Shaping anesthetic techniques to reduce post-operative delirium (SHARP) study: a protocol for a prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation compared with general anesthesia in older adults undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is common in older adults, especially in those patients undergoing spine surgery, in whom it is estimated to occur in > 30% of patients. Although previously thought to be transient, it is now recognized that delirium is associated with both short- and long-term complications. Optimizing the depth of anesthesia may represent a modifiable strategy for delirium prevention. However, previous studies have generally not focused on reducing the depth of anesthesia beyond levels consistent with general anesthesia. Additionally, the results of prior studies have been conflicting. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether reduced depth of anesthesia using spinal anesthesia reduces the incidence of delirium after lumbar fusion surgery compared with general anesthesia. METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled trial is enrolling 218 older adults undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Patients are randomized to reduced depth of anesthesia in the context of spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation using processed electroencephalogram monitoring versus general anesthesia without processed electroencephalogram monitoring. All patients are evaluated for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for 3 days after surgery or until discharge and undergo assessments of cognition, function, health-related quality of life, and pain at 3- and 12-months after surgery. The primary outcome is any occurrence of delirium. The main secondary outcome is change in the Mini-Mental Status Examination (or telephone equivalent) at 3-months after surgery. DISCUSSION: Delirium is an important complication after surgery in older adults. The results of this study will examine whether reduced depth of anesthesia using spinal anesthesia with targeted depth of sedation represents a modifiable intervention to reduce the incidence of delirium and other long-term outcomes. The results of this study will be presented at national meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals with the goal of improving perioperative outcomes for older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03133845. This study was submitted to Clinicaltrials.gov on October 23, 2015; however, it was not formally registered until April 28, 2017 due to formatting requirements from the registry, so the formal registration is retrospective.

Improvement of severe myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome symptoms following surgical treatment of cervical spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a potentially disabling disorder. Little is known about the contributors to severe forms of the illness. We describe three consecutive patients with severe ME/CFS whose symptoms improved after recognition and surgical management of their cervical spinal stenosis. METHODS: All patients satisfied clinical criteria for ME/CFS and orthostatic intolerance, and were later found to have cervical spinal stenosis. Overall function was assessed before and after surgery using the Karnofsky score and the SF-36 physical function subscale score. RESULTS: Neurological findings included > 3+ deep tendon reflexes in 2 of 3, a positive Hoffman sign in 2 of 3, tremor in 2 of 3, and absent gag reflex in 1 of 3. The cervical spine canal diameter in the three patients ranged from 6 to 8.5 mm. One had congenital cervical stenosis with superimposed spondylosis, and two had single- or two-level spondylosis. Anterior cervical disc replacement surgery in two patients and a hybrid anterior cervical disc fusion and disc replacement in the third was associated with a marked improvement in myelopathic symptoms, resolution of lightheadedness and hemodynamic dysfunction, improvement in activity levels, and improvement in global ME/CFS symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The prompt post-surgical restoration of more normal function suggests that cervical spine stenosis contributed to the pathogenesis of refractory ME/CFS and orthostatic symptoms. The improvements following surgery emphasize the importance of a careful search for myelopathic examination findings in those with ME/CFS, especially when individuals with severe impairment are not responding to treatment.

Staged Cement Injections for Massive Sacral Hemangioma.

Vertebral hemangiomas are typically asymptomatic; however, they can also be a source of severe axial back pain. In this report, the authors describe the case of an unusually large sacral hemangioma that was effectively treated with staged cement augmentation. A 57-year-old man presented with chronic mid-sacral pain that was episodically severe. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a massive lytic defect involving a majority of the body of S1 with features consistent with a hemangioma. It was theorized that the patient's pain could be attributed to the compromised structural integrity of the proximal sacrum with associated microfractures. Extensive conservative treatment failed to ameliorate the pain. A cement augmentation procedure was therefore recommended to stabilize the proximal sacrum. Due to concern about the potential for cement embolic complications, a staged bilateral approach was chosen. In the first procedure, 12 mL of bone cement was injected into the right proximal sacrum. The pain was partially improved by this injection. A 2-month interval was observed before the second cement injection in order to give time for pulmonary recovery from any potential microscopic emboli. In the second stage, 8 mL of bone cement was injected into the left proximal sacrum with excellent pain relief. There were no complications from either injection. At the 5-year follow-up, the patient reported no recurrence of mid-sacral pain. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case reporting the effective treatment of a sacral hemangioma with staged cement injections. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):e253-e256.].

