Recovery of Third, Fourth, and Sixth Cranial Nerve Palsies in Pituitary Adenoma and Meningioma Patients.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective, observational cohort study aimed to determine recovery rate and recovery time of ocular motor nerve palsies (OMP) of third (CN III), fourth (CN IV), or sixth cranial nerves (CN VI)-and associated prognostic factors-in meningioma and pituitary adenoma (PA) patients. METHODS: A total of 25 meningioma (28 eyes) and 33 PA patients (36 eyes), treated at the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands from January 1, 1978 to January 31, 2021, were included. OMPs were evaluated according to a newly created recovery scale using on-clinical and orthoptic examinations, which were performed every 3-4 months until palsy recovery, or at 18 months follow-up. RESULTS: Recovery rates of CN III (meningioma 23.5% vs PA 92.3%), CN IV (meningioma 20% vs PA 100%), and CN VI (meningioma 60% vs PA 100%) palsies were observed at 18 months follow-up, with differences between the 2 tumor types being observed in the treated patients only. Median recovery time of all OMPs combined was significantly longer in meningioma patients (37.9 ± 14.3 months vs 3.3 ± 0.1 months; P < 0.001). No significant protective or risk factors for recovery rate or time were identified. CONCLUSIONS: OMP recovery rates in treated patients were more favorable in patients with PA compared with patients with meningiomas, independent of OMP cause. With these new insights in OMP recovery, more accurate prognoses and appropriate follow-up strategies can be determined for meningioma and PA patients with OMPs.

Effect of awake craniotomy in glioblastoma in eloquent areas (GLIOMAP): a propensity score-matched analysis of an international, multicentre, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Awake mapping has been associated with decreased neurological deficits and increased extent of resection in eloquent glioma resections. However, its effect within clinically relevant glioblastoma subgroups remains poorly understood. We aimed to assess the benefit of this technique in subgroups of patients with glioblastomas based on age, preoperative neurological morbidity, and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS). METHODS: In this propensity score-matched analysis of an international, multicentre, cohort study (GLIOMAP), patients were recruited at four tertiary centres in Europe (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam and Haaglanden MC, The Hague, Netherlands, and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) and the USA (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA). Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-90 years, undergoing resection, had a histopathological diagnosis of primary glioblastoma, their tumour was in an eloquent or near-eloquent location, and they had a unifocal enhancing lesion. Patients either underwent awake mapping during craniotomy, or asleep resection, as per treating physician or multidisciplinary tumour board decision. We used propensity-score matching (1:3) to match patients in the awake group with those in the asleep group to create a matched cohort, and to match patients from subgroups stratified by age (<70 years vs ≥70 years), preoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (score of 0-1 vs ≥2), and preoperative KPS (90-100 vs ≤80). We used Cox proportional hazard regressions to analyse the effect of awake mapping on the primary outcomes including postoperative neurological deficits (measured by deterioration in NIHSS score at 6 week, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively), overall survival, and progression-free survival. We used logistic regression to analyse the predictive value of awake mapping and other perioperative factors on postoperative outcomes. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2010, and Oct 31, 2020, 3919 patients were recruited, of whom 1047 with tumour resection for primary eloquent glioblastoma were included in analyses as the overall unmatched cohort. After propensity-score matching, the overall matched cohort comprised 536 patients, of whom 134 had awake craniotomies and 402 had asleep resection. In the overall matched cohort, awake craniotomy versus asleep resection resulted in fewer neurological deficits at 3 months (26 [22%] of 120 vs 107 [33%] of 323; p=0·019) and 6 months (30 [26%] of 115 vs 125 [41%] of 305; p=0·0048) postoperatively, longer overall survival (median 17·0 months [95% CI 15·0-24·0] vs 14·0 months [13·0-16·0]; p=0·00054), and longer progression-free survival (median 9·0 months [8·0-11·0] vs 7·3 months [6·0-8·8]; p=0·0060). In subgroup analyses, fewer postoperative neurological deficits occurred at 3 months and at 6 months with awake craniotomy versus asleep resection in patients younger than 70 years (3 months: 22 [21%] of 103 vs 93 [34%] of 272; p=0·016; 6 months: 24 [24%] of 101 vs 108 [42%] of 258; p=0·0014), those with an NIHSS score of 0-1 (3 months: 22 [23%] of 96 vs 97 [38%] of 254; p=0·0071; 6 months: 27 [28%] of 95 vs 115 [48%] of 239; p=0·0010), and those with a KPS of 90-100 (3 months: 17 [19%] of 88 vs 74 [35%] of 237; p=0·034; 6 months: 24 [28%] of 87 vs 101 [45%] of 223, p=0·0043). Additionally, fewer postoperative neurological deficits were seen in the awake group versus the asleep group at 3 months in patients aged 70 years and older (two [13%] of 16 vs 15 [43%] of 35; p=0·033; no difference seen at 6 months), with a NIHSS score of 2 or higher (3 months: three [13%] of 23 vs 21 [36%] of 58; p=0·040) and at 6 months in those with a KPS of 80 or lower (five [18%] of 28 vs 34 [39%] of 88; p=0·043; no difference seen at 3 months). Median overall survival was longer for the awake group than the asleep group in the subgroups younger than 70 years (19·5 months [95% CI 16·0-31·0] vs 15·0 months [13·0-17·0]; p<0·0001), an NIHSS score of 0-1 (18·0 months [16·0-31·0] vs 14·0 months [13·0-16·5]; p=0·00047), and KPS of 90-100 (19·0 months [16·0-31·0] vs 14·5 months [13·0-16·5]; p=0·00058). Median progression-free survival was also longer in the awake group than in the asleep group in patients younger than 70 years (9·3 months [95% CI 8·0-12·0] vs 7·5 months [6·5-9·0]; p=0·0061), in those with an NIHSS score of 0-1 (9·5 months [9·0-12·0] vs 8·0 months [6·5-9·0]; p=0·0035), and in those with a KPS of 90-100 (10·0 months [9·0-13·0] vs 8·0 months [7·0-9·0]; p=0·0010). No difference was seen in overall survival or progression-free survival between the awake group and the asleep group for those aged 70 years and older, with NIHSS scores of 2 or higher, or with a KPS of 80 or lower. INTERPRETATION: These data might aid neurosurgeons with the assessment of their surgical strategy in individual glioblastoma patients. These findings will be validated and further explored in the SAFE trial (NCT03861299) and the PROGRAM study (NCT04708171). FUNDING: None.

