Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 88
Filtrar
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 206(6): e44-e69, 2022 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36112774

RESUMO

Background: Patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers suffer considerable burdens, and palliative care is a fundamental right for anyone who needs it. However, the overwhelming majority of patients do not receive timely palliative care before the end of life, despite robust evidence for improved outcomes. Goals: This policy statement by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and partnering societies advocates for improved integration of high-quality palliative care early in the care continuum for patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers and provides clinicians and policymakers with a framework to accomplish this. Methods: An international and interprofessional expert committee, including patients and caregivers, achieved consensus across a diverse working group representing pulmonary-critical care, palliative care, bioethics, health law and policy, geriatrics, nursing, physiotherapy, social work, pharmacy, patient advocacy, psychology, and sociology. Results: The committee developed fundamental values, principles, and policy recommendations for integrating palliative care in serious respiratory illness care across seven domains: 1) delivery models, 2) comprehensive symptom assessment and management, 3) advance care planning and goals of care discussions, 4) caregiver support, 5) health disparities, 6) mass casualty events and emergency preparedness, and 7) research priorities. The recommendations encourage timely integration of palliative care, promote innovative primary and secondary or specialist palliative care delivery models, and advocate for research and policy initiatives to improve the availability and quality of palliative care for patients and their caregivers. Conclusions: This multisociety policy statement establishes a framework for early palliative care in serious respiratory illness and provides guidance for pulmonary-critical care clinicians and policymakers for its proactive integration.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Cuidados Paliativos , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos , Políticas , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
2.
Aging Ment Health ; 26(10): 1933-1941, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34617489

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The feasibility of research into internet-delivered guided self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for family carers of people with dementia is not known. This study assessed this in an uncontrolled feasibility study. METHOD: Family carers of people with dementia with mild to moderate anxiety or depression were recruited from primary and secondary healthcare services in the UK. Participants were offered eight, guided, self-help online ACT sessions adapted for the needs of family carers of people with dementia with optional online peer support groups. Pre-defined primary indicators of success included recruitment of 30 eligible carers over 6 months and ≥70% completing at least two online sessions. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants (110% of the target sample) were recruited over 6 months and 30 participants (91%) completed two or more sessions, and thus both indicators of success were met. Further, 70% of participants completed seven or all eight sessions, and 27% of participants were lost to follow-up, but none of the reasons for early withdrawal were related to the intervention. CONCLUSION: This study supports the feasibility, including recruitment and treatment completion. A full-scale trial to assess the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the intervention including its long-term effects is warranted.


Assuntos
Terapia de Aceitação e Compromisso , Demência , Cuidadores , Demência/terapia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Internet , Qualidade de Vida
3.
Thorax ; 2021 Mar 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33653933

RESUMO

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following hospitalisations for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is associated with improved exercise capacity and quality of life, and reduced readmissions. However, referral for, and uptake of, post-hospitalisation PR are low. In this prospective cohort study of 291 consecutive hospitalisations for AECOPD, COPD discharge bundles delivered by PR practitioners compared with non-PR practitioners were associated with increased PR referral (60% vs 12%, p<0.001; adjusted OR: 14.46, 95% CI: 5.28 to 39.57) and uptake (40% vs 32%, p=0.001; adjusted OR: 8.60, 95% CI: 2.51 to 29.50). Closer integration between hospital and PR services may increase post-hospitalisation PR referral and uptake.

4.
Fam Pract ; 38(5): 637-643, 2021 09 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33871548

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Due to the uncertain disease trajectory and variable rate of progression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), health care professionals (HCPs) are challenged in explaining what the future may hold for patients compared to those with lung cancer (LC). Support and communication of timely information can significantly improve health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to identify factors that impact communication and support and recommend ways to improve patients' understanding of living with life-threatening illness. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with patients with LC (n = 22) and advanced COPD (n = 18), their informal carers (21 LC and 18 COPD) and HCPs (n = 51). Patients were recruited from primary and secondary care in the East of England, UK, during 2010-12. RESULTS: Directness and clarity characterized communication in LC, whereas uncertainty and limited explanations predominated in COPD. Discussions on how the disease might impact on decisions and preferences to be made in the future were less common in COPD. Information for LC patients was mainly from hospital clinicians and any information for COPD patients mainly from primary care clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of COPD patients could be improved by professionals soon after diagnosis explaining to them the typical pattern of decline in COPD, highlighting the inherent uncertainties about when exacerbations and death may occur. This conversation should lead to planning for the different challenges that the patient and informal carer recognize as most important to them. This contrasts with the 'breaking bad news' conversation that oncologists are highly trained to deliver.