Case report: Recurrent cervical spinal stenosis masquerading as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome with orthostatic intolerance.

Introduction: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, chronic, multi-system disorder that is characterized by a substantial impairment in the activities that were well tolerated before the illness. In an earlier report, we had described three adult women who met criteria for ME/CFS and orthostatic intolerance, and had congenital or acquired cervical spinal stenosis. All three experienced substantial global improvements in their ME/CFS and orthostatic intolerance symptoms after recognition and surgical treatment of the cervical stenosis. After a several year period of improvement, one of the individuals in that series experienced a return of ME/CFS and orthostatic intolerance symptoms. Main symptoms and clinical findings: Radiologic investigation confirmed a recurrence of the ventral compression of the spinal cord due to a shift of the disc replacement implant at the involved cervical spinal level. Therapeutic intervention: Decompression of the spinal cord with removal of the implant and fusion at the original C5-C6 level was once again followed by a similar degree of improvement in function as had been observed after the first operation. Conclusion: This recapitulation of the outcomes after surgical management of cervical stenosis provides further evidence in support of the hypothesis that cervical spinal stenosis can exacerbate pre-existing or cause new orthostatic intolerance and ME/CFS. Especially for those with refractory symptoms and neurological signs, surgical interventions may offer relief for selected patients with this complex condition.

Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery is well established for the treatment of disc degeneration from C3-C7, but there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of CDR at the cervicothoracic junction, C7-T1. CDR is an appealing option, in terms of range of motion preservation, symptom relief, and absence of risk for nonunion. Currently, C7-T1 CDR is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and the existing literature is limited to two case reports that describe the results of a combined two patients. This series explores whether C7-T1 CDR is a reasonable treatment and alternative to fusion. METHODS: We present a case series of seven consecutive patients who underwent CDR at C7-T1 by a single surgeon from January to December of 2019. There were five females and two males with an average age of 61.3 ± 6.4 years. RESULTS: Average follow up was 18.9 ± 2.5 months. The average postoperative NDI score was 22.6 % ± 14.0. We also recorded qualitative data regarding patient satisfaction and revision surgery status. There was one complication of disc subsidence following three months of complete pain resolution. The six other patients reported being very satisfied with their surgical outcome. CONCLUSION: These seven cases dramatically increase the volume of data in the literature on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following CDR at the cervicothoracic junction. Additionally, the heterogeneity of cases shows the effectiveness of this treatment in many real-world cases. A greater volume of cases with longer follow up will be necessary to better establish long-term clinical success.

