A comparative study of anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral offset aimer versus freehand technique for femoral tunnel preparation.

BACKGROUND: ACL reconstruction is one of the commonest orthopaedic procedures performed. There has been a shift in techniques from single bundle to double bundle to anatomic single-bundle reconstruction and also from transtibial to anteromedial method. Anteromedial technique results in more anatomic femoral tunnel with graft positioned at the native insertion site. The tunnel position is crucial for better outcome after ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: To compare the femoral tunnel position made by anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using femoral offset aimer device versus freehand drilling with 3D computed tomography. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective case series involving 60 patients with ACL tear who underwent anteromedial single-bundle ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Computed tomography scans were performed on 60 knees that underwent single-bundle anteromedial ACL reconstruction with 30 cases involving femoral drilling through aimer device and another 30 cases involving freehand drilling of the tunnel. Three-dimensional models were created, and the data were analysed according to the co-ordinate axes method. Femoral tunnel position was measured in proximal-to-distal and posterior-to-anterior directions. Data from both the groups were compared with each other and already published reference data on anatomical tunnel position. RESULTS: In the aimer group, the femoral tunnel centre on the medial wall of lateral femoral condyle was located at 35 ± 9% in the posterior-to-anterior direction and at 30 ± 12% in the proximal-to-distal direction. In the freehand group, tunnel was placed at 37 ± 10% in posterior-to-anterior and 28 ± 7% in proximal-to-distal directions. There was no significant difference in tunnel position in both the groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows there is no significant difference between both the drilling techniques of femoral tunnel, i.e. freehand drilling and drilling with aimer device. Also, it reiterates the efficacy and utility of computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction in the analysis of femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction.

Acromioclavicular joint septic arthritis in an immunocompetent child: A case report.

Septic arthritis of acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a rare entity. It is generally seen in patients who are immunocompromised. Only 15 cases have been reported till now, with only one case series of 6 patients. We report a case of septic arthritis of AC joint in an immunocompetent child. A 9 years old girl presented with history of pain in left shoulder for 4 days associated with fever. No history suggestive of any immunocompromised state was complained. On local examination, a swelling of around 3 cm in diameter was found over left AC joint region with raised local temperature, tenderness on palpation and positive response in fluctuation test. Total leukocyte count was 18.7 × 109/L with 80% of neutrophils. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 28 mm/1 h. C-reactive protein (CRP) was 12 mg/L. X-ray showed enlarged left AC joint space. Ultrasound revealed hypoechoic collection in the AC joint and the surrounding area. The aspirate was thick and purulent in nature, revealing Gram positive cocci at staining. Arthrotomy and thorough lavage of AC joint was done. Culture of the aspirate showed Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) after 48 hours that was sensitive to amikacin, gentamicin, erythromycin and teicoplanin. Patient was symptom-free at 2 months of follow-up with no signs of osteomyelitis on the radiographs. Thus this is the first case of AC joint septic arthritis in healthy individual. Being proximal to the shoulder joint, AC joint septic arthritis can be confused with the shoulder joint septic arthritis. Thus, high index of suspicion is required for accurate diagnosis.

3D CT evaluation of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: An anatomical double bundle ACL reconstruction replicates the anatomy of native ACL as the tunnels are made to simulate the anatomy of ACL with AM and PL bundle foot prints. The goal of anatomic ACL reconstruction is to tailor the procedure to each patient's anatomic, biomechanical and functional demands to provide the best possible outcome. The shift from single bundle to double bundle technique and also from transtibial to transportal method has been to provide near anatomic tunnel positions. PURPOSE: To determine the position of femoral and tibial tunnels prepared by double bundle ACL reconstruction using three dimensional Computed tomography. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective case series involving forty patients with ACL tear who underwent transportal double bundle ACL reconstruction. METHOD: Computed tomography scans were performed on forty knees that had undergone double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction models of the knee joint were prepared and aligned into an anatomical coordinate axis system for femur and tibia respectively. Tibial tunnel centres were measured in the anterior-to-posterior and medial-to-lateral directions on the top view of tibial plateau and femoral tunnel centres were measured in posterior to anterior and proximal-to-distal directions with anatomic coordinate axis method. These measurements were compared with published reference data. RESULTS: Analysing the Femoral tunnel, the mean posterior-to-anterior distances for anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 46.8% ± 7.4% and 34.5% ± 5.0% of the posterior-to-anterior height of the medial wall and the mean proximal-to-distal distances for the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 24.1% ± 7.1% and 61.6% ± 4.8%. On the tibial side, the mean anterior-to-posterior distances for the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 28.8% ± 4.3% and 46.2% ± 3.6% of the anterior-to posterior depth of the tibia measured from the anterior border and the mean medial-to-lateral distances for the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnel centre position were 46.5% ± 2.9% and 50.6% ± 2.8% of the medial-to-lateral width of the tibia measured from the medial border. There is high Inter-observer and Intra-observer reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Femoral AM tunnel was positioned significantly anterior and nearly proximal whereas the femoral PL tunnel was positioned significantly anterior and nearly distal with respect to the anatomic site. Location of tibial AM tunnel was nearly posterior and nearly medial whereas the location of tibial PL tunnel was very similar to the anatomic site Evaluation of location of tunnels through the anatomic co-ordinate axes method on 3D CT models is a reliable and reproducible method. This method would help the surgeons to aim for anatomic placement of the tunnels. It also shows that there is scope for improvement of femoral tunnel in double bundle ACL reconstruction through transportal technique.

Accuracy and Efficacy of Software-guided Bony Realignment in Periarticular Deformities of the Lower Limb.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: Software-guided realignment is proposed as an easy and accurate method of achieving simultaneous multiaxial correction. The accuracy and efficacy in periarticular problems have not been investigated fully. This study investigates the results and possible clinical benefits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed in 24 patients with 27 periarticular deformities of the lower limb treated by the Ilizarov technique. Bony realignment was achieved by a software-guided hexapod realignment device. The deformity category, deformity severity score (DSS) and individual deformity component scores were measured for objective quantification of each deformity. The periarticular level, number of manoeuvres, correction period and any difficulties in the execution of the correction manoeuvre were noted. Pre-procedure and post-procedure values of deformity parameters were analysed to estimate the accuracy and efficacy of the realignment device. RESULTS: The correction manoeuvre was accomplished successfully in all patients except two. The mean correction period was 14.9 days (range, 5-38 days). The mean pre-procedure DSS was 18.7 (range 6.3-27.3), which reduced to a mean post-procedure value of 1.5 (range, 0-7.9) with a 92.0% deformity correction (p-value < 0.001)). There was a significant reversal of individual deformity components. DSS values were achieved to an excellent level (< 3.5) in 25 deformities and to good and poor levels in one deformity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Software-guided realignments are effective for accurate realignment of periarticular deformities using Ilizarov fixators. These devices offer simultaneous multidimensional corrections even in complex multiplanar deformities and simplify the task of deformity correction. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present study assesses the accuracy and efficacy of software-guided realignments using novel concepts of deformity category, DSS and individual deformity component scores, which may overcome some of the shortcomings of conventional assessment methods. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh P, Sabat D, Dutt S, et al. Accuracy and Efficacy of Software-guided Bony Realignment in Periarticular Deformities of the Lower Limb. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(2):65-70.