People living with lung cancer (LC) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have poor health-related quality of life. However, more people with LC receive holistic palliative care (which involves supportive advance care planning) than those with COPD. We interviewed patients with LC or COPD, their informal carers (family/friends who support them) and health care professionals (HCPs) about their experiences and our findings confirmed this: HCPs said the uncertainty of COPD prognosis made starting advance care planning conversations challenging. The level of uncertainty and unpredictability is very different in LC and COPD: the cancer diagnosis is made at a single point in time with mortality immediately on the agenda, while COPD is a chronic condition that develops over many years. We urge clinicians to share this uncertainty with patients and to try to explain and communicate it sooner than later. These conversations should also continue as a recognized part of ongoing care so that COPD patients can benefit from understanding the uncertainties they are dealing and living with. LC and COPD should be approached differently to meet patients' condition-specific needs in order that the existing disparity in holistic care can be remedied.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Comunicação , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Incerteza
5.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 201(12): 1517-1524, 2020 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32182098

RESUMO

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) after hospitalizations for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) improves exercise capacity and health-related quality of life and reduces readmissions. However, posthospitalization PR uptake is low. To date, no trials of interventions to increase uptake have been conducted.Objectives: To study the effect of a codesigned education video as an adjunct to usual care on posthospitalization PR uptake.Methods: The present study was an assessor- and statistician-blinded randomized controlled trial with nested, qualitative interviews of participants in the intervention group. Participants hospitalized with COPD exacerbations were assigned 1:1 to receive either usual care (COPD discharge bundle including PR information leaflet) or usual care plus the codesigned education video delivered via a handheld tablet device at discharge. Randomization used minimization to balance age, sex, FEV1 % predicted, frailty, transport availability, and previous PR experience.Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was PR uptake within 28 days of hospital discharge. A total of 200 patients were recruited, and 196 were randomized (51% female, median FEV1% predicted, 36 [interquartile range, 27-48]). PR uptake was 41% and 34% in the usual care and intervention groups, respectively (P = 0.37), with no differences in secondary (PR referral and completion) or safety (readmissions and death) endpoints. A total of 6 of the 15 participants interviewed could not recall receiving the video.Conclusions: A codesigned education video delivered at hospital discharge did not improve posthospitalization PR uptake, referral, or completion.


Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício/estatística & dados numéricos , Tolerância ao Exercício , Hospitalização , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Qualidade de Vida , Gravação em Vídeo , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Recursos Audiovisuais , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente , Desempenho Físico Funcional , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Capacidade Vital
6.
Palliat Med ; 34(10): 1305-1315, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32669040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Informal carers play a key supportive role for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, caring can have a considerable impact on health and wellbeing. Carers may have unidentified support needs that could be a target for intervention. Literature on the support needs of informal carers has not been fully synthesised, and our knowledge of the comprehensiveness of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool for these individuals is limited. AIM: To explore whether the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool covers the support needs of carers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identified in published literature. DESIGN: English language studies were identified against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria through database searching. Further studies were identified through searching reference lists and citations of included papers. Papers were critically appraised and data extracted and synthesised by two reviewers. Identified needs were mapped to Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool questions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, CDSR, ASSIA, PsycINFO and Scopus databases (Jan 1997-Dec 2017). RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included. Results suggest that carers have support needs in a range of domains including physical, social, psychological and spiritual. Many of these needs are unmet. Particular areas of concern relate to prolonged social isolation, accessing services, emotional support and information needs. Findings also suggest amendment of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool may be required relating to difficulties within relationship management. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that carers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease would benefit from identification and response to their support needs by healthcare professionals but to enable this, the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool requires an additional question. Future planned work will explore this with carers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.