Treatment of cervical non-union with cervical disc replacement: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has become prevalent in the treatment of cervical pathology. CDR is an appealing option for several reasons, including improvement of symptoms, preservation of range of motion, and the absence of risk for nonunion - a complication of an anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery. In this case series, we explore the use of CDR to treat cervical nonunion. METHODS: Four patients, ages 50 to 64, presented to one surgeon with symptomatic cervical nonunion. Three of the four patients possessed risk factors for further nonunion and were therefore considered especially well-suited to a CDR rather than a revision ACDF. X-ray, MRI, and CT were used to confirm the presence of nonunion and to determine the architectural feasibility of replacing the level with a cervical disc arthroplasty. Six total nonunion levels were present in four patients (two levels in two patients and one level in two patients). Each of the nonunion levels was successfully treated with a revision decompression and CDR. RESULTS: Postoperatively, all four patients experienced improvement of nonunion symptoms. Neck Disability Index improved on average by 75% (preoperative score 51% to postoperative score 13%). Flexion-extension X-rays were available in three patients, which showed an increase in an average range of motion from 2 degrees to 7 degrees at the revised levels. CONCLUSION: The series describing four successful cases expands the current literature and provides support for future investigation into CDR as a treatment for cervical nonunion. We propose CDR as a viable option to treat symptomatic cervical nonunion and restore range of motion in patients without significant arthrosis and with preserved endplate architecture.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Lumbar Spine Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study (observational-retrospective chart review). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine clinical rates and correlations of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in elective spine decompression and fusion procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: POUR is a common postoperative complication that often has a major adverse impact on a patient's recovery from elective lumbar spine surgery. The etiology of POUR in most cases is unknown. Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery are considered to be at increased risk for POUR due to prone positioning during surgery and intraoperative cauda equina nerve root manipulation. Current studies reporting on POUR after elective spine surgery provide limited insight regarding risk factors and effective prevention strategies for this at-risk population. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for POUR after elective lumbar spine surgery and strategies for reducing its incidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients aged 50 years or older undergoing combined lumbar decompression and fusion procedures over a 5-month period at a single institution were prospectively observed. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively recorded, including: medical history, surgical data, medications administered, complications, and postoperative hospital course. Factors correlating with POUR through a univariate analysis with P≤0.20 were considered for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: POUR occurred in 19 of 200 patients. Those with POUR were more likely to be male (20% vs. 4%, odds ratio=6.2). Administration of scopolamine (P=0.02), neostigmine (P=0.01), and the total number of levels operated on (P=0.02) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of POUR. Length of surgery, surgical level, the performance of an interbody fusion did not have a bearing on the development of POUR (P>0.05). DISCUSSION: We describe a single institution's experience of POUR incidence in 200 consecutive patients aged 50 years or older undergoing single or multilevel lumbar spine fusion procedures by 1 of 4 surgeons. Specific demographic and clinical risk factors were identified and a codified classification for POUR in a surgical population is presented.The results of this study will help clinicians appropriately counsel patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion about the potential development of POUR. The perioperative administration of scopolamine and neostigmine should be cautiously considered in men over 50 years of age due to the increased POUR risk. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative scopolamine and neostigmine administration in men over 50 should be avoided when possible to minimize the risk of POUR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Does Local Steroid Reduce Dysphagia After Cervical Disc Replacement? A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of intraoperatively administered local Depo-Medrol on the incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing cervical disk replacement (CDR) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dysphagia is often reported as an adverse event after anterior cervical surgeries. One method for reducing the incidence of postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries is the intraoperative application of topical corticosteroids to the retroesophageal space. There have been no studies examining the effect of local steroids on dysphagia after CDR surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients underwent CDR surgery by a single surgeon at a single institution. A 1 cm ×3 cm ×3 mm gel foam collagen sponge was saturated by the nurse with either saline (1 cc) or Depo-Medrol (40 mg/1 cc) based on randomization protocol. The sponge was placed ventral to the cervical disk implant in the retroesophageal space. Study follow-up occurred on postoperative day 1, 4, 7, 14 and postoperative month 1, 2, and 3. Dysphagia outcomes were classified using the Bazaz Dysphagia Score and Eating Assessment Tool 10. RESULTS: The steroid group, compared with the control group, had significantly reduced incidence of dysphagia (50% vs. 75%; P=0.0427) and severe dysphagia (12% vs. 36% Bazaz score, P=0.0253; 18% vs. 42% Eating Assessment Tool 10, P=0.0378) at POD4. There was no significant long-term difference in rates of dysphagia between the control and the steroid group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides level 1 evidence that the use of intraoperative locally administered Depo-Medrol significantly reduces the incidence and severity of dysphagia within the first week after CDR surgery. The use of local steroid may provide patients undergoing CDR surgery with a more pleasant early recovery experience with respect to dysphagia.

Extradural arachnoid cyst with bony erosion: a rare case report.

