activity into actions, the neural decoder, should seamlessly identify and adjust to the altered neural signals with minimal inconvenience to the user. First, we introduce an adapted statistical process control (SPC) method that automatically identifies disrupted channels so that both decoding algorithms can be adjusted, and technicians can be alerted. Next, after identifying corrupted channels, we demonstrate the automated and rapid removal of channels from a neural network decoder using a masking approach that does not change the decoding architecture, making it amenable for transfer learning. Finally, using transfer and unsupervised learning techniques, we update the model weights to adjust for the corrupted channels without requiring the user to collect additional calibration data. We demonstrate with both real and simulated neural data that our approach can maintain high-performance while simultaneously minimizing computation time and data storage requirements. This framework is invisible to the user but can dramatically increase BCI robustness and usability.
RESUMO
Objective. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that record neural activity using intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) have shown promise for mitigating disability associated with neurological injuries and disorders. While the chronic performance and failure modes of MEAs have been well studied and systematically described in non-human primates, there is far less reported about long-term MEA performance in humans. Our group has collected one of the largest neural recording datasets from a Utah MEA in a human subject, spanning over 5 years (2014-2019). Here we present both long-term signal quality and BCI performance as well as highlight several acute signal disruption events observed during the clinical study.Approach. Long-term Utah array performance was evaluated by analyzing neural signal metric trends and decoding accuracy for tasks regularly performed across 448 clinical recording sessions. For acute signal disruptions, we identify or hypothesize the root cause of the disruption, show how the disruption manifests in the collected data, and discuss potential identification and mitigation strategies for the disruption.Main results. Neural signal quality metrics deteriorated rapidly within the first year, followed by a slower decline through the remainder of the study. Nevertheless, BCI performance remained high 5 years after implantation, which is encouraging for the translational potential of this technology as an assistive device. We also present examples of unanticipated signal disruptions during chronic MEA use, which are critical to detect as BCI technology progresses toward home usage.Significance. Our work fills a gap in knowledge around long-term MEA performance in humans, providing longevity and efficacy data points to help characterize the performance of implantable neural sensors in a human population. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT01997125) and conformed to institutional requirements for the conduct of human subjects research.
Assuntos
Interfaces Cérebro-Computador , Animais , Humanos , Microeletrodos , Primatas , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) record and translate neural activity into a control signal for assistive or other devices. Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable high degree-of-freedom BMI control for complex tasks by providing fine-resolution neural recording. However, chronically implanted MEAs are subject to a dynamic in vivo environment where transient or systematic disruptions can interfere with neural recording and degrade BMI performance. Typically, neural implant failure modes have been categorized as biological, material, or mechanical. While this categorization provides insight into a disruption's causal etiology, it is less helpful for understanding degree of impact on BMI function or possible strategies for compensation. Therefore, we propose a complementary classification framework for intracortical recording disruptions that is based on duration of impact on BMI performance and requirement for and responsiveness to interventions: (1) Transient disruptions interfere with recordings on the time scale of minutes to hours and can resolve spontaneously; (2) Reversible disruptions cause persistent interference in recordings but the root cause can be remedied by an appropriate intervention; (3) Irreversible compensable disruptions cause persistent or progressive decline in signal quality, but their effects on BMI performance can be mitigated algorithmically; and (4) Irreversible non-compensable disruptions cause permanent signal loss that is not amenable to remediation or compensation. This conceptualization of intracortical BMI disruption types is useful for highlighting specific areas for potential hardware improvements and also identifying opportunities for algorithmic interventions. We review recording disruptions that have been reported for MEAs and demonstrate how biological, material, and mechanical mechanisms of disruption can be further categorized according to their impact on signal characteristics. Then we discuss potential compensatory protocols for each of the proposed disruption classes. Specifically, transient disruptions may be minimized by using robust neural decoder features, data augmentation methods, adaptive machine learning models, and specialized signal referencing techniques. Statistical Process Control methods can identify reparable disruptions for rapid intervention. In-vivo diagnostics such as impedance spectroscopy can inform neural feature selection and decoding models to compensate for irreversible disruptions. Additional compensatory strategies for irreversible disruptions include information salvage techniques, data augmentation during decoder training, and adaptive decoding methods to down-weight damaged channels.