Promoter methylation of CDKN2A and lack of p16 expression characterize patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The product of CDKN2A, p16 is an essential regulator of the cell cycle controlling the entry into the S-phase. Herein, we evaluated CDKN2A promoter methylation and p16 protein expression for the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other liver tumors. METHODS: Tumor and corresponding non-tumor liver tissue samples were obtained from 85 patients with liver tumors. CDKN2A promoter methylation was studied using MethyLight technique and methylation-specific PCR (MSP). In the MethyLight analysis, samples with > or = 4% of PMR (percentage of methylated reference) were regarded as hypermethylated. p16 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in tissue sections (n = 148) obtained from 81 patients using an immunoreactivity score (IRS) ranging from 0 (no expression) to 6 (strong expression). RESULTS: Hypermethylation of the CDKN2A promoter was found in 23 HCCs (69.7%; mean PMR = 42.34 +/- 27.8%), six (20.7%; mean PMR = 31.85 +/- 18%) liver metastases and in the extralesional tissue of only one patient. Using MSP, 32% of the non-tumor (n = 85), 70% of the HCCs, 40% of the CCCs and 24% of the liver metastases were hypermethylated. Correspondingly, nuclear p16 expression was found immunohistochemically in five (10.9%, mean IRS = 0.5) HCCs, 23 (92%; mean IRS = 4.9) metastases and only occasionally in hepatocytes of non-lesional liver tissues (mean IRS = 1.2). The difference of CDKN2A-methylation and p16 protein expression between HCCs and liver metastases was statistically significant (p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Promoter methylation of CDKN2A gene and lack of p16 expression characterize patients with HCC.

Auditory evoked potentials compared with bispectral index for monitoring of midazolam and propofol sedation during colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare Bispectral index (BIS) and A-line auditory evoked potential index (AAI) for monitoring depth of low-dose midazolam and propofol sedation during colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 115 consecutive patients (ASA I-IV), receiving low-dose midazolam and propofol sedation for colonoscopy, were evaluated. BIS and AAI levels, Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, as well as the presence or absence of eyelash reflex, patient reaction to an external noxious stimulus and to procedure-related pain were recorded every 1-3 min by a single trained observer. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between BIS and OAA/S scores (correlation coefficient=0.77) and to a lesser extent AAI and OAA/S scores (correlation coefficient=0.47). BIS and AAI showed significant differences between subsequent levels of sedation (P<0.001). The clustered receiver operating characteristic curve estimate of BIS for the detection of deep sedation was significantly better than that of AAI (P<0.001). Regarding the presence or absence of eyelash reflex and patient reaction to an external noxious stimulus and to procedure-related pain, significant different levels were found for BIS as well as AAI, respectively. Only small changes were observed in hemodynamic variables and oxygen saturation. Overall, our data suggest target BIS levels of slightly above 73 for moderate sedation (defined as OAA/S scores 2 and 3). CONCLUSIONS: BIS and AAI correlated with the level of sedation. Hemodynamic variables were poor indicators of the hypnotic-anesthetic status of the patient. BIS discriminated best between moderate and deep sedation and could complement clinical observation for guidance of moderate sedation.

Differential Expression of SPARC in Intestinal-type Gastric Cancer Correlates with Tumor Progression and Nodal Spread.

AIMS: Nodal spread is the single most important prognostic factor of survival in gastric cancer patients. In this study, genes that were upregulated in the lymph node metastases of gastric cancer were identified and may serve as putative novel therapeutic target. METHODS: Complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray analysis and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of primary gastric carcinomas and matched lymph node metastasis were carried out. Immunohistochemistry with anti-SPARC antibodies was performed on large tissue sections of 40 cases with primary gastric carcinoma (20 diffuse, 20 intestinal) and the corresponding lymph node metastases, as well as on tissue microarrays of 152 gastric cancer cases. RESULTS: A cDNA microarray identified SPARC as being upregulated in primary gastric carcinoma tissue and the corresponding lymph node metastasis compared with the nonneoplastic mucosa. SPARC was expressed in fibroblasts and, occasionally, in tumor cells. However, the level of immunoreactivity was particularly strong in stromal cells surrounding the tumor. The level of expression of SPARC, determined by immunohistochemistry, correlated in intestinal-type gastric cancer with the local tumor growth, nodal spread, and tumor stage according to the International Union Against Cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides transcriptional and translational evidence for the differential expression of SPARC in gastric cancer tissue. On the basis of our observations and those made by others, we hypothesize that SPARC is a promising novel target for the treatment of gastric cancer.