The authors present the case of an otherwise healthy 38-year-old female with an atypical extradural arachnoid cyst with multi-level involvement in the lumbar spine leading to left quadriceps weakness and dysesthesia. Upon presentation, a lumbar spine MRI with contrast and plain radiographs revealed extensive L4 bony erosion. An MR angiogram and cervical spine MRI with contrast were then obtained in order to rule out any aortic root or cervical spine pathology. With no other apparent clinically relevant pathology revealed by these additional tests, an L3-5 posterior decompression and fusion procedure was performed. Her preoperative symptoms were successfully resolved following the procedure, with no resultant surgical complications. The cyst is atypical not only due to its size and location, but also due of the significant bony erosion of the left L4 pedicle and vertebral body. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of an extradural arachnoid cyst in the lumbar spine with bony erosion of the pedicle and vertebral body. In cases such as this, a CT myelogram may be useful in planning the operative approach through visualization of the exact communication between cyst and dura. This approach may also aid in diagnosing and identifying atypical cyst presentations such as the one presented here.

Spinal Anesthesia for Geriatric Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Comparative Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The use of spinal anesthesia (SA) as opposed to general anesthesia (GA) during elective lumbar spine surgery is an emerging technique and represents a potentially modifiable factor to limit perioperative complications. Few studies, however, have compared these anesthetic techniques in an elderly population. The aim of this study is to determine if SA is a safe alternative to GA for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive case series study was performed. All patients aged 70 years and older who underwent lumbar spine decompression or combined decompression and fusion using either SA or GA during a 2-year period at a single institution were identified. Demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of all patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 56 patients (19%) received SA and 239 (81%) received GA. Patients receiving SA were slightly older (median age, 77 years versus 75 years, P = .002), consisted of more men (57% versus 36%, P = .01), and had a lower mean body mass index (28.3 versus 30.1, P = .03). Indications for surgery and type of surgery were similar between groups. On average, operative times with SA were 101 minutes versus 103 minutes with GA (P = .71). After controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, patients receiving SA had decreased estimated blood loss (ß = -75 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -140.6, -9.4; P = .025) and intraoperative intravenous fluid requirements (ß = -205 mL; 95% CI, -389.4, -21.0; P = .029), shorter postanesthesia care unit stays (ß = -41 minutes; 95% CI, -64.6, -16.9; P = .001), lower maximum visual analog scale pain scores (ß = -0.89 points; 95% CI, -1.6, -0.1; P = .020), and decreased odds of receiving blood transfusion (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.62; P = .45); there were no significant differences in operative time, length of stay, nausea, or oral morphine equivalents consumed per day. Complication rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is a reasonable, safe alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients with degenerative conditions.

Lengthy complex lumbar fusion surgery in high-risk elderly patient under spinal anesthesia: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal Anesthesia (SA) continues to be an emerging technique for lumbar fusion surgery in the elderly population. SA is an appealing option in the high-risk geriatric population for several reasons, including the potential for reduced systematic stress, reduced blood loss, and reduced post-operative delirium. The safe limits of spine surgery under SA remain undetermined. PRESENTATION OF CASE: The following case-study describes an elderly high-risk patient (ASA III) with severe spinal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis who presented with lower back and right leg pain and underwent a 3-level lumbar fusion surgery with spinal anesthesia. The procedure lasted 3 h and 44 min with sufficient anesthesia maintained throughout. The patient experienced minor post-operative complications, but had an excellent clinical outcome at 3-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Further research should be conducted to define the temporal limits of SA in elderly patients and the etiology of post-operative complications following lumbar fusion surgery under spinal anesthesia in the geriatric population. CONCLUSION: The case reported, herein, demonstrates the feasibility of SA in elderly patients undergoing lengthy complex lumbar surgeries who have been designated "high-risk" patients (ASA > II) and provides support for future investigation into surgical and anesthesia treatment options for geriatric high-risk patients presenting with complex lumbar spine pathologies.

