RESUMO
The objective of this study was to evaluate factors that may influence decision-making with regard to extraction or maintenance of periodontally compromised teeth. A questionnaire with 2 distinct clinical scenarios, each including a radiographic image, was provided to students in their final year of dental school and practicing dentists. The participants were asked to record the action that they would take in each case (tooth maintenance vs extraction) and provide a justification for their decision. The questionnaires were answered by 158 dental students and 57 dentists (N = 215). Among the sample as a whole, 31.16% of participants recommended extraction in scenario 1, while only 5.58% recommended that action in scenario 2. In scenario 1, there was a statistically significant difference in the recommendations of the dental students and the dentists, with the former group significantly more disposed to conservative action, that is, maintenance of the tooth (P < 0.001; chi-square test). When the actions recommended by participants specializing in implants or periodontics (or both) were compared with those recommended by other specialists, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding maintenance and extraction (P = 0.012; Fisher exact test), with the former group recommending fewer extractions. When the responses were evaluated in terms of the participants' years of specialty practice, it was observed that professionals with fewer than 20 years of practice were more conservative in their decisions, choosing tooth maintenance significantly more often than specialists with longer experience (P = 0.031; Fisher exact test). Among the majority of both dental students and practicing dentists, the decision in both scenarios was to maintain the compromised teeth; however, the results suggested that that both the years of experience of the individual and the specialty of the practitioner can influence decision-making.