Effect of dexamethasone on postoperative morbidity after dental rehabilitation in children.

PURPOSE: Dexamethasone reduces postoperative morbidity after adenotonsillectomy, strabismus surgery, and third molar extraction. Our hypothesis was that dexamethasone would reduce pain and other morbidity in children undergoing dental surgery for up to 24 hr postoperatively. METHODS: A triple-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was carried out on 200 children undergoing prolonged dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Subjects were randomized into two groups: group D, given dexamethasone 0.3 mg·kg(-1); group S, given normal saline. The primary outcome measure was pain over 24 hr as evaluated by a parental 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Key secondary outcomes included oral intake on a four-point scale at 24 hr and the overall incidence of postoperative vomiting (POV). Analysis for the primary outcome consisted of comparison of means in the NRS with the Wilcoxon rank sum test and for occurrence of POV with Fisher's test. RESULTS: After eliminating 22 subjects for protocol violations and withdrawals, 178 subjects were analyzed. There was no significant difference in pain scores (NRS) at 24 hr or the worst NRS experienced over the preceding 24 hr. There was no difference in the quality of oral intake between the groups. There was a significant difference in the percentage of patients who vomited during the first 24 hr: eight of 91 in group S and one of 87 in group D. Therefore, 7.74% more vomited in group S (P = 0.045), with a 95% confidence interval of 0.32 to15.16 for the difference in percentages. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone, 0.3 mg·kg(-1), did not reduce pain over 24 hr in healthy children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. The quality of oral intake was also unaffected by dexamethasone at 24 hr. Dexamethasone did produce a significant reduction in postdischarge vomiting, beyond the incidence found with ondansetron alone.

Anesthesia can be safely provided for children in a high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging environment.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the challenges associated with providing safe anesthesia and perioperative care for children in a remote intraoperative magnetic resonance (iMR) operating room (OR) and to identify perioperative anesthesia outcomes, including adverse events related to the iMR environment. BACKGROUND: Increasingly, children undergo neurosurgical procedures in a high-field iMR OR. We describe a 10-year experience of providing anesthesia for children in this environment with a mobile 1.5-Tesla magnet. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective analysis was conducted of children who underwent neurosurgical procedures in a high-field mobile iMR OR. Primary outcomes related to perioperative adverse events and recovery profiles. Results were expressed as mean ± sd or median (range), as appropriate. RESULTS: One hundred and five procedures were performed on 98 children, aged 4 months-18 years, weighing 6-112 kg. The commonest two diagnostic categories were tumor (n = 52) and seizures (n = 27). Median anesthetic time was 439 (185-710) mins. There were no significant adverse events related to the iMR environment. The mean postanesthetic care unit admission temperature was 37 ± 0.9°C and the mean modified Aldrete Score at 30 mins was 7.2 ± 0.9. Two patients experienced seizures in the immediate postoperative period, readily controlled with propofol. There was one breach of MR safety protocol, and no adverse events related to patient transport. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia and perioperative care of children in an iMR setting were associated with a very low incidence of complications, despite the duration of the procedures involved. Such success depends upon a cohesive team-based approach.

Evidence-based clinical update: Which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this evidence-based clinical update is to identify the best evidence when selecting a long-acting local anesthetic agent for single-shot pediatric caudal anesthesia in children. METHODS: A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and Medline (OVID) using the terms "caudal" and combinations of at least two of "bupivacaine", "ropivacaine", and "levobupivacaine". The search limits included "randomized controlled trials" (RCTs), "meta-analysis", "evidence-based reviews" or "reviews", "human", and "all child: 0-18 yr". Seventeen RCTs were identified that concerned single-shot pediatric caudal anesthesia with at least two of the three drugs in question. Data were extracted for the areas of clinical efficacy and side effects. Study findings were assigned levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were made according to Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. RESULTS: The three drugs investigated were found to be equivalent in terms of efficacy. Evidence showed bupivacaine with the highest incidence of motor block and ropivacaine with the lowest. Adverse effects were rare and unrelated to the choice of drug. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: None of the three agents was shown to be superior in terms of efficacy. Bupivacaine is preferred if motor block is desired, ropivacaine is preferred if motor block is to be minimized. Adverse effects in human studies are rare, mild, and unrelated to the choice of drug. Despite encountering the absence of serious adverse events in each of the studies reviewed, it is noted that animal studies suggest a safer profile with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine than with bupivacaine.