Deep Vein Thrombosis After Complex Posterior Spine Surgery: Does Staged Surgery Make a Difference?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with single- versus multistage posterior-only complex spinal surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dividing the physiologic burden of spinal deformity surgery into multiple stages has been suggested as a potential means of reducing perioperative complications. DVT is a worrisome complication owing to its potential to lead to pulmonary embolism. Whether or not staging affects DVT incidence in this population is unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing either single- or multistage posterior complex spinal surgeries over a 12-year period at a single institution were eligible. All patients received lower extremity venous duplex ultrasonographic (US) examinations 2 to 4 days postoperatively in the single-stage group and 2 to 4 days postoperatively after each stage in the multistage group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the independent contribution of staging to developing a DVT. RESULTS: A total of 107 consecutive patients were enrolled-26 underwent multistage surgery and 81 underwent single-stage surgery. The single-stage group was older (63 years vs. 45 years; p < .01) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (2.25 ± 1.27 vs. 1.23 ± 1.58; p < .01). More multistage patients had positive US tests than single-stage patients (5 of 26 vs. 6 of 81; 19% vs. 7%; p = .13). Adjusting for all the above-mentioned covariates, a multistage surgery was 8.17 (95% CI 0.35-250.6) times more likely to yield a DVT than a single-stage surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo multistage posterior complex spine surgery are at a high risk for developing a DVT compared to those who undergo single-stage procedures. The difference in DVT incidence may be understated as the multistage group had a lower pre- and intraoperative risk profile with a younger age, lower medical comorbidities, and less per-stage blood loss.

Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Underestimate the Impact of Major Complications in Lumbar Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To examine Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCMI) as a marker for deterioration in health status not reflected in standard Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) measures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: HRQOL has become a primary metric for assessing outcomes following spinal deformity surgery. However, studies have reported limited impact of complications on postoperative HRQOL outcomes. METHODS: We examined serial CCMI, complications, and HRQOL outcomes for 138 adult lumbar deformity patients treated surgically with a minimum two-year follow-up that included 126 females (91%) with a mean age of 59.8 years (range, 40.2-78.5). Patients with no, minor, or major complications were compared at baseline and at one and two years postoperation. RESULTS: Minor complications were observed in 26 patients (19%) and major complications in 15 (11%). Major complications included motor deficit (7), deep vein thrombosis (4), and respiratory failure (3). There was no difference in preoperative SF-36 Physical Component Summary or Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS-22R) scores among the groups at baseline. Preoperative CCMI was lowest in the No Complication group (3.52 ± 1.70) followed by the Major (4.00 ± 1.13) and Minor Complication groups (4.15 ± 1.71, p = .165). At one year, there was a significantly greater CCMI deterioration in the Major Complication group (0.80 ± 1.01) compared to both the Minor (0.08 ± 0.27) and No Complication groups (0.27 ± 0.47, p < .001). There was no significant difference in SF-36 Physical Component Summary or SRS-22R scores among the three groups. Similar findings were observed at two years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar one- and two-year HRQOL improvement, patients with major complications had greater deterioration in CCMI. As CCMI is predictive of medical and surgical risk, patients who sustained a major complication now carry a greater likelihood of adverse outcomes with future interventions, including any subsequent spinal surgery. Although this increased risk may not alter the patient's perception of his or her current health status, it may be important, and should be recognized as part of the shared decision-making process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, high-quality prognostic study.

Complex Lumbar Spine Fusion for an Elderly Patient Under Spinal Anesthesia.

Spinal anesthesia for spine surgery is an emerging technique. Because of their lack of physiologic reserve, elderly patients are an appealing population for this technique. Unfortunately, the safe limits of spine surgery using spinal anesthesia for the geriatric population are not well defined. The authors describe an elderly patient with severe spine degeneration who elected for a 5-level lumbar spine fusion with spinal anesthesia. Adequate anesthesia was maintained throughout the procedure, which lasted 3 hours and 24 minutes. The patient experienced no perioperative complications. To the authors' knowledge, this is one of the longest spine surgeries using spinal anesthesia. Also, the fusion procedure spans more vertebral levels than previously reported. Further investigation is needed to determine the safety of this technique. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e915-e917.].

Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Spinal anesthesia is increasingly viewed as a reasonable alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery. However, the results of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression and combined decompression and fusion procedures are limited in the literature. The aim of this study was to report a single institution's experience using spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. A retrospective review was conducted using a prospectively collected database of consecutive lumbar spine surgeries performed under spinal anesthesia in patients 70 years or older at a single center between December 2013 and October 2015. A total of 56 patients were included in the study; 27 patients (48%) underwent lumbar decompression and 29 patients (52%) underwent combined decompression and fusion procedures. Mean operative time was 101 minutes (range, 30-210 minutes), and mean operative blood loss was 187 mL (range, 20-700 mL). Mean maximum inpatient postoperative visual analog scale score was 6.2 (range, 1-10). Nausea occurred in 21% (12 of 56) of the patients. Mean length of stay was 2.4 days (range, 1-6 days). No mortality, stroke, permanent loss of function, or pulmonary embolism occurred. None of the cases required conversion to general anesthesia. All of the patients were ambulatory on either the day of the surgery or the next morning. These results demonstrate that spinal anesthesia is a viable method of anesthesia for patients 70 years and older undergoing lumbar spine surgery. They also demonstrate the safety of this method for patients older than 84 years and for surgeries lasting up to 3½ hours. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):e317-e322.].

Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: There have been few detailed reports concerning pseudarthrosis following spinal instrumentation and arthrodesis in adults with spinal deformity since the introduction of modern segmental fixation techniques. The purposes of this study were to analyze the prevalence, risk factors, and outcome scores on the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument-24 associated with pseudarthrosis following instrumentation and arthrodesis for the treatment of spinal deformity in adults. METHODS: A clinical and radiographic assessment of 232 adults with spinal deformity who were treated surgically at a single institution was conducted. The average age of the patients was 40.8 years, and the operation was a primary procedure in 150 patients and a revision procedure in eighty-two patients. All patients who underwent a long (four vertebrae or more) spinal instrumentation and arthrodesis with a minimum follow-up of two years were included in the analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty patients had a pseudarthrosis. Factors that were found to be significantly associated with pseudarthrosis were preoperative thoracolumbar kyphosis of >20 degrees (p < 0.0001), an age of more than fifty-five years (p = 0.001), arthrodesis to S1 compared with arthrodesis to L5 or a cephalad level (p = 0.002), and arthrodesis of more than twelve vertebrae (p = 0.037). Patients with a pseudarthrosis had lower total outcome scores on the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, on the average, than those without a pseudarthrosis (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pseudarthrosis following long arthrodesis with use of modern segmental spinal instrumentation for the treatment of spinal deformity in adults was 17%, and the clinical outcome in these patients can be negatively affected by the pseudarthrosis.

Can Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Fusions With rhBMP-2 Be Reduced With Local Depomedrol Application?: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the local administration of depomedrol decreases the severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery using bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although recombinant human BMP-2 is effective in promoting arthrodesis, many physicians avoid using it in anterior cervical spine fusions due to concern for increased incidence of dysphagia, significant pre-vertebral swelling, and airway compromise. Pilot studies have shown that the local application of depomedrol may decrease the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. We performed a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of local depomedrol application in reducing the severity of postoperative dysphagia following anterior cervical fusions using low-dose rhBMP-2. We hypothesized that locally administered depomedrol reduces dysphagia following such surgeries. METHODS: Fifty patients between 18 and 70 years of age, undergoing 1, 2, and 3-level ACDFs, were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: BMP-2 with depomedrol or BMP-2 with saline. Patients were followed for 4 weeks postoperatively by the study administrator. Dysphagia was measured at 5 time intervals (postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28) using a 4-point Modified Dysphagia Scoring System. Additional data regarding overall length of hospital stay and the administration of dysphagia-directed treatments were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were randomized to the treatment (depomedrol) group and 23 were randomized to the control (saline) group. The 2 groups were nearly identical in terms of their demographic and operative characteristics. Patients receiving depomedrol experienced decreased dysphagia incidence and magnitude at all time intervals, with differences reaching statistical significance on postoperative days 4, 7, 14, and 28 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study provides Level 1 evidence that locally administered depomedrol on a collagen sponge significantly decreases postoperative dysphagia incidence and magnitude following anterior cervical spine fusion using low-dose rhBMP-2. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Accurate identification of adverse outcomes after cervical spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective clinical studies frequently utilize surgeon records as a source of outcomes data. The accuracy of data derived from surgeon records, however, is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of surgeon records in documenting the prevalence of subjective adverse outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone anterior cervical arthrodesis by four spine surgeons during a ten-month period were included. Surgeon records from the routine six-week, three-month, and six-month postoperative visits were examined for documentation of persistent dysphagia and dysphonia. Patients completed surveys inquiring about the presence and magnitude of symptoms at these three time-points. Agreement between the surgeon records and the patient surveys was analyzed with use of the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six patients had 342 postoperative visits. Dysphagia was documented twenty-six times in the surgeon records, compared with 107 times on the patient surveys. Dysphagia was thus underreported in 80% of cases. Similarly, dysphonia was documented ten times in the surgeon records, compared with seventy-two times on the patient surveys. Poor correlation between the surgeon records and the patient surveys was observed regardless of symptom severity, previous anterior cervical surgery, anterior arthrodesis of three motion segments or more, arthrodesis cephalad to the fifth cervical level, and anterior cervical plate use. Poor correlation between the surgeon records and the patient surveys also was observed for each surgeon, regardless of subspecialty or institution. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation between the surgeon records and the patient surveys was consistently poor, regardless of the specific patient and surgeon factor analyzed. While we chose to study dysphonia and dysphagia, it is conceivable that the results may be generalizable to many situations in which office notes are utilized to ascertain the prevalence of subjective adverse outcomes. These results suggest that the prevalence of such outcomes may be seriously underreported in studies that rely on the retrospective analysis of surgeon records.

