Higher performers upregulate brain signal variability in response to more feature-rich visual input.

The extent to which brain responses differ across varying cognitive demands is referred to as "neural differentiation," and greater neural differentiation has been associated with better cognitive performance in older adults. An emerging approach has examined within-person neural differentiation using moment-to-moment brain signal variability. A number of studies have found that brain signal variability differs by cognitive state; however, the factors that cause signal variability to rise or fall on a given task remain understudied. We hypothesized that top performers would modulate signal variability according to the complexity of sensory input, upregulating variability when processing more feature-rich stimuli. In the current study, 46 older adults passively viewed face and house stimuli during fMRI. Low-level analyses showed that house images were more feature-rich than faces, and subsequent computational modelling of ventral visual stream responses (HMAX) revealed that houses were more feature-rich especially in V1/V2-like model layers. Notably, we then found that participants exhibiting greater face-to-house upregulation of brain signal variability in V1/V2 (higher for house relative to face stimuli) also exhibited more accurate, faster, and more consistent behavioral performance on a battery of offline visuo-cognitive tasks. Further, control models revealed that face-house modulation of mean brain signal was relatively insensitive to offline cognition, providing further evidence for the importance of brain signal variability for understanding human behavior. We conclude that the ability to align brain signal variability to the richness of perceptual input may mark heightened trait-level behavioral performance in older adults.

Local temporal variability reflects functional integration in the human brain.

Local moment-to-moment variability exists at every level of neural organization, but its driving forces remain opaque. Inspired by animal work demonstrating that local temporal variability may reflect synaptic input rather than locally-generated "noise," we used publicly-available high-temporal-resolution fMRI data (N = 100 adults; 33 males) to test in humans whether greater BOLD signal variability in local brain regions was associated with functional integration (estimated via spatiotemporal PCA dimensionality). Using a multivariate partial least squares analysis, we indeed found that individuals with higher local temporal variability had a more integrated (lower dimensional) network fingerprint. Notably, temporal variability in the thalamus showed the strongest negative association with PCA dimensionality. Previous animal work also shows that local variability may upregulate from thalamus to visual cortex; however, such principled upregulation from thalamus to cortex has not been demonstrated in humans. In the current study, we rather establish a more general putative dynamic role of the thalamus by demonstrating that greater within-person thalamo-cortical upregulation in variability is itself a unique hallmark of greater functional integration that cannot be accounted for by local fluctuations in several other well-known integrative-hub regions. Our findings indicate that local variability primarily reflects functional integration, and establish a fundamental role for the thalamus in how the brain fluctuates and communicates across moments.