Canrenone on cardiovascular mortality in congestive heart failure: CanrenOne eFFects on cardiovascular mortality in patiEnts with congEstIve hearT failure: The COFFEE-IT study.

AIM: To evaluate canrenone effects compared to other therapies on cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and preserved systolic function after 10 years of evaluation. METHODS: We enrolled 532 patients with CHF and preserved systolic function. Patients were followed with a mean follow-up of 10 years: 166 patients were in therapy with canrenone, while 336 patients were in conventional therapy. We re-evaluated these data after 10 years, together with the rate of death and survival. RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lower with canrenone compared to the group not treated with canrenone, both in supine and orthostatism. In the group treated with canrenone we recorded a lower value of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin. Uric acid was lower in the group treated with canrenone, no differences were observed regarding creatinine, sodium, potassium, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), pro-BNP or plasma renin activity (PRA), while aldosterone levels were reduced in canrenone group compared to control. After 10 years, left ventricular mass was lower in canrenone group. We recorded a more pronounced progression of NYHA class in controls compared to patients treated with canrenone, with also a higher number of deaths. A higher number of deaths was recorded in control group in the 68-83 years range compared to canrenone. A higher incidence of death was reported among patients without hypercholesterolemia in control group; this was not significant in patients treated with canrenone. A longer survival was observed in patients treated with canrenone. CONCLUSION: Administered to patients with CHF and preserved systolic fraction, reduced mortality and extended the life.

Morbidity and mortality in a population of patients affected by heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) often coexist. Moreover, elderly patients suffering from HF have a higher incidence of COPD, which further complicates their clinical condition. Indacaterol/glycopirronium has shown benefits in the treatment of COPD, with few cardiologic adverse effects. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this therapy in patients with history of HF. METHODS: We enrolled 56 patients with a history of HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classes II and III) and stable COPD. We evaluated blood samples, clinical assessment, echocardiograms and basal spirometry at baseline and after 6 months of therapy with indacaterol/glycopirronium. In addition, the number of re-hospitalizations during the treatment period was evaluated. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were significantly reduced compared with baseline (p < 0.001) after 6 months of treatment, and a higher percentage of patients improved their clinical status compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Minor changes were noted in the hemodynamic and metabolic parameters. Significant improvements in the echocardiographic parameters were noted in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. All respiratory parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], FEV1/forced vital capacity [FVC] ratio and COPD Assessment Test [CAT] scores) improved significantly (p < 0.001). No hospitalizations owing to HF or COPD exacerbation occurred. One patient died of respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: Indacaterol/glycopirronium was well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of COPD in this cohort of patients with a history of HF. Further studies are needed to clarify whether this compound can have a direct role in improving overall cardiovascular function.

Effects of the concomitant administration of xanthine oxidase inhibitors with zofenopril or other ACE-inhibitors in post-myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of individual data of four randomized, double-blind, prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress is increased in hyperuricemic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Use of sulfhydryl ACE-inhibitors (ACEIs), such as zofenopril or captopril, plus xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs), may potentially result in enhanced antioxidant effects and improved survival. OBJECTIVE: We verified the benefit of such combination in a randomly stratified sample of 525 of the 3630 post-AMI patients of the four randomized prospective SMILE (Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation) studies. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five (31.4%) patients were treated with XOIs (79 under zofenopril, 86 placebo, lisinopril or ramipril), whereas 360 were not (192 zofenopril, 168 placebo or other ACEIs). In these four groups, we separately estimated the 1-year combined risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE, death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes). RESULTS: MACE occurred in 10.1% of patients receiving zofenopril + XOIs, in 18.6% receiving placebo or other ACEIs + XOIs, in 13.5% receiving zofenopril without XOIs and in 22.0% receiving placebo or other ACEIs, but no XOIs (p = 0.034 across groups). Rate of survival free from MACE was significantly larger under treatment with zofenopril + XOIs than with other ACEIs with no XOIs [hazard ratio: 2.29 (1.06-4.91), p = 0.034]. A non-significant trend for superiority of zofenopril + XOIs combination was observed vs. zofenopril alone [1.19 (0.54-2.64), p = 0.669] or vs. placebo or other ACEIs + XOIs [1.82 (0.78-4.26), p = 0.169]. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis suggests an improved survival free from MACE in post-AMI patients treated with a combination of an urate lowering drug with antioxidant activity and an ACEI, with best effects observed with zofenopril.

