Mobocertinib in Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MOON): An International Real-World Safety and Efficacy Analysis.

EGFR exon 20 (EGFR Ex20) insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are insensitive to traditional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Mobocertinib is the only approved TKI specifically designed to target EGFR Ex20. We performed an international, real-world safety and efficacy analysis on patients with EGFR Ex20-positive NSCLC enrolled in a mobocertinib early access program. We explored the mechanisms of resistance by analyzing postprogression biopsies, as well as cross-resistance to amivantamab. Data from 86 patients with a median age of 67 years and a median of two prior lines of treatment were analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 95% of patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 38% of patients and included diarrhea (22%) and rash (8%). In 17% of patients, therapy was permanently discontinued, and two patients died due to TRAEs. Women were seven times more likely to discontinue treatment than men. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate to mobocertinib was 34% (95% CI, 24-45). The response rate in treatment-naïve patients was 27% (95% CI, 8-58). The median progression-free and overall survival was 5 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5) and 12 months (95% CI, 6.8-17.2), respectively. The intracranial response rate was limited (13%), and one-third of disease progression cases involved the brain. Mobocertinib also showed antitumor activity following EGFR Ex20-specific therapy and vice versa. Potential mechanisms of resistance to mobocertinib included amplifications in MET, PIK3CA, and NRAS. Mobocertinib demonstrated meaningful efficacy in a real-world setting but was associated with considerable gastrointestinal and cutaneous toxicity.

MET Fusions in NSCLC: Clinicopathologic Features and Response to MET Inhibition.

INTRODUCTION: MET fusions have been described only rarely in NSCLC. Thus, data on patient characteristics and treatment response are limited. We here report histopathologic data, patient demographics, and treatment outcome including response to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in MET fusion-positive NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC and MET fusions were identified mostly by RNA sequencing within the routine molecular screening program of the national Network Genomic Medicine, Germany. RESULTS: We describe a cohort of nine patients harboring MET fusions. Among these nine patients, two patients had been reported earlier. The overall frequency was 0.29% (95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.55). The tumors were exclusively adenocarcinoma. The cohort was heterogeneous in terms of age, sex, or smoking status. We saw five different fusion partner genes (KIF5B, TRIM4, ST7, PRKAR2B, and CAPZA2) and several different breakpoints. Four patients were treated with a MET TKI leading to two partial responses, one stable disease, and one progressive disease. One patient had a BRAF V600E mutation as acquired resistance mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: MET fusions are very rare oncogenic driver events in NSCLC and predominantly seem in adenocarcinomas. They are heterogeneous in terms of fusion partners and breakpoints. Patients with MET fusion can benefit from MET TKI therapy.

Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of small-scale ROS1-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

BACKGROUND: ROS1 fusions are well treatable aberrations in NSCLC. Besides solvent-front mutations (SFM) in resistance to targeted therapy, small-scale ROS1 mutations are largely unknown. We exploratively analyzed the clinical and molecular characteristics of small-scale ROS1 mutations in NSCLC patients without activating ROS1 fusions or SFMs. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing was performed on tissue samples from NSCLC patients within the Network Genomic Medicine. Patients with ROS1 fusions and SFMs were excluded. We analyzed clinical characteristics of patients harboring small-scale ROS1-mutations, ROS1- and co-occurring mutations, and their response to systemic therapy. RESULTS: Of 10,396 patients analyzed, 101 (1.0%) patients harbored small-scale ROS1 mutations. Most patients were male (73.3%) and smokers (96.6%). Nearly half of the patients presented with squamous-cell carcinoma (SqCC, 40.4%). Most mutations were transversions (50.5%), and 66% were in the kinase domain. Besides TP53 mutations (65.3%), KRAS (22.8%), EGFR (5.9%), PIK3CA (9.9%) and FGFR1-4 mutations (8.9%) co-occurred. In 10 (9.9%) patients, ROS1 mutation was the only aberration detected. Median overall survival (mOS) differed significantly in patients with or without KRAS co-mutations (9.7 vs 21.5 months, p = 0.02) and in patients treated with or without immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) during treatment (21.5 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The cohort's clinical characteristics contrasted ROS1-fused cohorts. Co-occurrence of KRAS mutations led to shortened survival and patients benefited from ICB. Our data does not support the idea of ROS1 small-scale mutations as strong oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, but rather as relevant bystanders altering the efficacy of treatment approaches.

Resistance to MET inhibition in MET-dependent NSCLC and therapeutic activity after switching from type I to type II MET inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Resistance to MET inhibition occurs inevitably in MET-dependent non-small cell lung cancer and the underlying mechanisms are insufficiently understood. We describe resistance mechanisms in patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METΔex14), MET amplification, and MET fusion and report treatment outcomes after switching therapy from type I to type II MET inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment biopsies were analysed by NGS (next generation sequencing), digital droplet PCR (polymerase chain reaction), and FISH (fluorescense in situ hybridization). A patient-derived xenograft model was generated in one case. RESULTS: Of 26 patients with MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, eight had paired pre- and post-treatment biopsies (Three with MET amplification, three with METΔex14, two with MET fusions (KIF5B-MET and PRKAR2B-MET).) In six patients, mechanisms of resistance were detected, whereas in two cases, the cause of resistance remained unclear. We found off-target resistance mechanisms in four cases with KRAS mutations and HER2 amplifications appearing. Two patients exhibited second-site MET mutations (p.D1246N and p. Y1248H). Three patients received type I and type II MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors sequentially. In two cases, further progressive disease was seen hereafter. The patient with KIF5B-MET fusion received three different MET inhibitors and showed long-lasting stable disease and a repeated response after switching therapy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Resistance to MET inhibition is heterogeneous with on- and off-target mechanisms occurring regardless of the initial MET aberration. Switching therapy between different types of kinase inhibitors can lead to repeated responses in cases with second-site mutations. Controlled clinical trials in this setting with larger patient numbers are needed, as evidence to date is limited to preclinical data and case series.

RET-MAP: An International Multicenter Study on Clinicobiologic Features and Treatment Response in Patients With Lung Cancer Harboring a RET Fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Nearly 1% to 2% of NSCLCs harbor RET fusions. Characterization of this rare population is still incomplete. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients with any-stage RET positive (RET+) NSCLC from 31 cancer centers. Molecular profiling included DNA/RNA sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Clinicobiological features and treatment outcomes (per investigator) with surgery, chemotherapy (CT), immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), CT-ICB, multityrosine kinase inhibitors, and RET inhibitors (RETis) were evaluated. RESULTS: For 218 patients included between February 2012 and April 2022, median age was 63 years, 56% were females, 93% had adenocarcinoma, and 41% were smokers. The most frequent fusion partner was KIF5B (72%). Median tumor mutational burden was 2.5 (range: 1-4) mutations per megabase, and median programmed death-ligand 1 expression was 10% (range: 0%-55%). The most common metastatic sites were the lung (50%), bone (43%), and pleura (40%). Central nervous system metastases were found at diagnosis of advanced NSCLC in 21% of the patients and at last follow-up or death in 31%. Overall response rate and median progression-free survival were 55% and 8.7 months with platinum doublet, 26% and 3.6 months with single-agent CT, 46% and 9.6 months with CT-ICB, 23% and 3.1 months with ICB, 37% and 3 months with multityrosine kinase inhibitor, and 76% and 16.2 months with RETi, respectively. Median overall survival was longer in patients treated with RETi versus no RETi (50.6 mo [37.7-72.1] versus 16.3 mo [12.7-28.8], p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RET+ NSCLC have mainly thoracic and bone disease and low tumor mutational burden and programmed death-ligand 1 expression. RETi markedly improved survival, whereas ICB may be active in selected patients.

Genetic Heterogeneity of MET-Aberrant NSCLC and Its Impact on the Outcome of Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Robust data on the outcome of MET-aberrant NSCLC with nontargeted therapies are limited, especially in consideration of the heterogeneity of MET-amplified tumors (METamp). METHODS: A total of 337 tumor specimens of patients with MET-altered Union for International Cancer Control stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were analyzed using next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. The evaluation focused on the type of MET aberration, co-occurring mutations, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: METamp tumors (n = 278) had a high frequency of co-occurring mutations (>80% for all amplification levels), whereas 57.6% of the 59 patients with MET gene and exon 14 (METex14) tumors had no additional mutations. In the METamp tumors, with increasing gene copy number (GCN), the frequency of inactivating TP53 mutations increased (GCN < 4: 58.2%; GCN ≥ 10: 76.5%), whereas the frequency of KRAS mutations decreased (GCN < 4: 43.2%; GCN ≥ 10: 11.8%). A total of 10.1% of all the METamp tumors with a GCN ≥ 10 had a significant worse OS (4.0 mo; 95% CI: 1.9-6.0) compared with the tumors with GCN < 10 (12.0 mo; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4-14.6). In the METamp NSCLC, OS with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy was significantly better compared with chemotherapy with 19.0 months (95% CI: 15.8-22.2) versus 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.8-10.2, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in median OS was found between ICI therapy and chemotherapy in the patients with METex14 (p = 0.147). CONCLUSIONS: METex14, METamp GCN ≥ 10, and METamp GCN < 10 represent the subgroups of MET-dysregulated NSCLC with distinct molecular and clinical features. The patients with METex14 do not seem to benefit from immunotherapy in contrast to the patients with METamp, which is of particular relevance for the prognostically poor METamp GCN ≥ 10 subgroup.

K-ras Mutation Subtypes in NSCLC and Associated Co-occuring Mutations in Other Oncogenic Pathways.

INTRODUCTION: Although KRAS mutations in NSCLC have been considered mutually exclusive driver mutations for a long time, there is now growing evidence that KRAS-mutated NSCLC represents a genetically heterogeneous subgroup. We sought to determine genetic heterogeneity with respect to cancer-related co-mutations and their correlation with different KRAS mutation subtypes. METHODS: Diagnostic samples from 4507 patients with NSCLC were analyzed by next-generation sequencing by using a panel of 14 genes and, in a subset of patients, fluorescence in situ hybridization. Next-generation sequencing with an extended panel of 14 additional genes was performed in 101 patients. Molecular data were correlated with clinical data. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in two patients. RESULTS: We identified 1078 patients with KRAS mutations, of whom 53.5% had at least one additional mutation. Different KRAS mutation subtypes showed different patterns of co-occurring mutations. Besides mutations in tumor protein p53 gene (TP53) (39.4%), serine/threonine kinase 11 gene (STK11) (19.8%), kelch like ECH associated protein 1 gene (KEAP1) (12.9%), and ATM serine/threonine kinase gene (ATM) (11.9%), as well as MNNG HOS Transforming gene (MET) amplifications (15.4%) and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2) amplifications (13.8%, exclusively in G12C), we found rare co-occurrence of targetable mutations in EGFR (1.2%) and BRAF (1.2%). Whole-exome sequencing of two patients with co-occurring phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA) mutation revealed clonality of mutated KRAS in one patient and subclonality in the second, suggesting different evolutionary backgrounds. CONCLUSION: KRAS-mutated NSCLC represents a genetically heterogeneous subgroup with a high frequency of co-occurring mutations in cancer-associated pathways, partly associated with distinct KRAS mutation subtypes. This diversity might have implications for understanding the variability of treatment outcome in KRAS-mutated NSCLC and for future trial design.

Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of KEAP1- and NFE2L2-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC).

Purpose:KEAP1 and NFE2L2 mutations are associated with impaired prognosis in a variety of cancers and with squamous cell carcinoma formation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about frequency, histology dependence, molecular and clinical presentation as well as response to systemic treatment in NSCLC.Experimental Design: Tumor tissue of 1,391 patients with NSCLC was analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical and pathologic characteristics, survival, and treatment outcome of patients with KEAP1 or NFE2L2 mutations were assessed.Results:KEAP1 mutations occurred with a frequency of 11.3% (n = 157) and NFE2L2 mutations with a frequency of 3.5% (n = 49) in NSCLC patients. In the vast majority of patients, both mutations did not occur simultaneously. KEAP1 mutations were found mainly in adenocarcinoma (AD; 72%), while NFE2L2 mutations were more common in squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC; 59%). KEAP1 mutations were spread over the whole protein, whereas NFE2L2 mutations were clustered in specific hotspot regions. In over 80% of the patients both mutations co-occurred with other cancer-related mutations, among them also targetable aberrations like activating EGFR mutations or MET amplification. Both patient groups showed different patterns of metastases, stage distribution and performance state. No patient with KEAP1 mutation had a response on systemic treatment in first-, second-, or third-line setting. Of NFE2L2-mutated patients, none responded to second- or third-line therapy.Conclusions:KEAP1- and NFE2L2-mutated NSCLC patients represent a highly heterogeneous patient cohort. Both are associated with different histologies and usually are found together with other cancer-related, partly targetable, genetic aberrations. In addition, both markers seem to be predictive for chemotherapy resistance. Clin Cancer Res; 24(13); 3087-96. ©2018 AACR.