Assuntos
Cuidadores , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Aconselhamento , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Apoio Social
7.
Thorax ; 74(3): 270-281, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30498004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breathlessness is a common, distressing symptom in people with advanced disease and a marker of deterioration. Holistic services that draw on integrated palliative care have been developed for this group. This systematic review aimed to examine the outcomes, experiences and therapeutic components of these services. METHODS: Systematic review searching nine databases to June 2017 for experimental, qualitative and observational studies. Eligibility and quality were independently assessed by two authors. Data on service models, health and cost outcomes were synthesised, using meta-analyses as indicated. Data on recipient experiences were synthesised thematically and integrated at the level of interpretation and reporting. RESULTS: From 3239 records identified, 37 articles were included representing 18 different services. Most services enrolled people with thoracic cancer, involved palliative care staff and comprised 4-6 contacts over 4-6 weeks. Commonly used interventions included breathing techniques, psychological support and relaxation techniques. Meta-analyses demonstrated reductions in Numeric Rating Scale distress due to breathlessness (n=324; mean difference (MD) -2.30, 95% CI -4.43 to -0.16, p=0.03) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression scores (n=408, MD -1.67, 95% CI -2.52 to -0.81, p<0.001) favouring the intervention. Statistically non-significant effects were observed for Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery (n=259, MD 0.23, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.55, p=0.17) and HADS anxiety scores (n=552, MD -1.59, 95% CI -3.22 to 0.05, p=0.06). Patients and carers valued tailored education, self-management interventions and expert staff providing person-centred, dignified care. However, there was no observable effect on health status or quality of life, and mixed evidence around physical function. CONCLUSION: Holistic services for chronic breathlessness can reduce distress in patients with advanced disease and may improve psychological outcomes of anxiety and depression. Therapeutic components of these services should be shared and integrated into clinical practice. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017057508.


Assuntos
Dispneia/terapia , Saúde Holística , Cuidados Paliativos , Doença Crônica , Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/psicologia
8.
Palliat Med ; 33(6): 663-675, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30834813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have difficulty reporting their holistic support needs to health care professionals, undermining delivery of person-centred care. We lack tools that directly support patients with this. AIM: To develop an evidence-based, designed-for-purpose, tool to enable patients to directly identify and express support needs to health care professionals. DESIGN: Two-stage qualitative study. Stage 1: domains of support need were identified through a systematic review, analysis of an established qualitative dataset and patient/carer focus groups. Stage 2: draft tool developed using the identified domains of need and then refined through feedback from patients, carers and health care professionals, ensuring acceptability and suitability. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Stage 1 patients/carers recruited via four primary care practices and two patient support groups (East of England). Stage 2 health care professionals recruited via the Clinical Research Network and local community trust and patients/carers through two further practices and two additional support groups (East of England). In total, 57 patients, carers and health care professionals participated. RESULTS: A comprehensive set of evidence-based support domains (for example: overcoming boredom or loneliness, knowing what to expect in the future) was identified and formulated into questions. The resulting tool asks patients to consider whether they need more support in 15 broad areas. Patients, carers and clinical stakeholders broadly endorsed the tool's content and wording. CONCLUSION: The Support Needs Approach for Patients (SNAP) tool is a concise evidence-based tool designed to help patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identify and express their support needs to enable delivery of person-centred care.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Comunicação , Relações Enfermeiro-Paciente , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/enfermagem , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inglaterra , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Pesquisa Qualitativa
9.
Palliat Med ; 33(4): 462-466, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30764714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Holistic breathlessness services have been developed for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness, leading to improved psychological aspects of breathlessness and health. The extent to which patient characteristics influence outcomes is unclear. AIM: To identify patient characteristics predicting outcomes of mastery and distress due to breathlessness following holistic breathlessness services. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of pooled individual patient data from three clinical trials. Our primary analysis assessed predictors of clinically important improvements in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire mastery scores (+0.5 point), and our secondary analysis predictors of improvements in Numerical Rating Scale distress due to breathlessness (-1 point). Variables significantly related to improvement in univariate models were considered in separate backwards stepwise logistic regression models. PARTICIPANTS: The dataset comprised 259 participants (118 female; mean (standard deviation) age 69.2 (10.6) years) with primary diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (49.8%), cancer (34.7%) and interstitial lung disease (10.4%). RESULTS: Controlling for age, sex and trial, baseline mastery remained the only significant independent predictor of improvement in mastery (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence intervals 0.43-0.74; p < 0.001), and baseline distress remained the only significant predictor of improvement in distress (odds ratio 1.64; 95% confidence intervals 1.35-2.03; p < 0.001). Baseline lung function, breathlessness severity, health status, mild anxiety and depression, and diagnosis did not predict outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of mastery and distress following holistic breathlessness services are influenced by baseline scores for these variables, and not by diagnosis, lung function or health status. Stratifying patients by levels of mastery and/or distress due to breathlessness appears appropriate for clinical trials and services.