Left atrial volume indexed for height2 is a new sensitive marker for subclinical cardiac organ damage in female hypertensive patients.

Left atrial enlargement (LAe) is a subclinical marker of hypertensive-mediated organ damage, which is important to identify in cardiovascular risk stratification. Recently, LA indexing for height was suggested as a more accurate marker of defining LAe. Our aim was to test the difference in LAe prevalence using body surface area (BSA) and height2 definitions in an essential hypertensive population. A total of 441 essential hypertensive patients underwent complete clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. Left atrial volume (LAV), left ventricular morphology, and systolic-diastolic function were evaluated. LAe was twice as prevalent when defined using height2 (LAeh2) indexation rather than BSA (LAeBSA) (51% vs. 23%, p < 0.001). LAeh2, but not LAeBSA, was more prevalent in females (p < 0.001). Males and females also differed in left ventricular hypertrophy (p = 0.046) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) indexes (septal Em/Etdi: p = 0.009; lateral Em/Etdi: p = 0.003; mean Em/Etdi: p < 0.002). All patients presenting LAeBSA also met the criteria for LAeh2. According to the presence/absence of LAe, we created three groups (Norm = BSA-/h2-; DilH = BSA-/h2+; DilHB = BSA+/h2+). The female sex prevalence in the DilH group was higher than that in the other two groups (Norm: p < 0.001; DilHB: p = 0.036). LVH and mean and septal Em/Etdi increased from the Norm to the DilH group and from the DilH to the DilHB group (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). These results show that LAeh2 identified twice as many patients as comparing LAe to LAeBSA, but that both LAeh2 and LAeBSA definitions were associated with LVH and LVDD. In female patients, the LAeh2 definition and its sex-specific threshold seem to be more sensitive than LAeBSA in identifying chamber enlargement.

Effects of sacubitril valsartan on clinical and echocardiographic parameters of outpatients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

AIM: Sacubitril valsartan (SV) has revolutionized disease history in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Our study assessed SV impact on clinical and echocardiographic parameters in HFrEF outpatients previously treated with optimized therapy. METHODS: Forty-nine HFrEF outpatients were retrospectively included in the study. We collected data from transthoracic echocardiography and clinical assessment at baseline and after 3 ± 1 and 12 ± 1 months of treatment with SV. Results were also stratified by sex to analyse possible sex-based differences in reverse remodelling response to SV. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment we observed a significative improvement of both systolic and diastolic function with a reduction of left ventricular mass and relative wall thickness (RWT). At 12 months we observed a further improvement of all previous parameters, plus systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and left atrial (LA) diameter. In women, most of the echocardiographic parameters improved after SV initiation, but did not reach the statistical significance, except for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), PAP and LA diameter. As for clinical parameters, SV improved New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class, systolic blood pressure and loop diuretic dosage with a mild but significative increase in serum creatinine and potassium. CONCLUSION: Our study showed significative reverse remodelling properties of SV with an improvement of LV volumes, mass and systo-diastolic function. NYHA Class, systolic blood pressure and loop diuretic dosage also improved with only mild increase in serum creatinine and potassium. Women showed a lesser extent of reverse remodelling compared with men.

Possible influence on heart rate on tinnitus.

Assuming the possibility of the inner ear damage due to a hemodynamic imbalance essentially due to an abnormal vasomotor regulatory response, the possibility that heart rate (HR) has a correlation with the onset and/or the enhancement of tinnitus is hypothesized. In fact, recent studies have drawn the influence of other factors than blood pressure, in normotensive subjects, in taking part to the regulation of peripheral resistance, outlining the importance of both cardiac output (CO) - which is a function of heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV) and SV itself as a dynamic component to baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). From this point of view, it could be possible that a condition of bradycardia can enhance tinnitus regardless of its cause, and conversely that a more elevated HR can be related to a relief of this symptom.

Inner ear dysfunction of uncertain origin: a multidisciplinary approach could give something more.