Evidence-based clinical update: does premedication with oral midazolam lead to improved behavioural outcomes in children?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this evidence-based clinical update was to identify the best evidence to determine if behavioural outcomes are improved in children after oral midazolam premedication. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using both PubMed and OVID programs, utilizing the terms "midazolam", and either "premedication" or "preoperative treatment". Search limits that were employed included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), English language, human studies, children aged 0-18 yr, and publication dates 1990 - present (January 2006). A review of the 171 abstracts obtained was undertaken and, of these, 30 papers were identified that concerned oral midazolam in children prior to general anesthesia, and that involved a RCT with a placebo or control arm. These studies were assigned levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were made according to Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. RESULTS: Oral midazolam premedication in children was found to reduce the anxiety associated with separation from parents/guardians, and with induction of anesthesia. Recovery times are not significantly delayed. There is no consistent evidence to suggest a reduction in the phenomenon of emergence agitation. Evidence suggesting an improvement in behavioural outcomes at home is also inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Premedication with midazolam 0.5 mg x kg(-1) po administered 20-30 min preoperatively, is effective in reducing both separation and induction anxiety in children (grade A recommendation), with minimal effect on recovery times. However improved postoperative behavioural outcomes in the postanesthesia care unit, or at home cannot be predicted on a consistent basis.

[Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade].

PURPOSE: To determine whether a functional difference exists between the size 2 laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Classic (CLMA) and LMA-Proseal (PLMA) in anesthetized children who have received neuromuscular blockade. Airway leak during intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and adequacy of fibreoptic laryngeal view were the primary study outcomes. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, single-blinded study of 51 ASA I or II children weighing 10-20 kg was undertaken. The anesthetic technique was standardized. Following insertion of the LMA and cuff inflation to 60 cm H(2)O, we measured oropharyngeal leak pressure and gastric insufflation and leak fraction during IPPV, and evaluated the adequacy of fibreoptic view. RESULTS: Oropharyngeal leak pressure measured by neck auscultation was higher for the PLMA compared to the CLMA (23.7 vs 16.5 cm H(2)O, P = 0.009) but, when measured by the inspiratory hold maneuver was not significantly different (24.8 vs 20.3 cm H(2)O, respectively, P = 0.217). Leak fraction values were similar for the CLMA and the PLMA (21.2%. vs 13.3%, respectively, P = 0.473). A satisfactory view of the larynx was obtained more frequently in the PLMA group (21/25 vs 10/25, P = 0.003). Gastric insufflation during leak determination was more common with the CLMA (12/26 vs 2/25 CLMA vs PLMA, respectively, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: In children undergoing IPPV with neuromuscular blockade, the size 2 PLMA is associated with a higher leak pressure by auscultation and less gastric insufflation compared to the CLMA. Leak pressures assessed by manometric stability are similar with these two devices. The improved fibreoptic view of the larynx through the PLMA may be advantageous for bronchoscopy.

The ankle clonus test is not a clinically useful measure of spinal cord integrity in children.

PURPOSE: Bilateral flexion-induced ankle clonus has been proposed as a test of spinal cord integrity during anesthesia for scoliosis surgery. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability of this test in normal children emerging from volatile anesthesia. A secondary objective was to determine if there was a difference in the validity of this test with either sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: In a randomized, prospective blinded clinical trial, 32 healthy children aged three to 13 yr, were randomized to receive either isoflurane (Group I, n = 15) or sevoflurane (Group S, n = 17) for maintenance of anesthesia during dental restorative surgery. During emergence, an observer, blinded to group allocation, recorded ankle clonus scores (number of beats to a maximum of 5 on each side) at 60-sec intervals until tracheal extubation. End-tidal anesthetic concentration was measured contemporaneously. RESULTS: Non-sustained ankle clonus was elicited in a majority of children during emergence: 13 (87%) patients in Group I and 15 (88%) in Group S demonstrated at least non-sustained or unilateral clonus. However, bilateral sustained (> 5 beats.min(-1)) ankle clonus occurred in only four (27%) patients in Group I and four (24%) patients in Group S (P = 0.83). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the specificity of the ankle clonus test is too low to be clinically useful as a measure of spinal cord integrity in children, both when isoflurane and sevoflurane are used as the primary anesthetic agent.