Assuntos
Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/terapia , Saúde Holística , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico
10.
Fam Pract ; 36(6): 778-784, 2019 11 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31219151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It can be challenging for general practitioners to support their oldest old patients through the complex process of relocation. OBJECTIVE: To provide a typology of the experiences of moving in very old age that is clinically useful for practitioners navigating very old people's relocation. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of data from a mixed-methods UK population-based longitudinal study, Cambridge City over-75s Cohort (CC75C), from Year 21 follow-up onwards. Interviews with participants aged ≥95 years old and proxy informants (Year 21: 44/48, 92%, subsequent attrition all deaths). Thematic analysis of qualitative data available from 26/32 participants who moved before they died. RESULTS: Individuals who moved voluntarily in with family experienced gratitude, and those who moved into sheltered house or care homes voluntarily had no regrets. One voluntary move into care was experienced with regret, loss and increased isolation as it severed life-long community ties. Regret and loss were key experiences for those making involuntary moves into care, but acceptance, relief and appreciation of increased company were also observed. The key experience of family members was trauma. Establishing connections with people or place ahead of moving, for example through previous respite care, eased moving. A checklist for practitioners based on the resulting typology of relocation is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the sample moved into residential care. This study highlights the importance of connections to locality, people and place along with good family relationships as the key facilitators of a healthy transition into care for the oldest old. The proposed checklist may have clinical utility.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Morte , Família/psicologia , Assistência Terminal/psicologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Casas de Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa
11.
Chron Respir Dis ; 16: 1479973118816448, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30789022

RESUMO

Chronic breathlessness is highly distressing for people with advanced disease and their informal carers, yet health services for this group remain highly heterogeneous. We aimed to generate evidence-based stakeholder-endorsed recommendations for practice, policy and research concerning services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness. We used transparent expert consultation, comprising modified nominal group technique during a stakeholder workshop, and an online consensus survey. Stakeholders, representing multiple specialities and professions, and patient/carers were invited to participate. Thirty-seven participants attended the stakeholder workshop and generated 34 separate recommendations, rated by 74 online survey respondents. Seven recommendations had strong agreement and high levels of consensus. Stakeholders agreed services should be person-centred and flexible, should cut across multiple disciplines and providers and should prioritize breathlessness management in its own right. They advocated for wide geographical coverage and access to expert care, supported through skills-sharing among professionals. They also recommended recognition of informal carers and their role by clinicians and policymakers. Overall, stakeholders' recommendations reflect the need for improved access to person-centred, multi-professional care and support for carers to provide or access breathlessness management interventions. Future research should test the optimal models of care and educational strategies to meet these recommendations.


Assuntos
Dispneia , Prova Pericial/métodos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Colaboração Intersetorial , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Doença Crônica , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Progressão da Doença , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/fisiopatologia , Dispneia/terapia , Humanos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Formulação de Políticas , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Participação dos Interessados , Reino Unido
12.
Chron Respir Dis ; 15(1): 26-35, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28685601

RESUMO

Informal carers play a key role in supporting patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly when disease is advanced. They also enable delivery of healthcare professional advice. There is a well-established impact of the caring role on carers in both the generic and COPD-specific literature. The needs of carers of patients with COPD are both generic to the caring role and disease specific. Healthcare professionals and health systems supporting patients with COPD need to actively identify and support carers. Carer assessment enables unmet needs to be identified and appropriately addressed. Assessments should consider carers' support needs, their caring capacity and practices, and carers own clinical needs. This narrative review outlines considerations for the assessment process including what should be assessed, who should conduct assessment and what should happen as a result of assessment.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/enfermagem , Humanos
13.
Eur Respir J ; 50(2)2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28818884