Impact of maximal extent of resection on postoperative deficits, patient functioning, and survival within clinically important glioblastoma subgroups.

BACKGROUND: The impact of extent of resection (EOR), residual tumor volume (RTV), and gross-total resection (GTR) in glioblastoma subgroups is currently unknown. This study aimed to analyze their impact on patient subgroups in relation to neurological and functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients with tumor resection for eloquent glioblastoma between 2010 and 2020 at 4 tertiary centers were recruited from a cohort of 3919 patients. RESULTS: One thousand and forty-seven (1047) patients were included. Higher EOR and lower RTV were significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across all subgroups, but RTV was a stronger prognostic factor. GTR based on RTV improved median OS in the overall cohort (19.0 months, P < .0001), and in the subgroups with IDH wildtype tumors (18.5 months, P = .00055), MGMT methylated tumors (35.0 months, P < .0001), aged <70 (20.0 months, P < .0001), NIHSS 0-1 (19.0 months, P = .0038), KPS 90-100 (19.5 months, P = .0012), and KPS ≤80 (17.0 months, P = .036). GTR was significantly associated with improved OS in the overall cohort (HR 0.58, P = .0070) and improved PFS in the NIHSS 0-1 subgroup (HR 0.47, P = .012). GTR combined with preservation of neurological function (OFO 1 grade) yielded the longest survival times (median OS 22.0 months, P < .0001), which was significantly more frequently achieved in the awake mapping group (50.0%) than in the asleep group (21.8%) (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum resection was especially beneficial in the subgroups aged <70, NIHSS 0-1, and KPS 90-100 without increasing the risk of postoperative NIHSS or KPS worsening. These findings may assist surgical decision making in individual glioblastoma patients.