In order to find out any possible cause of an alteration of the vasomotor reactivity which can be responsible for a more or less severe sufferance of the inner ear, announced by the onset or the enhancement of sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, and some kind of dizziness and vertigo, a multidisciplinary approach should be considered. The possibility of an influence of hemodynamic imbalance due to hypotensive changes followed by vasomotor changes affecting the microcirculation of the inner ear has already been widely discussed; moreover, an increase in prevalence of tinnitus (which in many cases can be considered as a symptom of sufferance of the inner ear) has been found in subjects submitted to an "aggressive" antihypertensive therapy as well as in patients with severe heart failure, thus demonstrating a relationship between hemodynamic changes and inner ear dysfunction. For the same reason, the research for this mechanism of imbalance could concern other conditions possibly activating an abnormal response of the autonomic nervous system, which could in turn lead to a circulatory impairment of the labyrinth: among these, affections concerning central nervous system, endocrine system, metabolism, renal apparatus and even gastroenteric diseases with a functional component and any other factor which could interfere with vasomotor regulation should be considered. Thus, the absence of reliable causes for a sufferance of the inner ear should not lead to catalogue it as a disorder of "idiopathic" nature, but should represent a reason for a multidisciplinary investigation on all the possible causes of hemodynamic imbalance and/or autonomic dysregulation.

Could echocardiography yield a cardiovascular profile of the tinnitus prone subject?

The possible genesis of some damage of the inner ear from a hemodynamic imbalance of functional origin, possibly linked to hypotension followed by an abnormal vasomotor regulatory activity, has been pointed out by our group over the years. As tinnitus, which is often referable to an inner ear origin, can represent a signal of incoming sufferance of the organ of Corti and may not necessarily be linked to hearing impairment, it seemed of some utility to investigate on the prevalence of tinnitus under various well monitored hemodynamic conditions. This led to observe that the prevalence of this symptom, regardless of audiological features, was increased under "aggressive" antihypertensive therapy as well as in particularly severe degree of heart decompensation. These data represent a first step and encourage in searching for a profile of subject who could be more prone to the development of tinnitus with respect to the normal population, even in absence of pathological conditions. With this aim, echocardiography is thought to be able to yield useful informations in addition to standard and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in order to obtain a better definition of the correlations between cardiovascular function (and related changes) and inner ear insufficient perfusion.

Efficacy of zofenopril in combination with thiazide diuretics in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a pooled individual data analysis of four randomized, double-blind, controlled, prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: In the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Evaluation (SMILE) studies, early administration of zofenopril after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was prognostically beneficial as compared to placebo and other angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), such as lisinopril and ramipril. Here, we investigated whether zofenopril efficacy could be affected by a concomitant use of thiazide diuretics (TDs). METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled individual patient data from the SMILE studies. Patients treated with other diuretics than TDs were excluded. The primary study endpoint was the 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for CV causes, with or without TD. RESULTS: Among 2,995 patients, 263 (8.8%) were treated with a combination including a TD (TD+), whereas 2,732 (91.2%) were not treated with any diuretic (TD-). Proportions of subjects who were treated with TD were equally distributed (p=0.774) within the placebo, zofenopril, and other ACEIs groups. The 1-year risk of major cardiovascular events was similar in TD+ (18.3%) and TD- (16.8%) patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% CI 0.74-1.45; p=0.838). After stratifying per concomitant treatment and TD, the 1-year risk of CV events was significantly lower with zofenopril than with placebo (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.88; p=0.002) and other ACEIs (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.46-0.74; p=0.0001). Treatment with ACEIs and TD as concomitant therapy was associated with a larger blood pressure (BP) reduction (p=0.0001 for systolic BP and p=0.045 for diastolic BP). CONCLUSION: In post AMI patients, zofenopril maintained its positive impact on prognosis compared to placebo or other ACEIs, regardless concomitant TD administration. In this setting, TD shows advantages in managing the most difficult hypertensive patients.

Effects of the early ACE inhibition in diabetic nonthrombolyzed patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the ACE inhibitor zofenopril in a cohort of diabetic patients with nonthrombolyzed anterior acute myocardial infarction who were enrolled in the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Evaluation (SMILE) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Among the overall population of 1,512 patients, 303 (20.0%) had diabetes. The primary end point of this study was the effect of treatment on the 6-week combined occurrence of death and severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Secondary end points included the evaluation of the 6-week rate of major cardiovascular events as well as the 1-year survival rate. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of double-blind treatment, zofenopril significantly reduced both the incidence of the primary end point (8.6 vs. 18.3%; P = 0.019) and the 6-week incidence of severe CHF (0 vs. 7.3%; P = 0.001) in diabetic patients, and the effect was greater than that observed in nondiabetic patients. Conversely, 1-year mortality was significantly reduced among nondiabetic patients (9.1 vs. 13.8%; P = 0.010), whereas in the diabetic population, the decrease did not reach statistical significance (13.7 vs. 16.5%; P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that the clinical outcome of patients with diabetes and myocardial infarction can be significantly improved by early treatment with zofenopril. The lesser effect on 1-year mortality seems to suggest that long-term treatment is probably needed to maintain the benefits of the early ACE inhibition in patients with diabetes.

Serum cholesterol levels, blood pressure response to stress and incidence of stable hypertension in young subjects with high normal blood pressure.

RATIONALE: Elevated serum cholesterol levels are common in patients with high blood pressure (BP) and could contribute to the progression of the hypertensive disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum cholesterol levels affect the BP response to mental stress (MA) and the development of stable hypertension in young subjects with high normal BP. METHODS: Seventy young (age < 45 years) high normal BP subjects with elevated (> 200 mg/dl, n = 49; HC) or normal (< or = 199 mg/dl, n = 21; NC) serum cholesterol levels, and 20 normotensive normocholesterolaemic (serum cholesterol < 199 mg/dl; C) subjects undergoing standardized mental challenge (mental arithmetic) were followed up for 15 years according to a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study design conducted in an ambulatory setting. The main outcome measure was the evaluation of the 15-year incidence of stable hypertension (diastolic BP > 95 mmHg). RESULTS: After adjustment for age, resting BP, family history of high BP and body mass index at the study entry, high normal BP subjects with HC showed an enhanced BP reactivity to stress and a higher 15-year incidence of stable hypertension compared to high normal BP and NC subjects [relative risk (RR) = 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-5.5, P < 0.001] and controls (RR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.4-5.3, P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis of data the presence of high cholesterol levels was an independent predictor for the development of hypertension. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that subjects with high normal BP and elevated serum cholesterol might have an exaggerated cardiovascular response to stress and have an increased risk for stable hypertension that can be detected at young age.

Efficacy and tolerability of delapril plus indapamide versus lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide combination treatments in mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that antihypertensive monotherapy is commonly insufficient to control blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients and that concomitant use of ≥2 drugs is necessary in ∼50% of these patients. The combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a diuretic, delapril plus indapamide (D + I), has been shown to be effective and tolerable, with no interaction between the 2 components. Another widely used combination of ACE inhibitor and diuretic is lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide (L + H). OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to confirm the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination of D + I in mild to moderate hypertension, and to compare its therapeutic efficacy and tolerability with that of L + H. METHODS: The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of D + I (30-mg + 2.5-mg tablets once daily) or L + H (20-mg + 12.5-mg tablets once daily) in patients with mild to moderate hypertension were compared in a multinational, multicenter, randomized, 2-armed, parallel-group study. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years and had a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95 to 115 mm Hg and a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤180 mm Hg, both measured in the sitting position. After a single-blind, placebo run-in period of 2 weeks, patients were randomized to receive 1 of the 2 treatments for a 12-week period. The primary efficacy end point was the BP normalization rate (ie, the percentage of patients with a sitting DBP ≤90 mm Hg) after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points were as follows: (1) the responder rate (ie, the percentage of patients whose sitting DBP was reduced by ≥10 mm Hg from baseline or had a DBP ≤90 mm Hg after 12 weeks of treatment), (2) the percentage of patients with a DBP ≤85 mm Hg, and (3) changes in sitting SBP and DBP after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 159 hypertensive patients (88 women, 71 men) were randomized to receive D + I (44 women, 36 men; mean [SD] age, 53 [(11)] years) or L + H (44 women, 35 men; mean [SD] age, 55 [(10)] years). No significant between-group differences were found in any of the primary or secondary end points of the study. Both combinations induced a significant reduction in sitting DBP and SBP from baseline (P<0.001 for both groups at week 12), without significant differences between the groups. Five mild to moderate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in each treatment group. No patient dropped out of the study because of an ADR. CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference between D + I and L + H interms of antihypertensive efficacy or tolerability in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

The treatment of hypertension in pregnancy.