RESUMO

This study explored the benefits of a hand-held fan as perceived by patients with chronic breathlessness and their carers.A secondary multimethod analysis was conducted of interview data collected in three clinical trials. Two researchers independently coded level of benefit qualitatively reported by each patient. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to explore perceived benefit as a factor of sex, age and diagnosis. Qualitative analysis used an integrative method.133 patients commented on the fan, of whom 72 had a carer. Diagnoses included nonmalignant (n=91, 68.4%) and malignant (n=21, 15.8%) conditions. Of 111 patients who provided codable data, four (3.6%) perceived no benefit, 16 (14.4%) were uncertain, 80 (72.0%) perceived some benefit and 11 (10.0%) perceived very substantial benefit. Multivariate analysis was inconclusive. Benefit was described in terms of shorter recovery time, especially after activity. 10 (7.5%) patients said the fan reduced their need for home oxygen or inhaled ß-agonist medications. Negative perceptions of a few included dislike of the cooling sensation and embarrassment in public.Findings suggest that a hand-held fan is a portable intervention with few disadvantages from which most patients with chronic breathlessness will derive benefit alongside other nonpharmacological and pharmacological strategies. Research is needed to optimise guidance on fan administration.


Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Dispneia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Autogestão , Idoso , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/instrumentação , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/psicologia , Doença Crônica , Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/fisiopatologia , Dispneia/psicologia , Dispneia/terapia , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Autocontrole , Autogestão/métodos , Autogestão/psicologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Percepção Social , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
BMC Geriatr ; 17(1): 222, 2017 10 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28978301

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Comfort is frequently ranked important for a good death. Although rising numbers of people are dying in very old age, many with dementia, little is known about symptom control for "older old" people or whether care in different settings enables them to die comfortably. This study aims to examine, in a population-representative sample, associations between factors potentially related to reported comfort during very old people's final illness: physical and cognitive disability, place of care and transitions in their final illness, and place of death. METHODS: Retrospective analyses linked three data sources for n = 180 deceased study participants (68% women) aged 79-107 in a representative population-based UK study, the Cambridge City over-75s Cohort (CC75C): i) prospective in-vivo dementia diagnoses and cognitive assessments, ii) certified place of death records, iii) data from interviews with relatives/close carers including symptoms and "How comfortable was he/she in his/her final illness?" RESULTS: In the last year of life 83% were disabled in basic activities, 37% had moderate/severe dementia and 45% minimal/mild dementia or cognitive impairment. Regardless of dementia/cognitive status, three-quarters died following a final illness lasting a week or longer. 37%, 44%, 13% and 7% of the deceased were described as having been "very comfortable", "comfortable", "fairly comfortable" or "uncomfortable" respectively during their final illness, but reported symptoms were common: distress, pain, depression and delirium or confusion each affected 40-50%. For only 10% were no symptoms reported. There were ≥4-fold increased odds of dying comfortably associated with being in a care home during the final illness, dying in a care home, and with staying in place (dying at what death certificates record as "usual address"), whether home or care home, compared with hospital, but no significant association with disability or dementia/cognitive status, regardless of adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with reports that care homes can provide care akin to hospice for the very old and support an approach of supporting residents to stay in their care home or own home if possible. Findings on reported high prevalence of multiple symptoms can inform policy and training to improve older old people's end-of-life care in all settings.


