RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the percentage of and factors associated with unplanned transfer to the acute care service of glioblastoma multiforme acute rehabilitation inpatients. METHODS: Retrospective review of glioblastoma multiforme acute rehabilitation inpatients admitted 4/1/2016-3/31/2020 at a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine consecutive admissions of unique glioblastoma multiforme acute rehabilitation inpatients were analyzed. Fifteen patients (10.7%, 95% confidence interval 6.5-17.1%) were transferred to the acute care service for unplanned reasons. The most common reasons for transfer back were neurosurgical complication 6/15(40%), neurologic decline due to mass effect 4/15(26.7%), and pulmonary embolism 2/15(13.3%). Older age (p = 0.010), infection prior to acute inpatient rehabilitation transfer (p = 0.020), and lower activity measure of post-acute care 6-click basic mobility scores (p = 0.048) were significantly associated with transfer to the acute care service. Patients who transferred to the acute care service had significantly lower overall survival than patients who did not transfer off (log-rank test p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Acute inpatient physiatrists should closely monitor patients for neurosurgical and neurologic complications. The variables significantly associated with transfer to the acute care service may help identify patients at increased risk for medical complications who may require closer observation.
Assuntos
Glioblastoma , Pacientes Internados , Humanos , Hospitalização , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cuidados Críticos , Centros de ReabilitaçãoRESUMO
Background: Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) clinicians commonly care for patients with serious illness/injury and would benefit from primary palliative care (PC) training. Objective: To assess current practices, attitudes, and barriers toward PC education among U.S. PM&R residencies. Design: This is a cross-sectional study utilizing an electronic 23-question survey. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were program leaders from U.S. PM&R residency programs. Results: Twenty-one programs responded (23% response). Only 14 (67%) offered PC education through lectures, elective rotations, or self-directed reading. Pain management, communication, and nonpain symptom management were identified as the most important PC domains for residents. Nineteen respondents (91%) felt residents would benefit from more PC education, but only five (24%) reported undergoing curricular change. Lack of faculty availability/expertise and teaching time were the most endorsed barriers. Conclusion: PC education is heterogeneous across PM&R programs despite its perceived value. PC and PM&R educators can collaborate to build faculty expertise and integrate PC principles into existing curricula.