The hypertensive disease that occurs during pregnancy is a multifaceted clinical condition whose accurate diagnosis, not limited to the evaluation of degree of the hypertensive derangement, is crucial for a correct therapeutic approach. In particular, chronic hypertension pre-existing before pregnancy should be clearly differentiated from the hypertensive disease induced by pregnancy and particularly from pre-eclampsia. Non-pharmacological measures of intervention have not been proven to improve both maternal and fetal outcome. Severe hypertension during pregnancy (blood pressure > 170/110 mmHg) should be immediately treated with drugs that have been proven to prolong pregnancy and to improve both maternal and fetal outcome. In patients with mild to moderate hypertension, both chronic and pregnancy induced, antihypertensive treatment improves the maternal outcome, whereas no clear-cut evidence of benefit have been reported at the fetal level. Among the different antihypertensive drugs that have been reported to be effective, safe and well tolerated during pregnancy, methyldopa, beta-blockers and particularly calcium channel blockers (nifedipine) represent the more suitable solution.

Cost-effectiveness of zofenopril in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: a post hoc analysis of SMILE-4.

BACKGROUND: In SMILE-4 (the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation 4 study), zofenopril + acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was superior to ramipril + ASA in reducing the occurrence of major cardiovascular events in patients with left ventricular dysfunction following acute myocardial infarction. The present post hoc analysis was performed to compare the cost-effectiveness of zofenopril and ramipril. METHODS: In total, 771 patients with left ventricular dysfunction and acute myocardial infarction were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive zofenopril 60 mg/day (n = 389) or ramipril 10 mg/day (n = 382) + ASA 100 mg/day and were followed up for one year. The primary study endpoint was the one-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. The economic analysis was based on evaluation of cost of medications and hospitalizations and was applied to the intention-to-treat population (n = 716). Cost data were drawn from the National Health Service databases of the European countries participating in the study. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used to quantify the cost per event prevented with zofenopril versus ramipril. RESULTS: Zofenopril significantly (P = 0.028) reduced the risk of the primary study endpoint by 30% as compared with ramipril (95% confidence interval, 4%-49%). The number needed to treat to prevent a major cardiovascular event with zofenopril was 13 less than with ramipril. The cost of drug therapies was higher with zofenopril (328.78 Euros per patient per year, n = 365) than with ramipril (165.12 Euros per patient per year, n = 351). The cost related to the occurrence of major cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization averaged 4983.64 Euros for zofenopril and 4850.01 Euros for ramipril. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for zofenopril versus ramipril was 2125.45 Euros per event prevented (worst and best case scenario in the sensitivity analysis was 3590.09 and 3243.96 Euros, respectively). CONCLUSION: Zofenopril is a viable and cost-effective treatment for managing patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

Serum cholesterol levels on admission and survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with zofenopril: a post hoc analysis of the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation trial.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of early angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition by zofenopril in patients with anterior myocardial infarction and normal or high plasma low density lipoprotein-cholesterolaemia. Post hoc analysis of the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Evaluation study, a double-blind, clinical trial including 1400 patients with anterior myocardial infarction, randomized to zofenopril (n = 699, 66% hypercholesterolemics) or placebo (n = 701, 64% hypercholesterolemics) for 6 weeks. The rate of the primary end-point (6-week combined occurrence of death and severe congestive heart failure) was 8.1% in hypercholesterolemic and 6.4% in normocholesterolemic patients (P < 0.03). The favourable effect of treatment with zofenopril was enhanced in hypercholesterolemics patients when compared with normocholesterolemics (RRR = 43%, P = 0.034 vs. 25%, P = 0.19). One-year mortality was 10% in hypercholesterolemic patients vs. 7.5% in normocholesterolemic patients (P = 0.037), equally reduced in both hypercholesterolemic and normocholesterolemics patients by zofenopril. The presence of hypercholesterolaemia in patients with anterior myocardial infarction could be associated with more favourable effects of early ACE-inhibition.