Assuntos
Demência/epidemiologia , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Conforto do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Morte , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor/epidemiologia , Dor/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/prevenção & controle , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
16.
Psychooncology ; 25(8): 913-8, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26602492

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to understand the process of information disclosure and privacy as patients share their news of lung cancer with significant others. METHODS: Twenty patients with lung cancer and 17 family members/friends accompanying them at diagnosis-giving completed either individual or dyad semi-structured interviews. Initial thematic analysis, then Petronio's Communication Privacy Management theory was used to inform interpretation. RESULTS: Patients described a sense of ownership of the news of their cancer and sought control of how, when and with whom it was shared. Family members expressed a need to follow the patients' rules in sharing this news, which limited their own support systems. Patients and family members had to live within the relational communication boundaries in order to maintain their trusting relationship and avoid potential disruptions. CONCLUSION: Patients as individuals are strongly interlinked with significant others, which impacts on their experience of disclosing private information. This shapes their psychological processes and outcomes impacting on their illness experience. This should be considered when developing interventions to support patients with sharing bad news. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Assuntos
Família/psicologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Revelação da Verdade , Emoções , Feminino , Amigos/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Privacidade , Apoio Social
17.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 2: MR000036, 2016 Feb 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35658160

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Identifying and approaching eligible participants for recruitment to research studies usually relies on healthcare professionals. This process is sometimes hampered by deliberate or inadvertent gatekeeping that can introduce bias into patient selection. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to identify and assess the effect of strategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studies. SEARCH METHODS: We performed searches on 5 January 2015 in the following electronic databases: Cochrane Methodology Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, PsycINFO, ASSIA and Web of Science (SSCI, SCI-EXPANDED) from 1985 onwards. We checked the reference lists of all included studies and relevant review articles and did citation tracking through Web of Science for all included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected all studies that evaluated a strategy to identify and recruit participants for research via healthcare professionals and provided pre-post comparison data on recruitment rates. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened search results for potential eligibility, read full papers, applied the selection criteria and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios for each study to indicate the effect of each strategy. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven studies met our eligibility criteria and all were at medium or high risk of bias. Only five studies gave the total number of participants (totalling 7372 participants). Three studies used a randomised design, with the others using pre-post comparisons. Several different strategies were investigated. Four studies examined the impact of additional visits or information for the study site, with no increases in recruitment demonstrated. Increased recruitment rates were reported in two studies that used a dedicated clinical recruiter, and five studies that introduced an automated alert system for identifying eligible participants. The studies were embedded into trials evaluating care in oncology mainly but also in emergency departments, diabetes and lower back pain. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no strong evidence for any single strategy to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants in research studies. Additional visits or information did not appear to increase recruitment by healthcare professionals. The most promising strategies appear to be those with a dedicated resource (e.g. a clinical recruiter or automated alert system) for identifying suitable participants that reduced the demand on healthcare professionals, but these were assessed in studies at high risk of bias.

20.
BMC Med ; 12: 194, 2014 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25358424

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breathlessness is common in advanced cancer. The Breathlessness Intervention Service (BIS) is a multi-disciplinary complex intervention theoretically underpinned by a palliative care approach, utilising evidence-based non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions to support patients with advanced disease. We sought to establish whether BIS was more effective, and cost-effective, for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care. METHODS: A single-centre Phase III fast-track single-blind mixed-method randomised controlled trial (RCT) of BIS versus standard care was conducted. Participants were randomised to one of two groups (randomly permuted blocks). A total of 67 patients referred to BIS were randomised (intervention arm n = 35; control arm n = 32 received BIS after a two-week wait); 54 completed to the key outcome measurement. The primary outcome measure was a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale for patient distress due to breathlessness at two-weeks. Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Client Services Receipt Inventory, EQ-5D and topic-guided interviews. RESULTS: BIS reduced patient distress due to breathlessness (primary outcome: -1.29; 95% CI -2.57 to -0.005; P = 0.049) significantly more than the control group; 94% of respondents reported a positive impact (51/53). BIS reduced fear and worry, and increased confidence in managing breathlessness. Patients and carers consistently identified specific and repeatable aspects of the BIS model and interventions that helped. How interventions were delivered was important. BIS legitimised breathlessness and increased knowledge whilst making patients and carers feel 'not alone'. BIS had a 66% likelihood of better outcomes in terms of reduced distress due to breathlessness at lower health/social care costs than standard care (81% with informal care costs included). CONCLUSIONS: BIS appears to be more effective and cost-effective in advanced cancer than standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RCT registration at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00678405 (May 2008) and Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04119516 (December 2008).


Assuntos
Dispneia/terapia , Neoplasias/complicações , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ansiedade , Cuidadores/psicologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dispneia/etiologia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Ocupacional , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Método Simples-Cego , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA