Implementation of artificial intelligence-based computer vision model in laparoscopic appendectomy: validation, reliability, and clinical correlation.

BACKGROUND: Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in general surgery is evolving. Real-world implementation of an AI-based computer-vision model in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is presented. We aimed to evaluate (1) its accuracy in complexity grading and safety adherence, (2) clinical correlation to outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study of 499 consecutive LA videos, captured and analyzed by 'Surgical Intelligence Platform,' Theator Inc. (9/2020-5/2022). Two expert surgeons viewed all videos and manually graded complexity and safety adherence. Automated annotations were compared to surgeons' assessments. Inter-surgeons' agreements were measured. Since 7/2021 videos were linked to patients' admission numbers. Data retrieval from medical records was performed (n = 365). Outcomes were compared between high and low complexity grades. RESULTS: Low and high complexity grades comprised 74.8 and 25.2% of 499 videos. Surgeons' agreements were high (76.9-94.4%, kappa 0.77/0.91; p < 0.001) for all annotated complexity grades. Surgeons' agreements were also high (96.0-99.8%, kappa 0.78/0.87; p < 0.001) for full safety adherence, whereas agreement was moderate in partial safety adherence and none (32.8-58.8%). Inter-surgeons' agreements were high for complexity grading (kappa 0.86, p < 0.001) and safety adherence (kappa 0.88, p < 0.001). Comparing high to low grade complexity, preoperative clinical features were similar, except larger appendix diameter on imaging (13.4 ± 4.4 vs. 10.5 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). Intraoperative outcomes were significantly higher (p < 0.001), including time to achieve critical view of safety (29.6, IQR 19.1-41.6 vs. 13.7, IQR 8.5-21.1 min), operative duration (45.3, IQR 37.7-65.2 vs. 25.0, IQR 18.3-32.7 min), and intraoperative events (39.4% vs. 5.9%). Postoperative outcomes (7.4% vs. 9.2%) including surgical complications, mortality, and readmissions were comparable (p = 0.6), except length of stay (4, IQR 2-5.5 vs. 1, IQR 1-2 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The model accurately assesses complexity grading and full safety achievement. It can serve to predict operative time and intraoperative course, whereas no clinical correlation was found regarding postoperative outcomes. Further studies are needed.

Is fundoplication mandatory in children with neurological impairment undergoing gastrostomy?

AIM: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and surgical gastrostomy (SG) are common procedures in children with neurological impairment (NI) with swallowing difficulties. Pulmonary aspirations are a major concern and performing concomitant or delayed fundoplication is still controversial, especially among these patients. The aim of our study was to review our experience with fundoplication performed concomitantly with gastrostomy or later and to evaluate patient outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cohort study including all paediatric patients who underwent SG or PEG with or without Nissen fundoplication at Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel between the years 2007 and 2018. Patients' clinical and surgical data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2018, 345 patients underwent SG or PEG. Of these, 89 patients underwent fundoplication. Of the patients who underwent PEG/SG, 158 (45.8%) were neurologically impaired. Most of the patients who underwent fundoplication (n = 69, 77.5%) were NI patients (P = 0.0001). NI patients with refractory seizures showed almost no improvement in terms of relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms following fundoplication (P = 0.0001) compared to NI patients without refractory seizures. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that in NI patients a concomitant fundoplication is not mandatory and is not efficacious in preventing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with refractory seizures.

