How to use power Doppler ultrasound in transvaginal assessment of uterine fibroids.

Measuring vascularization in uterine fibroids is important for their diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Vascularization can be measured by power Doppler ultrasound. The power Doppler signal depends on fibroid characteristics and on a variety of ultrasound-machine settings. Literature describing which machine settings influence the power Doppler signal is limited. Each manufacturer names settings and presets at their own discretion, with little information available publicly. Consistency of machine settings is important for correct interpretation of images in daily practice and is essential in yielding reproducible data for research. The aims of this paper, drawing from both a literature search and semistructured interviews with ultrasound-machine engineers and clinical experts in gynecological ultrasound, were: (1) to provide comprehensive background information on ultrasound physics and fibroid characteristics; (2) to present an overview of machine settings relevant to both two- and three-dimensional power Doppler, including power Doppler frequency, pulse repetition frequency, gain, wall-motion filter, acoustic power, persistence and signal rise; and (3) to provide a step-by-step tutorial on the optimal settings for vascular evaluation of uterine fibroids using power Doppler. The step-by-step tutorial comprises six steps to optimize the power Doppler signal, create a preset and acquire a reliable three-dimensional volume. This step-by-step tutorial should help research groups and clinicians to use power Doppler correctly and reproducibly in the evaluation of uterine fibroids. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Visualisation of microvascular flow in benign uterine disorders: a pilot study of a new diagnostic technique.

Background: Uterine disorders have clear overlapping symptoms and ultrasound discrimination is not always easy. Accurately measuring vascularity is of diagnostic and prognostic value. Power Doppler is limited to imaging only the larger vessels. Assessment of the microvasculature requires advanced machine settings. Objectives: In this pilot study, we aimed to test the feasibility of microvascular flow imaging of benign uterine disorders. Material and Methods: Two experienced gynaecologists (JH, RL) randomly applied power Doppler and MV-flowTM mode during a single day, in ten patients each visiting the outpatient clinic. Images of eight patients were labelled with a diagnosis by the attending physicians and collected as coded data. Main outcome measures: Microvascular flow images of normal uterine architecture including the fallopian tube, and of benign disorders such as fibroids, adenomyosis, endometriosis and uterine niches were collected. For both Doppler techniques, qualitative descriptive evaluation of the vascular architecture and a quantitative vascular index of fibroids were provided. Finally, we evaluated the effect of the cardiac cycle. Results: All microvascular flow images showed more distinctive vascular structures than visible on power Doppler. Calculating a vascular index for fibroids on 2D MV-flowTM images was easily performed on-site. During the cardiac cycle a higher vascular index (VI 75.2) is obtained in systole as compared with diastole (VI 44.0). Conclusion: Microvascular flow imaging allowed detailed visualisation of the uterine vascular architecture and is easy to use. What is new?: Microvascular flow imaging may be of added value for diagnosing uterine disorders, as well as for pre- and post-operative assessment of suited surgical techniques. Yet, validation with histology and clinical outcomes is required.