Determining the setting of root canal sealers using an in vivo animal experimental model.

OBJECTIVES: To present and explore the potential of an animal-based experimental model developed to determine the set of root canal sealers in vivo. The setting of AH Plus, BioC Sealer, TotalFill BC Sealer, and Sealapex was determined using either ISO 6876 or the novel in vivo method proposed in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The in vitro setting time of the sealers tested was determined in accordance with ISO 6876:2012. In determining the in vivo set, 24 adult Wistar rats were followed up for two evaluation periods: 1 and 4 weeks. Their upper-right incisor was extracted, and its pulp tissue was removed. The root canal was then filled from retrograde with one of the 4 sealers, and the tooth was re-implanted and fixed with a layer of a flowable composite resin. After 1 or 4 weeks of the surgical procedures, the animals were euthanized, and their incisors were extracted. Two-mm-thick slices of the middle third of the tooth root were obtained and assessed with a Gillmore device, to determine whether or not the sealer had set. RESULTS: The following in vitro results were obtained by using ISO 6876 methodology: AH Plus set after a mean time of 423 ± 20 min and 476 ± 35 min, in metal and plaster molds, respectively. BioC Sealer set after 7 days (in dental plaster molds), whereas TotalFill BC Sealer and Sealapex did not set even after 25 days in both tested conditions (metal or dental plaster molds). Using the novel in vivo methodology, AH Plus, BioC Sealer, and TotalFill BC Sealer set after both 7 and 30 days. In contrast, Sealapex did not set at either time point. CONCLUSIONS: AH Plus and BioC Sealer set under both in vitro and in vivo test conditions. TotalFill BC Sealer did not set under in vitro conditions but did after 1 week under in vivo conditions. Sealapex did not set under either in vitro or in vivo conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The influence of the testing conditions on the setting results is a clear indication that new in vivo experimental models should be useful in future studies on Bioceramics root canal sealers.

Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: The Mtwo rotary system was designed to be used at full length without performing previous cervical enlargement or creating a manual glide path. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated whether preflaring influences instrument fatigue. The purpose of this clinical study was thus to evaluate the incidence of separation of Mtwo instruments during the preparation of mandibular and maxillary molars and bicuspids that was preceded by cervical preflaring. METHODS: A total of 556 treatments were performed by 6 endodontists after calibration. Cervical enlargement and exploration with hand files were undertaken before using the rotary files. The canals were negotiated with small K-type hand files. Cervical and middle thirds were prepared with hand files and Gates-Glidden burs. Irrigation was performed with 2 mL of 2.5% NaOCl after each instrument. The working length was established, and the apical third was prepared with Flexofiles until a #15 file could reach the working length, establishing a glide path. The Mtwo instruments were used following manufacturer's recommendations and disposed of after being used in 5 teeth. Each file was examined under ×8 magnification after use. In cases of file deformation or separation, the entire file kit was no longer used, except when using the 10.04 file. Because of its high failure rate, which is well-established in the related literature, this instrument could be replaced at any time. RESULTS: Separation and deformation rates were 1.98% and 28.78%, respectively. Ten of the total separations observed occurred with the 10.04 file (90.01%) and one with the 15.05 file (9.09%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Mtwo rotary instruments preceded by cervical preflaring with manual files and Gates-Glidden burs provides a low separation incidence.