Primary Versus Revisional Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Patients with a Body Mass Index ≥ 50 kg/m2-90-Day Outcomes and Risk of Perioperative Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) is an effective treatment for patients with severe obesity. Patients with higher body mass index (BMI) and patients undergoing revisional surgery have a higher rate of major complications. This study purpose is to evaluate perioperative outcomes of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 undergoing BMS between 2015 and 2023 was conducted. A comparative analysis was performed between patients undergoing primary versus revisional surgery. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients were included in the study. Primary procedures were performed in 220 patients (83.7%) and revisional procedures in 43 patients (16.3%). BMS included one anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 183), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 63), and other procedures (n = 17). Mean BMI was 54.6 with no difference between groups. There was no difference in baseline characteristics except the revisional group was older (44.8 ± 9.6 versus 39 ± 13 years; p = 0.006), had higher rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease (21% vs 7.3%; p = 0.005), and fatty liver disease (74% vs 55%; p = 0.02). There was perioperative mortality in three cases (1.1%) with no significant difference between groups. Leak rates were higher, and length of stay (LOS) was longer in the revisional group (4.6% vs 0.45%; p = 0.018 and 2.9 vs 3.7; p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Revisional BMS in patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 is associated with increased leak rates and LOS. Mortality rate is 1.1% and is insignificantly different between groups. Further prospective and large-scale studies are needed to clarify the optimal surgical approach to patients with extreme BMI including revisional surgery.

Sleeve gastrectomy after liver transplantation: results of a 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Severe obesity and metabolic syndrome are common long-term complications after liver transplantation (LT). Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is the essential treatment for severe obesity with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) being the most commonly performed procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all LT patients who underwent MBS between January 2006 and December 2020 in a single tertiary center. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 226 LTs were performed. Four patients (1.8%) underwent SG following LT. Time interval from LT to SG ranged 11-72 months. The median Body Mass Index (BMI) before LT and SG was 38.8(±6.5) and 41.8(±2.7) kg/m2, respectively. All patients suffered from type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with a median A1c level of 5.9% (±1) under medications. All patients were consuming immunosuppressants perioperatively. All surgeries were approached laparoscopically, the median operative time was 65.5 minutes (±47.6), there were no intra-operative complications, and no conversions to open surgery. There were no early (30-day) major complications. The median length of stay was 3.5 days (±3.6). The median range of follow-up was 61.6 months (±18.2), there were no late (>30 day) complications. The median BMI at 24, and 60 months was 29.61(±3.9) and 31.10(±2.6) kg/m2, respectively. The median percentage of total weight loss at 24, and 60 months was 29.18 (±5.2) and 28.87(±3.7), respectively. The median percentage of excess weight loss at 24 and 60 months was 60.5% (±13) and 58.57% (±11.7), respectively. Three patients had T2DM resolution. CONCLUSIONS: SG following LT is associated with low perioperative morbidity and satisfactory long-term results.

Safety of concomitant cholecystectomy during one anastomosis gastric bypass compared with sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Candidates of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are prone for gallstone formation. Concomitant cholecystectomy (CC) during MBS is controversial. This study is first to examine the safety of CC during one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), compared with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Single-center retrospective comparative study of CC (2012-2021) during OAGB, to SG and RYGB. CC was performed in 115 patients during OAGB (n = 50), SG (n = 39), and RYGB (n = 26). All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Baseline characteristics were similar except age, body mass index, gastroesophageal reflux disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and previous MBS (p < 0.05). Intraoperative complications occurred in one OAGB patient (2% vs. 0%, 0%; p = 0.52), which was not cholecystectomy related. There were no differences in total (6% vs. 2.6%, 15.4%; p = 0.13) and major (2% vs. 0%, 3.8; p = 0.50) early-complication rates. Of them, cholecystectomy-related complications occurred in one OAGB, compared with none of SG and one RYGB (2% vs. 0%, 3.8%; p = 0.50). The former was major, and the latter was minor complication. None of the OAGB patients needed re-admission (0% vs. 0%, 11.5; p = 0.04). All CC outcome parameters were similar between asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones. Previous bariatric procedures were found to be a significant risk for major complications and readmissions (OR = 16.87, p = 0.019). CC during OAGB for gallstones seems safe, as in SG and RYGB. No cholecystectomy-related intraoperative complications occurred, and postoperative complication rates were low and acceptable. Outcomes for asymptomatic gallstones were similar to symptomatic ones, and we cautiously support CC in the presence of gallstones.