Cervical myelopathy. current diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Cervical myelopathy is a varied clinical syndromes resulting from spinal cord dysfunction. Underlying causes are numerous, but spondylosis at one or more levels is the most common etiology. Natural history studies have demonstrated a variable clinical course with gradual neurologic deterioration in a majority of patients. While prospective clinical comparisons are limited, existing literature suggests that operative management reliably arrests the progression of myelopathy and may lead to functional improvement in a majority of patients. The selection of surgical procedures must be carefully individualized based on specific clinical and radiographic factors. Whereas anterior decompression and fusion procedures at one or two motion segments have predictable results, procedures involving three or more levels are associated with increased morbidity. Newer techniques for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy include anterior decompression with 360-degree fusion, hybrid corpectomy/anterior cervical discectomy and fusion techniques and the use of dynamic anterior cervical plates. An alternative technique for patients with a lordotic sagittal alignment is laminoplasty, which has a proven track record of long-term good to excellent results.

Reliability analysis for manual radiographic measures of rotatory subluxation or lateral listhesis in adult scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To define the inter- and intraobserver reliability of 3 measures of rotatory subluxation (RS) in adult scoliosis (AS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: RS is a hallmark of AS. To accurately track this measure, one must know its reliability. Reliability testing has not been performed. METHODS: PA 36" films of 29 AS patients were collected from one surgeon's practice. Three observers on 2 separate occasions measured all levels with >or=3-mm RS (60 levels, 360 measurements) on the convexity of the involved segment using 3 different techniques-midbody (MB), endplate (EP), and centroid (C). These data were then analyzed to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter- and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: The thoracolumbar/lumbar curve (average 58 degrees ) was the major curve for the majority (62%) of patients. RS at L3/4 was most common (35%). The overall inter- and intraobserver reliability was good-excellent for all methods, but the centroid method consistently had the highest ICC. ICC correlated with observer experience. Moderate-severe arthritic change (present in 55%) and poor image quality (52%) decreased ICC, but it still remained good-excellent for each measure. The reproducibility coefficient for each measure was 4 mm for MB and 2.8 mm for C and EP. CONCLUSION: MB, EP, and C are reliable techniques to measure RS even in elderly arthritic spines, but the methods inherently produce different values for a given level. The centroid method is most reliable and least influenced by experience. The EP method is easy to perform and very reliable. Spine surgeons should pick their preferred method and apply it consistently. Changes >3 mm suggest RS progression. RS may be a useful measure in addition to Cobb angle in AS. Having defined measurement reliability, the role of RS progression in surgical indications and patient outcomes can be evaluated.