An education on pharmacologically active complementary and alternative medicine and its effects on cancer treatment: literature review.

PURPOSE: This literature review examines the provision of an education on pharmacologically active complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs), to people with cancer, their carers and oncology health professionals. METHODS: A search of the published literature between 2000 and 2020, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted. The search retrieved 1121 studies, 1080 were excluded based on their title or abstract and 26 articles were excluded based on their text. One article was retrieved from the reference lists of the included articles and in total fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. This review utilised Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Four key outcomes were utilised for analysis and recommendations for future education and/or research were generated. The recommendations were graded according to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT). RESULTS: This review consistently found that people with cancer, their carers and oncology health professionals derived benefit from a pharmacologically active CAM education and recommends that this population receives one. Conversely, the review found many education formats utilised and no consensus on the most successful methods. CONCLUSION: Future research should examine who a CAM education should be delivered to, what type of delivery platform is most accessible and useful, and the features of the education that most increase CAM knowledge. The popularity of CAMs amongst people with cancer and the potential dangers associated with their use necessitates further research into how best to communicate CAMs to this population.

The Impact of an Evidence-Based Education on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage in People with Cancer: Pilot Study.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage amongst cancer patients is high globally and in Australia. CAM use in cancer care has the ability to increase chemotherapy toxicity or cause sub-therapy due to altered metabolism as well as increase a patient's bleeding risk. Furthering these risks, people with cancer are largely obtaining their CAM use information from non-evidence-based sources. This study aimed to determine whether the implementation of a CAM education influenced decision-making with regard to CAM usage amongst cancer patients. Twenty people with cancer were recruited for participation in this study. The aims of this study were achieved by surveying patients via questionnaire, both prior to and following receiving an evidence-based CAM education, in either or both written or audiovisual format. This exploratory study found, consistent with the literature, that the majority of participants were obtaining their CAM use information from non-evidenced-based sources. Additionally, it found that the participants wanted more CAM use information and that they demonstrated some altered decision-making after receiving evidenced-based information. On the post-educational questionnaire, the number of participants that stated that they would use CAMs decreased by almost 14%, and some participants made CAM use decisions in accordance with the information provided in the resources. Furthermore, a small increase in CAM knowledge was demonstrated, and it was reported that the resource had prompted them to look further into CAM information. Lastly, the participants in this study found the resource to be mostly useful and helpful and preferred the animated video to the written information.