Comparing fracture healing disorders and long-term functional outcome of polytrauma patients and patients with an isolated displaced midshaft clavicle fracture.

BACKGROUND: Although clavicle fractures are a common injury in polytrauma patients, the functional outcome of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (DMCFs) in this population is unknown. Our hypothesis was that there would be no differences in fracture healing disorders or functional outcome in polytrauma patients with a DMCF compared with patients with an isolated DMCF, regardless of the treatment modality. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients (treated at our level I trauma center) with a DMCF was performed and a follow-up questionnaire was administered. Polytrauma patients, defined as an Injury Severity Score ≥16, and those with an isolated clavicle fracture were compared. Fracture healing disorders (nonunion and delayed union) and delayed fixation rates were determined. Functional outcome was assessed by the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were analyzed, 71 polytrauma patients and 81 patients with an isolated DMCF. Questionnaire response of 121 patients (80%) was available (mean, 53 months; standard deviation, 22 months). No differences were found between polytrauma patients and those with an isolated DMCF with regard to nonunion (7% vs. 5%, respectively), delayed union (4% vs. 4%), and delayed fixation rate (13% vs. 13%). Polytrauma patients had an overall worse functional outcome, regardless of initial nonoperative treatment or delayed operative fixation. CONCLUSION: Polytrauma patients had a similar nonunion and delayed fixation rate but had an overall worse functional outcome compared with patients with an isolated DMCF. For polytrauma patients, a wait and see approach can be advocated without the risk of decreased upper extremity function after delayed fixation.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty versus Non-Operative Treatment of Three-Part and Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly Patient: A Pooled Analysis and Systematic Review.

Background: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is not yet fully elucidated. Of all treatment options, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and non-operative treatment (NOT) appear to provide the best results. Evidence to guide the choice between the two is sparse. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the available evidence on RSA versus NOT. Methods: Studies comparing complex proximal humerus fractures in patients aged >65 years treated either with RSA or NOT were included for systematic review and direct comparison via pooled analysis of patient-rated outcome and range of motion. Indirect comparison of case series and non-comparative studies on either treatment was performed separately. Results: Three comparative studies including 77 patients treated with RSA and 81 treated non-operatively were analysed. The RSA group scored better for both the Constant-Murley score (mean difference 6 points) and DASH score (mean difference 8 points). No differences were detected in ASES, PENN score, pain scores, or range of motion between treatment groups. The most common complications for RSA were infection (3%), nerve injury (2%), and dislocation (2%). Reoperation was required in 5%. In the NOT group, common complications included malunion (42%), osteonecrosis (25%), and non-union (3%); no reoperation was required. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. Conclusions: The functional outcomes and range of motion after RSA seemed satisfactory and potentially superior to NOT in elderly patients. Patient satisfaction was comparable despite a high malunion and osteonecrosis rate in the non-operative treatment group, which did not require re-interventions.

Radiographic alignment of unstable distal radius fractures fixed with 1 or 2 rows of screws in volar locking plates.

PURPOSE: We tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the change in volar tilt of the articular surface of the distal radius on lateral radiographs obtained before suture removal and 3 months or more after surgical fracture fixation when 1 or 2 rows of screws are used in the distal part of a volar locked plate. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 364 consecutive patients with a distal radius fracture treated by 2 surgeons with open reduction and volar locked plate fixation between 2007 and 2011 at our institution. A manually case-matched design with one-to-one matching of 2 different strategies for screws in the distal part of the plate (1 row versus 2 rows) on the basis of sex, AO type, presence of dorsal comminution, ulna fracture, mechanism of injury, and age (± 8 y) resulted in a group of 34 pairs, 68 total fractures. Radiographic alignment was measured before suture removal and 3 months or more after surgery. RESULTS: The change in volar tilt of the articular surface was -1.2° in the 1-row group and -0.9° in the 2-row group, which was not significantly different. The secondary displacement of radial inclination and ulnar variance were likewise small and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantage of 2 rows of distal screws over a single row of screws with respect to maintenance of achieved restoration of volar angulation after volar locked plate fixation of AO type A and C fractures of the distal radius. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Delayed Extension Block Pinning in 27 Patients With Mallet Fracture.

Background: Untreated bony mallet fingers can cause an array of problems; therefore, adequate treatment is essential. The primary aim of this study was to determine the patient-reported functional outcome of delayed surgical intervention of bony mallet fingers. The secondary aim was to determine the complication rate of delayed surgical intervention. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, all consecutive patients treated between 2010 and 2016 at our level 2 regional teaching hospital were included. Inclusion criterion was a bony mallet finger injury (excluding the thumb), presenting >21 days after injury, treated with extension block pinning. Indications for surgery were >2 mm fragment displacement or volar subluxation of the distal interphalangeal joint. Six to 82 months postoperatively, patients completed the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) by phone. Complications were extracted by chart review. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included, and all completed the PRWHE. Median time to surgery was 35 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 29-42; range = 22-61). Reasons for delay in surgical treatment were patient/physician delay in 24 cases and failed conservative treatment in 3 cases. The median PRWHE score was 0 (IQR = 0-5; range = 0-22.5). After retrospective assessment of the outpatient charts, no early symptoms of malunion or nonunion were found. One patient had a loss of Kirschner-wire fixation, which was corrected. Three patients had an infection that required antibiotic treatment. Conclusions: Delayed surgical management of bony mallet fingers demonstrated adequate functional outcome with minimal complications when compared with prior literature.