Long-term health-related quality of life and neurocognitive functioning after treatment in skull base meningioma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with skull base meningioma (SBM) often require complex surgery around critical neurovascular structures, placing them at high risk of poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and possibly neurocognitive dysfunction. As the survival of meningioma patients is near normal, long-term neurocognitive and HRQOL outcomes are important to evaluate, including evaluation of the impact of specific tumor location and treatment modalities on these outcomes. METHODS: In this multicenter cross-sectional study including patients 5 years or more after their last tumor intervention, Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-BN20 questionnaires were used to assess generic and disease-specific HRQOL. Neurocognitive functioning was assessed with standardized neuropsychological assessment. SBM patient assessments were compared with those of 1) informal caregivers of SBM patients who served as controls and 2) convexity meningioma patients. In addition, the authors compared anterior/middle SBM patients with posterior SBM patients and anterior/middle and posterior SBM patients separately with controls. Multivariable and propensity score regression analyses were performed to correct for possible confounders. RESULTS: Patients with SBM (n = 89) with a median follow-up of 9 years after the last intervention did not significantly differ from controls (n = 65) or convexity meningioma patients (n = 84) on generic HRQOL assessment. Statistically significantly but not clinically relevantly better disease-specific HRQOL was found for SBM patients compared with convexity meningioma patients. Anterior/middle SBM patients (n = 62) had significantly and clinically relevantly better HRQOL in SF-36 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scores than posterior SBM patients (n = 27): physical role functioning (corrected difference 17.1, 95% CI 0.2-34.0), motor dysfunction (-10.1, 95% CI -17.5 to -2.7), communication deficit (-14.2, 95% CI -22.7 to -5.6), and weakness in both legs (-10.1, 95% CI -18.8 to -1.5). SBM patients whose primary treatment was radiotherapy had lower HRQOL scores compared with SBM patients who underwent surgery on two domains: bodily pain (-33.0, 95% CI -55.2 to -10.9) and vitality (-18.9. 95% CI -33.7 to -4.1). Tumor location and treatment modality did not result in significant differences in neurocognitive functioning, although 44% of SBM patients had deficits in at least one domain. CONCLUSIONS: In the long term, SBM patients do not experience significantly more sequelae in HRQOL and neurocognitive functioning than do controls or patients with convexity meningioma. Patients with posterior SBM had poorer HRQOL than anterior/middle SBM patients, and primary treatment with radiotherapy was associated with worse HRQOL. Neurocognitive functioning was not affected by tumor location or treatment modality.

Surgery as a safe and effective treatment option for spheno-orbital meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical techniques and outcomes.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness and safety of surgery for spheno-orbital meningiomas remains subject of debate, as studies often describe different surgical approaches and reconstruction techniques with very heterogeneous outcomes. We aimed to systematically summarize and analyse the literature on spheno-orbital meningiomas regarding presenting symptoms, surgical techniques, outcomes and complications. METHODS: Studies were retrieved from eight databases. Original articles were included if in ≥5 patients presenting symptoms, surgical treatment and outcomes were described. Fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate weighted percentages with 95%CIs of presenting symptoms, outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles were included describing 1486 patients. Proptosis was the most common presenting symptom (84%; 95%CI 76-91%), followed by unilateral visual acuity deficits (46%; 95%CI 40-51%) and visual field deficits (31%; 95%CI 20-43%). In 35/38 studies (92%), a pterional craniotomy was used. Decompression of the optic canal (82%) and the superior orbital fissure (66%) was most often performed, and usually dural (47%) and bony defects (76%) were reconstructed. In almost all patients, visual acuity (91%; 95%CI 86-96%), visual fields (87%; 95%CI 70-99%) and proptosis (96%; 95%CI 90-100%) improved. Furthermore, surgery showed improvement in 96% (95%CI 78-100%) for both diplopia and ophthalmoplegia. The most common surgical complications were hypesthesia (19%; 95%CI 10-30%), ptosis and diplopia (both 17%; 95%CI, respectively, 10-26% and 5-33%) and ophthalmoplegia (16%; 95%CI 10-24). CONCLUSION: Patients with spheno-orbital meningioma usually present with proptosis or unilateral decreased visual acuity. Surgery shows to be effective in improving visual acuity and visual field deficits with mostly minor and well-tolerated complications.