Quality improvement for rheumatoid arthritis care: results from a focus group.

OBJECTIVES: Complex treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affect aspects of patients' physical, psychological and emotional well-being. We aimed to identify key attributes of patient-centered rheumatologic care for adults with RA through a qualitative study using patient focus group discussions in order to guide quality improvement efforts around optimisation of disease management. METHODS: Patients with RA were recruited from a large academic medical centre rheumatology clinic and its affiliate sites over one month and allocated into focus groups led by an experienced moderator. Focus groups were held until thematic saturation was reached. Patients' responses were examined, categorised into themes, and codified independently by three reviewers. We extracted statements identifying common themes from transcripts. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with RA were recruited and allocated into three focus groups. Mean age was 59.1±10.1 years and average RA disease duration was 17.8 years. All participants had experience taking at least one disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Following reviewer analysis of patients' responses, six common themes about quality RA care were identified including: the role and use of self-management strategies, the clinical environment, the health care delivery process, attitudes towards medication, insurance and medication access issues, and the impact of disease on lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: Themes uncovered in focus group discussions related predominantly to the clinical environment and patient-provider communication. These preliminary results identified the need to incorporate operational aspects of health care delivery into our assessment of the RA patient experience and formed the basis of a RA quality improvement programme targeting medication optimisation.

Treat-to-Target Approach in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Quality Improvement Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Using a quality improvement approach, our objective was to integrate a treat-to-target approach for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through routine electronic collection of patient-reported disease activity scores and a multidisciplinary learning collaborative for rheumatologists. METHODS: RA patients completed a patient-reported outcome measure, the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), at check-in. Nine rheumatologists and their patients were allocated to a learning collaborative intervention group focused on a treat-to-target approach and 13 were allocated to a control group. The primary outcome was documentation of a treat-to-target implementation score: disease activity score, disease activity score used in the medication change decision, the presence of a treatment target, and an indication of shared decision-making. A primary analysis of patient visits with medication changes was conducted using an interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: We studied 554 individual rheumatology patients with 709 patient visits. Treat-to-target implementation scores among intervention rheumatologists (mean ± SD 44.6% ± 1.63%) were 12.4% higher than in the control group (mean ± SD 32.2% ± 1.50%; P < 0.0001). We observed differences in treat-to-target implementation score components, comparing intervention group to control group rheumatologists: disease activity score present, 77.2% versus 68.0% (P = 0.02); disease activity score used in the medication change decision, 45.2% versus 30.0% (P < 0.01); treatment target, 9.0% versus 0.4% (P < 0.01); and shared decision-making, 46.9% versus 30.0% (P < 0.01). Secondary analysis of patient visits with high RAPID3 scores found that medication changes were 54% less likely in the intervention versus control group (odds ratio 0.46 [95% confidence interval 0.27-0.79], P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This nonrandomized, interrupted time-series trial demonstrated a modest but significant impact of a learning collaborative intervention on rheumatologist documentation of a treat-to-target approach in RA.

Association of Radial Longitudinal Deficiency and Thumb Hypoplasia: An Update Using the CoULD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Deficiency of the radial aspect of the forearm and hand is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency of the upper limb. Radial longitudinal deficiency is associated with several named syndromes. The purpose of the present study was to explore patterns of radial longitudinal deficiency and thumb hypoplasia in syndromes and to examine the severity of these differences across various syndromes. METHODS: Data were collected from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) registry. Congenital differences are classified in the registry with use of the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification system. Diagnosis of a syndrome by a physician as noted in the CoULD registry was recorded. Thumb deficiency and radial deficiency were classified according to the modified versions of the Blauth criteria and the Bayne and Klug criteria, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 259 patients with 383 affected limbs with radial deficiency. Eighty-three of these patients had a diagnosed syndrome. The severity of radial deficiency was correlated with the severity of thumb deficiency. The Kendall tau coefficient indicated significant correlation between radial severity and thumb severity (tau = 0.49 [95% confidence interval = 0.40 to 0.57]; p < 0.05). Subjects with a syndrome were twice as likely to have bilateral deficiency and 2.5 times more likely to have both radial and thumb deficiency compared with subjects without a syndrome. Subjects with VACTERL syndrome (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb defects) had patterns of thumb and radial deficiency similar to the general cohort, whereas subjects with Holt-Oram syndrome, TAR (thrombocytopenia absent radius) syndrome, and Fanconi anemia demonstrated varied presentations of thumb and radial deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The present study investigated the characteristics of patients with radial longitudinal deficiency and thumb hypoplasia. Our results support the findings of previous research correlating the severity of radial deficiency with the severity of thumb deficiency. Furthermore, we identified characteristic features of patients with radial longitudinal deficiency and associated syndromes.