Critical diagnostic delay associated with unusual presentation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with orbital metastases: a case report.

Orbital metastases are an extremely rare finding in patients with hepatocarcinoma (HCC), especially as its first presentation. Therefore, the risk of misdiagnosis is high, as well as that of drastic delays of the therapeutic algorithm. Here we report a 71-year-old man presenting with orbital metastases as the initial sign of HCC, whose initial misdiagnosis led to the impossibility to start life-saving cancer treatment. The patient's history has begun on March 2018 with a growing tumefaction of the right orbit initially treted with antibiotics and corticosteroids without benefit. Subsequently, a facial CT scan showed a voluminous right intra-orbital mass, eroding the orbital roof. Tissue biopsy documented well differentiated malignant epithelial tumor cells. Under the suspect of primitive lachrymal gland tumor, the patient was admitted to the head and neck Unit with surgical intent. However, a subsequent 18F-FDG-PET documented the presence of liver lesions and multiple sites of metastasis. A new biopsy, this time on liver nodules, was carried out and the diagnosis of HCC was finally made. Samples from the first biopsy were then reviewed and judged consistent with HCC metastasis. Unfortunately, the initial misdiagnosis resulted in a six-month delay of the start of a therapeutic approach. During that time, patient's general conditions got extremely worse, making him unable to afford an antiblastic treatment. The patient died three months after the definitive diagnosis. This case suggests that the presence of intraorbital lesion requires a multimodal approach starting from the initial presentation. Performing a complete staging since tumor's clinical onset is mandatory, preferably before carrying out a tissue biopsy. Even though HCC represents a rare cause of intraocular metastasis, it needs to be ruled out when an orbital mass is documented, as the short median survival and the frequently poor conditions of HCC patients make a timely diagnosis crucial.

Comparison of Sequential Testing and Next Generation Sequencing in advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma patients - A single centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: Molecular diagnosis determines therapeutic strategies for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer - adenocarcinoma (NSCLC-A) but depends on resources availability. We compared a sequential single-gene testing algorithm to next generation sequencing in NSCLC-A to assess differences in terms of effectiveness, costs, tissue consumption and time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of advanced NSCLC-A patients treated at the Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital. The sequential testing includes a first analysis of EGFR and KRAS status with further molecular testing physician driven. The available NGS panel detects 35 hotspot mutations,19 amplifications and 23 rearrangements. RESULTS: We included 1758 patients; 1221 characterized with the sequential algorithm between January 2014 to February 2019 and 537 with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) until January 2020. The prevalence of EGFR, ALK and KRAS alterations was similar between the stepwise and NGS group (16.5% vs 14.3%, 6.3% vs 6.3% and 36% vs 33.5%, respectively). Differently, ROS-1 rearrangements prevalence was higher in stepwise respect to NGS group (4.7% vs 0.7%). Similarly, the stepwise group presented higher prevalence than NGS for MET amplification (11.2% vs 2.2%), MET mutations (9.0% vs 2.4%), HER2 amplification (3.3% vs 1.9%) and mutations (9.8% vs 3.0%), and BRAF mutations (4.5% vs 5.6%). Among the NGS group other mutations were found in 141 patients (26.3%) and the presence of concurrent mutations in 131 (24.4%). The stepwise algorithm presented a relevant dropout rate that increased at each step, with 11.4%, 16.4% and 49.3% respectively for ALK, ROS1 and other analysis. Sequential testing's expenditure was 1375 € per patient, vs 770 € for NGS. Moreover, NGS testing can be performed with just a 25 µm slide respect to an estimated 33.3 µm slide for sequential strategy. CONCLUSION: NGS offered a less expensive and more reliable model of diagnosis respect to sequential one for patients affected by NSCLC-A.