Comparison of middle- and bottom-up mass spectrometry in forced degradation studies of bevacizumab and infliximab.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used as therapeutics need comprehensive characterization for appropriate quality assurance. For analysis, cost-effective methods are of high importance, especially when it comes to biosimilar development which is based on extended physicochemical characterization. The use of forced degradation to study the occurrence of modifications for analysis is well established in drug development and may be used for the evaluation of critical quality attributes (CQAs). For mAb analysis different procedures of liquid chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses are commonly applied. In this study the middle-up approach is compared to the more expensive bottom-up analysis in a forced oxidation biosimilar comparability study. Bevacizumab and infliximab as well as biosimilar candidates for the two mAbs were forcefully oxidized by H2O2 for 24, 48 and 72 h. For bottom-up, the reduced and alkylated trypsin or Lys-C digested samples were analysed by LC-MS with quadrupole time-of-flight mass analyser (LC-QTOF-MS) to detect susceptible residues. By middle-up analysis several species of every subunit (Fc/2, light chain and Fd') were detected which differed in the number of oxidations. For the most abundant species, results from middle-up were in line with results from bottom-up analysis, confirming the strength of middle-up analysis. However, for less abundant species of some subunits, results differed between the two approaches. In both mAbs, the Fc was extensively oxidized. In infliximab, additional extensive oxidation was found in the Fab. Assignment to specific amino acid residues was finally possible using the results from bottom-up analyses. Interestingly, the C-terminal cysteine of the light chain was partially found triply oxidized in both mAbs. The comparison of susceptibility to oxidation showed high similarity between the reference products and their biosimilar candidates. It is suggested that the findings of middle-up experiments should be complemented by bottom-up analysis to confirm the assignments of the localization of modifications. Once the consistency of results has been established, middle-up analyses are sufficient in extended forced degradation biosimilar studies.

Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment.

Oxidation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can impact their efficacy and may therefore represent critical quality attributes (CQA) that require evaluation. To complement classical CQA, bevacizumab and infliximab were subjected to oxidative stress by H2O2 for 24, 48, or 72 h to probe their oxidation susceptibility. For investigation, a middle-up approach was used utilizing liquid chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). In both mAbs, the Fc/2 subunit was completely oxidized. Additional oxidations were found in the light chain (LC) and in the Fd' subunit of infliximab, but not in bevacizumab. By direct comparison of methionine positions, the oxidized residues in infliximab were assigned to M55 in LC and M18 in Fd'. The forced oxidation approach was further exploited for comparison of respective biosimilar products. Both for bevacizumab and infliximab, comparison of posttranslational modification profiles demonstrated high similarity of the unstressed reference product (RP) and the biosimilar (BS). However, for bevacizumab, comparison after forced oxidation revealed a higher susceptibility of the BS compared to the RP. It may thus be considered a useful tool for biopharmaceutical engineering, biosimilarity assessment, as well as for quality control of protein drugs.