Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography stenosis score for coronary stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography stenosis score (CCTA-SS) is a proposed diagnosis score that considers the plaque characteristics, myocardial function, and the diameter reduction rate of the lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the CCTA-SS in seeking coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: The 228 patients with suspected CAD who underwent CCTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) procedures were under examination. The diagnostic performance was evaluated with the receiver operating curve (ROC) for CCTA-SS in detecting CAD (defined as a diameter reduction of ≥ 50%) and severe CAD (defined as a diameter reduction of ≥ 70%). RESULTS: The area under ROC (AUC) of CCTA-SS was 0.909 (95% CI: 0.864-0.943), which was significantly higher than that of CCTA (AUC: 0.826; 95% CI: 0.771-0.873; P = 0.0352) in diagnosing of CAD with a threshold of 50%. The optimal cutoff point of CCTA-SS was 51% with a sensitivity of 90.66%, specificity of 95.65%, positive predictive value of 98.80%, negative predictive value of 72.13%, and accuracy of 91.67%, whereas the optimal cutoff point of CCTA was 55%, and the corresponding values were 87.36%, 93.48%, 98.15%, 65.15%, and 88.60%, respectively. With a threshold of 70%, the performance of CCTA-SS with an AUC of 0.927 (95% CI: 0.885-0.957) was significantly higher than that of CCTA with an AUC of 0.521 (95% CI: 0.454-0.587) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CCTA-SS significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of coronary stenosis, including CAD and severe CAD, compared with CCTA.

Comparative Analysis of the Feasibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Index Versus CT-FFR in the Diagnosis of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Background: Using fluid dynamic modeling, noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) data provides better anatomic and functional information than CCTA, with a high diagnostic and discriminatory value for diagnosing hemodynamically significant lesions. Myocardial blood flow index (MBFI) based on CCTA is a physiological parameter that reflects myocardial ischemia. Thus, exploring the relationship between computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and MBFI could be clinically significant. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CT-FFR and MBFI and to analyze the feasibility of MBFI differing from CT-FFR in diagnosing suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Data from 61 patients (35 males, mean age: 59.2 ± 10.02 years) with suspected CAD were retrospectively analyzed, including the imaging data of CCTA, CT-FFR, and data of invasive coronary angiography performed within one week after hospitalization. CT-FFR and MBFI were calculated, and the correlation between MBFI or CT-FFR and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was evaluated. Using ICA (value ≥ 0.70) as the gold standard and determining the optimal cutoff value via a diagnostic test, the diagnostic performance of MBFI or CT-FFR was evaluated. Results: MBFI and CT-FFR were negatively correlated with ICA (r = -0.3670 and -0.4922, p = 0.0036 and 0.0001, respectively). Using ICA (value of ≥ 0.70) the gold standard, the optimal cutoff value was 0.115 for MBFI, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.833 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.716-0.916, Z = 5.357, p < 0.0001); using ICA (value of ≥ 0.70) the gold standard, the optimal cutoff value was 0.80 for CT-FFR, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.759 (95% CI: 0.632-0.859, Z = 3.665, p = 0.0002). No significant difference was observed between the AUCs of CT-FFR and MBFI (Z = 0.786, p = 0.4316). Conclusions: MBFI based on CCTA can be used to evaluate myocardial ischemia similar to CT-FFR in suspected CAD; however, it should be noted that CT-FFR is a functional index based on the anatomical stenosis of the coronary artery, whereas MBFI is a physiological index reflecting myocardial mass remodeling.