Development of the Utrecht Score for clavicle fractures: a short and complete clavicle score with patient-reported and objective measures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a clavicle-specific questionnaire with patient-reported and objective measures. METHODS: The present study used data of DASH and Constant scores from a previously performed randomized-controlled trial comparing plate and intramedullary pin fixation of clavicle fractures. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify the most relevant items and the underlying structure of the questionnaires. To optimize the applicability to patients with a clavicle fracture, the selected items were reformulated. If relevant themes were underexposed, an additional question was added. RESULTS: Based on the scree plot of eigenvalues and the parallel analysis, a seven-factor model with good factorability was constructed. Using exploratory factor analysis, 13 patient-reported and 2 objective measurements were identified. The internal consistency of the selected questions was excellent. An additional question was added to cover complaints relating to direct pressure on the clavicle and implants. CONCLUSION: The Utrecht Score for clavicle fractures is a compact yet complete tool that was developed to assess functional outcome specifically in patients with a clavicle fracture, consisting of patient-reported and objective measures. After external validation, the USC can be used for research purposes or clinical follow-up during rehabilitation in patients with a clavicle fracture.

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in polytrauma patients and the influence of high traumatic energy transfer.

INTRODUCTION: For several extremity fractures differences in morphology, incidence rate and functional outcome were found when polytrauma patients were compared to patients with an isolated injury. This is not proven for distal radius fractures (DRF). Therefore, this study aimed to analyse fracture morphology in relation to energy transfer in both poly- and mono-trauma patients with a DRF. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. All patients aged 16 years and older with a DRF were included. Patients with an Injury Severity Score of 16 or higher were classified as polytrauma patients. Injuries were defined as high or low energy. All DRFs were classified using the AO/OTA fracture classification system. RESULTS: A total of 830 patients with a DRF were included, 12% were polytrauma. The incidence rate of DRF in polytrauma patients was 3.5%. Ipsilateral upper extremity injury was found in >30% of polytrauma and high-energy monotrauma patients, compared to 5% in low-energy monotrauma patients. More type C DRF were found in polytrauma and high-energy monotrauma patients versus low-energy monotrauma patients. Operative intervention rates for all types of DRF were similar for polytrauma and high-energy monotrauma patients. Non-union rates were higher in polytrauma patients. CONCLUSION: Higher energy mechanisms of injury, in polytrauma and high-energy monotrauma patients, were associated with more severe complex articular distal radius fractures and more ipsilateral upper extremity injuries. Polytrauma and high-energy monotrauma patient have a similar fracture morphology. However, polytrauma patients have in addition to more injured body regions also more non-union related interventions than high-energy monotrauma patients.

Fractures and dislocations of the hand in polytrauma patients: Incidence, injury pattern and functional outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Injuries of the hand can cause significant functional impairment, diminished quality of life and delayed return to work. However, the incidence and functional outcome of hand injuries in polytrauma patients is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, distribution and functional outcome of fractures and dislocation of the hand in polytrauma patients. METHODS: A single centre retrospective cohort study was performed at a level 1 trauma centre. Polytrauma was defined as patients with an Injury Severity Score of 16 or higher. Fractures and dislocations to the hand were determined. All eligible polytrauma patients with hand injuries were included and a Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QDASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) were administered. Patients were contacted 1-6 years after trauma. RESULTS: In a cohort of 2046 polytrauma patients 72 patients (3.5%) suffered a hand injury. The functional outcome scores of 52 patients (72%) were obtained. The Metacarpal (48%) and carpal (33%) bones were the most frequently affected. The median QDASH score for all patients with hand injury was 17 (IQR 0-31) and the PRWHE 14 (IQR 0-41). Patients with a concomitant upper extremity injury (p=0.002 for PRWHE, p0.006 for QDASH) and those with higher ISS scores (p=0.034 for PRWHE, QDASH not significant) had worse functional outcome scores. As an example, of the 5 patients with the worst outcome scores 3 suffered an isolated phalangeal injury, all had concomitant upper extremity injury or neurological injuries (3 plexus injuries, 1 severe brain injury). CONCLUSION: The incidence of hand injuries in polytrauma patients is 3.5%, which is relatively low compared to a general trauma population. Metacarpal and carpal bones were most frequently affected. The functional extremity specific outcome scores are highly influenced by concomitant injuries (upper extremity injuries, neurological injuries and higher ISS).

Tertiary survey in polytrauma patients should be an ongoing process.

INTRODUCTION: Due to prioritisation in the initial trauma care, non-life threatening injuries can be overlooked or temporally neglected. Polytrauma patients in particular might be at risk for delayed diagnosed injuries (DDI). Studies that solely focus on DDI in polytrauma patients are not available. Therefore the aim of this study was to analyze DDI and determine risk factors associated with DDI in polytrauma patients. METHODS: In this single centre retrospective cohort study, patients were considered polytrauma when the Injury Severity Score was ≥ 16 as a result of injury in at least 2 body regions. Adult polytrauma patients admitted from 2007 until 2012 were identified. Hospital charts were reviewed to identify DDI. RESULTS: 1416 polytrauma patients were analyzed of which 12% had DDI. Most DDI were found during initial hospital admission after tertiary survey (63%). Extremities were the most affected regions for all types of DDI (78%) with the highest intervention rate (35%). Most prevalent DDI were fractures of the hand (54%) and foot (38%). In 2% of all patients a DDI was found after discharge, consisting mainly of injuries other than a fracture. High energy trauma mechanism (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7), abdominal injury (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1) and extremity injuries found during initial assessment (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.6-3.3) were independent risk factors for DDI. CONCLUSION: In polytrauma patients, most DDI were found during hospital admission but after tertiary survey. This demonstrates that the tertiary survey should be an ongoing process and thus repeated daily in polytrauma patients. Most frequent DDI were extremity injuries, especially injuries of the hand and foot.

Distribution and treatment of clavicular fractures in monotrauma and polytrauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Although extensive research for the optimal treatment of clavicle fractures has been performed, comparative studies between monotrauma and polytrauma patients are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare fracture distribution and treatment in monotrauma and polytrauma patients with a clavicle fracture. METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study. Fractures were classified by the Robinson classification. Monotrauma patients sustained only a clavicle fracture or a clavicle fracture plus a minor abrasion, hematoma, or superficial skin lesion leading to an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 4 or 5 respectively. Polytrauma patients had an ISS ≥16 as a result of injury in 2 or more Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) regions. RESULTS: 154 monotrauma and 155 polytrauma patients with a clavicle fracture were identified. Monotrauma patients had a higher incidence of Type IIB fractures (displaced midshaft) compared to polytrauma patients (P = 0.002). No difference was observed regarding Type I (medial) and Type III (lateral) fractures. In monotrauma patients, Type IIB fractures were treated operatively more frequently (P = 0.004). The initial treatment for Type I and Type III fractures did not differ between monotrauma and polytrauma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Monotrauma patients had a higher incidence of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures compared to polytrauma patients, and monotrauma patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were treated operatively more frequently. No differences were found in the distribution and treatment of medial and lateral clavicle fractures.

Factors associated with incomplete DASH questionnaires.

BACKGROUND: Missing data are unavoidable in clinical research. Older age, female gender, and fewer years of education are risk factors for missing items in a questionnaire. This study assessed the differences between patients with complete and incomplete Disabilities of the Arms, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaires in terms of demographics and psychological factors. METHODS: We analyzed a convenience sample of 1,204 patients enrolled in eight prospective studies. The DASH and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale were completed by all patients. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, and an ordinal pain scale were completed by 745, 493, 545, and 391 patients, respectively. Bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression were used to determine risk factors for incomplete (one or more unanswered question) or invalid (more than three unanswered questions) DASH questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of patients did not complete all questions on the DASH. Patients with an incomplete DASH were older, had fewer years of education, and had higher levels of catastrophic thinking, depression, and pain anxiety. Age and catastrophic thinking were retained in the best logistic regression models of predictors of both incomplete and invalid DASH questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that patients who complete disability questionnaires are different from patients who do not may affect the interpretation of clinical research. Computer adaptive testing may be preferable to avoid incomplete questionnaires. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.

Demographics of the injury pattern in severely injured patients with an associated clavicle fracture: a retrospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing interest in the treatment of clavicle fractures, this is still a not yet defined area in severely injured patients as most studies exclude these patients. Analyzing fracture type and evaluate accompanying injuries can provide valuable information in an early stage of trauma care. OBJECTIVE: To identify prevalence, fracture type and accompanying injuries of clavicle fractures in the severely injured patient. METHODS: We included all severely injured patients (ISS ≥ 16) with a clavicle fracture from January 2007 - December 2011. We prospectively collected data about demographics, injuries, trauma mechanism and mortality. Fractures were classified using the Robinson classification. RESULTS: A total of 1534 patients had an ISS ≥16, of which 164 (10.7%) patients had a clavicle fracture. Traffic related accidents were the main cause of injury (65%). Most fractures were midshaft fractures (66.5%) of which 56% were displaced. Seven patients were treated operatively. There was no significant difference in ISS between the three fracture types. 83% of the patients sustained additional injury to the head and neck; the most prevalent injuries were skull or skull base fractures (41.5%) and maxillofacial fractures (29%). Furthermore 77% of the patients had additional thoracic injury; the most prevalent injuries were rib fractures (59%) and a pneumothorax (38%). The mortality rate was 21.4%. CONCLUSION: A clavicle fracture was present in more than 10% of the severely injured patients. Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were the most common type of fracture. Additional injuries to the head and neck region occurred in 83% of the patients and thoracic injuries occurred in 77% of the patients.