Belimumab corticosteroid-sparing treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus: a real-life observational study (BESST study).

Data about the impact of Belimumab on corticosteroid sparing in real life are scarce. To assess the corticosteroid-sparing effect among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with Belimumab in real-life settings. Multicentric observational retrospective study including patients with SLE and having received Belimumab for at least 6 months between 2011 and 2020, in eight French hospitals. "Low dose" referred to patients receiving up to 7.5 mg of prednisone a day and "Very low dose" to those receiving strictly ≤ 5 mg prednisone a day The primary endpoint was the reduction of daily prednisone dose after six months of Belimumab. The secondary endpoint was a change in the proportion of patients with low or very low dose of prednisone as well as those without prednisone during the Belimumab course. Censoring occurred for patients who stopped Belimumab. Bivariate analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Thirty patients were included. All were female with a median age of 38 years. A significant reduction in prednisone dose was observed at month 6 (10 [7-20] vs 6.75 [2-9] mg, p < 0.0001), continued until month 12 (10 [7-20] mg vs 5 [0-7.12] mg, p < 0.001) and was sustained until month 24. The proportion of patients with very low dose of prednisone and those without prednisone progressively increased during the Belimumab course. Introducing Belimumab in patients with SLE, in real-life conditions, is associated with early and sustained corticosteroid-sparing effect.

Controversies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 2021: Changing the Paradigm in the Management of Lupus Nephritis.

ABSTRACT: Lupus nephritis (LN) affects about a third of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Although the use of conventional therapy has significantly improved the prognosis of LN, the response to treatment remains suboptimal, with high rates of relapse and the occurrence of end-stage kidney disease. The implementation of new diagnostic and treatment strategies aimed at improving these outcomes represents a necessary paradigm shift in the management of LN.Herein, we discuss different points of view regarding these still unresolved issues; these comments represent a debate that took place during the virtual congress of the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) and which was organized by the PANLAR Lupus Study Group, GLADEL (Grupo Latino Americano De Estudio del Lupus) on August 15, 2021.

Worse long-term renal outcome of lupus nephritis patients of African descent living in Europe.

INTRODUCTION: Prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) among patients of African descent living in Europe has been understudied. METHODS: In a retrospective study performed in two European university hospitals, we compared the prognosis of LN in patients of African descent or Caucasians. Remission was defined as a urine protein to creatinine (uP/C) ratio<0.5 g/g and a serum creatinine value<120% of baseline. Renal relapse was defined as the reappearance of a uP/C>1 g/g, leading to a repeat kidney biopsy and/or immunosuppressive treatment change. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Adherence was retrospectively assessed through medical files and/or hydroxychloroquine level measurements. RESULTS: 52 patients of African descent and 85 Caucasian patients were included in this analysis. Class III and isolated class V LN were more common among patients of African descent. Time to first renal remission did not differ between ethnic subgroups. By contrast, patients of African descent suffered from earlier renal flares, CKD was more common and time to CKD was shorter after a flare. In a multivariate analysis, African ancestry was an independent risk factor for progression to CKD. We observed no significant difference in non-adherence to treatment between the two groups. CONCLUSION: LN patients of African descent have worse renal outcomes, mainly explained by a higher rate of renal flare.

Absence of renal remission portends poor long-term kidney outcome in lupus nephritis.

BACKGROUND: The very long-term consequences of absence of remission in lupus nephritis (LN) remain understudied. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we studied a selected cohort of 128 patients with biopsy-proven class III, IV or V incident LN followed for a median period of 134 months (minimum 25). Remission was defined as a urine protein to creatinine (uP:C) ratio <0.5 g/g and a serum creatinine value <120% of baseline. Renal relapse was defined as the reappearance of a uP:C >1 g/g, leading to a repeat kidney biopsy and treatment change. Poor long-term renal outcome was defined as the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). RESULTS: Twenty per cent of patients never achieved renal remission. Their baseline characteristics did not differ from those who did. Absence of renal remission was associated with a threefold higher risk of CKD (48% vs 16%) and a 10-fold higher risk of end-stage renal disease (20% vs 2%). Patients achieving early remission had significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at last follow-up compared with late remitters. Accordingly, patients with CKD at last follow-up had statistically longer time to remission. Among patients who achieved remission, 32% relapsed, with a negative impact on renal outcome, that is, lower eGFR values and higher proportion of CKD (33% vs 8%). CONCLUSION: Early remission should be achieved to better preserve long-term renal function.

[Aortitis in giant cell arteritis: Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment]. / Aortite de l'artérite à cellules géantes : diagnostic, pronostic et traitement.

Aortitis, defined by aortic parietal thickening, is noted in about 50% of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). Aortic structural lesions, ectasia or aneurism, may occur with or without inflammatory aspect of the aorta, sometimes since the diagnosis of GCA, but more frequently during follow-up. Assessment of aortic involvement, which has to be searched in each patient at the diagnosis of GCA, can be assessed using aortic imaging, angio-CT, angio-MRI or PET-CT. Prognosis of aortitis and its complications remains poorly known, but mortality due to serious events like aneurism rupture or aortic dissection, could be potentially reduced with precocious diagnosis and regular monitoring. Treatment of GCA-related aortitis is based on high-dose glucosteroids, with an initial prednisone dose at 0.7 mg/kg/d, as recommended by the French Study Group for large vessel vasculitis (GEFA). Aortic ectasia and aneurisms have to be monitored, in order to propose aortic surgery in the best conditions as possible.